与「MEV」相关的搜索结果

🤔这几天有一个项目，吸引了我的目光，原因只有一个：这个项目 @Arcium 居然让 @solana 官方为其更换了头像 我特意去搜了搜，自从20年上线以来，Solana官推的更换头像的次数是能数过来的 我简单说一下之前的更换头像的行为 1、25年底为了庆祝Solana Mobile的迭代和生态的腾飞，Solana官推更换过头像 2、23年中的时候因为Mad Lads重塑了Solana NFT市场的竞争格局，所以官推将头像换成了其标志性的“涂鸦风格人物”头像 从上述两次更换头像，其中的含金量不言而喻，直白点：更换头像意味着对这个生态项目在其Solana生态位中的认可 而现在的这份认可，在我个人看来，意味着solana未来3-5年生态扶持和核心竞争力变化的预演 在过去这波牛市中，Solana生态是Meme和价格的故事。更往前的牛市中，Solana生态是DePin、NFT、DeFi的故事 而26年，现在，故事应该要变了。很契合今天隐私爆发的一个主题，也符合大家在Solana链上目前刚需的一个缺口，就是 如果更多复杂应用要上链，链上是否可以保证保护用户敏感数据？直白点就是用户资产、交易意图、机构策略、AI 输入、数据协作结果，是否都必须暴露在公开环境中？ 简单一句话就是：Solana 上的应用能不能在不泄露敏感数据的情况下运行！？ 这一条，就让Arcium成为Solana生态中独一无二的存在，不去卷其他叙事，而是切实解决Solana链和用户痛点 📒很简单的一些场景需求问题描述： 在DeFi场景中，公开订单流的模式容易带来抢跑和策略暴露 在机构场景里，资金动向和仓位变化很难完全公开 在AI场景里，用户输入、模型参数和数据来源往往具有隐私属性 在DePIN或数据市场里，数据需要被验证和使用，但不一定适合被所有人直接读取 所以我们可以得出一个结论：如果链上世界只处理简单转账和公开交易，透明性是优势，这个不能否认；但当链上应用开始进入更复杂的金融、AI、数据和机构场景时，完全透明就会变成限制 因此，Solana 如果要从“高性能交易链”继续向“高性能应用网络”演进，就需要补齐隐私计算、数据保护和复杂应用执行能力 ➡️Arcium切入的就是这一层：努力成为Solana上的保密计算基础设施 具体就是Solana提供底层结算、账户状态和高性能执行环境；Arcium则试图在此之上提供一套可以处理加密数据的计算网络。开发者可以把敏感输入交给Arcium的计算环境，在数据不被单个节点完整掌握的情况下完成计算，再把结果返回链上应用 Arcium 文档中反复提到的MXE，即MPC eXecution Environment，可以理解为保密计算任务的执行环境。因为我不是技术，我不就这个细节展开与大家讨论，我直接说价值 这套架构的价值在于为Solana应用增加了一种新的构建方式：应用不必在“完全公开”和“完全中心化”之间二选一，而是可以在链上可验证性和数据保密之间寻找平衡 如果用更直观的方式理解，直接看图吧 🤔对于开发者来说有什么场景可以应用呢？ 我个人想得到的主要是3个，这个取决于我之前参与项目的经验哈，大家可以自己去探索一下，应该还有很多场景可以使用 1、最直接的是保密DeFi需求。我个人亲身经历，虽然当前DeFi的透明性提高了透明度和审计性，但也带来了交易策略暴露、MEV、抢跑、订单流被利用等问题 我曾经就被MEV坑过不少钱 如果 Arcium 能让部分交易意图、报价、策略参数或订单流在加密状态下处理，那么 Solana上可能出现更多接近机构级金融产品的设计 2、其次是保密支付。我曾经跟我做传统企业的朋友聊过，推荐他们采用加密货币支付，他们的原话是区块链会完整公开链上的转账金额、地址关系和资产流向，这对他们这种追求隐私的企业用户来说是一个不小的问题 如果应用可以在保持链上结算的同时隐藏部分敏感信息，支付类场景拓展B端市场应该会更加容易 3、是AI相关的场景。这个也是未来几年内最热门的叙事之一。通过Arcium，可以有效保护相关的代码、提示词和核心逻辑避免被逆向工程，或者防止在执行时被恶意拦截 （我询问了我做AI产品的朋友，他的原话，对我来说有些一知半解） 但是我知道：AI隐私很重要，哈哈哈 综合以上：大家应该能看出来，Arcium在Solana生态中算是一个基建类型的产品。其核心价值体现在方方面面 直白点：一个想要在Solana上做开发同时注重隐私的团队，那就绕不开Arcium 有点像 使用交易所，绕不开币安 链上金融场景，绕不开Hyperliquid Solana隐私需求，绕不开Arcium 继续观察其核心采用数据，这应该代表了Arcium的一个商用潜力。不过从我个人角度来说，应该不会很差，大家拭目以待

The top crypto and financial news headlines today👇 Tech selloff drags crypto lower as Strategy buys $35M bitcoin:native. Is a further price decrease on Bitcoin inevitable? THE MAJORS —— US signs executive orders setting 2031 deadline for post-quantum migration. Michael Saylor's Strategy acquired 520 BTC for $35 million ALT COINS & STOCKS —— @Pumpfun New bounty feature covered by NY Post after humiliate themselves for money. MegaETH's solana:megaA5QDK1qLXtjpvg9oCFMvxT9d5BCMrVTBddnM5kV token ~$14M unlock on Jun 23 will represent ~33% of supply. @solana remains the top chain for USDC activity, processing 22.7M transactions last week and holding the #1# spot for 7 straight weeks. AI —— Google bankrolls @A24 to build AI filmmaker tools. XRP Ledger now supports agentic payments with x402 NEW LAUNCHES —— Charles Schwab plans to launch S&P 500 prediction markets with Cboe. CRIME —— Polymarket paid creators to stage $1.9M in fake winning bets on dummy sites. (story via ,) Notorious 'jaredfromsubway' MEV bot drained for roughly $7.5 million in counter-MEV honeypot More stories linked in next thread...

1. Intro Vitalik recently wrote about where the EF should go; Aya added a note to explain how we got here, and why. I’ll write about the execution. We now have enough clarity to stop treating “what is the EF for?” as an open-ended question. Our mandate is clear: The EF exists to ensure Ethereum is, becomes, and remains real permissionless infrastructure for self-sovereignty: censorship (and capture) resistant, free and open source, private, and secure; and capable of supporting sovereignty-preserving coordination at scales where trusted institutions hitherto have been unavoidable. The following are my thoughts on some of the points that follow from the mandate and how we are translating it to action. But first, a short reminder about 2. What the EF is not for We are not here to optimize for EF importance, corpo/pol appeal, or ecosystem popularity. We are also not here to please short-term speculators, prop up TBTF neo-SIFIs, market every app on Ethereum, help anyone look good to their crypto or investor friends, or provide on-demand entertainment for dinner parties and private retreats. 