与「LitVM」相关的搜索结果

Litecoin should not still be here. It launched in 2011, watched thousands of flashier coins promise to replace it, and quietly buried almost all of them. The survivor everyone wrote off is about to do the one thing nobody expected. In this conversation, Roc and Aztec of LitVM walk through a major expansion that finally brings smart contracts to one of crypto's oldest names. Their argument is that the recent downturns, which they attribute to predatory shorting, are masking a quieter trend, with capital steadily rotating back into proven legacy assets that have already weathered more than a decade of cycles. The project itself is a purpose-built layer-two (L2) modular stack that brings Ethereum Virtual Machine compatibility natively to Litecoin. They point out that while the major chains support dozens of layer twos, LitVM is the only one building on Litecoin, using zero-knowledge cryptography to let users launch smart contracts and real-world assets trustlessly. Here is the part that should make you pay attention. With no airdrop incentives dangled in front of anyone, the testnet has already crossed 40 million transactions and 3 million unique active wallets, which means people are showing up for the technology rather than a payout. Roc and Aztec explain what that signals, and why they believe the oldest survivor in crypto might be the one writing its most important chapter yet... @LitecoinVM Disclaimer: This content was produced in collaboration with the other party and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute financial or investment advice. Always conduct your own research before making any decisions. 00:00 Mario Nawfal, Roc, and Aztec break down the current market cycle and the reasons capital is returning to legacy chains. 04:40 The founders address crypto's narrative crisis and why sovereign networks are essential against financial weaponization. 13:51 The discussion shifts to LitVM and how it delivers smart contract and EVM functionality directly to the Litecoin network. 23:14 The team elaborates on LitVM's position as Litecoin's exclusive layer two and their community-driven distribution strategy. 35:48 The founders reveal strong organic testnet numbers before Mario closes out the session.

【目前值得撸的空投项目都在这了，今年是暴富还是暴负？】 2026年最值得埋伏的 100+ 加密项目空投终极矩阵！ 🟢 S 级：殿堂级标的（全球焦点 / 最强核心叙事） 预测市场与主权链：Arc、Polymarket、Kalshi、Base 核心协议：Tempo、Dango 🟡 A 级：超一线生态（强劲基本面 / 爆发潜力无限） Variational、Extended、Nado、PredictFun、Robinhood（Web3生态）、LitVM Abstract、Ink（核心Layer2）、KAST、Ethos、Ethereal、Hibachi、GRVT、Pacifica、Myriad 🔵 B 级：中坚支柱（稳健基本面 / 核心防御资产） Bulk、Liquid、Carbon、Bullpen、Hyena、DreamCash、01、Noise AI与硬核科技：Nous Research、Minara、Axis Robotics、Mahojin、Canopy、Oro AI、GenLayer Fhenix、Shelby、Seismic 🟠 C 级：新星黑马（中等热度 / 极早期高爆生态） MegaETH（超高性能L2）、Jumper、Relay、Katana、Titan、TradeXYZ、Ostium、Vest Exchange、RiseX HotStuff、Satori、Novig、SX Bet、XO Market、D3、KiiChain、June、PrismaX、Pond 🔴 D 级：极致投机（高贝塔博弈 / 低确信度高赔率） Project X、Drip、SpiceNet、DAWN、OneBalance、N1、TYB、Cerebro、Ritual、Fermah、Euphoria、Apyx、Sphinx、Miden、Renais、Surf、Fableborne、Opinion、Quaranium、Superposition、Fraction AI、Bullshot、Hylo、Oshi、Cashmere、Octra、Perena、Squads、Jiritsu、Offline Protocol、Squid

絵本編　p731 ==スイカりなしぃ🍉== 宇宙王子「スイカに変身してみて～♪」 プリンセスR「こ、こうかな？」 宇宙王子「スイカよき～♪」 model：りなしぃさん（ @rinyanpassan ) ※掲載許可済 ※創作劇だよ

