与「Outside」相关的搜索结果

X AI ALGORITHM UPDATE (BIG ONE) 🚨 X updated their open source algorithm yesterday and the biggest number in it is gone: copy link went from 20 to 0 points. Small accounts should focus on: posts people like, reply to and stay on (so stop counting on link copies) tl;dr: - on Nov 13 X's open source code set the score for copying a post's link to 0 - copy link: 20 → 0 - it was the top score in the whole system, 4x a reply - the code also names a "copy link bait" spam check - likes (0.708), replies (5) and DM shares (5) didn't move full details: - The number that's gone Since I started reading X's open source code in August, one number sat at the top: 20, for someone tapping share and copying your post's link. Nothing else came close. As of the Nov 13 release, it's 0. X still guesses who'll copy your link. It just multiplies that guess by 0 now. X didn't explain it. It's just what the code says. (I check the open source algo daily with Claude and share updates with you) - Cross it off your list My own checklist called copy link the biggest number. Last week's post said it too. It was true then. It isn't now. If you saved that list, cross that line out. - The "copy link bait" check X's code now mentions a spam check called "copy link bait". In the code it adds a spam label to the post, and that label already keeps a post out of strangers' feeds. It only shows up in a test, so I can't see if it's running or how strict it is. My read: X saw people baiting link copies, so it turned the score off and built something to catch the bait. That's a read, the code doesn't say why. - Why that matters if you're small If your plan was posts people copy the link to, that plan now earns 0 in X's ranking. A copied link can still bring people in from outside X. It just doesn't push your post up anymore. What still pays: likes at 0.708 (the highest ever), people staying on your post, replies at 5 and back and forth with mutuals at 20. - Also new: photo and video tags If a post has a spam label, people you tag in its photo or video who don't follow you won't get notified. Same idea as last week's rule for replies. - What didn't change Every other score. Your new posts still get their extra push in the first 2 hours and first 200 views, and early likes still pick which one gets it. Here's a recap of what you should be doing: - aim for likes, replies and time spent, the copy link score is gone - a DM share still earns 5, same as a reply or a quote - likes sit at 0.708, never higher - time on your post keeps counting at its best rate yet - 10+ seconds after someone taps in adds 0.385 - write your replies yourself, under big accounts most of all - give people a reason to hang around your profile - in videos the opening seconds carry it, an open alone scores 0 - posts read to the end help X find you strangers - smaller accounts (below 50K) get a shot at a spot near 16 for a fresh original - early likes decide which new post gets that spot - post when your followers are awake, the push lasts 2 hours and 200 views - mutuals going back and forth earn 20, so follow back the regulars - only your originals ever get shown to strangers - like 1 and like 32 each unlock another way to reach strangers - one strong post per feed, your second only counts 62% - clips longer than 10 seconds for the video lists - a post likely to win you a follow gets +4 - give your pinned post a look, it can affect the whole account What you should NOT be doing: - counting on copy link shares, they score 0 now - baiting link copies, the code names a spam check for exactly that - a spam label also stops your photo tags reaching non-followers - AI-written replies under big accounts, "llm slop" is a flag X uses - copy-paste replies, labeled ones skip non-followers' notifications - chasing taps, 0.274 and dropping - drifting off your topic, each probable "not interested" takes 53.07 away - videos people open and leave, the open itself earns 0 - posting at 3am, it wastes the 2 hour push - expecting replies and reposts to reach strangers - an insult label, it hides that post from non-followers - earning a misinfo or low quality label, which adds a warning and locks strangers out of liking or sharing - 3 adult photos or videos among your latest 5 posts, that puts a label on you - forgetting videos get rechecked at 64 and 512 likes - one account label and strangers stop seeing you - pinning a link to a site X rates badly, that can mean a label for a week - posting your own old words again risks the copypasta flag - a low quality link plus tagged strangers reads as spam - bait for engagement, big or small it gets a label - several posts back to back, they split the same feed - hashtag piles, they do nothing - bookmarks for reach, they score 0 - hoping a 3 day old post still lands in For You, it stops at 2 days

Exciting Claude Duet update: every Pro, Max and Ultra subscriber in the US who was on the waitlist as of yesterday has now been invited. Thank you for your patience! If you haven’t joined yet, the waitlist is here: We also wanted to share a note on usage. To give you room to play with Claude Duet, the research preview comes with limit resets: 3 for Pro, 1 for Max and Ultra. Please check your inbox, give Claude Duet a try, and keep the feedback coming. We’re aiming to open up to more countries outside the US very soon.

Anthropic just published an engineering guide on how to build always-on agents. The biggest misconception: an always-on agent does NOT run 24/7. It sleeps almost all day, wakes up for short runs, saves state, and goes back to sleep. The 5 core pieces I distilled: 1. Event Inbox Put a database table between webhooks and your agent. Acknowledge webhooks fast, run only one active worker per user so runs never collide, and batch rapid messages together. 2. Timers Keep timers in a separate table from the inbox. Split them into one-off follow-ups and recurring schedules. A background poller drops due timers into the inbox. 3. Lean Memory + Dreaming Only store what cannot be looked up again: user instructions, user notes, past messages, and task progress. Load a small index at wakeup, not every file. Run periodic dreaming passes to clean out stale facts. 4. Unattended Permissions Never put raw API keys inside the agent sandbox — inject them through an outside proxy. Use Deferred Tool Calls to pause risky actions for approval without blocking the worker. 5. Outbox Queue outgoing replies so your agent paces notifications instead of spamming users at 3 AM.