3. What the EF is for: Eliminating weaknesses We are here to defensively strengthen places where Ethereum is, or can still become, extractive, totalizing, or vulnerable to cartel or state capture, or authoritarian tools of surveillance or coercion. We will base our actions on a full examination of what Ethereum is and can be at the protocol layer (what is actually running as “Ethereum”), the access layer (what users use to interact with the protocol), the user layer (the end-users who need and will need Ethereum), and the institutional layer (the intermediated paths that scale self-sovereign usage). The EF exists to harden every surface of Ethereum, including those where Ethereum can remain formally permissionless while becoming practically captured. Some obvious surfaces are the transaction pipeline, staking and network security, access layer standards and interfaces, self-sovereignty norms, privacy expectations, institutional adoption patterns, and social layer governance processes. The primary concerns are similar across most of them: does the status quo and its future trajectory minimize trusted dependencies, minimize points of leverage and capture vectors, make user privacy the default, preserve exit, and make trust assumptions legible? The work starts with the EF itself. We are moving compensation and major financial relationships toward ETH and mandate-compliant Ethereum-native stables, with exceptions where positive law or unavoidable operational constraints require exceptions. Rather than a purity ritual or instruction for people to take unmanaged personal risk, it is robustness, alignment, and product pressure. If the EF’s work is to make Ethereum usable as infrastructure for self-sovereignty, everyone at the EF will increasingly live inside the constraints of the system the EF exists to improve: wallet UX, volatility, accounting, privacy gaps, payment friction, stablecoin trust assumptions, recovery, dependency risk, etc. If we can’t use these tools ourselves, it is unrealistic to expect others to. Ethereum is already mature; those who do not depend on the user-facing stack have no business trying to shape its future, at any layer. The transaction pipeline is next. Preventing toxic MEV capture is core EF work, not a peripheral market-structure concern. Transaction supply, ordering, inclusion, block construction, propagation, and settlement are part of Ethereum’s neutrality boundary. Some MEV may persist as an adversarial phenomenon the protocol contains, but it must be absolutely minimized and, for that to be possible, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence by its beneficiaries. If credibly neutral execution is subverted by privileged orderflow, cartelized builders, trusted relays, opaque routing, or validators outsourcing into a narrow supply chain, Ethereum will look permissionless while users experience it as intermediated at the moment value moves. EF protocol work will therefore prioritize lower barriers to block building and validation, stronger inclusion guarantees, reduced extraction opacity, competitive transaction pipelines, user-facing legibility of trust assumptions, and more aggressively exploring the open orderflow solution space. None of this is simple. A good solution in one place can aggravate problems elsewhere. FOCIL is good for censorship resistance, but it may introduce more cross-block MEV. While ePBS solves the relayer trust problem, we must make sure that its implementation does not inadvertently obstruct long-term solutions to even larger problems. It would be unacceptable, for example, if ePBS enshrining the builder economy ends up making it harder to reduce reliance on the private orderflow that has emptied out the public mempool. Encrypted