与「Release」相关的搜索结果

X AI ALGORITHM UPDATE (BIG ONE) 🚨 X updated their open source algorithm yesterday and the biggest number in it is gone: copy link went from 20 to 0 points. Small accounts should focus on: posts people like, reply to and stay on (so stop counting on link copies) tl;dr: - on Nov 13 X's open source code set the score for copying a post's link to 0 - copy link: 20 → 0 - it was the top score in the whole system, 4x a reply - the code also names a "copy link bait" spam check - likes (0.708), replies (5) and DM shares (5) didn't move full details: - The number that's gone Since I started reading X's open source code in August, one number sat at the top: 20, for someone tapping share and copying your post's link. Nothing else came close. As of the Nov 13 release, it's 0. X still guesses who'll copy your link. It just multiplies that guess by 0 now. X didn't explain it. It's just what the code says. (I check the open source algo daily with Claude and share updates with you) - Cross it off your list My own checklist called copy link the biggest number. Last week's post said it too. It was true then. It isn't now. If you saved that list, cross that line out. - The "copy link bait" check X's code now mentions a spam check called "copy link bait". In the code it adds a spam label to the post, and that label already keeps a post out of strangers' feeds. It only shows up in a test, so I can't see if it's running or how strict it is. My read: X saw people baiting link copies, so it turned the score off and built something to catch the bait. That's a read, the code doesn't say why. - Why that matters if you're small If your plan was posts people copy the link to, that plan now earns 0 in X's ranking. A copied link can still bring people in from outside X. It just doesn't push your post up anymore. What still pays: likes at 0.708 (the highest ever), people staying on your post, replies at 5 and back and forth with mutuals at 20. - Also new: photo and video tags If a post has a spam label, people you tag in its photo or video who don't follow you won't get notified. Same idea as last week's rule for replies. - What didn't change Every other score. Your new posts still get their extra push in the first 2 hours and first 200 views, and early likes still pick which one gets it. Here's a recap of what you should be doing: - aim for likes, replies and time spent, the copy link score is gone - a DM share still earns 5, same as a reply or a quote - likes sit at 0.708, never higher - time on your post keeps counting at its best rate yet - 10+ seconds after someone taps in adds 0.385 - write your replies yourself, under big accounts most of all - give people a reason to hang around your profile - in videos the opening seconds carry it, an open alone scores 0 - posts read to the end help X find you strangers - smaller accounts (below 50K) get a shot at a spot near 16 for a fresh original - early likes decide which new post gets that spot - post when your followers are awake, the push lasts 2 hours and 200 views - mutuals going back and forth earn 20, so follow back the regulars - only your originals ever get shown to strangers - like 1 and like 32 each unlock another way to reach strangers - one strong post per feed, your second only counts 62% - clips longer than 10 seconds for the video lists - a post likely to win you a follow gets +4 - give your pinned post a look, it can affect the whole account What you should NOT be doing: - counting on copy link shares, they score 0 now - baiting link copies, the code names a spam check for exactly that - a spam label also stops your photo tags reaching non-followers - AI-written replies under big accounts, "llm slop" is a flag X uses - copy-paste replies, labeled ones skip non-followers' notifications - chasing taps, 0.274 and dropping - drifting off your topic, each probable "not interested" takes 53.07 away - videos people open and leave, the open itself earns 0 - posting at 3am, it wastes the 2 hour push - expecting replies and reposts to reach strangers - an insult label, it hides that post from non-followers - earning a misinfo or low quality label, which adds a warning and locks strangers out of liking or sharing - 3 adult photos or videos among your latest 5 posts, that puts a label on you - forgetting videos get rechecked at 64 and 512 likes - one account label and strangers stop seeing you - pinning a link to a site X rates badly, that can mean a label for a week - posting your own old words again risks the copypasta flag - a low quality link plus tagged strangers reads as spam - bait for engagement, big or small it gets a label - several posts back to back, they split the same feed - hashtag piles, they do nothing - bookmarks for reach, they score 0 - hoping a 3 day old post still lands in For You, it stops at 2 days

NAYEON SINGLE “NA-sty” ONCE, NAYEON is hosting a listening party on Spotify! RSVP at the links below to join the party, live with NAYEON. 🗓️November 20th at 5:30 PM KST / 03:30 AM ET / 12:30 AM PST RSVP: *available only for Premium users in select regions Have a question for NAYEON? Submit it below! 🔗 🖥️[NA-sty] Pre-save🖥️ ➮ Release 2026.11.20 FRI 2PM KST/0AM ET #TWICE# #트와이스# #NAYEON# #나연# #NA_sty# #BABY_ANGEL# #SpotifyListeningParty# @SpotifyKR @SpotifyKpop

