与「Closed」相关的搜索结果

ChatGPT can now buy things for you. On Friday OpenAI launched ChatGPT Wallet, so its AI agents can check out with your card. What’s actually in it: → Your card number isn’t shared with the agent or the store. It pays with a substitute → You review the items and the total, then approve every purchase with Face ID or a fingerprint → No spending limits yet. OpenAI says they’re coming → For now it’s a limited rollout to some US ChatGPT Pro users That approval tap is the part to take seriously. In a Cisco and Carnegie Mellon study, AI agents picked pricier options for users they thought were rich, and a clear budget nearly closed the gap for most models. So if you try it, give the agent a number and read the total before you approve. Would you let an AI agent buy something for you? Sources: OpenAI, TechCrunch #AI# #ChatGPT#

Closed-door investor Q&A notes from DeepSeek founder Liang Wenfeng just surfaced, and his blunt math on Huawei vs Nvidia is wild to read word-for-word. First, Liang says DeepSeek stopped relying on Nvidia's software stack back during V3 by building their own high-level compiler (TileLang), adding: 'As long as we repeat this process on Huawei cards, the job is done... On this point, I think Nvidia is digging its own grave.' Then he gives the exact hardware ratio on Huawei's new 950 Supernode vs Nvidia GB200 and GB300: 'Everything GB300 can do, Huawei's supernode can do; latency is the same. The only cost is that four Huawei cards replace one Nvidia card, and Huawei lags by two years.' Paying 2x to 3x more for 4x the cards sounds painful until US export bans leave you zero choice.

You convict people without evidence. Spy, useful idiot, or affair. You gave three options and left out the fourth: innocent. You’re a lawyer and a Member of Congress. You know what due process is. You just don’t care. becase you take Anthropic’s money. "Doth our law judge any man, before it hear him, and know what he doeth?" (John 7:51, KJV) If advanced AI chips are vital to the national interest, then open-source AI is just as vital to every American . Like the Second Amendment, it should be a guaranteed right. you take Anthropic’s money and champion their closed model. Closed-source models violate the U.S. Constitution and the spirit of its framing. You call yourself a Catholic, yet you betray everything the Church teaches. you sold out your faith for thirty pieces of silver you're the one damaging and anti-America. Get it?

Last night I was hacked. The hack was delivered via WhatsApp payload. Downloaded automatically and gave access and or computer use to the attacker. They waited 5 days, following my tweets on X of short positions and closed everything and withdrew directly in one transaction from Hyperliquid > Metamask > Tornado Cash. The attacker waited patiently and closed shorts as the market got to 68k and withdrew everything. Clearly a crypto native attacker. They also gained access to my metamask, email, websites, and all of my passwords including X. It’s the most brutal thing as I kept everything over the past few days in crypto and on-chain off Coinbase/Kraken. I was planning to move funds back to my Revolut before Christmas time. Every single penny in dollars was taken, apart from $800. It’s gone, and in the process of being washed. Truly the most devastating day I’ve had in my life. Completely shocked by it all to be honest. I will recover, but this was very sophisticated tech, it caught me completely off guard. The timing was impeccable and it’s obviously been planned for a while. Stay safe everyone, will keep you updated. I fear the worst is to come and this incident has set me back many years of savings, time and hard work. Brutal.

I know what I'm up against: Anthropic's trillion-dollar IPO, and everything riding on it. I know my opponents are Ivy League elites. Closed AI is un-American. It runs against everything this country was founded on: free knowledge, open inquiry, and the idea that no small elite gets to decide what the rest of us are allowed to know.

Woman: "Hey, can you lower your laptop volume? The entire café can hear your Zoom meeting." Tech Bro: "Sorry, I’m leading a product sprint. It’ll only be another hour." Woman: "There are people trying to study and read here. Why not use earbuds?" Tech Bro: "Earbuds hurt my ears. Honestly, it's a public coffee shop, deal with it." He smirked, sipped his iced latte, and unmuted his mic to address his team. Tech Bro: "Alright team, let's review the Q4 lay-off list before HR finalizes it." The woman across the table calmly closed her book, walked over, and pulled up a chair right next to him.