mempools may not only reduce pre-execution transparency and pending orderflow visibility, but also shift competitive advantage to new privileged actors, including specialized hardware operators in some designs, while adding protocol complexity. In order to avoid wasting time playing whack-a-mole, we must commit to solving the extraction problem at a whole system scale. Doing so will require creativity, courage, and the understanding that failure to solve this problem is unacceptable. If we fail, we will have left in place an unnecessary barrier to institutional adoption, but, more importantly, we will also have surrendered a core part of the promise of Ethereum - the replacement of extractive middlemen with permissionless, credibly neutral infrastructure and competitive markets. That must not happen. MEV is likely to be the next major front in the cypherpunk war. We must set ourselves up to win here. Privacy is just as fundamental. A public ledger without serious privacy defaults is a surveillance substrate with settlement guarantees. That is not an acceptable end state for the world computer. Unconditional privacy will be readily available across Ethereum, with programmability on top for selective disclosure, proofs, auditability, compliance logic, reputation, governance, identity, and other constraints chosen by users and their communities. The temporal order matters: unconditional privacy must exist first, opt-in constraints come second. It is also important to avoid forcing users to assemble a fragile stack of special wallets, RPCs, bridges, apps, compliance providers, and operational habits to attain privacy. Deep privacy must be more secure than this. Privacy is a condition for Ethereum’s viability as freedom-respecting coordination infrastructure and as such must be robust. Staking must be treated as protocol infrastructure risk. Staking is not merely a yield product, and liquid staking is not merely an app-layer market. If stake, liquidity, validator access, DeFi collateral, and governance influence concentrate around a small set of issuers or operators, Ethereum’s security layer becomes vulnerable to capture through capture of the economic layer around it. EF will support research, specifications, and designs that keep staking permissionless, private where possible, plural in operation, and resistant to intermediaries becoming permanent control points. The access interfaces are where users access either the protocol directly or through intermediated defaults. The primary problem to solve here is not getting Ethereum into more rooms directly, but making its users, both end users and institutions, more self-sovereign and less susceptible to coercion, and avoiding normalization of soft coercion in exchange for reach. EF will not help Ethereum become more acceptable by sanding off the properties that make it uniquely valuable. Ethereum does not need to become another permissioned settlement backend with better branding. It needs to show, in production, that self-sovereign coordination at scale is possible. Across Ethereum, the EF’s defensive work seeks to ensure that Ethereum is infrastructure people can still use when counterparties fail, platforms censor, governments overreach, intermediaries extract, and coordination problems become infeasible for trusted systems to handle. A core part of that is to make that infrastructure secure and robust against capture at every layer wherever capture opportunities can hide. 4. What the EF is also for: Seizing opportunities Shoring up the fundamentals is not enough. Ethereum’s potential is still largely unrealized, but that does not mean that the path ahead is going to be straight. Opportunities must be seized when the time is right. At this moment in time, a number are visible, including: * Ethereum becoming the first quantum-resistant global infrastructure. Ethereum researchers will lead the post-quantum cryptographic migration before the threat becomes