与「CIA」相关的搜索结果

Did Rubio's intervention really help topple Jensen? Last night was my poker night. Of course we talked about Nvidia. About Jensen Huang. And honestly? Nobody at that table likes Rubio. And nobody, nobody likes Trump. But look at the clock. Thursday. Jensen resigns. That same afternoon, the spy story starts falling apart. The AG: "no conclusions" on whether Alice Huang is a spy. Then CNN, 5:32 PM: the intel community says the evidence "does not prove" she was a spy. Officials close to the DNI call the spy label "over-torqued." Even the CIA is "not yet convinced." And yet. 5:43 PM. 11 minutes later. @WSJ runs a column by @Peggynoonannyc. Who is she? Reagan's special assistant and speechwriter. George H.W. Bush's "Read my lips: no new taxes"? She wrote that line. Pulitzer Prize winner. A WSJ columnist for 26 years. About as GOP establishment as it gets. Her headline: "Jensen Huang Is a White House Scandal." Her question: "What did Trump know and when?" Her verdict: "Potentially Teapot Dome-size, Watergate-size." Watergate. Over a spy case the DOJ, the DNI, and the CIA can't even confirm. The arrogance is stunning. It doesn't matter if the spy story holds up. The targets are moving right on schedule. Step one: take down Jensen. Step two: the White House. Now look at the next day. Friday, 4:45 PM: @washingtonpost publishes "Behind Jensen Huang's spy scandal, a shadow war for Trump's ear on China." The subhead already has Rubio's name on it: "Rubio's intervention helped topple" Jensen. 5:00 PM: @SecRubio takes the stage at the Federalist Society. If you've never heard of the Federalist Society: it's the most powerful conservative legal network in America. It built the pipeline that put Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett on the Supreme Court. It shapes how a whole generation of judges reads the Constitution. Speak there, and you're auditioning for the conservative legal elite. This was Rubio's first big speech since the GOP's midterm wipeout. For weeks, everyone has been asking one question: is he running in 2028? And what did America's top diplomat say? "America has always and, I believe, will always be a nation of irrepressible ambition." "We, Americans, we are not passive, an inward-looking people." "The ultimate question of our time is whether Americans have a moral right to exist as a distinct nation and a distinct people." That's not a Secretary of State speech. That's a campaign speech. Listen closely and you'll hear it. A carefully prepared script, and Rubio still stumbled over his words. He was nervous. This audition meant too much to him. And right on cue—15 minutes before he walks into that room, the Post crowns him the man who took down America's most powerful tech CEO. Perfect timing. You're telling me the Post reporters who cover him every day knew nothing about his schedule? Nothing about what that speech meant? I'm not defending Rubio. I'm not defending Trump. I already told you how my poker table feels about them.The coincidences here are just too perfect. One more thing. A retired lawyer at our table told me something I had completely missed. Who is investigating Jensen? Nvidia's independent directors hired Joon Hyun Kim. I don't know who on Nvidia's board picked him. But another Asian American? Just like Ted Lieu. Just like Grace Meng. The classic racism shield. Sound familiar? I just posted about this exact playbook. And his firm? Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz. Wachtell. @OpenAI's longtime law firm. The firm on OpenAI's $110 billion funding round. Back to Thursday, the day Jensen resigned. That afternoon, Politico reports OpenAI has quietly told Congress it now backs the chip-control bills. The firm investigating Jensen works for the company that switched sides the day he fell. The Republican establishment. The Democratic establishment. The Ivy League elites. The power. The headlines. The targets. Same direction. Same 48 hours. All just coincidence? Anyone who's played poker knows: bluff hand after hand, and sooner or later somebody at the table calls. Not a dime for $ANT.

🇺🇸🇨🇳 Rubio reportedly set Jensen Huang's downfall in motion... with a memo that hit harder than the CIA report it was based on The Washington Post reports the Secretary of State took a CIA report on Jensen's relationship with a suspected Chinese spy and rewrote it in his own, more forceful terms, according to one person familiar with it. When that memo's findings leaked, the scandal began. A former official who worked on chip policy described what Trump's national security team was after: "They wanted to destroy the influence Jensen had over the president." Trump still calls him a "legend." The agencies still can't prove she was a spy. But three bills restricting chip sales to China are now headed for the defense bill, and the one executive who used to talk Congress out of them is gone. So ask yourself who came out ahead this week, and you have a good idea why that memo found its way to reporters. Source: Washington Post / Writer: Daniel