An American porn actress says a single shoot in Madrid involved 80 men and nearly a liter of semen. She counted 122 ejaculations, followed by another 10 onto her face. The night before, she had sat across from the director asking about pay and medical testing. He answered by opening a spreadsheet. In the interview below, she describes how the production was organized, from recruiting performers to deciding when she could take a break. According to her, the studio maintained a roster of around 300 men in Madrid. Getting onto it required a referral. Test results fed into the spreadsheet so the crew could track who was cleared to participate. The men could earn more depending on the shot they delivered. She says she was given three medications before filming, including one she describes as a muscle relaxant. Nine women worked as fluffers. Their waiting room had pink furniture and candy on the table. Outside, the men lined up while her videos played on a television. The shoot followed a repeating schedule: ten ejaculations into her mouth, swallow, then another ten. After fifty, she took a break and recorded an interview before returning. One assistant held a bowl beneath her chin to catch whatever spilled. She says the role even had a name: “scooper.” Amid all that coordination, she remembers one man missing and quietly apologizing. “I’m so sorry. I’m so sorry.” For the final sequence, she requested ten men instead of the usual five. Then the director addressed the group in Spanish. One word caught her attention: “ojos.” Eyes. Afterward, she asked whether he had instructed them to aim at her eyes. He denied it. According to her, he had repeated something she mentioned over dinner - that she didn’t mind and the men interpreted it differently. She has since referred other American performers to the production. “I’ve sent them so many Americans.”

MY PAYCHECK WAS SUPPOSED TO BE $4,000. INSTEAD, $50,000 HIT MY BANK ACCOUNT. I reported it to HR the next morning. Twenty minutes later, the CEO walked into the office, locked the door and said something that made my blood run cold. "I was beginning to think nobody here was honest." I've worked for this company for six years. My regular paycheck is $4,000. So when I checked my banking app on payday and saw a $50,000 direct deposit, I knew something was wrong. I didn't spend it. I didn't transfer it. I didn't even tell my coworkers. The next morning, I walked straight into HR. ME: "I think there's been a payroll mistake." HR: "What kind of mistake?" ME: "My paycheck was $50,000." She stopped typing. HR: "How much?" ME: "$50,000. My usual paycheck is $4,000." She stared at me for several seconds. HR: "Have you moved any of it?" ME: "No." HR: "Not even a small amount?" ME: "It's not my money. Why would I touch it?" She slowly closed her laptop. Then she asked a question I wasn't expecting. HR: "Did you receive a notification about the payment?" ME: "Of course. That's how I noticed it." She picked up her phone and made a call. I couldn't hear the person on the other end, but I heard her say: "He's here. And he hasn't touched it." She ended the call. ME: "What's going on?" HR: "How much do you know about the company's payroll system?" ME: "Nothing beyond checking my paycheck." She stood up, walked to the office door and closed it. HR: "Listen. You're not the first person to receive that amount." My stomach tightened. ME: "What do you mean?" She turned her computer towards me. There were eleven employees on a payroll report. Every single one had received a $50,000 payment. ME: "Eleven people?" HR: "Yes. You're the only one who hasn't moved the money." ME: "What happened to the others?" Before she could answer, someone knocked. Two firm knocks. Her face changed. Then a man's voice came from outside. "Open the door. We need to talk about those eleven payments." It was the CEO. 🧵

After Jensen Huang was forced to resign, flowers were left outside Nvidia’s California headquarters, and a woman could be seen appearing to cry near the building’s entrance. #JensenHuang#

🚨 BREAKING: MICROSOFT CEO SATYA NADELLA FINALLY ADDRESSES THE 24-HOUR OUTLOOK OUTAGE, AND HIS REMARKS ARE ALREADY RAISING EYEBROWS. In his statement, Nadella says: “We understand the frustration millions of users are experiencing, and we take full responsibility for the disruption affecting Microsoft services. However, I want to address something that has been circulating online. This incident is not politically motivated, it has nothing to do with Jensen Huang, and there is no connection between Microsoft’s technical challenges and the personal or professional affairs of individuals outside this company. Our internal review is ongoing, and while we have identified several areas that require further examination, I cannot disclose every detail at this stage. I ask our users to remain patient as we work towards a full restoration. We will provide further updates when we are in a position to share more.” The CEO’s carefully worded response has left some users asking an uncomfortable question: If there is nothing unusual behind the outage, why does the explanation sound so carefully guarded?

🚨🇺🇸 A simple majority of Nvidia's 11 directors can remove Jensen Huang "with or without cause"... and they are reportedly meeting TONIGHT Reuters says the meeting is under way, three days after the same board said it had confidence in him. Ten of the eleven directors are independent, and he owns about 3.6% of the stock, which is nowhere near enough to stop a vote against him. One longtime tech analyst described what the board is weighing: "Jensen is not replaceable... there is no other person on the management team bench that can step in seamlessly as CEO." With no successor named, speculation has turned to his children, who both started as interns and now hold senior roles. His daughter Madison, 35, leads marketing for Nvidia’s robotics and AI platforms and travels with him to major events, while his son Spencer, 36, manages robotics products. A Huang in charge would signal continuity, but their father said last month either would have to earn the job, and neither is an executive officer, so a temporary chief from outside the family is the likelier first move. Source: Reuters, WSJ / Writer: Daniel