与「Airdrops」相关的搜索结果

Most apps help you do one thing. A financial super app helps you do everything. Pre-IPO Perps Stocks Tokenized Stocks (bStocks) Spot Futures Margin Options Alpha Wallet Pay Card Chat Earn P2P Fiat Gateway Launchpool Megadrop HODLer Airdrops Simple Earn Loans Mining Pool VIP Program Institutional Infrastructure Research Academy Square Crypto-as-a-Service OMS Toolkit And we're just getting started.

🔥 The sUSDD incentive stack just got stronger with newly added $TRX rewards. @trondao ✨ On top of the existing rewards program, we've injected additional $TRX incentives into the @pendle_fi sUSDD market. The yield stack remains stronger than ever: USDD Rewards + $PENDLE Incentives + $TRX Airdrops 🥳Current market highlights: 🔹 sUSDD TVL on Pendle has reached $26.12M, while YT Long Yield APY remains at 301%, ranking #2# among Pendle's Hot Incentivized Markets 🔹 Earn 6.9% APY by providing liquidity via Pendle LP, or lock in 7.65% fixed yield through PT 🔹 PT-sUSDD/USDT on @Morpho has migrated to the highly liquid Gauntlet USDT Frontier V1 Vault, combining deeper liquidity with lower borrowing costs to unlock even greater yield opportunities ⏳ The high-incentive window is still open. Choose the sUSDD strategy that fits your goals and start earning today 👇 🔗 Pendle PT/YT Market: 🔗 Pendle LP Pool: 🔗 Morpho PT-sUSDD/USDT:

Anti-CV Spent months chasing points, completing tasks and tracking leaderboards for rewards that never arrived At the time, I thought the payout was the goal Some campaigns paid less than expected Some testnets led nowhere Some airdrops never came What surprised me was realizing that the rewards were only part of the experience The people I met, the things I learned and the communities I discovered ended up being worth more than most of the payouts I was chasing My most marketable skill is probably knowing which dashboards are worth checking before I've had my first coffee Thanks @RallyOnChain for reminding me that not every valuable outcome fits neatly into a wallet Have you ever gone after the rewards and discovered something you didn't expect ? Which project was it ?

Why are top exchanges all backing $USD1? Like @binance and @Bybit_Official providing double-digit yields and WLFI airdrops for USD1, while exchanges like Gate have also introduced a yearly yield of up to 20%. This is not a short-term marketing stunt, because top exchanges are building a brand new financial ecosystem. - Exchanges want an asset with unique regulatory exemptions and state-backed credibility to easily bypass the standard compliance hurdles slowing down traditional stablecoins. - Exchanges need to ensure their market volume share because a large portion of the supply is concentrated on a single exchange, and heavy interest subsidies have already triggered a tenfold surge in trading activity. - Exchanges are backing a token designed to scale past the crypto bubble by capturing the global remittance market and integrating with low Earth orbit satellite networks for off-grid payments. - Centralized exchanges are locking in the default payment network for the future AI economy because the underlying developer kit allows autonomous software agents to manage accounts without human intervention. These aggressive yield campaigns play a strategic bridging role in attracting capital. The exchanges securing USD1 liquidity today will control the core payment tracks of tomorrow.