urgent, not after it becomes a governance emergency. That means hardening Ethereum’s cryptographic foundations while there is still time to design carefully. The same applies to other long-horizon risks, where waiting for market demand means waiting until the window for principled design has already closed. * Verifiably self-sovereign stack, from soup to nuts, whether local or remote, with no censorship or extraction openings: browsers, wallets, intents, broadcasts, orderflow, inclusion, block construction, proposal, proving, exit, and recovery. Minimal MEV, and zero toxic MEV entrenchment, either in or around the protocol. No execution layer that is formally permissionless but practically gatekept by privileged supply chains. If there’s a funnel towards an extractive private lane, there’s other options that keep the game live. The goal is not only to prevent extraction or capture, but to make credibly neutral execution competitive enough that serious users prefer it. * Making ETH normal digital cash: a private, dignity-respecting, debasement-resistant and surveillance-resistant medium of exchange and store of value, as well as the native asset of private computation and private coordination for both humans and their agents. If Ethereum can make private economic life and private institutional life possible without routing users back through the friction and potential abuse of custodians, surveillance vendors, or permissioned ledgers with softer branding, as well as provide a venue for secure and competitive machine economics, the value unlocks will be immense. * Personal wallets with personal AI agents that users can actually own and run on their own personal computers. Not your keys, not your coins; not your model, not your mind. As agents become interfaces for more economic and social action, the question of who owns the wallet, the model, the memory, the policy, and the signing authority becomes an existential question about sovereignty instead of UX details - we are all users above any other roles, and no one at EF will forget this. * Institutional and enterprise use cases where Ethereum wins by not disappearing into an invisible backend, gatekept by intermediaries or terrible UX, and by not compromising into a compliant fintech rail with web3 branding. Rather, we will win through proving that credibly neutral infrastructure can handle disintermediated coordination so competitively that trusted intermediaries have to meet Ethereum users on Ethereum’s terms. * Security-preserving scaling. L2s and related infrastructure will be able to meet institutional-level needs without accepting dependencies on closed operators, opaque sequencing, custodial UX, or upgrade committees that users cannot realistically exit. Scale is not throughput alone. Scale is the guaranteed availability of self-sovereignty under real load. We are ensuring Ethereum remains the hardest bedrock for settlement, local and worldwide; and beyond that, a civilizational ledger and execution substrate to stand the test of time. When future civilizations speak of the infrastructure they inherited from the Antiquity of the Information Age, their first example should be Ethereum. Ethereum will outlast all of us. More than enough people watching understand this. Many wondered why it needed saying at all, but it did. If you don't believe us or don't get it, we don't have time to try to convince you, sorry. 