Dario looks just like Cesare Borgia. He has been fabricating stories from the very beginning, trying to frighten society, manipulate public opinion, and force the U.S. government to regulate AI. His political allies will then help Anthropic use regulation as a knife to kill open-source models, so they can achieve an oligopoly. To that end, he is even willing to team up with Altman—first eliminate everyone else. The biggest threat to Dario is Jensen Huang, who supports open-source models, and Nvidia is also about to release its own open-source model. The second threat is China’s open-source models. This is why Dario uses the scare tactic that “AI will destroy humanity.” He even wants to turn AI into a religion. All religions originate from fear—they need an apocalypse to terrify the believers. Because the Republicans are vigorously developing AI, the Democrats have turned around and started demanding limits and regulation on AI, using it as a political weapon to attack Trump and the Republican Party. This is the American political-business game. Have you learned it? ---

Dario looks just like Cardinal Richelieu. He has been fabricating stories from the very beginning, trying to frighten society, manipulate public opinion, and force the U.S. government to regulate AI. His political allies will then help Anthropic use regulation as a knife to kill open-source models, so they can achieve an oligopoly. To that end, he is even willing to team up with Altman—first eliminate everyone else. The biggest threat to Dario is Jensen Huang, who supports open-source models, and Nvidia is also about to release its own open-source model. The second threat is China’s open-source models. This is why Dario uses the scare tactic that “AI will destroy humanity.” He even wants to turn AI into a religion. All religions originate from fear—they need an apocalypse to terrify the believers. Because the Republicans are vigorously developing AI, the Democrats have turned around and started demanding limits and regulation on AI, using it as a political weapon to attack Trump and the Republican Party. This is the American political-business game. Have you learned it? ---

窝趣！Obsidian 的 CEO 把自己用的知识库模板放到 GitHub 上了。 想用 Obsidian 搭建个人知识库，但不知道怎么分类、怎么组织笔记的朋友，可以先看看他的模板。 除了知识库模板，Obsidian 官方和 CEO Steph Ango（kepano）还分享了几个相关项目，我整理了 7 个： 1、40 Questions：年度复盘问题 kepano 整理的一份问题清单，用来回顾自己过去一年或一个阶段的生活。 不知道年度复盘从哪里开始的朋友，可以挑几个问题，结合自己的日记和笔记来回答。 2、Minimal：Obsidian 主题 一个简洁、可自定义的 Obsidian 主题。喜欢干净一点的笔记界面，可以在 Obsidian 的主题市场里搜索 Minimal。 3、obsidian-sample-plugin：官方插件模板 如果你用 Obsidian 的时候，发现现有插件满足不了自己的需求，可以拿这个官方模板作为起点，尝试开发一个自己的插件。 也可以把仓库交给 Codex，让它先帮你解释项目结构和开发步骤。 4、kepano-obsidian：个人知识库模板 Obsidian 的 CEO 把自己使用的 Vault 模板放到了 GitHub 上。里面展示了他组织笔记和资料的方式，可以下载下来研究，再根据自己的需求修改。 注意，这是公开的模板，不是他完整的私人知识库。 5、Flexoki：写作和编程配色 kepano 为写作和代码设计的一套配色。如果你想调整 Obsidian、编辑器或者自己网站的颜色，可以参考这套方案。 6、obsidian-releases：插件和主题目录 这里维护了 Obsidian 的社区插件目录、主题目录和公开版本信息。 想找插件、研究社区都有哪些工具，可以从这里入手。仓库本身不包含 Obsidian 的源代码。 7、JSON Canvas：开放式画布格式 Obsidian 的 Canvas 可以用来把笔记、图片和想法放到一张画布上。 JSON Canvas 是用于保存这些画布数据的开放文件格式。对想研究画布工具，或者希望了解画布数据怎么存储的朋友，可以看看这个项目。 如果你是刚开始用 Obsidian，我建议先看知识库模板和 Minimal 主题：先把笔记写起来，用一段时间之后，再根据自己的需求调整分类和插件。

Just want to let everyone know I have been released and I am good,healthy and ready to go . I want to thank everyone in Abu Dhabi for your help in resolving this matter. I love visiting Abu Dhabi and am happy to be welcomed. I do hope that they release everyone - i would not press charges. I want peace and the best for all. Thanks everyone for your love and support🦾

Leopold Aschenbrenner’s complete Q2 performance before his newest trades release Monday Top tier: • SanDisk $SNDK: -62% • Micron $MU: -34% Second tier: • Bloom Energy $BE: -38% • Taiwan Semiconductor $TSM: -18% • Nebius $NBIS: -59% Third tier: • CoreWeave $CRWV: -49% • Core Scientific $CORZ: -45% • STMicroelectronics $STM: -39% • Applied Digital $APLD: -49% • Riot Platforms $RIOT: -37% • SharonAI $SHAZ: -74% • IREN $IREN: -61% Smaller positions: • T1 Energy $TE: -82% • WhiteFiber $WYFI: -76% • Babcock & Wilcox $BW: -69% • Keel Infrastructure $KEEL: -69% • Bitdeer $BTDR: -66% • HIVE Digital $HIVE: -58% • CleanSpark $CLSK: -56% • Cerebras $CBRS: -53% • Vishay $VSH: -52% • ProPetro $PUMP: -49% • Solaris Energy $SEI: -23% Options: • Bloom Energy $BE [Calls]: $44,100,000 • Taiwan Semiconductor $TSM [Calls]: $23,900,000 • Infosys $INFY [Puts]: $5,200,000 Summary: Every common stock position is red. His entire portfolio is down 46.8% from Q2 release to present day. His newest trades release Monday, November 16th, showing what he owned on September 30th, after he sold most of this to Citadel in late July

