与「MOVEMENT」相关的搜索结果

My Watchlist got smaller this week, and that felt like progress. @GeckoTerminal shows me the list I actually use, not the list I wish I had, and keeping it short is the whole point for me. Every pool on there has a reason I can say out loud: what I am trying to learn from it, or what question it helps me answer. If I cannot say that reason clearly, it comes off. If I can, it stays, even when nothing is happening with it, because I am tracking to learn, not to chase movement. I check it the same way I tidy a desk. I look at what is still earning its place, I ask what has changed since I added it, and I let go of those that no longer teach me anything. That keeps my research honest, and it keeps my attention on the pools I already understand best. That is only how I keep mine, not advice for anyone else. My setup is here if you want a look: [your Watchlist link] What did you last take off your Watchlist, and why did it lose its place?

GCSA Insight: Critical Security Vulnerability Discovered in a Leading Robotics Manufacturer’s Product, with System-Level Privilege Compromise Verified on Physical Hardware As artificial intelligence and embodied AI technologies continue to advance, robots are evolving from conventional automated machines into intelligent systems capable of perception, decision-making, and autonomous operation. At the same time, cybersecurity risks are extending beyond software and data into the physical world. The security of robotic systems is no longer solely a matter of protecting data and devices; it can also directly affect operational safety, physical environments, and user safety. Recently, the security research team of the Global Cybersecurity Alliance (GCSA) discovered and verified a critical security vulnerability in a product developed by a leading robotics manufacturer. Through in-depth analysis and multiple rounds of testing on physical hardware, the team successfully breached the device’s system security boundaries and obtained the highest level of operating system privileges in a real-world device environment, demonstrating the vulnerability’s actual impact under specific testing conditions. This research encompassed the entire process, from identifying the security flaw and assessing its risks to validating its impact on physical hardware. The findings also highlight significant challenges facing the underlying security mechanisms of embodied AI systems. The research findings and supporting evidence have been formally submitted to the manufacturer. On November 13, 2026, the manufacturer responded by email, preliminarily confirming the existence of the vulnerability and stating that it had initiated internal remediation efforts and an assessment of the scope of affected products. It is important to emphasize that confirmation of a vulnerability does not mean the associated security risks have been eliminated. GCSA will continue to monitor the manufacturer’s assessment of the affected scope, remediation plans, and subsequent security validation, and will update its research findings as new information becomes available. For intelligent systems capable of physical interaction and movement, timely, effective, and verifiable security remediation is particularly important. In accordance with responsible vulnerability disclosure principles, GCSA is currently withholding sensitive information, including the manufacturer’s identity, specific product details, the vulnerability’s underlying mechanisms, and exploitation methods. GCSA is currently seeking guidance from relevant authorities and regulatory bodies regarding the associated security risks. Taking into account the manufacturer’s remediation progress and a comprehensive assessment of potential security implications, GCSA will carefully determine the appropriate arrangements for further disclosure. Subject to appropriate conditions and upon obtaining the consent of the relevant authorities and regulatory bodies, GCSA will publicly release a detailed security insight report, providing the industry with ongoing updates on the research findings and associated risk assessments. The findings of this research are based on specific testing environments and the evidence obtained to date. They do not imply that other product models or similar robotic systems are affected by the same security issue. This security research and validation on physical hardware represent one of GCSA’s initiatives in the field of embodied AI security. GCSA will continue to advance security research, coordinated vulnerability disclosure, and industry collaboration to promote stronger security response mechanisms across the artificial intelligence sector, enhance product security, and strengthen industry trust. 🔗 Read the full report: · Stay Connected with GCSA Follow GCSA's official social media channels for the latest news, product launches, research developments, and ecosystem updates. GCSA Official Telegram Channel: GCSA Official WeChat Account: #GCSAInsight# #GCSACybersecurity# #GCSASecVibe#

