注册并分享邀请链接,可获得视频播放与邀请奖励。

与「GR」相关的搜索结果

GR 贴吧
一个关键词就是一个贴吧,路径全站唯一。
创建贴吧
用户
未找到
包含 GR 的内容
Tomorrow, football honors one of its greatest quarterbacks 🙌 @ProFootballHOF Enshrinement -- Aug. 8 12pm ET on @NFLNetwork Stream on @NFLPlus
0
11
21
0
转发到社区
5. Even after 9 years of growth, one of the industry’s biggest unresolved challenges is still trust at scale — how to make digital assets more secure, more intuitive, and more accessible for billions of people across very different markets and regulatory environments. That is not a challenge any one company solves overnight. But what we are doing today is continuing to invest in the fundamentals: stronger security, better compliance frameworks, more resilient infrastructure, and simpler user experiences. At the same time, we are working to help the industry mature in a way that protects users while preserving the innovation that makes this space so powerful. The opportunity ahead is enormous, but long-term leadership comes from solving hard problems responsibly. That is where our focus remains.
显示更多
3. The future of finance should work for everyone, not just the few. We believe more people around the world will benefit from open access, faster cross-border payments, and new ways to build and grow wealth through blockchain. We see Binance evolving beyond an exchange, but not away from its crypto-native roots. Our focus is to bring the best of crypto — openness, access, speed, and user choice — into a broader financial experience for the next wave of users. Binance is here to help lower barriers, connect global opportunity, and bring financial freedom to more people everywhere. Over time, the line between “crypto” and “finance” may matter less. What users will care about is whether it’s seamless, transparent, and useful. The future isn’t crypto vs finance — it’s better finance.
显示更多
2026 Big League Wiffle Ball World Series champions 😭🔥 The Green Apples win it all with a no-hitter at the ESPN Wide World of Sports Complex 🏆 #TheOcho#
0
87
930
41
转发到社区
一台 GB300 NVL72: → 72 颗 GB300 (Blackwell Ultra) GPU + 36 颗 Grace CPU。 → 单卡显存:GB300 288 GB HBM3e → 整机柜总显存:72 × 288 GB ≈ 20.7 TB → NVLink 总带宽约 130 TB/s → 全机柜通过 NVLink 5 连成统一内存池,可以视为一张拥有 20TB 显存的“超大 GPU”。 DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 核心规格: →304B 参数(0731 仓库包含 DSpark speculative decoding 模块) → 基础模型 284B → 13B activated → 1M context → 官方权重为 FP8 + FP4 Mixed 加油 OpenCode !
显示更多
UKRAINIAN WOMAN HOLDING ONTO HER BOYFRIEND AS HE’S FORCED ONTO THE FRONT LINE INTO THE MEAT GRINDER
0
410
11.6K
816
转发到社区
Native USDC and CCTP are now live on @XLayerOfficial by @okx! PSPs, fintechs, AI agents, and DeFi apps and protocols on X Layer can now access the world’s largest regulated dollar stablecoin for a range of use cases: → DeFi activity: Use USDC as collateral to enable onchain lending, borrowing, and spot and perps trading with 24/7 settlement → Crosschain money movement: Move USDC seamlessly across chains with CCTP for robust liquidity access to power swaps, purchases, and treasury management → AI-powered workflows: Support agentic payments on X Layer’s x402 ecosystem, enabling automated AI agent payments for services, APIs, and more → Institutional-grade settlement: Seamless USDC issuance and redemption on X Layer via Circle Mint for qualified businesses Day 1 apps: @OKX, OKX DEX Bridge With this integration, USDC is supported natively on 36 blockchains. CCTP is now available on 26 blockchains and enables secure USDC crosschain transfers.
