与「ATTITUDE」相关的搜索结果

As eval is downstream of everything, it determines whether you will spend your time optimizing the right metrics. The current gap between academia and industry AI labs is the attitude toward eval. In academia, the eval set is very hard to change since a) you need to explain why your eval is better and b) you need to benchmark against your cited works with the new eval and show that your work is superior. Doing both a and b at the same time invites risky rebuttal, even if you are doing a good job on a. It is far easier to benchmark against the eval set that everyone has agreed upon. In contrast, in industry AI labs, customer feedback is your eval set and it keeps changing to cover the long tail that you could never think of during years of PhD programs. If the loss functions are not a good proxy for customer feedback, then you change them until both are aligned. Thus, academia might train students who are very good at hill climbing but inexperienced in building eval sets that capture hard real cases. To move the needle, building the right eval set matters the most.

Crypto has given us everything we wanted Only because we gave something to it first Today the new people think they’re owed something because they’re here When we joined the industry we didn’t feel that level of entitlement and still don’t Sad state of affairs with the take only attitude Funny enough the biggest takers are the least credible and have done nothing important or memorable At some point this has to change and the swamp gets drained Likely to be from cannibalism like we are seeing now from the leeches leech from each other There are a lot of great people here that i have gotten to know and become part of their journey Many more of them have also left because of the late stage capitalism we are seeing here Its admiring to still see people striving for impact and fighting for progress multiple cycles later We have also reached a point of adoption where everyone knows what crypto is and have heard everything about it But have not a great experience onchain It’s now a game of delivery and overall experience They are aware of the traditional problems and are seeking active solutions 50%

❤️ puppies Community — The Warmest Pack on X Today, I want to share something truly heartwarming from our community. Our brother 忧郁大喷菇 has been facing some health challenges recently and is receiving treatment in the hospital. Seeing someone who has always been so positive and helpful now fighting through this, our whole community feels deeply for him. Today, the puppies community took action and organized a pure charity livestream on Binance — no trading, no contracts, just pure support, encouragement, and companionship for our brother. Many members stepped up: some hosted and planned the stream, some contributed their livestream rewards, and others sent private messages of care and encouragement. After the livestream ended, all the proceeds were fully transferred to 大喷菇. That moment truly moved me to tears. We are learning from the attitude of @cz_binance and @heyibinance treating every community member like real family, taking our responsibility seriously, and warming others with genuine care and action. In this fast-paced, often cold and calculating online world, puppies community chooses a different path. We are not just usernames or random accounts. We are a group of people who genuinely care for each other and are willing to stand up when a brother needs help. @elonmusk, this is the true “pack” spirit we admire — staying loyal, never abandoning each other, and protecting our own especially in difficult times. This is the long-term value puppies community wants to build. 喷菇, thank you for always bringing positivity and warmth to our community. Now it’s our turn to give that energy back to you. We hope you can feel it — you are never fighting alone. The entire puppies pack stands behind you. Thank you to @binance for providing a platform where real community can come together. And thank you to every brother and sister who showed up with love and support. Because of you, this care actually reached him. puppies community is different because of love. Because of every kind and warm-hearted member like you, this community is truly worth cherishing and being proud of. May this collective warmth become a light on 喷菇’s road to recovery. We will continue to stand by his side, cheer him on, and look forward to the day he returns to us healthy and strong. puppies pack — forever together, never leaving any brother behind. 🐾❤️ — puppies Community

Subnautica 2 Design Lead Anthony Gallegos recently explained the reasoning behind the game’s no-killing policy in an interview with MinnMax. Gallegos said the decision was not made because the studio opposes violence in games: “We’re not like ‘we’re a game about pacifism’ or ‘we’re a non-violent studio’the studio was founded by modders who made Half-Life mods, and their first mods were all about shooting aliens.” Instead, he said the team had two main goals. The first was to shape how players interact with the world: “Our intent, actually, was two things. One, we wanted to avoid giving players the attitude that they were dominators over the world, because the message of the game was very much about people learning to live in parallel with the world they’re in.” Gallegos also explained that the team wanted to preserve the sense of danger and tension and cited SOMA and Alien: Isolation as major inspirations: “We’re really inspired by games like SOMA and Alien: Isolation.” “If [SOMA] ever gave players the means to fight things, no matter how intentionally miserable they made the experience, players would always be like ‘it’s always better to master the crappy combat than it is to deal with the constant threat of the thing’.” According to Gallegos, removing creature killing helps maintain the feeling of vulnerability and encourages players to survive, adapt, and coexist with the alien ecosystem rather than simply eliminating every threat they encounter.

