与「INFORMA」相关的搜索结果

This March, we introduced Ask Maps, the biggest @googlemaps update in a decade. Now, we’re making it even more helpful and bringing it to more people. 🌏 Expanded availability: Rolling out in Australia, Brazil, Canada, Indonesia, Japan and Mexico, along with over 150 countries and territories in English. ✨Get more done with Ask Maps: Including complex, multi-step tasks, like ordering food – along with finding the perfect hotel or discovering nearby events. ⌚Real-time transit information: Stay informed about up-to-the-minute delays and conditions for your bus, train, and more. 💬Personal intelligence and past conversations: Choose to securely connect @Gmail so Ask Maps can automatically reference booking details, like a hotel reservation or flight information. You can also pick up conversations just where you left them. 🗣️An easier way to help your community: Share tips and suggest edits to a place conversationally, like changing a store’s hours, right in Ask Maps and the Contribute tab.

Ask Maps is getting an upgrade. 🔍✨ Now powered by agentic capabilities, real-time information, and Personal Intelligence, Ask Maps is transforming how you plan and move through the world.

Tomorrow will be my last day at Google after 27 years, and watching it grow from 25 people to 190,000+ has been an amazing journey. Below is a note I shared with many people internally at Google today. An excerpt is: It has been an absolute pleasure to work with you and to help build some of the most widely used and impactful products of all time. As a kid, I dreamed of helping build software that would be used by many people, and Google now has thirteen products used by more than a billion people (amazing!). Our work has had a tremendous impact in the world, and I have been lucky enough to collaborate and form friendships with many colleagues that I deeply admire, respect, and enjoy. It still brings me joy every time I see people out in the world using our products to find information, handle email, translate documents, watch videos, learn new things, navigate and understand the physical world, browse the web, use their phone, run large-scale computations on our infrastructure, ride in an autonomous vehicle, or perform complex tasks with the help of our AI systems. I hope you all share this sense of joy, because it is a shared accomplishment! Thank you to all of my colleagues at Google over many years! Now I'm excited to go start @DiscoLoopAI with my longtime friends and colleagues @Sanjay_Ghemawat, @OriolVinyalsML, and @quocleix. (Updated post: slightly redacted to not have some personal info)

🚨 BREAKING: Apple filed for a PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION against OpenAI AND asked a federal judge to put them under forensic supervision "Apple respectfully moves the Court for a preliminary injunction to stop THE THEFT OF ITS TRADE SECRETS" Apple filed NINE sworn declarations, a 28-page memorandum and a concurrent motion for expedited discovery What Apple now says, under oath: Chang Liu: 8 years at Apple, now OpenAI "Member of Technical Staff" exploited an authentication bug to steal Apple trade secrets "on AT LEAST FIVE SEPARATE OCCASIONS" from February to April 2026, WHILE working for OpenAI Liu downloaded "THOUSANDS OF PAGES of Apple's most sensitive trade secrets" The stolen files, NAMED: >DisplayNotes.key — "several hundred pages" on Apple's custom display power development program >Architecture analyses. Fabrication decisions. Testing results >Engineering data for an UNANNOUNCED Apple product: 'touch, display, and power systems" >Final.key + V2.key — compilations of two undisclosed Apple R&D projects >and those are "only four of the dozens of proprietary documents Mr. Liu stole" Liu fed OpenAI "a steady stream of Apple proprietary information that he actively concealed" Liu also "coached Yu-Ting "Alyssa" Peng, then still INSIDE Apple, how to access and copy files from Apple workstations "to avoid trouble with the security team" and directed her to communicate with him on the encrypted LINE app "to avoid detection" Tang Yew Tan: 24-year Apple VP, now OpenAI's Chief Hardware Officer, "used an Apple internal project codename for an unannounced product to elicit still more trade secrets from job candidates." Tan's own messages, quoted in the motion: >"Just like last time, bring some parts you worked on" >"mlb, battery, shields type of stuff is interesting" OpenAI recruiter, quoted: "No, you won't sign anything at the exit interview. If they do ask you to sign anything, let me know asap." APPLE TOLD FEDERAL JUDGE: >"OpenAI knows its misappropriation is wrong and has tried to conceal it." >"This is not a case of 'mere hiring'... it is a case of repeated instances of deliberate theft." Apple says OpenAI went after its SUPPLIERS: >OpenAI "directed a trusted Apple partner [name redacted] to perform [Apple's proprietary metal finishing] process for them, knowing it was proprietary to Apple... because they were involved in this partnership while at Apple." Apple put its own Surface Finishing Manager, Jackie Hughes, under oath to prove it. Apple named ELEVEN MORE former Apple employees at OpenAI — beyond Liu, Tan, and Peng — Fourteen people total. Apple also filed a concurrent motion for EXPEDITED DISCOVERY demanding depositions: - Liu. Tan. Peng. - A fourth unnamed OpenAI employee - Plus OpenAI itself, under oath, through Rule 30(b)(6) Apple has asked a federal judge to put OpenAI under forensic supervision RIGHT NOW: >Forensic inspection of ALL OpenAI devices >ALL cloud storage, Slack, email >Including anything that "previously contained" Apple data — deleted included Demanding the "first available hearing date," citing "imminent threat" to its trade secrets. APPLE: > "The harm is happening now — every day that passes without an injunction allows OpenAI to embed their knowledge of Apple's stolen information into its hardware development efforts." Hearing: October 1, 2026. Judge Edward J. Davila. ITS HAPPENING

