与「DID」相关的搜索结果

HISTORY MADE: Starship Ship 42 has been caught by the launch tower! After roughly 22.5 hours in space and 14 orbits around Earth, Ship 42 returned from orbit and performed a controlled landing back at the launch site. It deployed 26 Starlink V3 satellites, tested its heat shield with onboard cameras, and demonstrated a controlled atmospheric re-entry. Then came the incredible moment: Ship 42 flipped upright, reignited its engines, and was caught by the tower's mechanical arms. The Super Heavy booster didn't make its planned catch, but Ship 42 pulled off something never achieved before. The first successful launch-tower catch of a Starship upper stage. A massive milestone for reusable rocketry!

we have all seen the comparison going around token prices in 2021 vs today. i wanted to do one for @BNBCHAIN on what it was in 2021 and what it has become. during all these years, fundamentals didn't just hold, they kept getting stronger. “build and build” (and still, the price followed with a first 4 digit all time high last year). plus with the new L1 in the works the future is already being prepared. extremely bullish on what's coming for this ecosystem.

The trade you didn't take might teach you more than the one you actually executed. That's an idea I've been thinking about while following @Hypesium. In fast-moving on-chain markets, traders naturally focus on completed transactions. They remember their entries, exits, profits, and losses. But what about the opportunities they deliberately ignored? A new token launches, volume begins increasing, and the chart suddenly moves higher. You notice it, examine the available information, and decide not to enter. An hour later, the price has doubled. It's easy to look back and call that decision a mistake. But I don't think that's always fair. If the token had insufficient liquidity, unclear contract information, or risks outside your strategy, avoiding the trade may have been completely reasonable. Hypesium provides a Telegram-based trading workflow focused on the Elysium ecosystem, where multiple launchpads create a constant stream of potential opportunities. What interests me is how traders can develop better judgment while navigating that environment. I believe missed trades deserve their own research journal. Record what caught your attention, why you decided against entering, and what happened afterward. Over time, those observations might reveal useful patterns. Perhaps your filters are too restrictive. Perhaps they consistently protect you from unstable launches. Or perhaps certain market conditions deserve further investigation. The important part is evaluating the original decision without letting hindsight rewrite the reasoning. For me, @Hypesium is interesting because easier market access makes selectivity even more important. You don't need to participate in every opportunity to learn from it. Sometimes watching a market without risking capital is the most productive decision. Would you rather track only your completed trades or also study the opportunities you deliberately skipped?

I stopped checking my watchlist, and @onlystreetsfun is the reason, while @rarelistio keeps the board for the people still watching screens. My watchlist is a street now. I walk the same route every morning and the street updates itself: a new shutter, a fresh poster, a dog in a different spot. No charts, no candles, no refresh button. The street does not need me to click anything. It just changes while I walk. That is the part I keep coming back to. A watchlist asks me to sit and stare. A street asks me to move, and moving makes me richer in attention than staring ever did. Would you trade your watchlist for a walk?

A Detailed Update on the Indian Police Freeze Case Let’s start with the most important point. Gate is an independent third party. We don’t make decisions about funds in this case based on one side’s evidence, and we have not committed to any asset handover. Every request is reviewed internally, case by case, and no assets have been handed over. Since 2025, we have continuously put legal resources into this case and worked to keep communication open for the user. We did not take the authorities’ request at face value. Where things currently stand: 1. After the freeze request arrived in September 2025, our AML team kept asking the police for more evidence, and our legal team kept requesting supporting documents. The on-chain records the police provided are detailed and involve multiple wallets and fund flows. When a handover related request came in April 2026, we did not simply comply. We kept asking for more material and held to case by case review. When we followed up with the police in September 2026, they confirmed the case is still under court review. Under the court order, Gate continues to hold the funds while the user has the chance to respond. 2. We kept the user informed. The day the police told us the charge sheet had been filed, we asked whether we could share case progress with the user. Once the police agreed, we updated the affected users so they could follow the proceedings and seek legal advice. The local counsel we retained is also in contact with local police and the court, to help the user find a lawful way to respond. 3. Our local counsel has advised that Gate can’t mount a defense or challenge the court order on the user’s behalf. However, they have also confirmed that the user can do so through the court process. We will keep helping the user communicate with the right parties and understand how that process works. To reiterate: Gate has a duty to cooperate with judicial investigations, but we do not dispose of user funds based on one side’s evidence. The case is still ongoing. We will keep working between all parties and share updates as soon as we can. Gate November 15, 2026