5. Addressing departures There has been a lot of online speculation about departures from EF, both before and after the mandate. Some people resigned, others were terminated. Some departures were about strategy, some about role fit, some about normal institutional change, and some simply about people deciding that their best work for Ethereum should happen somewhere else. We will not litigate individual personnel matters on Twitter. That is the default because it is better for EF, better for the people involved, and better for Ethereum. People who contributed through EF deserve dignity on the way out. They do not deserve to have their employment history turned into factional content. Where possible, we have let people describe their departures in their own words as a matter of courtesy, and not concession. If public claims materially mislead people about EF’s direction, decision-making, or mandate, we may correct the record at the level of policy, process, and institutional facts. We still will not turn personal files into public spectacle. Ethereum is permissionless. People may disagree, criticize, compete, fork, and build elsewhere. We intend to keep exits dignified and expect others to do the same. It will suffice to say that we are thankful for what all contributors have built; we will continue to do work Ethereum needs. 6. Addressing EF spinouts Some work should and will leave the EF in the months to come. We hope and expect this process to result in some excellent work being done in service of scaling self-sovereign adoption, but we also must take care lest it becomes an abdication of responsibility or an excuse for undisciplined spending. Some work is not mandate-compatible and should not be carried forward with EF funds or EF endorsement, either inside or outside the Foundation. The efforts carried out by the spinouts will vary widely. Some efforts will leave EF because another org would be a better home for them; others will leave because markets should decide on their worth. Some will leave because they are not compatible with the direction set out in the mandate; others because they are useful but not EF work. Just as a spinout is not automatically good because it reduces EF headcount, former EF affiliation is not a claim on EF funding. The question we ask when deciding on funding is not “did this come from the EF?” But, rather the questions that should be asked about all external funding: “Is this work mandate-critical? Would the EF do this work internally if it had the organizational and financial capacity? Is there no better natural home? Can the external party execute without increasing capture risk, private extraction, opacity, or dependence? Does supporting it reduce Ethereum’s dependence on the EF over time, without prematurely transferring resources and legitimacy to new organizations and thereby risking operational failure or mission drift?” EF funding for work being done externally can be appropriate when it is a capacity solution for mandate work - work the EF should responsibly want done; work that protects CROPS; work that advances self-sovereignty and scales it; essential work that no actor can or will reliably do without EF funding; and work that can be scoped, reviewed, and held accountable without creating a permanent dependency. Such funding is not appropriate when it is a lazy continuity payment, a friendship payment, a reputational hedge, a way to avoid making a hard decision, or a way to support work that is not compatible with the mandate. EF has finite funds, finite legitimacy, and a specific mandate. We will spend all three as if they matter. When we say “EF is one of many nodes”, we mean that we intend to be one of many nodes working to keep self-sovereignty and its scaling the North Star, and working to keep CROPS the undisplaceable first-class properties of the network. We don’t mean that we will support orgs or projects with different priorities. Diversity that leads to ecosystem resilience, coordination cost right-sizing, and better decision-making is good. Diversity that leads to mission drift is not. We are not neutral on the direction Ethereum takes. CROPS are not just things we “believe in”, they are characteristics we understand must be thoughtfully prioritized at every fork for Ethereum to realize its potential. We are partisans for and builders of something of such incredible neutrality that it will fundamentally reshape the world we live in; we wish to work with everyone committed to this shared purpose.

