注册并分享邀请链接,可获得视频播放与邀请奖励。

与「NERD」相关的搜索结果

NERD 贴吧
一个关键词就是一个贴吧,路径全站唯一。
创建贴吧
用户
未找到
包含 NERD 的内容
梁文锋是非常特立独行的,浙大毕业不找正经工作,闭关炒股三年,最后干量化干到国内一霸,割得A股散户嗷嗷叫,筹集资金干AI,生在美国完全就是考藤校,大二辍学创业那种类型的nerd 幸运的是,梁出生在广东一个观念比较开明的教师家庭,允许他从小拆装收音机,超前学高数,广东是中国商业氛围最浓厚的省份之一,要生在内地,梁估计就只会做题进大厂了。。。
显示更多
0
148
1.2K
85
转发到社区
重生之我在币圈捡垃圾 ‣ BFI @bitfi_org ‣ Cap @capapp ‣ Bulk @bulktrade ‣ ReFi @refihub 这周疯狂塞钱,美股再牛逼跟我也没关系,作为 CNN(Crypto Native Nerd)哪里赚钱哪里亏最开心。 以上项目如果你一个也没参加,恭喜你,我们终于分手了。
显示更多
0
16
31
5
转发到社区
Today a crazy quantum story just got wilder. On March 31, the Google Quantum AI team published a landmark result on Shor's algorithm for elliptic curve cryptography. Technically, the paper was a bombshell: a dramatic 10x improvement over the state-of-the-art. As a stunt and wakeup call to the blockchain space, those optimisations were illustrated on secp256k1, the elliptic curve underlying Bitcoin and Ethereum signatures. But perhaps the most striking part of the paper was sociological, not technical. Instead of following standard academic process, the optimisations were kept secret, hidden behind a zero-knowledge (ZK) proof. Google's accompanying blog post mentions they "engaged with the U.S. government". The ZK proof demonstrates the existence of algorithmic improvements without leaking details. Academic censorship with ZK, a historic first! As a co-author of the Google paper I witnessed some of the context surrounding this censorship. To be honest, multiple aspects of that context don't sit well with me. As much as I believe the general public ought to know more, I am limited in my ability to whistleblow. Though let me be clear about one thing: the Google team's professionalism has been absolutely exemplary, and they deserve nothing but praise. Censorship has a way of backfiring. The Streisand effect, where an attempt to bury something only draws more attention to it, is exactly what's unfolding today. First, Google's key optimisation has been rediscovered by the French. And in a thrilling turn of events, a collaborative Shor-at-home challenge just launched. The initiative, available at ecdsa[.]fail, breached a new Shor world record in a matter of hours. Let's start with the rediscovery. Just two months after Google's paper, French quantum expert André Schrottenloher cracks the main secret optimisation. His paper, titled "Optimized Point Addition Circuits for Elliptic Curve Discrete Logarithms", landed on the arXiv today. Big congrats to André, who beat several other nerdsnipped experts to it. In a blog post also published today, Craig Gidney, the world expert on Shor optimisations, revealed that he'd been sitting on this very optimisation for a whole year under censorship pressure. Interestingly, André missed a handful of minor optimisations, both from Google's original publication and from improvements found since. It's plausible there's still plenty of juice left to squeeze out of Shor, and this is exactly what the ecdsa[.]fail challenge is about. The verifier program developed for the ZK proof does double duty, automatically filtering for valid submissions. Dozens of compounding small and micro improvements are rolling in. As of the time of writing there's an 8.4% improvement to Google's circuit, as measured by the product of logical qubit count and Toffoli gate count. Nice! The nerdsnipping ran deeper than anyone expected. Over the last few weeks it became clear it extended well beyond André and other quantum experts. Behind the scenes, a small army of amateurs quietly got to work. Inspired by Karpathy-style autoresearch, they turned AI on Shor. Ironically, the verifier program for the ZK proof makes an ideal reward function for AIs. The barrier to entry for this modern style of research is refreshingly low, with several non-experts, even a teenager, finding nice optimisations. Get in touch if you'd like to join a Telegram group with fellow autoresearchers :) Part 2: neutral atoms and qday The story doesn't end with Google. On the same day Google went public, a stealthy startup called Oratomic published its own Shor paper in a coordinated release. It made a splash, ultimately becoming the most upvoted paper on scirate[.]com, a website ranking arXiv papers. Oratomic's claim was wild. By building on Google's logical optimisations and applying custom physical optimisations for neutral atoms, they claimed just 10K physical qubits were sufficient to run Shor's algorithm on secp256k1. That number is mind-bogglingly low. Knowing essentially