与「ART」相关的搜索结果

🚨 MAJOR BREAKING: Premier League confirm an independent Commission has found Manchester City GUILTY OF ALL CHARGES related to serious breaches of the Premier League’s financial rules over a nine-season period, and the majority of charges in relation to its failure to co-operate with the League’s investigation. The club has the right to appeal the independent Commission’s findings and has until Friday 2 October to exercise that right. The Premier League Board’s intention is that the full process (including any appeals and publication of relevant decisions) is concluded as soon as possible. The independent Commission found that between Seasons 2009/10 and 2017/18: - Manchester City arranged ‘sham’ contracts (which misrepresented the true agreement between the parties) with a number of its commercial partners, as well as relying on ‘sham’ agreements with others, to artificially inflate the club’s revenues and reduce its costs - The club filed misstated accounts and concealed the true state of its finances from its auditors and football regulators - Manchester City was significantly in breach of both the Premier League’s and UEFA’s spending limits - During the Premier League’s investigation, Manchester City committed multiple breaches of its duties of co-operation and utmost good faith towards the League (three of the four alleged breaches were upheld)

Hi, Tomorrow we are re-opening the Pro $200 subscriptions to new subscribers, but together with it we are also changing how we calculate the usage for it. In effect, if you do the math, it will net out at half the dollar in API spend compared to the old Pro $200 plan. Now that it's said, let me explain why this is happening and why you will still get more work done than if you were on the Pro $200 subscription one month ago. (a) We didn't want to compromise in other ways and are committing to not reintroducing the 5h limit, so that you can fully use the weekly usage when you want. (b) On the subscription, we guarantee that over time you always get more work done and with an increasing level of quality. This means that you will continue to get more value per dollar spent as a result of models getting more efficient and us passing down the improvements in the form of API price reductions. (c) We don't want to put an incentive on ourselves to artificially inflate the API list prices to make it look like you are getting a lot (and workaround it through discounts, etc). Instead we want to continue to both rapidly reduce prices and increase capabilities of models on the API. This week we introduced GPT-6 Sol and GPT-6 Luna at 50% of their previous price. Over time, we see prices go low enough that it makes sense for most to buy usage as needed without there being a significant gap between what you get in a subscription and what you get in the API for a dollar spent. (d) Tomorrow, we are adding more things to the subscription that won't draw on the usage, I won't reveal what that is yet. I wanted to be transparent before all the big announcements tomorrow. Lots of new exciting things are coming to the subscriptions that will make it super compelling, but I wanted to make sure to share this change ahead of time so you can all understand it before we shower you with good news. Codexingly, Tibo

Retentive highlights the extraordinary potential of peer-to-peer infrastructure, positioning Perceptron Network as a cornerstone of next-generation artificial intelligence research, decentralized bandwidth sharing, and sovereign data management. @PerceptronNTWK #NodeAndProud#

Anthropic 放出了 Sonnet 5.5 的完整跑分，最抢眼的一行是 Terminal-Bench 4.0：Sonnet 5 是 10.3%，Sonnet 5.5 是 70.6%，一代之内涨了将近七倍，还超过了 Opus 5.5 的 66.4%。 几个关键数字： OSWorld 2.1 电脑操控：57.0% 到 80.1%，Opus 5.5 是 81.8%。 GDPval-AA 职场知识任务：1844，Opus 5.5 是 1846，GPT-6 Sol 是 1487。 图表识别 Chartography：15.6% 到 61.6%，Sol 是 53.6%。 价格 $2/$10，和 Sonnet 5 一样，是 Opus 5.5 的一半。 很多人看这张表最大的误区，是以为 Sonnet 5.5 已经全面追平 Opus 5.5。脚注里有三处要读： Terminal-Bench 上 Sonnet 用的是 max 档，Opus 用的是 xhigh 档，档位不一样。 独立机构 Artificial Analysis 自己跑出来是 64%，比官方低。 FrontierCode 上 Sonnet 是 46.2%，Opus 5.5 是 54.4%，Sol 是 49.3%，Sonnet 在这一项排在两者后面。 这张表真正讲透的一件事是：便宜的 token 不等于便宜的任务。max 档下，Sonnet 5.5 每个任务要输出约 19 万 token，比 Opus 5.5 还多约六成。独立测下来，最高档的单任务成本已经超过 Opus 5.5。而且拉满也不一定更强，FrontierCode 上 xhigh 是 52.1%，max 反而掉到 46.2%。 所以同样用 Sonnet 5.5，一律拉到 max 的人，账单可能比用 Opus 还高；按任务选档的人，才吃到它便宜的那一半。 你上一次选模型，是看跑分表，还是看自己任务的账单？挑一个真实任务，high 和 max 各跑一遍，对比 token 和结果，再决定。

Claude can now help you build evaluations and hillclimb on them. In this article, we share guidance on eval design & skills that Claude Code can use to improve your applications.

2️⃣ Visual-first conversational search Ask any question about arts and culture and receive a visually rich, context-aware answer grounded in authoritative partner archives—pairing insightful explanations with high-resolution artworks, curated stories, and events.

.@googlearts has partnered with 3,000+ cultural institutions across 90+ countries to make art and heritage accessible to everyone—and today, we’re rolling out a refreshed mobile app experience. 📱🌎 Here are some of the new ways you can use it to explore world culture 🧵↓

Grok 4.7 xHigh ranks #1# in Artificial Analysis Cyber Index It's a powerful frontier model performing at the highest level in enterprise cyber defense Outperforming Fable 5.1 Max, Opus 5.5, Astra 6, GPT-6 and other leading AI systems