6.22梭哈晨报： 兄弟们心心念念的工作日来了，瞅了一眼股票一片形势大好，这就是大家期待的日子吗？ 1. bitcoin:native 兜兜转转终于美股开盘了，然后还是趴着一动不动，还是挺好的； 2. ethereum:native 反正也没人关心，都开始权力斗争了； 3. solana:So11111111111111111111111111111111111111112 我就看全体sol天团如何放弃sol去吹bp，能吹出什么花样来； 4.臭名昭著的“jaredfromsubway”MEV机器人在反MEV蜜罐中被清空，损失约750万美元； 全网都在庆祝😂； 5. 世界黄金协会：更多央行选择将黄金储备移回国内； 难道都存美国吗？ 6.SpaceX盘前延续跌势，跌幅近5%； 你的天空梦还在吗？ 7.Taiko：链状态验证机制遭入侵，建议用户立即从相关跨链桥中提取资金； 这个是什么链，不是鬼链吗？ 8.Altura CEO：因提款激增决定有序关闭Altura金库，已处理850万枚USDT赎回； 还有人弄DeFi？ 9.日经 225 指数创下历史新高，日内涨 1%； 还在继续上涨，太恐怖了； 10.StarkWare CEO 谈以太坊基金会风波：技术选择应优先于"对齐"政治； 11.Michael Saylor 再次发布比特币 Tracker 信息，或披露增持数据； 卖了一次比买一千次对市场影响还大； 12.以防长：过去和现在以军在黎巴嫩行动均不受限制； 13.巴基斯坦外长：在未来 60 天内，伊朗不会阻止船只通过霍尔木兹海峡； 14.伊美谈判第一轮已结束； -------------- 世界杯理财的集体破灭了，芯片+半导体+存储继续起飞了，只有crypto还是软趴趴，不知道喜欢加密的人有福了，因为足够的稳定。 #Bitcoin# #Ethereum# #Solana# #Crypto# #Nasdaq#

MEV 机器人 jaredfromsubway 被黑导致 770 万美元资产被洗劫。 对于所有运行自动化策略的开发者来说，这是一个极具警示意义的案例：攻击者通过漏洞瞬间清空了该机器人的全部流动性，包括 1,583.5 ETH、2.87M USDC 和 2.09M USDT。 目前资产转移路径非常清晰： 1. 攻击者已将所有资金兑换为 4,427 ETH（约 770 万美元）。 2. 其中 1,000 ETH 已被转入 Tornado Cash 进行混币洗钱。 在 MEV 这种高频且高度竞争的领域，合约权限管理和资产隔离是生死线，任何逻辑漏洞都会直接导致数百万美元瞬间蒸发。

终日在链上 "打猎" (三明治攻击/DEX 套利) 的 MEV 机器人，今天被 "鹰" (黑客) 给啄了一口。 果然黑客才是链上生物链的最顶层掠食者😂不仅抢劫项目方/机构，三明治攻击机器人碗里的肉也没放过。 链上 MEV 机器人合约 [jaredfromsubway] 在 6 小时前被黑客通过虚假合约拿到了代币授权，被转走价值 $771 万的代币。 包括：1,583.5 枚 ETH ($275 万)、287 万 USDC、209 万 USDT。 USDT 跟 USDT 随后被换成了 ETH，除了把 1,000 枚 ETH 转进 Tornado，目前黑客地址还持有 3,426 枚 ETH ($594 万)。 攻击地址： -------------------------------------------------------------------------- #Bitget# 来了就是VIP！Crypto、美股、CFD，全球先机一站布局

🚨 Major incident: My MEV bot JaredFromSubway.eth was just drained for $15M I am offering a $1,000,000 USD bounty for the full return of the funds No Q asked. Full confidentiality and safe return guaranteed. This is a legitimate, time-sensitive bounty. Contact me privately.

AggrNews: 著名MEV机器人“JAREDFROMSUBWAY”似乎已遭受攻击，损失超1500万美元：链上数据 这就是我说的，钱在链上理财风险远大于收益。为了几个点的利息，冒着损失所有本金的风险，根本就没有任何意义了。DeFi 已经死了。

🚨Community Alert: Blockaid Exploit Detection system detected an exploit involving the @jaredsmev MEV bot on Ethereum. The incident resulted from attacker-controlled contracts tricking an automated MEV execution system into granting token approvals, later used to drain funds. 7.5M$ drained. Exploit tx: More details in🧵