与「Raul」相关的搜索结果

🚨 | LO TORTURARON CON BOLSAS EN LA CABEZA Y GASES TÓXICOS. HOY A SUS 71 AÑOS SALIÓ EN SILLA DE RUEDAS | El caso del general Lozada libre tras 13 años de persecución Se llama Ramón Antonio Lozada Saavedra. General retirado de la Guardia Nacional. Padre de cinco hijos. Esta noche salió del Palacio de Justicia en silla de ruedas, con un estado de salud que Alfredo Romero calificó como "gravísimo". Llevaba más de dos años postrado en una cama del Hospital Militar de Caracas. Diabetes, hipertensión, anemia, infecciones, pérdida de visión. Un cuerpo destruido por el régimen. Su historia es la de un hombre al que el chavismo intentó matar sin matarlo. En 2013 fue secuestrado y torturado durante días por funcionarios de inteligencia. Lo abandonaron en una vía de Aragua, destruido físicamente. Todo para presionar a su amigo, el general Raúl Baduel, quien después moriría bajo custodia del Estado. En 2017 lo detuvieron otra vez. Asfixia mecánica, bolsas en la cabeza, gases tóxicos, sin comida ni agua. Quedó en 40 kilos. En 2019 fueron por él una tercera vez. Estaba enfermo, en reposo en su casa en Barinas. Le cubrieron la cabeza, lo llevaron a un bosque, lo desnudaron, lo ataron e intentaron ahogarlo en un río. Él repetía: "Esta vez sí voy a morir." En 2022 su cuerpo colapsó. Fue operado del cerebro por un hematoma causado por los golpes. Esta noche el Tribunal 23 de Juicio del Área Metropolitana de Caracas lo condenó a 8 años por instigación a la rebelión. Llevaba 9 años y medio preso. Sin pruebas. Sin testigos. Sin evidencia en el expediente. Lo condenaron por debajo del tiempo que ya le habían robado. Esa fue la fórmula del régimen para sacarlo sin admitir lo que le hicieron.