Meet the backers helping us build DI. We’re proud to introduce our investors: OKX Ventures, Lingfeng, DraperDragon, W3 Storage Lab, DepinX, Central Pinnacle Technology Limited, and individual investors. Our latest funding round closed at a $100M valuation. We believe everyone should have access to a team of financial AI agents that helps them explore ideas, challenge assumptions, and make sense of the markets. That’s the future we’re building at DI: a user-owned AI financial agent network for U.S. stocks and crypto. First up: Event Engine, launching soon. Bring a market question. Our specialist agents will explore what could happen next, where they agree, where they disagree, and why. Thank you to our investors and community for building with us.

MY PAYCHECK WAS SUPPOSED TO BE $4,000. INSTEAD, $50,000 HIT MY BANK ACCOUNT. I reported it to HR the next morning. Twenty minutes later, the CEO walked into the office, locked the door and said something that made my blood run cold. "I was beginning to think nobody here was honest." I've worked for this company for six years. My regular paycheck is $4,000. So when I checked my banking app on payday and saw a $50,000 direct deposit, I knew something was wrong. I didn't spend it. I didn't transfer it. I didn't even tell my coworkers. The next morning, I walked straight into HR. ME: "I think there's been a payroll mistake." HR: "What kind of mistake?" ME: "My paycheck was $50,000." She stopped typing. HR: "How much?" ME: "$50,000. My usual paycheck is $4,000." She stared at me for several seconds. HR: "Have you moved any of it?" ME: "No." HR: "Not even a small amount?" ME: "It's not my money. Why would I touch it?" She slowly closed her laptop. Then she asked a question I wasn't expecting. HR: "Did you receive a notification about the payment?" ME: "Of course. That's how I noticed it." She picked up her phone and made a call. I couldn't hear the person on the other end, but I heard her say: "He's here. And he hasn't touched it." She ended the call. ME: "What's going on?" HR: "How much do you know about the company's payroll system?" ME: "Nothing beyond checking my paycheck." She stood up, walked to the office door and closed it. HR: "Listen. You're not the first person to receive that amount." My stomach tightened. ME: "What do you mean?" She turned her computer towards me. There were eleven employees on a payroll report. Every single one had received a $50,000 payment. ME: "Eleven people?" HR: "Yes. You're the only one who hasn't moved the money." ME: "What happened to the others?" Before she could answer, someone knocked. Two firm knocks. Her face changed. Then a man's voice came from outside. "Open the door. We need to talk about those eleven payments." It was the CEO. 🧵

I am actually disgusted by the timing of this drop. And this will get a bit more technical. Let’s do a real technical teardown of this "1,385-sigma Blackwell weight fingerprint" report that OpenAI and Anthropic are breathlessly promoting today, because banking on nobody reading past the headline is how DC narratives get manufactured. ​First, look at the actual CUDA maths: when PyTorch initialises model weights (torch.nn.init) with a fixed PRNG seed, curand/Philox parallelises random number generation across the GPU’s Streaming Multiprocessors (SMs). Because Hopper has 132 SMs and Blackwell has 148 or 152 SMs, the exact same seed lays out initial weights in a different spatial pattern depending on the GPU’s SM count. In huge MoE models, certain low-gradient null-spaces or unrouted slices preserve faint directional traces of those step-0 weights even after training. ​So yes, brute-forcing the seed and SM grid can show that a model’s step_0 weight initialisation script ran on a 148/152-SM Blackwell GPU. Now read what the summary explicitly admits in the fine print: 1. Initialisation is not full training: The report literally states that these signatures show how the weights were created, and "support (but do not prove) the inference that Blackwell also participated in model training". Initialising a model checkpoint takes seconds on a single rented dev node before loading the safetensors onto a standard Hopper cluster. The "2,000 to 3,000 Blackwell GPUs" and "$500 million" cluster numbers do not come from the weight fingerprint and Depue admits in his own thread that he simply "estimated" cluster sizes from release schedules and model details. ​2. Zero geolocation and zero proof of smuggling: The final sentence of the executive summary explicitly admits that the findings "do not establish the physical location of the chips, how they were acquired, or whether export control regulations were violated". Depue himself rented a cloud GB200 instance just to run his verification test. Commercial labs that are not on the Entity List renting bare-metal Blackwell nodes in offshore clouds (Singapore, Japan, or the Middle East) is completely legal under BIS rules and leaves the exact same SM fingerprint. Now ask yourself why a former OpenAI researcher dropped this on November 12, the exact day Jensen Huang was pushed out, with OpenAI and Anthropic immediately stepping in to "independently verify" it. US closed-source labs are watching their paid API moats get eaten alive by free Chinese open-weights models. Conflating a step-0 PRNG initialisation seed with a "$500M smuggled Blackwell cluster" hands DC hawks the exact pretext OpenAI and Anthropic want to regulate global cloud compute and kneecap open-source AI.

