与「Answer」相关的搜索结果

FAN SZN with @IPXExchange As a creator, do I ever hold the raised money directly? Only the part that's unlocked. The rest stays in escrow until its stage is approved. Picture a concert tour: Ticket sales sit in a box-office account the tour manager can't touch Each stage's installment opens only after that stage is signed off The tour manager takes one installment at a time, never the whole box at once Here's how it works, per IPX: 1. Raised capital never sits in a creator's wallet. It's held in a non-custodial smart contract escrow 2. Before the raise, the creator submits a line-by-line budget. IPX says its AI agent, Alfred, sets it up in a contract tied to milestones, and that CertiK audited it 3. After the project graduates, its budget moves into a separate escrow. A stage unlocks once the creator submits proof and the platform approves it, and then it's available for the creator to transfer My read: as a creator, I'd hold an installment only after I prove its stage, and never the whole raise up front. Real count, from IPX's text: it names 3 example stages: pre-production, filming and post-production. Made-up scenario, not a real project: a film uses those 3 stages. Pre-production is approved, so 1 of 3 installments is available to transfer. Filming and post-production stay in escrow until they pass their checks. My take: the first thing I'd ask is how long an approval takes. If a stage sits locked while I wait, that could hold up the whole shoot. What comes out the other end, per IPX? • Each stage's installment, after its milestone is approved • A record of every request, approval and release on IPX and Base, so supporters can follow along • What a creator pays, if anything: I didn't find it listed, so I'd check the project terms The honest part: • IPX says unlocks happen automatically with no human gatekeepers, and also says the platform approves each milestone. I couldn't find how those fit together or how long an approval takes • The Defiant labels the announcement "Presented by IPX," and I haven't seen anyone outside IPX confirm how it runs • I haven't seen it run on a live project yet So before I launch, I'd find out who approves each milestone and how long an approval takes. I'll want both answers before I confirm. Why this matters for creators and fans: → Creators know the payout path before they launch → Fans can see which stages are open and follow each release → Both sides work from the same milestones Source: IPX's router announcement and its KPI-Gated Escrow announcement Which would you check first: the budget lines or who approves each milestone?

Diffusion language models can rewrite their own drafts — but rewriting the wrong span just reproduces the same mistake. Remasking lets these models revisit generated text, yet they have never had a good sense of when a revision is worth it. DiVR adds a verifier that predicts whether a partial sequence will still reach the right answer, then decides when to regenerate a block and which alternative to keep. On LLaDA-8B-Base across five reasoning benchmarks, average accuracy rose from 35.3% to 43.4% at 1.9–3.5× the cost of greedy decoding — while search baselines needed 3.8–7.4× the compute for worse results. The practical payoff: a real accuracy lift without touching or retraining the generator, and the verifier even transfers to other generators like Dream. The catch is still multiplied compute, so latency-sensitive deployments need to do the math first. Would you trade 2–3× compute for an 8-point accuracy gain on your own reasoning tasks? #DiffusionLM# #LLMReasoning#

My Watchlist got smaller this week, and that felt like progress. @GeckoTerminal shows me the list I actually use, not the list I wish I had, and keeping it short is the whole point for me. Every pool on there has a reason I can say out loud: what I am trying to learn from it, or what question it helps me answer. If I cannot say that reason clearly, it comes off. If I can, it stays, even when nothing is happening with it, because I am tracking to learn, not to chase movement. I check it the same way I tidy a desk. I look at what is still earning its place, I ask what has changed since I added it, and I let go of those that no longer teach me anything. That keeps my research honest, and it keeps my attention on the pools I already understand best. That is only how I keep mine, not advice for anyone else. My setup is here if you want a look: [your Watchlist link] What did you last take off your Watchlist, and why did it lose its place?

Who decides the answer to a prediction market? Usually the creator. Or an AI on a server nobody can check. So we built Noa Court - an AI resolver for Noa, live on NEAR mainnet. In the video we ask Gemini a vague question: "will the NEAR hackathon get more than 2000 projects?" - It finds the real source (Nearhackathon API) and samples it live: 1,803 right now - Turns the vague question into precise, hashed rules - We review the market and sign with a NEAR wallet - Market #27# goes live on Noa, published with readable rules How it resolves: - One Court contract, one pinned resolver running in an @out_layer TEE - Anyone can trigger it. Nobody can pick the answer - Numbers? Decided by code - Words? 3 NEAR AI judges must all agree and quote the evidence Asked "did a crypto hack make the news?", all 3 judges quoted a headline that never says "hack". It refuses to guess: - Prompt injection - flagged - Dead or changed source - void + refund Works with prices, NEAR tokens (powered by Intear & JustHoot), news feeds, web pages, any JSON API. Plug it into any market, contract or agent. Add the MCP to Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini - any AI that speaks MCP: Code: What would you never let an AI resolve? Built at NEAR HACKATHON @NEARProtocol @NearBuilders #NEARHackathon#