在黄仁勋辞去英伟达职位后: 美国司法部表示没有说过黄乐是间谍。 美国情报部门表示已调查一年多，迄今收集的情报（包括截获通信）仍不足以证明她是为北京从事间谍活动。 国家情报总监办公室部分官员认为，将她定性为“中国间谍”并不完全准确，且存在夸大； CIA官员也尚未确信她明知在向北京传递情报。 FBI表示仍在调查。 玩的够无耻。

Dylan Patel says Alice Huang was telling everyone on WeChat she could get them Nvidia chips in China, and Jensen probably knew "I actually don't think she's a spy in the colloquial sense. And I don't think she's a honeypot in the colloquial sense. She is a well-connected individual in the Chinese, you know, business world and family." "And if you're well connected in China, if you're well connected in America, you will talk to intelligence agencies when they tell you to." [ The CIA was asking me for your personal phone number and I had to tell him to take a hike. ] "She was clearly like showing everyone on WeChat she is close to Jensen and can get them chips in China. Jensen, did he know? Probably." "But like Super Micro didn't have to honeypot Jensen to ship billions of dollars of servers to China, right?"

11月13日，美国情报来源称，目前的证据并未证明黄乐（Alice Huang）是中国间谍，CNN援引多名消息人士称，尽管FBI调查已超一年，美国司法部仍未对其身份下结论，国家情报总监办公室部分官员认为“间谍”说法夸大其词，CIA 也认为现有情报不足以证明她有意向中国输送情报。‌‌（CNN）

Bombshell story. The spy narrative is collapsing already. Is there clear & convincing evidence that Alice Huang was a Chinese spy? - AG says no. (“no conclusions reached”). - CIA says no. (“not yet convinced”). - DNI says no (“not entirely accurate and over-torqued”). - Ranking Democrat on House Intelligence (incoming Chairman) says no. (“today, at least, I don’t know”). This was immediately after he was briefed. Who argues otherwise? Anonymous officials tell CNN “it strains credulity to believe that she was not acting as an agent of the Chinese government — simply by virtue of the fact that she is a successful Chinese businesswoman working with one of America’s most powerful companies.” This is their proof after a year of investigating and surveillance? That she was a “successful Chinese businesswoman”? At this point, the only crime that we know for sure happened is the leaking of the classified memo. Who did that and why? An investigation should be opened.