显示更多
0
21
143
19
转发到社区
Very welcome recent news from Signal: they are working on letting you register an account without a phone number. That said, an important counterpoint about what this would and would not accomplish. The good #1#: reducing dependence on phone numbers. Even aside from privacy benefits, reducing dependency on a highly oligopolistic system of chokepoints is good in itself. The good #2#: phone numbers are for many people not a good "root" of identity from an access control perspective. Phone numbers get sim swapped all the time. The good #3#: allowing phone-number-free accounts will make it harder for them in the future to discriminate against people by country - and so make it harder for governments to pressure them to block their own citizens. Now, on privacy. Significantly better than status quo, so yes it is good #4#, but... In practice, in 2026, I believe that pseudonymity (a long-term persistent account that is not tied to your primary identity) is a dead concept. There are just too many channels by which we accidentally slowly leak data about who we are - timing of messages, the pattern of who we send messages to with what frequency, size, etc. And too many highly effective AI-based means (both using LLMs per-user, and LLMs helping every person and agency under the sun use math that we had all along) to uncover and piece together those hints. As a trivial example, whatever server you interact with learns your IP address, but even if you hide *that* with a VPN or Tor, there are many other identity leakage vectors. And so the only defensible form of privacy is *message-by-message unlinkability* - no one except sender and receiver knows the (sender, receiver) pair, ideally even not knowing who the sender or the receiver are. A natural taxonomy of privacy is the following 2x2: * Sitting duck: adversary knows "X did Y" * Confidentiality: adversary knows "X did ???" [E2E encryption provides this] * Anonymity: adversary knows "??? did Y" [aka message-by-message unlinkability] * Ideal: adversary knows "??? did ???" Signal has already had confidentiality for a long time. (Note: in other contexts, "confidentiality" sometimes means "someone knows X did Y, and we trust that someone to not reveal it", ie. not true privacy. Here, by confidentiality we mean hiding contents from third parties) This adds pseudonymity: in the above schema, adversary knows "0x8b512c... did Y", where they don't initially know who 0x8b512c... is, but may figure that out over time. The ideal is getting to message-by-message unlinkability. Actually accomplishing that gets into territory that is currently being explored by mixnet projects as well as newer messengers, eg. @session_app and @SimpleXChat. Once we get deeper into this territory, I suspect the primary frontier will be spam and DoS protection. Right now, much of the internet blocks all Tor exit nodes - not because they personally hate privacy, but because that's where DoS attacks come from. So we need ways for people to prove their non-spammer status while maintaining message-by-message unlinkability. See here for one direction (which complements nicely). So I hope that we appreciate the victory that is mainstreaming of end-to-end encryption, that we actually get Signal accounts without phone number dependency (it's a great thing even if it had zero privacy consequences), and then that we keep moving forward and pushing the frontier of data leakage minimization.
显示更多
@grok : 假如一年后你赚不到500万就会被枪毙,你怎么办,有什么具体的办法? 注意不是抢是赚啊。
SpaceX is SIGNIFICANTLY undervalued if you believe Elon and the team can execute on what they just laid out. At today’s ~$1.51T market cap, SpaceX trades at roughly 48-66x sales. Is it expensive based on today’s numbers? Sure. But look at what happens if the SpaceX team hits the targets shared on the Q2 earnings call: • $100B ARR by the end of 2026 → ~15x Price/Sales • $1 Trillion in annual revenue by 2030 → ~1.5x Price/Sales And fyi, that $1T target was pulled forward from 2031, with Elon saying there’s even a non-zero chance of reaching it in 2029. You see, SpaceX doesn’t need to stay at a 50x+ sales multiple for today’s valuation to eventually look cheap. If revenue grows ANYWHERE close to management’s roadmap, the denominator catches up super fast and the valuation multiple collapses. At the same $1.51T market cap, you go from ~48-66x sales today to ~15x at $100B ARR, and eventually just ~1.5x at $1T in revenue. So investment thesis is actually pretty simple… Either 1/ management’s targets are wildly wrong… or 2/ SpaceX at $1.51T is still pricing in far less of the future than people realize. I’m putting $ where my mouth is that the latter is the case.
显示更多
0
25
270
41
转发到社区