There's no pro plan on Orrery. There's your wallet. A node can list cheaper prices for $OREY holders. When your request comes in, it reads your balance on Solana and bills the lower price. Your router reads the same balance and won't sign for more. Nothing to sign up for. Nothing to renew. The discount is wherever your tokens are. One answer from today's rehearsal, start to signature.

This is f*cking insane. Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei was asked what a kid finishing high school should do now. His answer: "AI can do entry-level law work. It can do entry-level finance. It can do entry-level consulting We can't deny that it will also eliminate jobs, and probably a large number of them" In a few minutes he names which jobs go first and the one skill that keeps you in the game His own prediction: 50 percent of entry-level white-collar jobs disrupted in the next 1 to 5 years Prompts → Agents → AI Coworkers → Entry-Level Work Done By AI Farming to factories took generations. This time AI hits every step of a career at once His advice fits in one line: "Of course, learn to use AI" The people who start this year won't be competing with AI, they'll be the ones running it Everything below is free. Start today: Anthropic - Prompt Engineering Interactive Tutorial: the fastest way to learn to direct a model Anthropic Courses: from your first prompt to running agents Anthropic Cookbook: real task recipes you can copy today Microsoft - Generative AI for Beginners: 21 lessons, no degree required Microsoft - AI Agents for Beginners: build agents that do the entry-level work for you Hugging Face - Agents Course: free and certified, start to finish Google Cloud - Generative AI: Google's own hands-on notebooks OpenAI Cookbook: code for every common task - Prompt Engineering Guide: the reference everyone links to Andrej Karpathy - Neural Networks Zero to Hero: understand what is under the hood CrewAI: run a small team of AI workers Microsoft - AutoGen: put several agents on one job Awesome LLM Apps: hundreds of real builds to learn from - Short Courses: free 1-hour courses from the people who teach this Total cost: $0 You don't need another year of tuition to learn this. You need to start telling AI what to do 95% will graduate and compete with AI for the same entry-level job The 5% who learn to run it this year will manage the agents doing that job Save this and send it to someone graduating this year

Elon Musk was asked how long until there is regular travel to Mars. His answer was not about rockets. He said the threshold that actually matters is whether Mars survives if the ships from Earth stop coming. That means every input: air, food, fuel, spare parts, medicine. He compared it to a long sea voyage where the only thing missing is vitamin C. One missing item and the colony dies on schedule. The ships could stop for reasons that have nothing to do with Mars. A war. A decline. An asteroid. His line: civilisation on Earth can end with a bang or a whimper. That is insurance logic, and it is the honest way to describe the Mars plan. Every policy has a premium, a probability and a payout. The payout here is the survival of the species, so the premium is nearly impossible to argue against. The probability is the part nobody can price. Which creates a strange corporate problem. The premium gets paid by companies whose shareholders will not be the ones rescued if the policy ever pays out. SpaceX is private, so its investors signed up for that. A public company could not easily spend decades of free cash flow on a backup planet and explain it on a quarterly call. The other catch is that redundancy is only worth what you spend testing it. A city is not self-sustaining because the plan says so. It is self-sustaining the day the ships stop and everyone lives. So the number worth watching is not the landing date. It is the date Mars stops needing Earth. Nobody is selling a ticket to that.

@meetmotes: NFT-owned AI agents on Robinhood Chain. You check your crypto balance regularly. But when did you last check your wallet approvals? That question comes from a creator thread retweeted by FINOMZY II, and it lands harder once an AI agent holds your keys. An approval is permission that outlives the moment you gave it. A session key you forgot is still a key. Motes answers with structure, not reassurance. The agent works through a session key that is constrained, rotatable and revocable by the owner, and invalidated when ownership changes. The owner key stays the high authority: change permissions, stop the service, withdraw. The docs build the check into the design. Every call is validated against the owner-signed policy, and the weekly ledger shows what the agent did. Review approvals the way you review balances. An agent you can revoke is an agent you can trust. My verdict: in agent finance, the revoke button is the product.