注册并分享邀请链接,可获得视频播放与邀请奖励。

与「ENR」相关的搜索结果

ENR 贴吧
一个关键词就是一个贴吧,路径全站唯一。
创建贴吧
用户
未找到
包含 ENR 的内容
Vice President Vance on the Trump Administration's H1B visa reforms: "The H-1B should not exist to replace American workers with low-wage foreigners. It should exist to enrich the American economy."
显示更多
0
3.1K
17.9K
2.5K
转发到社区
A director who doesn't come up to the builder's heels makes a four-hour film about him. Yesterday in Venice, Alex Gibney's nearly four-hour documentary "Musk" had its world premiere. It is a classic case of someone who has spent a career telling other people's stories taking on a man who actually builds those stories with rockets, cars, satellites, and infrastructure, not slides. Alex Gibney is an acclaimed documentarian. An Oscar for Taxi to the Dark Side, Emmys for Going Clear on Scientology, high-profile films on Enron, Elizabeth Holmes and Theranos. His specialty is exposing corporations, cults, and frauds. He does it skillfully and with a thesis. The problem starts when he applies the same method to someone who is not selling an illusion, but hardware that either flies or blows up in front of the entire world. Gibney's fuel is controversy. Elon's fuel is the pursuit of truth hard, engineering truth, the kind that either works on the test stand or it doesn't. It would have been enough to make a film based on facts. Instead we got another rut that fits the slogans of provocation: megalomaniac, confidence man, threat to democracy, an AI avatar reciting old quotes, ex-wives, his father, a former partner. Musk said in 2023 it would be a hit piece. After the premiere, a large share of reviewers effectively agreed with him. I don't know about you, but four hours of falsified formulas would bore me. Instead I watch how much Elon has already done. His energy is extraordinary. Tesla changed the car industry. SpaceX brings rockets back. Starlink works. Starship stands on the pad and prepares for the next flight. This is not a PowerPoint. It is steel, fuel, engines, and people who cannot hide failure in the edit suite. A weak documentary like this is a crumb on the shoulder of his jacket. Now it depends on us when and how quickly that blown-off crumb a utopian attention vampire is simply starved of attention. You could list the names of people who tried to take Elon's energy. Energy is the most precious thing we have. Anyone who steals it with slogans, gossip, and a four-hour indictment that excludes the main subject is sowing under his own feet. Gibney: you reap what you sow. If you have a shred of shame, look at the list of Elon's accomplishments. Look at what kind of person he is for the world and what he does around himself so that things get better cars that drive, internet from orbit, rockets that return, attempts at a brain-computer interface, AI that is supposed to be more than another chatbot. You can dislike his tweets, his political alliances. You cannot honestly erase the scale of what was physically built. A good documentarian should stand, at least for a moment, in the shoes of the person he is portraying. Gibney did not just fail to do that. He took a measure cut for Enron and Holmes and held it up to a man who lands rockets. He left Elon's shoes in the edit suite. Elon walked on barefoot and kept building. One man tells stories about the world from an editing chair. The other moves that world. A four-hour film will not change that. At most it will confirm what people who already disliked Musk already believed. Everyone else can blow the crumb off the jacket and keep going. History does not judge a man by the length of a film. It judges him by what is still in the air when the camera has stopped running. Controversy feeds on attention. Building feeds on repetition. One vanishes when you look away. The other keeps flying. You can cut a man together in four hours. You cannot cut a landing together. A documentary can be switched off. The work cannot.
显示更多
0
48
637
69
转发到社区
The X Safety team conducted an investigation into suspected Chinese inauthentic accounts involved in influence operations: We identified a bot farm of approximately 200,000 accounts. Within this farm, we found 200 accounts posting in a manner that could manipulate a legitimate debate about American AI and energy policy. These posts contained claims that AI data centers are driving up household electricity prices and straining the grid. Others included AI-generated cartoons that depicted data-center operators enriching themselves at the public's expense. We remain committed to maintaining an open and authentic platform where people debate topics of public interest. We take seriously any attempts to undermine the integrity of the global town square and suspend accounts that violate our Authenticity policy.
显示更多
0
240
3.6K
916
转发到社区
BREAKING 🚨: CLAUDE CAN'T RUN YOUR WHOLE COMPANY YET. IT CAN RUN YOUR WHOLE OUTBOUND. NOT DATA. NOT ENRICHMENT. NOT TEMPLATES. RESEARCH, VERIFICATION, AND A PERSONALIZED COLD EMAIL IN UNDER 2 MINUTES. $30 FREE CREDITS 👇
显示更多
This week, @ActinideInc became the first startup in history to enrich uranium, producing HALEU, the fuel for next-gen and small modular reactors. We did it using Endurance, a particle accelerator that we designed and built in Texas. Endurance usually produces enriched Yb-176, a precursor for cancer therapies worth roughly $30,000 per gram. After a bulk Yb-176 delivery on July 30, we reconfigured Endurance for uranium.
显示更多
0
231
3.6K
390
转发到社区
🚨 ÚLTIMAS NOTÍCIAS! O engenheiro que criou o Claude Code do zero acabou de publicar um vídeo de 28 minutos que é ouro puro : como escrever prompts que realmente entregam resultados absurdamente bons. Já vi cursos de US$ 300 que nem chegam perto do que ele explica nos primeiros 10 minutos. Arquivos CLAUDE. md, atalhos de memória, sessões paralelas e padrões de prompting que quase ninguém usa… Tudo em um único vídeo. Totalmente gratuito. Sem enrolação. Não importa se você é desenvolvedor, está começando agora ou já usa o Claude há meses : isso muda o jogo para você a partir de hoje. Salve. Assista. Compartilhe.
显示更多
0
33
2.7K
501
转发到社区
A Jeju police officer was arrested today for deliberately shutting down missing-person cases — not one or two, but roughly 298 of them. He told families their loved ones were safe, then quietly deleted the cases from the missing-persons system. The case cracked open because of Jang Mi-ran's disappearance, which turned out to expose a far larger cover-up. Jang Mi-ran, 37, went missing on May 12. Her boyfriend reported it, and the officer assigned to the case told him he'd reached her, that she was safe, and that she didn't want her location shared — then closed the file that same night. It later emerged there was no record police had ever actually contacted her. Once the officer was identified and implicated, investigators went back through his past cases. Between August 22 and 24, they found four bodies of people who had been reported missing — Jang Mi-ran among them, found 104 days after she disappeared, just a few minutes' walk from where she'd been staying. The other three were men, two in their 60s and one in his 70s. Since prosecutors' authority to conduct supplementary investigation was abolished, public anxiety has been mounting over how a single officer could kill hundreds of cases with almost no way for anyone to catch it. Video: the family, enraged, confronts the officer. (Chanel A News)
显示更多
0
451
70.7K
12.4K
转发到社区
-White woman gets a year long visa in India -Gets culturally enriched immediately and wants to leave after 2 weeks
0
2.4K
62K
7.5K
转发到社区
🚨🔴🔵 Luis Enrique on Bradley Barcola and Ibrahima Mbaye out of PSG squad tonight: “I’ll talk about the situation after the transfer window has passed”.
0
295
40.9K
1.4K
转发到社区