😭 ON DIRAIT LE SÉLECTIONNEUR !! Cette vidéo de Kylian Mbappé en train de serrer des mains amuse énormément les internautes 😭⚽ Entre son attitude et la musique « Général » en fond, beaucoup ont l’impression que c’est lui le sélectionneur de l’équipe 💀

And the #crazy# part is: just a few years ago, $50 or $60 could get a family of four a pretty decent meal at a sit-down restaurant. But now, because inflation has gone up so much while salaries haven’t kept up—and for some people, salaries have effectively gone #down—things# that used to be affordable are no longer affordable. #McDonald’s# becoming a “#luxury”# is already a sign of how much has changed. The same thing is happening with eating out in general. Back then, a working-class family could go out to eat maybe once a month. Now even that can feel like a luxury. Places like Applebee’s or Cheesecake Factory used to be treated as “cheap” or even a joke—people would say #things# like, “If your boyfriend takes you to Applebee’s, dump him.” But today, that attitude doesn’t even make sense anymore, because Cheesecake Factory is expensive too. Eating out has become a middle-class luxury, not something normal.

Some of my perspective on where the @ethereumfndn is going. First of all, this is only my own view. The board is not just me, and I have no extra special powers on the board that the other board members do not. @aerugoettinea is the one executing much of this transition. My input has been largely on technical questions. The board is in the process of expanding, and my own power within the org will continue to decrease, which is honestly what I want. The 2025 era brought many important improvements to EF and its ability to execute. Many issues were resolved, and EF continues to benefit from its improved efficiency and greater focus on concrete goals to this day. And so with those problems resolved, early this year, the largest remaining hole that I perceived was something different nagging at me: I would regularly spot people saying things like "vitalik says these beautiful things about ethereum needing to be decentralized, and have privacy, and be a sanctuary technology, but why do the EF's actions not reflect that?" Now, you may have been hearing something different. You may not have been sensing a feeling of crisis at all, and maybe were hearing people saying that finally we were taking execution and BD seriously and the main task for us is to keep going that way and be even better and faster. Then probably there is genuine difference between you and me, in what kinds of criticism I take most seriously, and what kinds of critics through their criticism are most able to make me feel pain. As an analogy, let's briefly switch over to a different domain. One belief you can have about Google is that it is a success story, and has brought a lot of good to humanity in organizing the world's information. Another belief you can have about Google is that they had a beautiful idealistic beginning, but at some point the corruption of mainstream corporate attitudes seeped in, and they slowly bit by bit completely abandoned the "don't be evil" slogan. My belief on Google specifically is probably somewhere between the two. BUT, if you had taken me back in time to ~2008, and offered me a button to press to make Google one or two standard deviations more "dogmatic", eg. give Richard Stallman permanent veto power over some key policies, I would immediately press it. Why? Because a choice for one company is not a choice for the world, or even one country. Google existed and exists in the context of a technology industry generally drifting away from early idealistic don't-be-evil roots and toward greed for financial gain, totalizing visions of accelerated superintelligence, infiltration by sociopaths, and craven capitulation to (or worse, active participation in) government pressure for ideological control, surveillance and war. And so *one company* doing something different, positioning itself to be what George Bernard Shaw calls the Unreasonable Man, resisting the trend of the times, would have been better for freedom, balance of power and stability of society as a whole, than *all* large companies bending to dominant trends. This is a part of my version of pluralism. This line of thinking is not just mine, but I also is not too far off from what Aya and others had in mind with the Mandate. Now how does this all get to the role of the EF? EF is not a "center of Ethereum", rather EF is "one node, with a defined purpose, alongside other nodes". We've always said that the EF should be the latter, but many in the Ethereum ecosystem (and even within the EF) wanted us to be the former. Now, we are taking action to ensure that we will be the latter. This is particularly important because EF is a limited organization, with limited resources and limited organizational capacity. The EF has only ~0.16% of all ETH (less than many other individual ETH holders), whereas among other blockchains it's common for "the central foundation" to have 10-50%. Fiscally, the EF was originally designed to fulfill a limited work scope defined in the token sale docs and other pre-launch materials (building the chain software; getting through Frontier, Homestead, Metropolis, Serenity), which was fully completed in 2022; it was not designed to be an eternal steward. And so today, the EF is choosing to use its remaining resources to pursue longevity over breadth (yes, this means we sell less ETH). The EF focuses *specifically* on those activities critical to the