与「BILLIONAIRE」相关的搜索结果

50 Sites That Show What Billionaires Buy and Read for Free🤯 1.) → Current portfolios of famous investors 2.) → Quarterly fund trades 3.) → Stock transactions of US politicians 4.) → Executives' own company stocks 5.) → Making fund filings readable 6.) → Companies' official reports 7.) → Buffett's letters since 1977 8.) → Video archive of Buffett meetings 9.) → Howard Marks' investor memos 10.) → Research from Ray Dalio's firm 11.) → Dalio's principles for free 12.) → Jeremy Grantham's market notes 13.) → Quantitative fund research 14.) → Damodaran's valuation data 15.) → Valuation professor's blog 16.) → Morgan Housel's money writings 17.) → Mental models for decision-making 18.) → JPMorgan's free market guide 19.) → Innovation-focused fund research 20.) → Venture capital essays 21.) → Value investing lecture notes 22.) → Columbia's value investing archive 23.) → Fed's economic data archive 24.) → Fed decisions and statements 25.) → European Central Bank data 26.) → Reports from the central bank of central banks 27.) → Countries' economic indicators 28.) → Companies' long-term charts 29.) → Company financials for free 30.) → Companies' market cap rankings 31.) → Stock screener and heat map 32.) → Portfolio backtesting 33.) → Charts and market analysis 34.) → Professional market screener 35.) → Company activity reports archive 36.) → SEC's investor education site 37.) → Passive investing encyclopedia 38.) → Financial terms dictionary 39.) → Free finance guides 40.) → CFA research publications 41.) → Fund and stock evaluations 42.) → Companies' visual analysis 43.) → Archive of selected investment theses 44.) → Seeing what's inside funds 45.) → European fund backtests 46.) → Investment writings with data 47.) → Market history notes 48.) → Investor psychology writings 49.) → Explaining the economy with charts 50.) ourfiniteworld? → (see note) The rich don't hoard information. They just don't tell you where it is. Save it, follow @Liyana_Coder you'll need it. Not investment advice. @Liyana_Coder

Here’s why Jensen Huang did NOT fall for a “Chinese honeypot.” 1. China doesn’t actually want Nvdia chips. They ordered their biggest tech companies to CANCEL orders. 2. Almost 1 MILLION Nvidia chips are stranded in Hong Kong as China won’t let them in the mainland. 3. Nvidia itself said China tells customers to purchase and use “China-based competitors” 4. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick admitted it’s because using Nvidia gets China "addicted to the American technology stack” 5. Alice was DISOBEYING China by smuggling chips. Chinese authorities were INVESTIGATING her. 6. The ONLY source of her being a honey pot is “U.S. intelligence”. NO ONE knows what the intelligence actually is.. 7. The US Attorney General admitted the DOJ has NOT determined she was a spy… Fake news took down one of the most powerful CEOs in the world from the company he founded. Thats what happens to non-pedo billionaires.

The American people voted for change. They want a Democratic Party that will stand up to powerful special interests, take on the billionaire class and fight for working families. That is why I am supporting Senator Chris Van Hollen to lead Senate Democrats.

Jensen Huang cheating on his wife is reprehensible. But with a second alleged affair suddenly surfacing, something feels very off. Jeff Bezos and Bill Gates had affairs, yet neither faced this kind of immediate coordinated pressure to be ousted as CEO. Tech billionaires having affairs or women problems is not new. I feel as though someone is deliberately trying to destroy Jensen’s reputation and force him out of NVIDIA. Am I the only one who suspects something more coordinated is happening here?

overheard from friends talking about AI in China, and it’s very alarming - AI short films went massive in China market because of how good the video models are now - the first wave of people who mastered using AI to generate short films and comics made quite some money because they could produce a lot more content than traditional workflows - but within just a few months, everybody and their mom could make equally good short films because all the expertise could be written in a markdown file - when everyone’s more productive, no one actually has an advantage and it’s a race to the bottom. very quickly it became impossible to make money, and everyone’s busier than they were without AI - the only one making money now is companies like bytedance who owns user demand and distribution. they sell ads to creators who pay to get traffic, and eventually ad spend became 80% of those creators’ operating expense, while AI tokens is less than 5% so what are the problems here? 1. there’s no moat if you are creating anything with AI if a human is really good at something, and it’s hard to find more humans who can do the same, they can leverage the scarcity of their skill to get paid very well but if AI is good at something, it will be infinitely replicated, so there’s no scarcity hence you can’t really expect a sustainable business by creating anything with AI 2. more creators created more content people actually liked. that’s a good thing but the economical benefit of that all got absorbed by the distribution platforms there’s a famous chinese poem 遍身罗绮者，不是养蚕人 - it basically says people who dress well aren’t the people making dresses. that’s exactly what’s happening here if our society doesn’t figure out a better way to distribute wealth, AI will help billionaires become trillionaires while average people become more exhausted than ever

Billionaire investor Warren Buffett said that he drinks 5 Cokes every day and hasn't drunk plain water for the past 48 years. He said that Cokes are the reason he maintains good health and play an important role in his long life. Hey @grok, can you confirm whether this statement is true?