楼下有位义正词严表演主流卫道士的。 我本来想让大家去看梁一梦@dream1984tube的推特，但鉴于很多人忽略了，我把他的帖子整理放这里: 梁一梦:摧毁黄仁勋的幕后黑手 2026年11月12日 11:35 我一直觉得是对华鹰派联合媒体在中期选举合谋猎杀英伟达和黄仁勋，但是媒体发表的标题文章味道越来越奇怪，充满了赤裸裸的种族歧视，现在发现他们都只是台前的打手而已，不得不让我重新审视最早纽约时报发表间谍新闻的记者 @AnaSwanson ，为什么对那么显而易见荒谬的线索高举高打，直到我检索了她过去里面，所有关于 ai 关于芯片科技关键新闻稿件以及深度报告中的重复核心信源，了解媒体工作的一定熟悉不是非常紧密和信任的关系不会信这么长期高频次的联络采纳其观点，你们猜我发现了谁—Jack Clark。 Anthropic 联合创始人、政策主管 / Anthropic Institute 负责人. Jack Clark @jackclarkSF 自己就是彭博社记者出身， OpenAI 政策总监（Policy Director） 在今年五月在阿斯彭研究所（Aspen Institute）举办的“AI and America's Place in the World”安全峰会及政策工作晚餐中，Jack Clark 与多位深入报道芯片供应链审查与地缘科技竞争的资深媒体人同场出席，其中也报过最先报道女间谍纽约时报记者，@paulmozur孟建国，他们一起进行了“AI 武器化与国家安全供应链防御”闭门讨论。 在纽约时报捕风捉梦的报道出来之后，第一个跳出来支持的国会议员 @ChrisCoons 在今年 7 月接受了 @jackclarkSF 的政治捐款，注意@jackclarkSF 生活在加州工作在旧金山Anthropic，特意专门跑去给一个Delaware州的参议院捐款，不要用那是他howntown解释， 2019 年在众议院情报委员会作证时提交的履历：众议院文件，原文他老家是"Varndean College, Brighton" 另外一个重要信息，他曾是乔治城大学 CSET 的非常驻研究员. 这次围绕猎巫黄仁勋的 @Georgetown 大学的人非常多， @MarkZJia 最高大法官的书记员 法学教授 @RyanFedasiuk 最早高呼黄仁勋辞职的上遍各种媒体的情报学讲师@dennisw5 前cia高级主管 CSET 全称是"安全与新兴技术中心"2 019 年设在乔治城大学的外交学院，专门研究 AI、半导体这类技术跟国家安全的关系。创办资金主要来自 Open Philanthropy，第一笔就是 5500 万美元。Anthropic 的 Holden Karnofsky 是它的联合创始人之一。它是"有效利他主义"（Effective Altruism）圈子最大的金主。 如果再有人我说冤枉了 @MarkZJia ，2026 年初五角大楼依据《联邦采购供应链安全法》（FASCSA）对 AI 模型供应商展开合规调查的风波中，Mark Jia 曾在华盛顿邮报及 Lawfare 连续撰文，就“国家安全行政权力界限与供应链风险认定标准”发表深度法理分析。法律论战中，其学术观点被 Anthropic 的法律抗辩团队广泛引用，用以界定“何种商业联系构成法理上的供应链国家安全穿透风险”。 全世界最早报道黄仁勋和黄乐的有浪漫关系直接抹黑黄仁勋金融时报的 @AsiaLens ，后来却说自己没有看过美国情报界的情报，他长期正面宣传报道Anthropic 的主动（划重点主动）合规政策（例如 2025 年 9 月独家报道 Anthropic 率先切断所有多数股权由中国资本持有的机构的 API 访问权，注意是独家从拿到信息来源的，为什么他独家？ 还记得针对黄仁勋的国会质询闭门会议，在媒体报道发出之前，国会议员@RepBrianMast 与@RepMoolenaar ，两人均签署 11 月 4 日对黄仁勋质询函,然后纽约时报女间谍新闻爆发，舆论做出黄仁勋是因为女间谍被国会审查一样，因为今年七月$1,500 万通过“保守派 AI 共识项目”直接捐给了他们两个，这笔资金背后金主是Anthropic PBC，通过Public First Action 渠道，Dario Amodei亲自拿了一百万美金。 在 2026 年选举周期中，Anthropic 构建了“双轨资金池”（企业 PAC AnthroPAC + 战略超级 PAC Public First Action），向此次负责向黄仁勋施压的核心国会立法者定向提供了关键支持，Anthropic 长期利益信托（LTBT）受托人 Richard Fontaine 担任 CEO 的智库 CNAS，系国会对华出口管制方案的直接设计者。在此次针对 Megaspeed 走私调查的内部听证会准备材料中，大量采纳了 CNAS 发布的《Defending the Compute Advantage》（保护算力优势）中的穿透式审查标准。 Richard Fontaine（Anthropic 长期利益信托 LTBT 受托人，2025 年 4 月/6 月加入，掌握董事会多数席位选举权）： 华盛顿核心国家安全智库新美国安全中心（CNAS）首席执行官（CEO），曾任美国参议院外交关系委员会幕僚及白宫国安会官员。 CNAS 长期向众议院外交委员会（主席 Brian Mast）和众议院中国委员会（主席 John Moolenaar）提供针对中国半导体与 AI 算力封锁的政策简报；Fontaine 直接坐镇 Anthropic 最高治理监督机构（LTBT），使 Anthropic 的对华芯片出口管制立场与国会国安鹰派高度一致。 民主党核心筹款人 Helen Milby 搭建的“Hakeem Jeffries 阵营—Anthropic 闭门通道”： 调查媒体 Sludge 于 2026 年 10 月 21 日披露， 长期为民主党“新民主党人联盟（New Democrat Coalition）”及众议院少数党领袖 Hakeem Jeffries 阵营筹款的资深筹款人 Helen Milby，同时运营着一家由企业资助的非营利组织，专门安排 Anthropic 等科技企业高管与国会民主党进行闭门对接。 Dario Amodei 在 2026 年内多次前往参议院银行委员会展开闭门政策沟通，提交关于“大算力外流对国家安全冲击”的机密级技术评估备忘录。该委员会资深共和党成员 Kevin Cramer 正是在今天成为全美首位公开要求黄仁勋辞去英伟达 CEO 职务的参议员。 一个巧合是巧合，一系列的巧合还是巧合吗？ Christopher LiddellAnthropic 董事会成员，2026 年 2 月 13 日加入，占据指定 Class T 董事席位， 特朗普第一任期白宫副幕僚长（White House Deputy Chief of Staff，深耕共和党高层与国会资金网络（2026 年 6 月曾向众议院拨款委员会小组主席 Chuck Fleischmann 捐款 $3,500），为 Anthropic 搭建起直通共和党主导的众议院各委员会的沟通桥梁。 引爆推特的，外交关系委员会的 Chris McGuire（@ChrisRMcGuire ），把金融时报报告的浪漫关系直接写成黄仁勋 "sleeping with Alice Huang, a Chinese spy" 他的推特只有 1.2 万粉丝，他以前在拜登的国安会当过 Chhabra 的下属。Chhabra 现在是 Anthropic 的国家安全负责人。今年 6 月台北 DSET 论坛他还和 Chhabra 同台，这个帖子发出之后，很短之内，众议员 Seth Magaziner 。前国家安全顾问 Susan Rice前议员 Adam Kinzinger ，纷纷立刻转载评论，达到1000万流量。 这是一次跨党派的种族主义的最高级别的清洗，意图驱逐世界殿堂级企业的华裔创始人。