It is with a heavy heart that we announce we are winding down the Botanix network. This decision is the hardest one we have made in four years, and we want to share the reasoning openly because the people who backed us, built with us, and used what we shipped deserve more than a quiet shutdown notice. First off, an immediate practical consideration for the Botanix community: please withdraw your Bitcoin and other assets before July 9th, 2026. When we started in 2022, the pitch was simple enough to say in a sentence: bring real utility to Bitcoin. What that actually meant in practice, and what we have spent nearly four years building toward, was more ambitious than that sentence made it sound. We were trying to build a Bitcoin-based blockchain that could find genuine product-market fit as a platform for Bitcoin applications, without using token incentives to drive growth, manufacture users, or simulate utility. Almost every chain that has launched in the last cycle has reached for the same playbook (issue a token without PMF, engineer the incentive surface, point at the resulting metrics), and we did not believe this route is a viable strategy in the long term. We wanted to know whether a Bitcoin chain could earn its users on the strength of what was built on top of it, the value it brings in the market with Bitcoin itself as the only meaningful economic primitive in the system. And we built it. The Spiderchain went live and stayed live, a year of mainnet operation with one hundred percent uptime and zero security incidents on a genuinely novel cryptographic architecture. We built Dynafed, a dynamic federation that turned the Spiderchain from a static multisig set into a rotating, decentralized one, the technical milestone that most people in this space said could not be built on Bitcoin without compromising trust assumptions. Twenty-five million transactions, two hundred thousand wallets, and tens of millions of dollars in assets moved across the chain, every single number of that earned organically without a token, without airdrops, without points programs, or any of the manufactured-demand machinery. Chainlink, Morpho, GMX, Dolomite, Fireblocks, Alchemy, Galaxy, OKX Wallet, all integrated. We shipped a Bitcoin neobank with BINK on iOS and Android, with self-custodial email login for Bitcoin (something that had never existed before), native Bitcoin yield, and the lowest borrowing rates against Bitcoin anywhere in the world, all of it downstream of owning the infrastructure. The point of saying this is not to argue with our own conclusion. The protocol works, the product works, and our team and ecosystem worked in concert to do exceptional work. We have run this experiment in earnest, with a working protocol, real applications, and a serious team, for over a year on mainnet and nearly four years in total. The honest answer we have arrived at, after living inside it every day, is that it did not work, at least not in this market and not on this timeline. We want to share what we think we learned, with the caveat that some of this is conviction and some of this is still suspicion, and we would rather be transparent about the difference than pretend to have clarity we do not have. The first thing I've had to sit with is timing. Bitcoin utility, making Bitcoin programmable, productive, and integrated into real financial activity, isn't where the real world users sit right now. The conversation is still on Bitcoin as a reserve asset, on its monetary and political positioning, on base-layer conservatism. Those questions are upstream of the ones a Bitcoin L2 needs people to be asking. I still believe Bitcoin gets there, but belief in the destination is not the same as being able to predict when, and nobody can. It's also possible the destination never materialises at all, and that Bitcoin's role as a reserve asset is simply where it settles. If that's true, there will never be a market for what we were building, and no amount of time or capital would change that. The second is the token question. We intended to eventually launch a token. We saw it, and still see it, as a genuinely new form of equity, something closer to an IPO than an airdrop, to be done when you reach product market fit and the moment is right. That moment never came. What became clear over the last year is that the market largely stopped rewarding even the more considered versions of that playbook. Token launches across the board have broadly underperformed, and those that did go to market with tokens haven't seen the outcomes or PMF that the model is supposed to produce. The third lesson is about where DeFi demand on Bitcoin actually lives. For most use cases that exist today, lending, yield, leveraged exposure, WBTC on a mature general-purpose L2 is genuinely sufficient. Users have voted with their behaviour, and the verdict is that the trust assumptions of a wrapped representation on Ethereum are acceptable to almost everyone who wants Bitcoin-denominated DeFi. Decentralisation matters to people in principle and in conversation; in practice, when something cheaper and easier is in front of them, they use it. The security case for a dedicated Bitcoin L2 is real, but it only matters for a narrower band of applications than our thesis required, one of the clearer lessons this market has taught us. The fourth lesson is structural. The on-chain economy is consolidating around venues that own the user relationship: Hyperliquid, Robinhood, the major CEXes, and now TradFi participants absorbing an ever-larger share of attention, flow, and revenue. Convenience and institutional credibility win, every time, as soon as they're available. As retail participation thins, that concentration only deepens. We were, and still are, believers in decentralisation, but the current direction of on-chain growth is running through distribution, and any team building base-layer infrastructure today is rowing upstream against that current. We were no exception. The fifth lesson is the most concrete. Both of the above played out directly in our economics. The users we attracted were primarily using Bitcoin as a store of value for yield, a legitimate use case, but not the high-frequency transaction volume that drives fee revenue on a network like ours. BINK was our answer to that: a Bitcoin neobank designed to bring daily usage of BTC and stablecoins on-chain, driving the transaction volume the network needed. It was the right strategic instinct, and one we never got the chance to fully test. BINK only landed on both app stores in the last few weeks, a product that by its nature could only be built once the underlying infrastructure was proven and live. When users choose the convenient option and economic gravity pulls toward distribution, what's left on a decentralised infrastructure layer is a user base that costs more to serve than it generates. Infrastructure costs are what they are, and the fee income never came close to covering them. If you would like to see how we were imagining a Bitcoin future and what we have been working on since September, feel free to download BINK and give it a spin: it’s a full-fledged self-custodial Bitcoin Neobank with email login, one click borrowing, a Lightning integration and more. App store: Play store: This UX is where we think Bitcoin is ultimately heading towards although it feels too early. You can use invite code 1SD31R, but remember to remove your funds by July 9th. We could keep going. We have chosen not to, however, because continuing past the point where additional time stops producing additional learning is not conviction, it is something that looks like conviction from the outside while corroding into something else on the inside. We would rather stop now, with integrity intact and resources available to take care of the people who took a chance on us, than push the experiment past the point where it still has something to teach us. Reminder: Please withdraw all your assets by July 9th. After this, the federation will sweep the remaining Bitcoin. Any other assets or tokens on the network from then onwards will unfortunately be unrecoverable. After this, the federation will sweep the remaining Bitcoin. Any other assets or tokens on the network from then onwards will unfortunately be unrecoverable. To our investors, who backed a thesis that was harder to defend than it should have been, to our partners who built alongside us and bet pieces of their own roadmaps on ours, to the developers who deployed on Spiderchain, to our users and the BINK community who showed up for something experimental and stayed, and most of all to the Botanix team who shipped a genuinely novel system with rigour and care and who made every hard day worth the difficulty: Thank you, more than the words available here can carry.