success of ethereum as a censorship/capture-resistant, open, private and secure system, that would not happen otherwise. This means making hard choices, and in some cases even activities that we highly approve of and people that we highly respect becoming outside of the EF. People of great technical talent, public respect and even alignment with the mission and CROPS being outside of the EF is in fact necessary if we want important tasks to be able to attract outside capital. This also means the EF taking opinionated stands culturally. This is all intended in cooperation with all other parts of ethereum. We recognize that many other parts of the ethereum world highly respect CROPS and related values. But highly respecting is not the same as choosing to specialize and totally dedicate to a domain (Compare in a different domain: I think reducing animal cruelty is important, and I like vegan food, but am not full unconditional vegan myself) EF is still in a transition period, and we expect its new long-term form to stabilize over the next few months. What are the guiding principles of this new form? Again, I am only one person, but I can give my answer from a technical perspective (there are also critical non-technical aspects). At the core, *Ethereum must be impressive*. We are living in an age of highly intelligent AI and all kinds of other technological acceleration. "Status quo EVM, with a hard fork or two a year to optimize for short-term needs of users" is not interesting. To some, "impressive" means: 250ms latency and 1M TPS. I think Ethereum trying to go that route is a mistake. Being as fast and as scalable as possible, and only a small epsilon more decentralized than the others, is a route to mediocrity, and if we try it we will lose. I think Ethereum should scale. But I think Ethereum should strive the hardest to be deeply impressive in a different dimension: the CROPS dimension. This means things like: * Provably bug-free Ethereum. This is a goal that all cybersecurity researchers would have thought is absurd and impossible, up until roughly 6 months ago. Now, it's on the cusp of being possible, thanks to AI-assisted formal verification. So we should be frontrunners in doing this. * Available chain consensus. Ethereum is, and with lean consensus will cotninue to be, the ONLY chain that has both (i) traditional-BFT style properties that it's safe under asynchrony up to a high level of fault tolerance, and (ii) the bitcoin PoW-style property that under synchrony it's safe up to 49% attackers. As far as I can tell, literally no other chain has this or is planning for it; bitcoin goes for (ii) only and most other chains go for (i) only. Some will remember I fought hard for this, Unreasonably insisting that it is not OK for ethereum to rely on social consensus and hard forks to rescue ethereum from 34% of nodes going offline. It's OK for chains like hyperledger, bnb, solana, tempo, etc. It's not OK for bitcoin or ethereum or eg. zcash. * Intermediary minimization. The fact that smart contract wallets, protocols like railgun, etc have to send transactions through intermediaries to get included onchain is honestly embarrassing, and it's a constant point of fragility. Hence the work on FOCIL and EIP-8141 (and 7701 and years of work before) to make transaction sending intermediary-minimized with public mempool and strong inclusion properties, in a truly general-purpose way, that covers not just eg. secp256r1, but also privacy protocols and much more. Kohaku is pushing intermediary minimization at the user layer, pulling Ethereum away from the dystopian status quo world where our wallets don't even verify the chain, send our private data out to a dozen third-party servers, and toward a brighter CROPS future. Some of these goals are Unreasonable - maybe Ethereum would be "fine" getting only 50% of the way - what if we depend on intermediaries, but make it easy to switch? But going 50% of the way would not make Ethereum Deeply Impressive in the CROPS way. So we push for 100%. Fortunately all these goals are compatible with high TPS, this is a major focus of research (esp. on scaling the state). Well-designed L2s can also help, especially L2s optimized for specific applications (eg. high-volume trading, privacy...). These goals are even compatible with significantly lower slot times, thanks to Raul's work on erasure-coded P2P, and many other optimizations. The most high-value "product" of the ethereum blockchain, financially speaking, is ETH the asset. Ethereum secures $250 billion of ETH. The types of properties of Ethereum that I mentioned above are very good for ETH the asset. Nearly 90% of my net worth is in ETH, and most of the remainder is ~$40m of onchain fiat of which every dollar has already been allocated for some open-source biotech or software or hardware initiative. That said, there are aspects of supporting ETH the asset - *necessary* aspects even - that are outside the scope of the EF. This is where we need other heroes (some of whom hold more ETH than the EF does) to step in and help. EF has been recently thinking more about how it will relate to other such organizations, and give them needed initial support. EF will be a smaller ship than in previous years, a more opinionated one - in some cases more opinionated in ways that might be difficult to comprehend - but a longer-lasting one, and one suited to making sure that ethereum brings something meaningful to the world. We are grateful to all those inside and outside the EF who are helping to make this happen.