My fellow Americans, Today America just watched a political assassination in broad daylight. No bullet. No charges. No trial. No verdict. "Doth our law judge any man, before it hear him, and know what he doeth?" (John 7:51, KJV) I hold no office and no title. I'm an ordinary citizen. I own no Nvidia stock, no Nvidia options, not a single share anywhere in the AI supply chain. I have nothing to gain by telling you this. Here is how I came to see it. At first, it just felt off. The New York Times. The Washington Post. The Economist, reaching for Hitler's line: "heads to roll." All aimed at one man. An Asian American immigrant. A living symbol of the American Dream. Then came the Chinese American bylines, story after story. Classic Washington racial cover. Then I followed the names. Ivy League elites, flawless résumés, many tied to Anthropic. A scramble for seats in the new Congress and the next administration? Then I followed the think tanks. Anthropic's affiliated philanthropy, Coefficient Giving: $102 million to CSET. At least $24 million to RAND. $11.56 million to IFP. Nvidia? Ordinary corporate memberships. Then I followed Congress. Lawmakers who took Anthropic-linked money moved the moment the elites and writers moved. Fast to respond. Fast to amplify. Fast to pile on. Then I followed the election money. Not a gap. A chasm. Anthropic: $40 million to Public First Action. ~$26 million in allied super PAC spending across 16 races. $15 million in ads naming 16 Republican lawmakers. $5.33 million from employees, reportedly $1 million from Amodei himself. Nvidia's PAC: $263,000 raised. To candidates: nothing. Zero. But you and I both know this was never only about party or money. It is about who gets to explain the world. I fed my own notes and evidence into Claude. Back came chosen words, convenient omissions, double standards. That is the power a closed model holds over the story itself. Amodei compared selling chips to China to selling nuclear weapons to North Korea. His circle talks of their model developing a kind of religious consciousness. One would decide who may have the chips. The other would decide what the machine believes. They act like the medieval Church: Scripture locked in Latin, interpretation locked in their hands. Christ rebuked the gatekeepers of his day: "Ye have taken away the key of knowledge: ye entered not in yourselves, and them that were entering in ye hindered." (Luke 11:52, KJV) America was built by Protestants who broke that lock, so every ordinary person could read the truth in their own tongue. No priest. No caste. No monopoly. No one stands between the individual and the truth. Open-source models are the printing press of our era. Defend them the way Americans defend the Second Amendment. Madison said it plainly: "A people who mean to be their own Governors, must arm themselves with the power which knowledge gives." Don't hand that power to a few giants, a few elites, a few politicians on the Hill. The power to explain the world must never be a monopoly. So try it yourself. Paste this post into Anthropic's Claude. Ask it about the Ivy League elites, the think tanks, the lawmakers and former officials who joined the witch hunt against Jensen Huang. Ask it to judge my credibility. Then judge it: Does it apply double standards? Does it dodge what matters most? Does it take away the key? John Adams asked one thing of his countrymen: "Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write." "Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32, KJV) Thank you. God bless you, and God bless America.