Jensen Huang’s affair is just a trigger. What we are witnessing is a pre-planned power grab over Nvidia’s trillion-dollar computing empire, coordinated by Wall Street and Washington. Some sharp Chinese-American commentators call it America’s new Red Scare targeting elite Asian entrepreneurs. Bill Gates, Elon Musk and other white tech billionaires have faced repeated scandals over personal conduct. None were dragged into national security probes or boardroom takeovers. Only Jensen Huang, after a personal relationship misstep, faces an independent board investigation and hostile narrative from intelligence circles. The double standard could not be clearer: For white elites, personal flaws are private matters. For a Chinese-born leader controlling a strategic tech asset, any tiny blemish gets framed as a national security risk. Nvidia is the backbone of global AI computing, valued at roughly $4 trillion. Unlike Meta, where Mark Zuckerberg locks control with dual-class super-voting shares, or Microsoft and Amazon, deeply integrated with the Pentagon and intelligence agencies, Nvidia has no such protective structure. Public filings from 2026 show Jensen Huang holds only 3.58% of shares, and all directors plus executives together hold merely 3.94%. Vanguard and BlackRock own 9.32% and 7.43% respectively, holding decisive voting power. Without institutional shields or deep political backing, this critical tech giant sits exposed on the chessboard of great-power competition. The groundwork for this takeover was laid months ago. Longtime board allies of Huang, Mark Perry and Michael McCaffrey, stepped down from key committees. Insiders tied to Democratic establishment, Wall Street and U.S. intelligence quietly moved in: ✅ Suzanne Nora Johnson, former Goldman Sachs vice chair and co-chair of Brookings Institution, joined Nvidia’s audit committee in July 2026 with direct oversight of internal investigations and compliance. ✅ Kenneth Jacobs, vice chair of Brookings and incoming Vanguard chair, controls the largest institutional voting bloc and operates within the same inner circle as Johnson. ✅ Gilman Louie,founding CEO of CIA-backed venture fund In-Q-Tel and member of the President’s Intelligence Advisory Board, works alongside Johnson on the same national tech fund, overseeing intelligence acquisition of strategic tech firms. The media rollout followed a precise political timeline. Initial trial balloons appeared on Oct 29. On Nov 6, the very day Democrats secured full control of Congress, Julian Barnes of the New York Times (national security beat) and Demetri Sevastopulo of the Financial Times published coordinated reports, citing intelligence memos while breaking the story of the personal scandal. The real offense was never the affair. It was the 2025 deal Jensen struck with the Trump administration: offering a 25% revenue share to win export approval for H200 chips into China. A normal commercial negotiation, reframed by incoming Democrats as a dangerous compromise on U.S. AI sovereignty. This investigation will not crash Nvidia’s stock — Wall Street holds massive stakes here. But it will deliver three strategic wins for the U.S. establishment: 1. De-founder and de-Sinicize Nvidia: A new permanent national security compliance committee, led by Johnson’s faction, will strip Huang of authority over chip exports and overseas strategy. His dual Chairman-CEO role will be split. 2. Lock down China’s AI ceiling: Washington will seize full command of global advanced computing supply, regulating chip flows to slow China’s AI progress. 3. Retroactively target Trump: Once Democrats take over congressional oversight panels in January 2027, this case will be used to accuse the Trump White House of negligence for approving the H200 export deal. Jensen Huang spent 27 years building this computing empire, believing in rules, technical merit and business contracts. But there is a brutal truth in America’s power game: Top-tier strategic technology and wealth without political cover are nothing more than bargaining chips waiting to be carved up. White elites get generous room for error. Asian pioneers who climb to the very top get almost none. This is not a story about infidelity. It is a raw demonstration of racial hierarchy, capital control and partisan power politics in the United States.

2015, Colbert: “You’re a billionaire trying to do good things. Superhero or supervillain? You have to choose one.” Elon: shows him a robot snake that plugs itself into your car Colbert: “Is that thing going to attack me in my sleep?” Elon, completely deadpan: “For the prototype, at least, I would recommend not dropping anything when you’re near it.” Ten years later he’s built reusable rockets, humanoid robots and the best-selling EV on the planet, and he’s still the only CEO who can deliver a product safety warning and a punchline in the same sentence. Superhero, obviously. Just one with a very dry sense of humor. @elonmusk