There are some evil people in the world. An 81-year-old YouTuber known as GrammaCrackers, who has been raising funds for her grandson’s cancer treatment, was swatted at her home last night. In her latest video, she recounted the incident with a cheerful attitude, describing the responding female officer as “the prettiest policewoman I’ve ever seen. She was so sweet.” She said they walked her out while her family hugged her tightly, adding that she “didn’t know what was going on but it was kind of fun” GrammaCrackers also said she got her first ride in a police car “never been in a police car before” before simply returning to bed. The act is especially cruel given her age and her selfless charitable efforts. The people who did it should be put in prison.

『メスガキ風煽り表情とポーズ4選』 みなさん、こんにちは！ 今回は、見下し構図と広角パースで魅せるメスガキ風な煽り表情とポーズを紹介します✨ --- 今回使うベースプロンプトはこちら👇 [STYLE]: The artwork features clean, bold digital lineart and vibrant cel-shading, modern anime game CG style. masterpiece, best quality. ​[CHARACTER]: 1girl, solo, kawaii, petite, white bob cut, soft facial features, detailed beautiful eyes, fluffy hair, translucent skin. ​​​​​​​​[EXPRESSION]: ​[POSE]: [OUTFIT]: pop art outfit, layered bright and contrasting colors, short oversized graphic jacket with colorful patches, asymmetrical shirt, dynamic pattern undershirt, loose high-waist shorts, black thighhighs, colorful accessories. ​[COMPOSITION]: thigh shot, captured from a dramatic low-angle shot, dynamic wide-angle lens, extreme foreshortening. The composition focuses on her from the head down to the mid-thigh, with the lower legs cropped out of the frame. Her upper body and thighs tower over the viewer, creating an imposing and stylish silhouette. ​[BACKGROUND]: simple white background, high-contrast studio lighting, sharp focus. ---- ベースプロンプトの 【​​​​​​​​[EXPRESSION]:】と【[POSE]:】部分にプロンプトを差し込みます👍 ---- ​① 興味なし（スマホ見下し） [EXPRESSION]: looking down with a disaffected expression, slight smirk, (yawning). [POSE]: resting her chin on one hand, elbow placed on her raised knee, Her other hand is lazily holding a phone. The low angle emphasizes her attitude of dismissal and arrogance. ---- ② スタイリッシュV字煽り [EXPRESSION]: supreme arrogance, looks down with a smug smirk, looking at viewer from above with distinct condescension, sharp focus on her eyes. ​​​[POSE]: leaning backward with a dynamic posture, pushing her hips forward. One hand is placed confidently on her hip. The other hand is brought directly in front of her mouth and smirk, forming a loose "V" sign with two fingers, and slightly waving it tauntingly toward the viewer. The strong foreshortening makes her leading fingers look massive and aggressive, creating an imposing and defiant gesture that towers over the viewer. ---- ③ 爆笑！指差し嘲笑 [EXPRESSION]: laughing hysterically, mouth wide open, (showing teeth:1.1), eyes squeezed shut in amusement, looking down with extreme ridicule, vibrant and joyful yet condescending expression. ​[POSE]: Dynamic three-quarter view, leaning her body backward significantly while tilting her head to the side as if laughing from the bottom of her heart. One hand is extended directly toward the viewer, pointing an index finger in a mocking gesture. The other hand is brought up to her open mouth, lightly covering it with a few fingers as she ridicules the viewer. The extreme low-angle and wide-angle lens make her pointing hand and finger look massive and impactful due to foreshortening, creating an imposing and highly defiant silhouette that towers over the viewer. ---- ④ 計画通り！ドヤ顔てへっ [EXPRESSION]: mischievous and triumphant grin, widely upturned corners of the mouth showing a confident smile, winking one eye, playful and smug smirk, a look of successful childish mischief. ​[POSE]: Dynamic low-angle thigh shot. She stands with a casual, wider stance. One hand is brought up to her head, lightly tapping her own temple or forehead with her index finger in a playful "tehe!" or "brainy" motion. Her other arm is lowered, with that hand casually and dynamically tucked deep into her loose high-waist short's pocket. She is leaning slightly forward and tilting her head to the side, looking down at the viewer with an intensely teasing yet victorious attitude. ---- そのまま使うもよし、ベースとして改変するのもおすすめです✨ 是非キャラや服装のプロンプトも自分好みに変えて、好みのメスガキ風な表情とポーズを見つけて試してみてください👍