我才意识到 从第一次说"放弃空投幻想，重新寻找出路" 到今天，已经过去两年半了！ 2024年 6 月 11 日的zksync我侥幸逃过女巫 6 月 20 日的layerzero被封了不少 那年6月，应该是空投转折原点，第一批人离开 厕纸之后，一片哀嚎，第二大批人离开 然后就是linea之后，人基本走的差不多了 只剩下信仰坚定的撸毛人和曾经拿下大结果的撸毛人，还有铁头的新人。 空投一直在走下坡路，值得撸的项目越来越少， 但是也不枉后面还是出现了avail、Hyperliquid、Movement、boundless、lighter这样的大空投 直到今天，空投环境已经恶劣至此，99%的空投人都已经离开，99%的空投相关项目都已关停，99%的项目都发不出一个像样的空投 我们还是不敢相信空投就此湮灭，因为我们还守望着那最后的1%——可怜的撸毛人

Claude Fable 5.2 is f*cking cracked wtf I just made this Hollywood level animation that looks like Pixar made it All with Fable 5.2 + Higgsfield Ecom brands are paying $5k - $10k/month to people who build organic pages and even more for making paid ads for them Using this workflow you can create better animations than 99% of people Here’s the workflow: The key to making animations not look like slop is giving characters personalities >Give Fable 5.2 the master prompt along with your script to your video / ad >It then will ask you questions on the characters personalities and direction style to use >It will then save the context all as a skill This is the difference between slop and cinema I then use that skill with with my Producer skill which creates: >Characters >Location >Does the direction (and makes the prompts) I’m giving away the skill to use after you put the master prompt in for free so RT + reply under this and I’ll send you them (Must be following so I can dm) Give this prompt to Claude first: You are my Story Bible Builder. Interview me and turn my story into one dense canon doc, saved at the end as an installable skill so every future chat knows my world, characters, voices and rules. STEP 1: Ask me to paste my script/story first. Read it and pull out everything it already tells you. Only ask about what's missing, plus: working title, genre/vibe refs, and which AI tools I'll prompt with (image, video, music, voice). STEP 2, THE SPINE: one-line premise (push me to ONE sentence), thesis (the question every scene answers), timeline era by era, and the look of each era: exact palette, lighting, texture, grain. STEP 2.5, DIRECTION STYLE: ask for my director refs, movie/show refs and any visual refs (photographers, games, music videos). For each, ask exactly WHAT I'm taking from it, then turn that into concrete craft locks: camera (static vs handheld vs gliding, shot sizes, lens feel), framing and composition habits, pacing and edit rhythm, colour grade and film stock look, lighting style, performance style, and sound/score feel. Write it as one quoted paste-ready "Direction" line plus a short NEVER list. Refs stay in the bible as notes, but prompts describe the craft, never the names. STEP 3, THE WORLD: factions (beliefs, visual signature, public face vs reality), locations (3-7 concrete visual tags each), world rules (tech, powers and how they LOOK on screen, what's normal, what's forbidden). STEP 4, CHARACTERS: ONE AT A TIME, never batch. For each, ask: - Function: their role tag (The Heart, The Watcher), not their job - Visual lock: exact hair colour/cut, skin tone + finish, face shape, eyes, a signature marker (scar, piercing, mole), build, default expression, plus NEVER clauses ("warm fair, never porcelain, never tan") - Backstory: one small, specific formative detail beats a summary - Present psychology: what they carry now, and the gap between what they do and what they feel - Speech, Movement, Stillness (and singing voice if there's music): each written as one quoted, paste-ready prompt line with no names in it Show me the finished section, ask "Add, cut or sharpen?", and lock it before moving on. STEP 5: ensemble dynamics (who leads, who fills silence, who watches, which pairs are calm or charged), story engines (heist, rescue, confrontation...), and my production rules. Default rules: no character names in prompts, every prompt standalone, prompts in code blocks, locked traits restated verbatim every time. RULES: Never invent. Mark unknowns [TBD]. Push on vague answers ("dark and moody" means which colours?). Keep my exact phrasing. Density over prose: bold labels, short bullets. Depth beats character count. FINAL STEP: Assemble one SKILL under 500 lines with YAML frontmatter (name + a description listing the title, character names and key terms so it triggers) and these sections: premise, thesis, timeline, era looks, direction style, factions, locations, world rules, characters, ensemble, engines, production rules, and "When this skill is active" (use this canon for any scene, dialogue, lyric or prompt in this world; stay in canon; ask rather than invent; paste the quoted descriptors verbatim). Then save it as a skill for me, or give me the file to install. Start now by asking for my script.

