注册并分享邀请链接,可获得视频播放与邀请奖励。

与「Institutional」相关的搜索结果

Institutional 贴吧
一个关键词就是一个贴吧,路径全站唯一。
创建贴吧
用户
未找到
包含 Institutional 的内容
BNB Chain is already home to one of the largest user bases in crypto with rapid growth across stablecoins and RWAs. Today, we’re welcoming @thomasxchen as our Chief Business Officer as BNB Chain deepens its focus on institutions, capital and onchain market activity. Thomas brings deep experience across traditional finance and digital assets, with a strong track record building institutional businesses across capital markets, custody, trading and growth. At BNB Chain, his focus is clear: bring more institutions and capital onchain, deepen liquidity, grow volume and strengthen long-term value across the ecosystem. Welcome to BNB Chain, Thomas. Let’s keep building.
显示更多
0
65
215
22
转发到社区
Institutional clients are a core focus for Bitget's next phase, which means we're listening closely to what they actually need. Over the past few weeks, I've been sitting down with leaders from some of our key institutional partners for a new CEO Chat Series, where we talked about topics reshaping the market, from prime brokerage and fragmented liquidity to smarter collateral, tokenization at scale, and the changing expectations around institutional execution. Fire chat coming soon, stay tuned to @bitget
显示更多
0
33
173
10
转发到社区
GM ☀️ Today, we’re sitting down with @CanaryFunds to discuss the Canary Staked TRX ETF and the broader institutional landscape around TRON. ⏰ 10AM ET | 10PM HKT Set a reminder:
显示更多
The Canary Staked TRX ETF is bringing a new spotlight to TRX and institutional access. Join @justinsuntron, TRON and @CanaryFunds on September 11 to discuss the filing, its structure, and the broader context around TRX. 🗓️ September 11 - 10am EST
显示更多
0
22
116
35
转发到社区
Launching today… Canary Staked TRX ETF (TRXS) First spot TRX ETF TRX is 8th largest crypto asset by market cap @justinsuntron: "The launch of the Canary Staked TRX ETF demonstrates the growing recognition of the TRON network as critical infrastructure for the global digital economy & provides institutional investors with a new way to access a network that is already powering real-world financial activity at scale."
显示更多
With institutional expansion and index inclusion, Tron Inc. (Nasdaq: $TRON ), the publicly listed company executing a TRX treasury strategy, now counts several major institutions among its shareholders, including BlackRock, Vanguard, and Goldman Sachs.
显示更多
0
36
103
9
转发到社区
Tron Inc. (Nasdaq: $TRON) has been added to the Russell 2000, Russell 2500 and Russell 3000 Indexes — expanding visibility among U.S. index funds and institutional investors #TRX# #RussellIndex#
显示更多
LATEST: ⚡️ Ripple Prime launched a Delta One business for institutional equity derivatives, with over $1B in regulatory net capital.
0
43
230
29
转发到社区
"Tokenized deposits are actual representation of someone's deposit at a bank so they are treated in the same regulatory way and stay within the bank perimeter." @gluk64 breaks down tokenized deposits and how Prividiums match their institutional requirements on @FINTECHTVglobal
显示更多
⚡️The early Bitcoin holder may be one of the cleanest wealth outcomes capitalism can produce. Think about what happened to the rare person who accumulated meaningful Bitcoin very early and actually held it. They did not need to build a 10,000-person company. They did not need customers. They did not need employees. They did not need a board. They did not need to manage LP money. They did not need to continually recreate the economic engine that made them wealthy. They made one extraordinarily consequential capital-allocation decision, survived years of uncertainty, and eventually the asset itself did almost all of the scaling. That is an incredible lifestyle outcome. A founder worth $100M may technically have the same net worth, but much of it can be trapped inside a company requiring their attention, carrying payroll, lawsuits, competition, customers, executives, financing, and constant strategic decisions. The early Bitcoin holder can have $100M sitting in an asset that requires almost no organizational complexity to own. Enormous wealth. Tiny operating surface area. That combination is rare. There is also something profound about how the wealth was created. They recognized a new category before the world agreed the category was real. The wealth came from carrying uncertainty. Bitcoin looked ridiculous. Then dangerous. Then speculative. Then legitimate. Then institutional. Every step upward removed uncertainty while also removing asymmetry. The earliest holders were compensated for occupying the period when the world could still plausibly say the entire thing was worthless. But survivorship bias here is enormous. Thousands of people also concentrated into things they believed were revolutionary and lost everything. Even among people who bought Bitcoin early, many sold at 2x, 5x, 10x, or 50x. Others lost keys. Others got destroyed by exchanges. Others overleveraged. Others simply could not psychologically carry an asset through repeated 70% to 90% drawdowns while everyone around them told them they were insane. So the extraordinary outcome required several things to happen together: see correctly very early, size enough for being right to matter, survive enormous volatility, preserve custody, and resist selling when the gain already looked life-changing. That is almost impossibly difficult in real time. The highest form of wealth creation may actually be finding a very small number of generational capital-allocation decisions rather than continually maximizing labor output. One Bitcoin-like decision can compress decades of economic effort into ownership of the right thing at the right moment. Afterward, the entire purpose of wealth can change. You no longer need to optimize for more work. You can optimize for autonomy. Time. Privacy. Research. Relationships. Travel. Building things because they matter to you rather than because they need to pay you. And compared with becoming a billionaire CEO whose phone can never truly be turned off, the anonymous person who quietly owns enormous permanent capital may have won a different and arguably more valuable game. The founder builds a machine powerful enough to create freedom later. The generational investor finds an asset powerful enough to make the machine unnecessary. That second outcome is incredibly rare. But when it happens, the lifestyle asymmetry is almost absurd.
显示更多
0
25
305
30
转发到社区