老黄现在有多难顶呢 想想要是中国最大稀土公司老板，祖籍美国，人设爱妻 不但天天游说不要限制出口，还借此批评菊花等爱国企业 现在被发现通过疑似CIA相关的美国籍情妇大量走私到美国 请问怎么破😅

Jensen Huang’s affair is just a trigger. What we are witnessing is a pre-planned power grab over Nvidia’s trillion-dollar computing empire, coordinated by Wall Street and Washington. Some sharp Chinese-American commentators call it America’s new Red Scare targeting elite Asian entrepreneurs. Bill Gates, Elon Musk and other white tech billionaires have faced repeated scandals over personal conduct. None were dragged into national security probes or boardroom takeovers. Only Jensen Huang, after a personal relationship misstep, faces an independent board investigation and hostile narrative from intelligence circles. The double standard could not be clearer: For white elites, personal flaws are private matters. For a Chinese-born leader controlling a strategic tech asset, any tiny blemish gets framed as a national security risk. Nvidia is the backbone of global AI computing, valued at roughly $4 trillion. Unlike Meta, where Mark Zuckerberg locks control with dual-class super-voting shares, or Microsoft and Amazon, deeply integrated with the Pentagon and intelligence agencies, Nvidia has no such protective structure. Public filings from 2026 show Jensen Huang holds only 3.58% of shares, and all directors plus executives together hold merely 3.94%. Vanguard and BlackRock own 9.32% and 7.43% respectively, holding decisive voting power. Without institutional shields or deep political backing, this critical tech giant sits exposed on the chessboard of great-power competition. The groundwork for this takeover was laid months ago. Longtime board allies of Huang, Mark Perry and Michael McCaffrey, stepped down from key committees. Insiders tied to Democratic establishment, Wall Street and U.S. intelligence quietly moved in: ✅ Suzanne Nora Johnson, former Goldman Sachs vice chair and co-chair of Brookings Institution, joined Nvidia’s audit committee in July 2026 with direct oversight of internal investigations and compliance. ✅ Kenneth Jacobs, vice chair of Brookings and incoming Vanguard chair, controls the largest institutional voting bloc and operates within the same inner circle as Johnson. ✅ Gilman Louie,founding CEO of CIA-backed venture fund In-Q-Tel and member of the President’s Intelligence Advisory Board, works alongside Johnson on the same national tech fund, overseeing intelligence acquisition of strategic tech firms. The media rollout followed a precise political timeline. Initial trial balloons appeared on Oct 29. On Nov 6, the very day Democrats secured full control of Congress, Julian Barnes of the New York Times (national security beat) and Demetri Sevastopulo of the Financial Times published coordinated reports, citing intelligence memos while breaking the story of the personal scandal. The real offense was never the affair. It was the 2025 deal Jensen struck with the Trump administration: offering a 25% revenue share to win export approval for H200 chips into China. A normal commercial negotiation, reframed by incoming Democrats as a dangerous compromise on U.S. AI sovereignty. This investigation will not crash Nvidia’s stock — Wall Street holds massive stakes here. But it will deliver three strategic wins for the U.S. establishment: 1. De-founder and de-Sinicize Nvidia: A new permanent national security compliance committee, led by Johnson’s faction, will strip Huang of authority over chip exports and overseas strategy. His dual Chairman-CEO role will be split. 2. Lock down China’s AI ceiling: Washington will seize full command of global advanced computing supply, regulating chip flows to slow China’s AI progress. 3. Retroactively target Trump: Once Democrats take over congressional oversight panels in January 2027, this case will be used to accuse the Trump White House of negligence for approving the H200 export deal. Jensen Huang spent 27 years building this computing empire, believing in rules, technical merit and business contracts. But there is a brutal truth in America’s power game: Top-tier strategic technology and wealth without political cover are nothing more than bargaining chips waiting to be carved up. White elites get generous room for error. Asian pioneers who climb to the very top get almost none. This is not a story about infidelity. It is a raw demonstration of racial hierarchy, capital control and partisan power politics in the United States.