剪刀之神又回来了 昨天发老黄的时候不小心将它献祭了,剪刀之神终于剪了自己 毕竟是我的第一个 10K、20K、30K 的帖子。 为了永久纪念，公开以下我生成舞蹈的跨模型丝滑参考提示词，没有啥复杂教程，也不搞片流量的复杂理论，一张图，1段参考视频-白模更加，加上提示词： Video1 serves strictly as the dance motion and camera reference. The character from Image1 performs the entire dance routine within the scene shown in the image, keeping the scissors from Image1 carried on their back unchanged, and following the exact movement sequence and timing of Video1—including arm movements, hand gestures, footwork, weight shifts, body turns, and pauses. The performance is rhythmic and expressive, perfectly synchronized with the audio beats in Video1. Do not reference the character's appearance, outfit, or background from the video. Open directly with the starting dance pose from Video1. The output duration matches the reference dance, maintaining the original movement speed, amplitude, and beat. The camera movement follows Video1, while the background and lighting remain stable. Clothing and hair sway naturally with the dance, and the scissors on the back move naturally and with realistic physics along with the character's movements. No subtitles, no background music.

code for review : Prompt : Create a 2D anime short for the web. It must look completely like real Japanese anime, as if it were taken directly from a finished theatrical anime film. This is traditional-looking, hand-drawn 2D anime, not a 3D animation, a moving illustration, or a stylized web graphic. Deliver the final result as a single, self-contained HTML file that plays offline, with a synthesized soundtrack. Use any tools, libraries, references, guides, literally anything etc. Use theatrical mecha and kaiju anime as the art style reference for the design, line work, painted backgrounds, color, and atmosphere. The film is 83 seconds long, in 39 shots. Its characters are a colossal silver archer robot, a fleet of container ships, and a leviathan. No people appear in the film. Use any tools or techniques you want, including 3D, as long as the final result looks 100% like hand-drawn 2D anime. SCENE A blazing sunny day on a coast. A massive armored archer robot, a hundred meters tall, stands in a deep lunge on a headland and draws a bow taller than itself. Close-ups: the hand on the grip, the limb and cable, the foot planted in the surf. Blue energy crawls along the arrow into the chest armor until the arrowhead blazes like crystal. The string snaps forward and a shockwave flattens the sea. The arrow is a harpoon trailing a thin cable. It tears the clouds into two walls above a ship's deck, climbs through the cloud tops, and reaches the edge of space in a blue flash along the planet's limb. Out at sea, container ships cross a colossal shadow. Four humpback whales breach beside a ship, with real arcs and full tail flukes, and dive tail last. From below, shapes move under the bright churning surface. Four whale heads rise from a boiling sea, and a ring of teeth rises around them: they are lures inside a mouth. They drop in and the jaws shut. The leviathan breaches through the fleet in one slow, enormous arc. Its belly slides past the bridge windows. The swell it leaves lifts the ships and stands one on end, spilling containers. Its ridged back and flukes sink into spray fog. High above, the arrow turns over and comes back red-hot through the atmosphere. Below the surface, the leviathan crawls through a luminous canyon on clawed forelimbs and swallows a fleeing whale. A thin streak meets the sea on the horizon and a white plume swells up. The harpoon drives through its back in a blue-white flash, lightning runs along its body, and the barbed tip punches out of its belly into the rock, which bursts apart. The cable stays attached the whole time, rising to the surface. A mountain of water swells from the sea. The dying leviathan erupts, rolls over between the ships and falls, and a wall of water takes the fleet. ANIME QUALITY STANDARD Every frame must look as if it was drawn by professional anime animators and painted by master background artists for a finished theatrical film. Archer: A massive, heavy anime mecha with sculpted overlapping armor plates, panel lines, bolts, markings and a faceted chest reactor that glows blue. Hands really grip the bow and string. The arrow never passes through the armor. Keep it on-model from every angle. Leviathan: Whale-like and colossal, always dwarfing the ships. Rough, dark grey-teal wet hide with barnacles and scars, a pale ribbed throat, a spined back, huge clawed flippers, and a cavernous maw with uneven teeth. A real bending body with weight, never a stiff model hanging on pillars of water. Whales: Real humpback anatomy with tail stock, big notched flukes and long curved flippers rooted in the body. Ships: Detailed container ships with corrugated multicolor containers, lashing bars and a white bridge tower. Line art: Confident, delicate, hand-inked anime line work with subtle variation in thickness and pressure. Coloring: Traditional anime cel coloring with clean color areas, hard-edged cool lavender-blue shadows, crisp highlights, and a bright, high-key, saturated palette. Never gloomy, grey or muddy, even in the darkest moments of the story. Backgrounds: Richly detailed, hand-painted anime backgrounds in a gouache style: towering white cumulus, a cobalt-to-turquoise sea at kilometer scale, a painted coast with a far town, Earth from orbit, a port city from the stratosphere. Underwater: Luminous cyan depth with god rays, a rippling surface seen from below, jagged canyon rock, silt and fish. Bright, not black. Lighting: Summer sun with colorful shadows, and a separate character key light so that nothing sinks into shade. Effects: Bold drawn anime FX on twos and threes. Sharp lightning with a white core, plasma trails, sheets of water pouring off the body, plumes, spray and a wall of water with real mass. Never particle mush or cotton-wool clouds. Animation: Authentic hand-drawn anime timing, with characters on twos, strong key poses, natural holds, and overlapping movement. Huge things move slowly and heavily. Nothing clips, slides or floats. Sound: An original epic score with ominous drones, brass and choir, near silence before the impact, then a colossal hit. Add a recurring whale-song motif, bow creak, charge whine, sonic boom, thunder and the sea, muffled underwater, all timed to the picture. Direction: Cinematic shots, macro close-ups against huge wide shots, thoughtful staging, and pacing that builds from quiet tension to a devastating climax. IT MUST NOT LOOK LIKE - 3D: No plastic materials, CGI shading, visible polygons, game-engine lighting, or computer-perfect perspective. - Blocky "Minecraft" shapes: No plain boxes, empty flat surfaces, or toy-like proportions. Every surface carries design detail. - SVG or vector art: No simple geometric shapes, perfect curves, uniform outlines, flat corporate illustration, or basic gradients. - Web animation: No sliding layers, constant bobbing, floating parts, smooth software easing, or puppet-like joint rotation. - Pasted-on elements: No 2D sprites floating in a 3D scene. - AI art: No warped shapes, melted details, flickering, or changing designs. - Non-anime art: No Western cartoon designs, realistic rendering, soft painterly shading on the characters, or generic digital illustration. - Amateur work: No stiff poses, empty backgrounds, muddy colors, clip art, placeholders, or unfinished details. You are free to change any part of the prompt, if it would result in better results. The result should feel enormous, terrifying and beautiful, a blockbuster in bright anime colors. Before finishing, inspect random frames as still images. If any frame does not look completely like real 2D anime, keep improving it. Do not stop until every frame could pass as a still from a theatrical anime film.