【6.04 (Thu)】Wink Music Service "Tout Va Bien" release live @livehouse_fever 本日リハーサルでした〜！ なんと星野みちるちゃんが差し入れを持って遊びに来てくれました！感謝〜！ そして、みんなで記念撮影〜！ 大賀咲希 アンジーひより オーバンドルフ凜 白鳥沙南 めあり 心愛 LPにてチケット発売中！ #大賀咲希# #アンジーひより# #オーバンドルフ凜# #白鳥沙南# #LITMOON# #めあり# #ゆるめるモ# @Lin_0407　@kokoa_616

Tomorrow, we’re releasing the full technical walkthrough for CVE-2026-5865, a chrome v8 0-day found by our AI security agent "Vega". More Linux kernel and Chrome 0-day writeups are coming later this month. Stay tuned, and follow our bug list for updates:

A summary of the RAVE -95% price fluctuation from $26 to $1 over the past 24 hours. RAVE Timeline: April 18, 2026 7:26 am UTC: I posted a call to action for Binance, Bitget, & Gate to investigate RAVE market manipulation and offered a $10K bounty. 10:56 am UTC: I posted an update increasing the bounty to $25K. 11:18 am UTC: Bitget publicly acknowledged the call to action. 2:08 pm UTC: Binance publicly acknowledged the call to action. 3:06 pm UTC: RaveDAO posted claiming they have no involvement. 4:19 pm UTC: Gate publicly acknowledged the call to action. In the days leading up, on April 13 & 14, I confronted RaveDAO co-founder Yemu Xu (wildwoomoo) but have yet to receive an answer. RAVE launched in Dec 2025 on Binance Alpha with a 1B total supply. The addresses below, linked to the initial distribution, control ~95% of the RAVE supply (h/t Mlm): 0x9831156F1a6E506Fca41503590b42F07c2e80f54 0x8Ed6245C3276307E1A9D9Dc872E98A0E770070fd 0x6020656d1EF182173E45D4Fc375BDD5a48c674B0 0x2664cB80a5ee7D8EC05fe7C752dD62E078056E6d 0x2D81F8AeBf3e58A5e638006c9fd8F38C5220ecab 0x31694d761A8e851cFFbCd286aC54D01e5Ce5aFe6 0x0A1F07993a51CcEb4f52CA67765AECeADDA790d7 0xEB74Df8588cFC1C179Df4bd96C0bB8B227B9bE92 0x53d7d52301366DC14E1916b14eFeC1aDD8F3487b I found suspicious CEX activity in April 2026 tied to RaveDAO team addresses onchain, which potentially contradicts their recent statement: Bitget 0x2dc20f2180582172f5450c5d71e23fa438a7031b 0xa3a02aeb97fc1737c66f50d07d024799c137891d 0x2d95eb42525e6087e0cb7869f98da6838ed2e743 Gate 0x31711246b05d71e9eda5e38a3abb654020ee3353 Given the supply concentration, the team at minimum knows who is responsible for this price action. A simple litmus test: $6B in market cap was wiped out on just $52M of 24hr liquidations (h/t CoinGlass). That ratio points to a manipulated and unsustainable valuation. RAVE is not the only token with manipulation we have seen on major centralized exchanges. It's just the most blatant, reaching a top 15 market cap within 10 days before dropping 95% in hours. Other projects with highly questionable price action recently include: SIREN, MYX, COAI, M, PIPPIN, RIVER. Exchanges need faster intervention on manipulation. Detection at scale isn't easy, but each day of delay means retail traders absorb losses while platforms collect fees on the volume. The outcome is the same regardless of intent. While it's good the exchanges responded, I find it unlikely this activity wasn't spotted internally before I raised it publicly. I recognize how much this behavior takes from retail traders, and I plan to investigate similar movements in hopes of identifying the responsible parties. I want to reiterate that I did not take a position. If I had, I would have been liquidated myself. I also could not anticipate if or when the exchanges would comment publicly. My $25K bounty will remain active since the only DMs received were unverified claims rather than non-public information with supporting evidence as requested.