DEXE Trading Statement Just clarify recent speculations and clear all misleading information: - We bought a lot of DEXE in 2024 - Sold some DEXE in 2025 for profits - Bought a lot of DEXE again around 10/10 - Hedged our gains first half of 2026 - When Funding changed to negative, we were forced to close our shorts and increase our cash reserves by selling DEXE spot End of the story All our buys and sells were done on CEXes, they all know our UIDs and my words can be easily checked Shame on all paid KOLs who are spreading misleading information Cheers

Price discovery doesn't wait for Monday. Over the last seven weekends, bStocks captured a median 92% of Monday's opening gap. Showing how 24/7 markets absorb new information before traditional exchanges reopen.

Today, I want to share something that happened to me on Kraken. I’m completely new to crypto, and this was my first time using Kraken. All I wanted to do was convert USDC into USD. Unfortunately, because USDT and USD differ by only one letter, I accidentally selected USDT instead of USD. I didn’t realize my mistake until the transaction had already been completed. In less than a minute, a single misclick resulted in a loss of approximately 810 USDT—more than $800. To be honest, I was shocked and devastated. Like many newcomers, I assumed that all major stablecoins were worth roughly the same, so converting between them would involve little or almost no loss. I never imagined that such a simple mistake could instantly cost me more than 1% of my funds. I immediately contacted Kraken Support, hoping they would understand that this was an honest human error and review my case, or at least consider making a one-time exception. What disappointed me even more was that almost every response came from AI. I was never able to speak with a real support agent. The only explanation I received was that the transaction had already been executed, the conversion details had been displayed before confirmation, and therefore nothing could be reversed or refunded. I understand that Kraken may not have violated its own rules, and I acknowledge that the final amount I would receive was displayed before I confirmed the transaction. But I believe that “the information was displayed” does not necessarily mean “a new user truly understands what it means.” As a beginner, I saw what I believed was a normal stablecoin conversion. I had no idea that the number shown on the confirmation screen meant I was about to lose more than $800. If a platform expects users to recognize an $800+ pricing difference on their own, instead of proactively warning them that the conversion is unusually unfavorable, I don’t believe that’s a user-friendly experience—especially for beginners. I believe that a platform responsible for customers’ assets should do more than simply display numbers. It should also be designed to help users avoid obvious mistakes that can lead to significant financial losses. Crypto is already complicated enough. The risks users take should come from the market—not from a product design that makes such costly mistakes so easy to make. This experience has left me deeply disappointed and has almost completely destroyed my trust in Kraken. I’m not trying to deny Kraken’s rules, and I’m not asking for special treatment. I’m simply asking @kraken and @krakensupport to review my case, seriously consider improving the user experience, provide real human support when genuine mistakes happen, and consider a one-time resolution for customers who make an honest human error. If this could happen to me, it could happen to any newcomer entering the world of crypto. I hope my experience helps others avoid making the same mistake. Please double-check every click. @krakenfx @krakenpro @krakensupport

Tech publication The Information reports China has started mass-producing domestic DUV lithography machines, the chipmaking tools used to print circuits onto wafers. Dutch supplier ASML has dominated this equipment category, and export controls assumed China would stay dependent longer.

沒subscribe the information, 但宇量昇通過了alpha stage不是人所皆知嗎？做幾台繼續測試有什麼驚奇的？ 有人能回答我套刻精度和throughput參數嗎？😅 謝謝大家

AI-powered Flock Safety cameras are facing growing scrutiny over privacy concerns despite being used by law enforcement to recover stolen vehicles and solve crimes. The cameras capture license plates and other identifying vehicle features, storing the information in databases accessible to police agencies. Critics argue the technology creates a warrantless mass surveillance network, prompting some Connecticut towns to remove the systems. | @HARRISFAULKNER @FaulknerFocus @foymeetsworld