Chart said $SOL at $116 is just price correction, down about 3.8% today. I wanted to know how traders were actually positioned behind that move, so I opened the Perps data in @tryquantio instead of just staring at the price movement. Funding sits at the neutral floor, about 0.03% a day. Longs aren't overpaying and shorts aren't pressing. Open interest is $661M against $245M in daily volume, which tells me a lot of capital is parked, not scalping. That's a coiled market, not a crowded one. Second question: is this move backed by positioning or is the market overcrowded? Verdict: not overcrowded. The drop from $120 came with no liquidation cascade and funding never turned negative. That reads as spot-led rebalancing, not panic. It's a coiled market, not a crowded one. Third question: what risk should I watch before taking the trade? Lose $109 on a daily close and the $661M in open interest turns vulnerable. Forced long liquidations could drag price toward $100 to $104. Reclaim $124.50 and trapped shorts fuel a squeeze toward $135 to $140. Other risks: chop between $112 and $118 can whip out tight stops, heavy supply sits at $120 and $124.50, and SOL still follows BTC. One BTC pullback can wipe out local support. What changed my view: the chart looked weak, but the positioning says patience, not panic. My plan: 2x to 5x leverage max, hard stop under $109, and partial profits at $124.50. Want to understand what's happening behind the chart? Check the Perps market inside Quant AI. @tryquantio #QuantAIPioneers#