Some of my perspective on where the @ethereumfndn is going. First of all, this is only my own view. The board is not just me, and I have no extra special powers on the board that the other board members do not. @aerugoettinea is the one executing much of this transition. My input has been largely on technical questions. The board is in the process of expanding, and my own power within the org will continue to decrease, which is honestly what I want. The 2025 era brought many important improvements to EF and its ability to execute. Many issues were resolved, and EF continues to benefit from its improved efficiency and greater focus on concrete goals to this day. And so with those problems resolved, early this year, the largest remaining hole that I perceived was something different nagging at me: I would regularly spot people saying things like "vitalik says these beautiful things about ethereum needing to be decentralized, and have privacy, and be a sanctuary technology, but why do the EF's actions not reflect that?" Now, you may have been hearing something different. You may not have been sensing a feeling of crisis at all, and maybe were hearing people saying that finally we were taking execution and BD seriously and the main task for us is to keep going that way and be even better and faster. Then probably there is genuine difference between you and me, in what kinds of criticism I take most seriously, and what kinds of critics through their criticism are most able to make me feel pain. As an analogy, let's briefly switch over to a different domain. One belief you can have about Google is that it is a success story, and has brought a lot of good to humanity in organizing the world's information. Another belief you can have about Google is that they had a beautiful idealistic beginning, but at some point the corruption of mainstream corporate attitudes seeped in, and they slowly bit by bit completely abandoned the "don't be evil" slogan. My belief on Google specifically is probably somewhere between the two. BUT, if you had taken me back in time to ~2008, and offered me a button to press to make Google one or two standard deviations more "dogmatic", eg. give Richard Stallman permanent veto power over some key policies, I would immediately press it. Why? Because a choice for one company is not a choice for the world, or even one country. Google existed and exists in the context of a technology industry generally drifting away from early idealistic don't-be-evil roots and toward greed for financial gain, totalizing visions of accelerated superintelligence, infiltration by sociopaths, and craven capitulation to (or worse, active participation in) government pressure for ideological control, surveillance and war. And so *one company* doing something different, positioning itself to be what George Bernard Shaw calls the Unreasonable Man, resisting the trend of the times, would have been better for freedom, balance of power and stability of society as a whole, than *all* large companies bending to dominant trends. This is a part of my version of pluralism. This line of thinking is not just mine, but I also is not too far off from what Aya and others had in mind with the Mandate. Now how does this all get to the role of the EF? EF is not a "center of Ethereum", rather EF is "one node, with a defined purpose, alongside other nodes". We've always said that the EF should be the latter, but many in the Ethereum ecosystem (and even within the EF) wanted us to be the former. Now, we are taking action to ensure that we will be the latter. This is particularly important because EF is a limited organization, with limited resources and limited organizational capacity. The EF has only ~0.16% of all ETH (less than many other individual ETH holders), whereas among other blockchains it's common for "the central foundation" to have 10-50%. Fiscally, the EF was originally designed to fulfill a limited work scope defined in the token sale docs and other pre-launch materials (building the chain software; getting through Frontier, Homestead, Metropolis, Serenity), which was fully completed in 2022; it was not designed to be an eternal steward. And so today, the EF is choosing to use its remaining resources to pursue longevity over breadth (yes, this means we sell less ETH). The EF focuses *specifically* on those activities critical to the success of ethereum as a censorship/capture-resistant, open, private and secure system, that would not happen otherwise. This means making hard choices, and in some cases even activities that we highly approve of and people that we highly respect becoming outside of the EF. People of great technical talent, public respect and even alignment with the mission and CROPS being outside of the EF is in fact necessary if we want important tasks to be able to attract outside capital. This also means the EF taking opinionated stands culturally. This is all intended in cooperation with all other parts of ethereum. We recognize that many other parts of the ethereum world highly respect CROPS and related values. But highly respecting is not the same as choosing to specialize and totally dedicate to a domain (Compare in a different domain: I think reducing animal cruelty is important, and I like vegan food, but am not full unconditional vegan myself) EF is still in a transition period, and we expect its new long-term form to stabilize over the next few months. What are the guiding principles of this new form? Again, I am only one person, but I can give my answer from a technical perspective (there are also critical non-technical aspects). At the core, *Ethereum must be impressive*. We are living in an age of highly intelligent AI and all kinds of other technological acceleration. "Status quo EVM, with a hard fork or two a year to optimize for short-term needs of users" is not interesting. To some, "impressive" means: 250ms latency and 1M TPS. I think Ethereum trying to go that route is a mistake. Being as fast and as scalable as possible, and only a small epsilon more decentralized than the others, is a route to mediocrity, and if we try it we will lose. I think Ethereum should scale. But I think Ethereum should strive the hardest to be deeply impressive in a different dimension: the CROPS dimension. This means things like: * Provably bug-free Ethereum. This is a goal that all cybersecurity researchers would have thought is absurd and impossible, up until roughly 6 months ago. Now, it's on the cusp of being possible, thanks to AI-assisted formal verification. So we should be frontrunners in doing this. * Available chain consensus. Ethereum is, and with lean consensus will cotninue to be, the ONLY chain that has both (i) traditional-BFT style properties that it's safe under asynchrony up to a high level of fault tolerance, and (ii) the bitcoin PoW-style property that under synchrony it's safe up to 49% attackers. As far as I can tell, literally no other chain has this or is planning for it; bitcoin goes for (ii) only and most other chains go for (i) only. Some will remember I fought hard for this, Unreasonably insisting that it is not OK for ethereum to rely on social consensus and hard forks to rescue ethereum from 34% of nodes going offline. It's OK for chains like hyperledger, bnb, solana, tempo, etc. It's not OK for bitcoin or ethereum or eg. zcash. * Intermediary minimization. The fact that smart contract wallets, protocols like railgun, etc have to send transactions through intermediaries to get included onchain is honestly embarrassing, and it's a constant point of fragility. Hence the work on FOCIL and EIP-8141 (and 7701 and years of work before) to make transaction sending intermediary-minimized with public mempool and strong inclusion properties, in a truly general-purpose way, that covers not just eg. secp256r1, but also privacy protocols and much more. Kohaku is pushing intermediary minimization at the user layer, pulling Ethereum away from the dystopian status quo world where our wallets don't even verify the chain, send our private data out to a dozen third-party servers, and toward a brighter CROPS future. Some of these goals are Unreasonable - maybe Ethereum would be "fine" getting only 50% of the way - what if we depend on intermediaries, but make it easy to switch? But going 50% of the way would not make Ethereum Deeply Impressive in the CROPS way. So we push for 100%. Fortunately all these goals are compatible with high TPS, this is a major focus of research (esp. on scaling the state). Well-designed L2s can also help, especially L2s optimized for specific applications (eg. high-volume trading, privacy...). These goals are even compatible with significantly lower slot times, thanks to Raul's work on erasure-coded P2P, and many other optimizations. The most high-value "product" of the ethereum blockchain, financially speaking, is ETH the asset. Ethereum secures $250 billion of ETH. The types of properties of Ethereum that I mentioned above are very good for ETH the asset. Nearly 90% of my net worth is in ETH, and most of the remainder is ~$40m of onchain fiat of which every dollar has already been allocated for some open-source biotech or software or hardware initiative. That said, there are aspects of supporting ETH the asset - *necessary* aspects even - that are outside the scope of the EF. This is where we need other heroes (some of whom hold more ETH than the EF does) to step in and help. EF has been recently thinking more about how it will relate to other such organizations, and give them needed initial support. EF will be a smaller ship than in previous years, a more opinionated one - in some cases more opinionated in ways that might be difficult to comprehend - but a longer-lasting one, and one suited to making sure that ethereum brings something meaningful to the world. We are grateful to all those inside and outside the EF who are helping to make this happen.