nothing about neutral atoms when Oratomic's paper landed, I was intrigued and decided to learn more about the tech. I fell straight down the rabbit hole and spent a couple hundred hours on the topic. I got a little obsessed and watched every YouTube video I could find and spoke to a bunch of experts. My conclusion? The tech is real, very real. Even Google recently decided to start a neutral atom lab, a notable pivot from their sole focus on superconducting qubits. If you care about qday, i.e. the day a quantum computer will break the first piece of cryptography in production, neutral atoms demand your attention. I shared some of my learnings on Shor and neutral atoms in a 30min talk at the ZKProof cryptography conference. You can find it on YouTube by searching "zkproof neutral atom". Here's an interesting observation about this duo of breakthrough papers: neither Google nor Oratomic say a word about what their results mean for qday. No timelines. Zero. Nada. That is especially baffling given that the whole point of whitehat quantum cryptanalysis is to inform qday estimations and help the general public make good decisions. So let me attempt to partially fill the silence, similarly to what Scott Aaronson did in his April 29 post. Given everything I know, including scary non-public information, I now put the odds of qday by 2032 at 50%. 10% by 2030. Anecdotally, the US government has its own date: 2035. Originating at the NSA and later adopted by NIST, it's when branches of the US government will be disallowed from using quantum-vulnerable cryptography. In plain language: with hindsight, that date is a joke and should be discounted entirely. I don't see how NIST avoids being forced to pull it forward by years. Part 3: post-quantum cryptography There are good reasons to sound the alarm today, but please do not panic. Rushing carelessly towards immature post-quantum cryptography is a recipe for disaster. IMO a good target date for migration is 2029, roughly 3.5 years out. 2029 happens to be the date selected by Google, Cloudflare, and the Ethereum Foundation. These days most of my time goes to safely migrating Ethereum towards post-quantum cryptography as part of the broader lean Ethereum effort. There's a lot to do. We need to rip out and replace BLS signatures at the consensus layer, KZG commitments at the data layer, and ECDSA signatures at the execution layer. The plan to get there is compelling, and is based on hash-based cryptography. Within the Ethereum Foundation we've developed a Swiss army knife called leanVM (github[.]com/leanEthereum/leanVM) powered by the magic of hash-based SNARKs. Thanks to truly exceptional work by Emile, Thomas, and others, its performance is derisked. Regarding security, leanVM is a jewel, a minimal zkVM crafted for end-to-end formal verification and maximum security. Want to help? There are two $1M initiatives. First, the Proximity Prize (proximityprize[.]org). Solve a long-standing mathematical conjecture in coding theory, improve hash-based SNARKs, and go home a millionaire. Second, the Poseidon Initiative (poseidon-initiative[.]info), offers $1M for breaking Poseidon, the SNARK-friendly hash function.
显示更多
0
286
4.9K
867
转发到社区
/ 6月1日(月)エントリー受付開始! 2026 66th ACC TOKYO CREATIVITY AWARDS フィルム部門紹介📺🎬 \ #ACC賞# フィルム部門では、 📌テレビCM・地域テレビCMを評価する「Aカテゴリー」 📌Web上で公開されている映像広告を評価する「Bカテゴリー」 の2つカテゴリーで作品を募集します。 🟦フィルム部門 審査委員紹介 <審査委員長> 花田礼(電通/クリエイティブディレクター、プランナー) <審査委員> ・有元沙矢香(電通/クリエイティブディレクター、コピーライター) ・市川晴華 (CHOCOLATE/プランナー、クリエイティブディレクター) ・市之瀬浩子(TBWA HAKUHODO/脚本家、CMプラナー) ・大澤創太 (NERD/代表取締役、クリエイティブディレクター) ・奥山雄太 (SIX/クリエイティブディレクター) ・栗田雅俊 (電通/CMプランナー、コピーライター) ・小堀友樹 (電通 (Creative KANSAI)/CMプランナー、コピーライター) ・指原莉乃 (太田プロダクション/タレント) ・佐藤雄介 (電通/クリエイティブディレクター、CMプランナー) ・澤本嘉光 (dentsu japan/グロースオフィサー ECD) ・中田みのり(博報堂/CMプラナー、映像監督) ・まるそう (CHOCOLATE/プランナー) ・水本晋平 (電通/クリエイティブディレクター、プランナー) ・山崎隆明 (Watson-Crick/クリエーティブディレクター、プランナー、コピーライター) 👥審査委員詳細 🔗 📝応募要項 🔗 皆さまからのご応募をお待ちしております! #ACCTOKYOCREATIVITYAWARDS# #ACC審査委員紹介2026# #フィルム部門# #film# #テレビCM# #onlinefilm#
显示更多
0
6
422
61
转发到社区
Dear AI Nerds, What have you vibe coded so far that is actually making money? (got a link?)
0
6
219
2
转发到社区
are nerdy Asian girls your type? yes or no.
0
61
1.3K
16
转发到社区
got a massage today & she asked why i’m so tense in my shoulders and neck, i didn’t know how to tell her it’s from nerd necking while gaming
i love my manss so silly, nerdy, & submissive (yet aggressive lol)
0
10
187
5
转发到社区
@DiscussingFilm he’s such a nerd and it’s so awesome