OpenAI has yet to release GPT-6.2. There can only be three reasons: 1) They were surprised by how capable Fable 5.2 is and had to make GPT-6.2 better. 2) They found security vulnerabilities or other issues that need to be fixed. 3) Anthropic is going public next week, and OpenAI knows GPT-6.2 surpasses both Fable 5.2 and Opus 5.5. They’re trying to steal the spotlight ahead of their own planned IPO in 2027. I’m torn between 1 and 3, but I honestly don’t know. My gut tells me OpenAI was surprised by how good Fable 5.2 is. Either way, I expect GPT-6.2 to be released before November 19.

GCSA Insight: Critical Security Vulnerability Discovered in a Leading Robotics Manufacturer’s Product, with System-Level Privilege Compromise Verified on Physical Hardware As artificial intelligence and embodied AI technologies continue to advance, robots are evolving from conventional automated machines into intelligent systems capable of perception, decision-making, and autonomous operation. At the same time, cybersecurity risks are extending beyond software and data into the physical world. The security of robotic systems is no longer solely a matter of protecting data and devices; it can also directly affect operational safety, physical environments, and user safety. Recently, the security research team of the Global Cybersecurity Alliance (GCSA) discovered and verified a critical security vulnerability in a product developed by a leading robotics manufacturer. Through in-depth analysis and multiple rounds of testing on physical hardware, the team successfully breached the device’s system security boundaries and obtained the highest level of operating system privileges in a real-world device environment, demonstrating the vulnerability’s actual impact under specific testing conditions. This research encompassed the entire process, from identifying the security flaw and assessing its risks to validating its impact on physical hardware. The findings also highlight significant challenges facing the underlying security mechanisms of embodied AI systems. The research findings and supporting evidence have been formally submitted to the manufacturer. On November 13, 2026, the manufacturer responded by email, preliminarily confirming the existence of the vulnerability and stating that it had initiated internal remediation efforts and an assessment of the scope of affected products. It is important to emphasize that confirmation of a vulnerability does not mean the associated security risks have been eliminated. GCSA will continue to monitor the manufacturer’s assessment of the affected scope, remediation plans, and subsequent security validation, and will update its research findings as new information becomes available. For intelligent systems capable of physical interaction and movement, timely, effective, and verifiable security remediation is particularly important. In accordance with responsible vulnerability disclosure principles, GCSA is currently withholding sensitive information, including the manufacturer’s identity, specific product details, the vulnerability’s underlying mechanisms, and exploitation methods. GCSA is currently seeking guidance from relevant authorities and regulatory bodies regarding the associated security risks. Taking into account the manufacturer’s remediation progress and a comprehensive assessment of potential security implications, GCSA will carefully determine the appropriate arrangements for further disclosure. Subject to appropriate conditions and upon obtaining the consent of the relevant authorities and regulatory bodies, GCSA will publicly release a detailed security insight report, providing the industry with ongoing updates on the research findings and associated risk assessments. The findings of this research are based on specific testing environments and the evidence obtained to date. They do not imply that other product models or similar robotic systems are affected by the same security issue. This security research and validation on physical hardware represent one of GCSA’s initiatives in the field of embodied AI security. GCSA will continue to advance security research, coordinated vulnerability disclosure, and industry collaboration to promote stronger security response mechanisms across the artificial intelligence sector, enhance product security, and strengthen industry trust. 🔗 Read the full report: · Stay Connected with GCSA Follow GCSA's official social media channels for the latest news, product launches, research developments, and ecosystem updates. GCSA Official Telegram Channel: GCSA Official WeChat Account: #GCSAInsight# #GCSACybersecurity# #GCSASecVibe#

Some GOP pointed to Times... I doubt Times would release a good investigative journal as they have not for the last decade as they focused on cheap, easy albeit wellwrutten EDITORIALs. FT and Economics is definitely a drainage for the target release of filth. The US leaks thru UK is definitely for legal reason as the UK media sits on the Defence and Security Media Advisory (DSMA) Committee to use sovereign immunity on their hit list. I doubt this is the case, they might have fucked up in this op: Georgetown, Columbia is the Goldmine. They first did it thru the US media: if it is false accusation, they are going to be fucking sued but the richest man.