FAN SZN with @IPXExchange As a creator, do I ever hold the raised money directly? Only the part that's unlocked. The rest stays in escrow until its stage is approved. Picture a concert tour: Ticket sales sit in a box-office account the tour manager can't touch Each stage's installment opens only after that stage is signed off The tour manager takes one installment at a time, never the whole box at once Here's how it works, per IPX: 1. Raised capital never sits in a creator's wallet. It's held in a non-custodial smart contract escrow 2. Before the raise, the creator submits a line-by-line budget. IPX says its AI agent, Alfred, sets it up in a contract tied to milestones, and that CertiK audited it 3. After the project graduates, its budget moves into a separate escrow. A stage unlocks once the creator submits proof and the platform approves it, and then it's available for the creator to transfer My read: as a creator, I'd hold an installment only after I prove its stage, and never the whole raise up front. Real count, from IPX's text: it names 3 example stages: pre-production, filming and post-production. Made-up scenario, not a real project: a film uses those 3 stages. Pre-production is approved, so 1 of 3 installments is available to transfer. Filming and post-production stay in escrow until they pass their checks. My take: the first thing I'd ask is how long an approval takes. If a stage sits locked while I wait, that could hold up the whole shoot. What comes out the other end, per IPX? • Each stage's installment, after its milestone is approved • A record of every request, approval and release on IPX and Base, so supporters can follow along • What a creator pays, if anything: I didn't find it listed, so I'd check the project terms The honest part: • IPX says unlocks happen automatically with no human gatekeepers, and also says the platform approves each milestone. I couldn't find how those fit together or how long an approval takes • The Defiant labels the announcement "Presented by IPX," and I haven't seen anyone outside IPX confirm how it runs • I haven't seen it run on a live project yet So before I launch, I'd find out who approves each milestone and how long an approval takes. I'll want both answers before I confirm. Why this matters for creators and fans: → Creators know the payout path before they launch → Fans can see which stages are open and follow each release → Both sides work from the same milestones Source: IPX's router announcement and its KPI-Gated Escrow announcement Which would you check first: the budget lines or who approves each milestone?

I LAUNCHED A GROK BOT TERMINAL OVERNIGHT, GAVE IT $44.82 AND STOPPED ASKING AI WHAT IT WOULD DO. BY MORNING IT HAD $11,643.21 AND SIX AGENTS LOGGING EVERY TRADE I spent a year asking agents what they'd trade and watching the chat scroll. Last weekend I built the thing that actually trades, in Grok Bot, with no code I touched by hand. The six agents share one screen, each one job: > scanner reads new token pairs and volume spikes > rug check filters suspicious tokens before anything executes > sizer sets position from account equity, not a fixed ticket > executor opens and closes with slippage tracking > logger writes the reason behind every trade > equity curve updates on every close I went to bed on $44.82 and left the laptop open on the dashboard. By morning the balance read $11,643.21. Every trade on the activity feed had a reason next to it and a line in the log. That's the shift I didn't see coming. Not that an agent made money overnight. That I stopped being the one asking "would you long this?" and started being the one reading the log of what already happened. Starting balance: $44.82 Current balance: $11,643.21 Grok Bot built the terminal, the agent architecture and the dashboard. I described what I wanted and the thing went live. The full build is in the article below ↓ The whole build is in the post below ↓ Comment " Grok_Bot " 2️⃣ Like and Repost 3️⃣ Follow me @EaStEnRaY1 I'll DM you the complete setup.