The U.S. is taking steps to indict Raúl Castro, the 94-year-old former president of Cuba and brother of Fidel, in connection with the downing of planes 30 years ago, according to U.S. officials familiar with the matter. CBS News' @lilialuciano explains what we know so far.

The U.S. is taking steps to indict Raúl Castro, the 94-year-old former president of Cuba and brother of Fidel, in connection with the downing of planes 30 years ago, according to U.S. officials familiar with the matter.

Meta says it may have to shut down Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp for everyone in New Mexico. The company issued this warning in a court document as part of an ongoing lawsuit that New Mexico started in 2023. The state claims Meta let kids see harmful and addictive content, including messages from predators, and did not tell families the truth about the risks. In March 2026, a jury agreed with the state and ordered Meta to pay a $375 million fine. The state now wants major changes including: -stronger age verification checks -safety-first content suggestions -private accounts by default for kids -easier ways to report and block users. Meta says these rules are too difficult and too expensive and would need to create separate versions of its apps just for New Mexico The company adds that it does not want to shut down service in the state but may have no other choice if the court orders full compliance. New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez called the warning a pressure tactic. He said the real issue is protecting children, not company profits.

5th ALBUM "音故知新" ユニット曲 Music Video 公開🎬 Hikaru Iwamoto / Tatsuya Fukazawa 'Symmetry'💛💜 🔗 Ryohei Abe / Ren Meguro 'ART'💚🖤 🔗 Ryota Miyadate / Daisuke Sakuma '地球してるぜ' ❤️🩷 🔗 Raul / Shota Watanabe / Koji Mukai 'サンシャインドリーマー'🤍💙🧡 🔗 #SnowMan# #SnowManデビュー6周年#

4th ALBUM "RAYS" ユニット曲 Music Video 公開🎬 Hikaru Iwamoto / Raul 'GLITCH'💛🤍 🔗 Ren Meguro / Daisuke Sakuma 'Hot Flow'🖤🩷 🔗 Tatsuya Fukazawa / Ryohei Abe / Ryota Miyadate 'ナイトスケープ'💜💚❤️ 🔗 Shota Watanabe / Koji Mukai '星のうた'💙🧡 🔗 #SnowMan# #SnowManデビュー6周年#