币安宣布第 65 期 HODLer Airdrops 将上线 AI 基础设施项目 Genius Terminal（GENIUS）。2026 年 5 月 11 日至 13 日期间申购 BNB Simple Earn 或 On-Chain Yields 产品的用户可获得空投奖励。本次空投总计分发 1000 万枚 GENIUS，占总供应量 1%；GENIUS 总供应量为 10 亿枚，上线时流通量约 3.35 亿枚，占总量 33.54%。GENIUS 定位为面向 AI 的开放基础设施网络，部署于 BNB Chain。

We are investigating a security incident that occurred for the token, $GUA, through a suspected address poisoning attack on May 27, 2026, which has caused significant volatility on the token. Initial findings indicate an address manipulation through a multisig transaction intended to release additional unlocked tokens into the airdrop claim contract, which allows users to claim unlocked airdrops. The intended address for this is 0x70ae7D3DECfB4C3aE996fb1c07092566F73D5c15 (the intended address) but the resulting address the executed transaction sent to was 0x70AE678b457C5E1b3fD7AD9537F234dFc1795C15 (the hacker address). The hacker address never had any interaction with any addresses associated with SUPERFORTUNE previously, so address poisoning as an attack vector is unlikely. Furthermore, internal operating procedures account for address poisoning attempts by matching addresses through several checks. We are continuing to investigate the hack and will provide the community on an ongoing basis. We have contacted authorities and incident response teams to assist.

GM @trondao 👋🏻 Introducing sUSDD (27 Aug 2026) by @usddio $300k of exclusive $USDD rewards to be earned, including additional $TRX airdrops for YT. Read on to learn more about @justinsuntron’s favourite stable 👇🏻