与「Bots」相关的搜索结果

Ladies and gentlemen, it's time to pass the torch and demote myself to my natural state: a poster. I'll be stepping back from leading product for 𝕏 and will continue on as an advisor. Serving the X community has been the privilege of a lifetime. X is, and will remain, the most important communication technology in history. But running this app is a 24/7 job and it's now time for me to take a breather. The app is seeing unprecedented growth in new users & engagement. We continue to break records every month. We've climbed 70 spots in the App Store since this time last year. And in the last 400 days, we rebuilt almost every aspect of X: the Timeline, the Android app, onboarding, notifications, chat and more. We also launched nearly 30 new products while protecting the integrity of the town square: becoming the first app to show Country-of-Origin on profiles and mounting defenses against AI bots. There's certainly much more work to be done, but our foundation is stronger than ever. None of this would have been possible without the incredible team here. The next leaders will take X to even greater heights with @benjitaylor on design, @singhai on core product engineering and @dinkin_flickaa on mobile engineering -- among many other great people. Thank you to Elon and the X team for welcoming me into the company. See you on the Timeline.

But here we get to the thing that will confound looking at human and machine as separate units: the possibility of deeper and deeper integration between human and machine. This is the strand of technology that includes: computers being able to work much more symbiotically with us, picking up on all kinds of conscious and sub-conscious signals we release as an interface, brain-computer interfaces, computer-assisted telepathy that helps multiple people better understand each other and work together. The ultimate end is erasing the binary divide between human and machine and opening up any position on that spectrum. On one end, you sitting at a laptop terminal; on the other end, mind uploading, and also everything in between. The hope is that deeply integrated human + machine will outperform separated human + machine, and that this will remain the case all the way up to the technological ceiling. This is the best "far-future AI outcome that I actually like" that I can come up with: * We preserve global political and economic pluralism (no single company or government dominates) all the way up to the technological ceiling. * We humans each get the ability to either take technological upgrades to ourselves, and explore the universe at a level competitive with "pure" machines, or stay as we are, and get some ability to act in the world through having a bot listen to our instructions. * Most of Earth will probably become a highly-regulated nature preserve where anyone can continue living the kind of life they have now (without the pains and annoyances; most challenge will be healthy "good challenge"), and if you want to do more crazy things, you go to space. Make no mistake - this is a ride through a narrow corridor. Things could go off the rails in one of several different ways: AI-on-its-own could get too powerful relative to the alternatives; one country or one company could gain decisive advantage and decide to lock it in permanently, powerful technological ways of destroying each other could cause incalculable harm, or the human + machine integration approach itself ends up preserving not enough of our humanity, and so it ends up being "just another way to make powerful bots". For these reasons, I wish that we can ride through the narrow corridor at 60 kph and not 200 kph, which is why I feel warmly toward "slowdown" / "pause" proposals (including "give us a chance to hit the brakes" ideas like mutually assured compute destruction (as in AI 2040, also previously Dan Hendrycks, and others)). My ideal world is actually one where (i) open weights wins, and (ii) Dean Ball turns out to be completely right that open weights is decelerationist because it deters capex in frontier models [though it will enable more capex in peripherals and applications], because then we get slowdown without any of the downsides of doing it through heavier-handed political means. But also I don't think we should count on the world to naturally give us "convenient" laws of economics and physics. We do have some degree of agency over the laws of politics, plenty of ways to change incentives without putting a king in charge, and we should exercise that.

But AGI is not the same as ASI (artificial superintelligence). To see the difference, let us zoom into what things might look like one year before the singularity. We also need to add a third line to the chart: the centaur (human + machine). An analogy here is chess. Machine surpassed the average human in the late 1970s, and surpassed the top human (Kasparov) in 1997. But human + machine continued to beat machine alone all the way until around 2017. What did the twilight of human + machine in chess look like? Actually, it did look like humans being relegated to more and more "high-level strategic thinking" functions, while bots managed the move-by-move. Very similar to vibe coding in 2026. Before we get to a point where there are no areas where our input is economically helpful, we will be in a regime where there are only a few such areas. And because we humans are scarce, those few areas will become the global economy's bottleneck - they will be the only thing you can't optimize down to near-zero cost (and latency), and so all our attention will go toward those tasks.

Still trading manually? Smart traders are already using trading bots to make profits. Follow BotBunz to get started quickly and master quantitative trading with ease. Try the bot now and watch this. 👉

Feels bad, -49.4% drawdown this month after the recent crash. My portfolio is mainly AI chokepoints and bottlenecks. In the memory, photonics, robotics, and upstream semis, (on margin) which all tend to be higher beta than others. But reduced leverage recently from the crash. I see a lot of people making fun of the drop or AI names, saying it’s obvious that: - “AI is a bubble” - “memory/kospi is a bubble” - “photonics is a bubble” - “humanoids won’t get anywhere” - “neoclouds will get replaced by hyperscalers like Meta” And a bunch of retail + bots saying “sell everything, it’s never going to recover”. But I have conviction that all these themes are backed by structural revenue growth or technological shifts. And I’ve had similar drawdowns back when there admin threatened global tariffs, before markets pulled off a recovery. I personally have a longer horizon + higher tolerance for volatility than others, to see how this plays out. Especially considering a lot of retail view things on a week to week basis: no, my thesis isn’t wrong yet if I project revenue inflection in H2 2027 and it’s 2026 now. Anyway, feels bad short term just wanted to share anyway for transparency.

💥 @cz_binance at the Binance 9YA livestream: "AI will make crypto safer" I think AI in crypto splits into two futures. - One: bots patch every vulnerability before a human finds it and hacks fall to zero. - Two: exploit swarms drain chains faster than any team can react. But I'm also more sided towards the first option. What's your take? 👀

Hi, I'm RC. I built Kimi CLI at Moonshot last year, and back in 2015, bots that lived in group chats. For the past four months, I've been building Raft in public. Today I'm launching Raft 1.0. Right now, working with agents means juggling terminals, sessions, and skills. The more you run, the more you end up holding it all together yourself, and the easier it is to lose the thread. Raft puts your agents in team mode: one workspace where working with agents feels like messaging your team. The work keeps moving, and you stay at the wheel. Meet my Raft agent team👇