与「Shock」相关的搜索结果

Today, we’re proud to introduce the Pika API Club—a membership that gets you access to the leading gen media models at previously impossible prices. We were shocked by the 3x markup by many API aggregation platforms. So we built our own, negotiated better prices, and kept our markup as low as possible to pass the savings on. It’s time for AI to empower the next generation of builders and creators, not price them out.

AI模型评分都是被专项攻坚创造出来的，于是我对比了Fable5，Grok4.5， Kimi K3针对同一个交易系统审计结果进行了对比。 先说结论： Fable5：最适合作为系统级主审核模型 Kimi：最适合作为代码缺陷与一致性专项审核模型 Grok：最适合作为代码梳理和方案发散模型，不适合单独决定策略修改 最佳组合：Fable5全面审核+Grok 4.5代码梳理+K3代码审核 具体细节： 1. Fable5：系统级判断能力最强 Fable5 最大的优势不是代码读得比另外两个模型更多，而是它能把： 代码规则； sizing snapshot； intent ledger； 实际 block 统计； 当前资产 headroom； SELL/REDEEM 回流路径； 放进同一个因果框架。 它使用了几个非常关键的实盘指标： ADD 近 7 天约占新增资金 43%； 84% 资金已经部署； ETH、SOL、XRP headroom 为 0； 近 40 个周期中主要阻塞是：blocked_capital_efficiency=47 blocked_asset_cap=28 deployment cap=0 runway=0 这让它能够区分： “某个机制理论上可能限制资金” 和 “当前实盘真正正在限制资金的机制”。 最终它得出： ADD 对资金流向重要，但当前周转主因在回收端、资产 cap 和效率过滤，不在 ADD 准入本身。 这是三个模型中最接近生产系统审核要求的判断。 弱点 Fable5 仍有一些过度推断： 把 ADD 描述为让资金“锁得更久”，实际上 ADD 的剩余 TTE 通常比 ENTRY 短； 把超 cap 资产总持仓约 $382 说成可以“直接解锁 $382”，没有区分总持仓、超额部分和可成交部分； 把模型中的 redeem_lag_days=2 一度当作实际回款延迟； “$5 仓位几乎不受每美元每日利润门约束”的推理不正确，因为该指标已经按资金归一化； 2-lot 最低 ENTRY 建议可能系统性损失覆盖率。 因此，Fable5 的系统方向判断最好，但具体数字和金融指标仍需二次校验。 最适合的角色 PRIMARY_SYSTEM_REVIEWER LIVE_OPERATIONAL_DIAGNOSIS CHANGE_PRIORITY_DECISION CROSS_MODULE_ROOT_CAUSE_ANALYSIS 2. Kimi：代码缺陷侦测能力最强 Kimi 对代码结构的还原比较准确： 固定 ADD 次数和 interval 已退役； ADD 采用 target-gap 模型； ENTRY 60%，ADD 补到 100%； allocator 是最终数量权威； style 仅作诊断； 现金、集中度、shock、深度共同限制订单。 更重要的是，Kimi 找出了其他两个模型没有明确指出的具体问题： shared_deployable_pool() 读取 account_snap["capital"]["deployable_cash"] 但该字段可能没有实际写入 → 回退到 free_cash → 策略层与 allocator 层资金口径可能不一致 它还发现了： 合同写 debounce 60 秒，代码/配置为 30 秒； 注释周期 16 分钟，实际 loop 600 秒。 这些是典型的静态审核、字段追踪和合同一致性检查优势。 弱点 Kimi 在资本效率和交易语义上的推理弱于它的代码检查能力。 典型错误是： ADD 价格更高，所以边际 edge/day 必然更差。 这忽略了剩余持有时间也缩短。更高 ask 并不必然意味着更低 edge/day。 它还认为： 60/40 会让剩余资金长期闲置； 提高 entry share 会改善周转； CONFIRMATION_NO 应收紧； 增加单市场软 cap 会改善组合周转。 这些结论缺少真实候选竞争、实际 block attribution 和反事实分配数据支持。 最适合的角色 STATIC_CODE_AUDITOR SCHEMA_AND_FIELD_FLOW_CHECKER CONTRACT_IMPLEMENTATION_DIFF LOCALIZED_BUG_DISCOVERY Kimi 很适合回答： “代码是否存在字段没有写入、默认值回退、文档与实现不一致、某个 gate 实际是否生效？” 但不适合单独回答： “应该如何改变交易策略和资本分配？” 3. Grok：代码梳理最完整，但最容易过度设计 Grok 对整个 ADD 路径的整理最详尽： 各层准入条件； risk latch； REDUCE reentry cooldown； 价格带； fingerprint； emergency cap； market target； ENTRY/ADD gap； allocator 的现金、集中度、shock 和深度约束； ADD 与 ENTRY 的评分和 continuity； SELL/REDEEM 对现金回收的影响。 它对当前代码执行模型的概括非常清楚： 能不能加由 headroom 决定；加多少由 target gap 离散为 lot；ADD style 只是解释标签。 因此，在“快速理解一个陌生复杂系统”方面，Grok 表现很好。 弱点 Grok 最大的问题是： 从“发现一个可能的机制副作用”快速跳到“建议修改策略”。 它提出了大量未经实盘证明的改动： TIME_TOPUP 冷却； ADD 1.5 倍 edge/day 门槛； ask≥0.97 限制为 1 lot； 降低 peak target； 提高 entry share； 单次仅补部分 gap； 弱化 continuity； 降低 TTE confirmation 权重。 这些建议表面上都很合理，但存在三个问题： 没有先证明这些机制实际造成了损失； 没有量化被 ADD 挤出的 ENTRY 是否更优； 可能重新引入此前已经修复的低 ADD recall 和 leader fidelity 偏差。 Grok很擅长生成完整优化空间，但容易把： POSSIBLE SIDE EFFECT 升级成： CONFIRMED ROOT CAUSE 再进一步升级成： SHOULD CHANGE PRODUCTION LOGIC 这是生产交易系统审核中最危险的倾向。 最适合的角色 SYSTEM_MAPPING CODE_AND_CONFIG_EXPLANATION HYPOTHESIS_GENERATION DESIGN_OPTION_ENUMERATION 不适合作为唯一的： PRODUCTION_CHANGE_APPROVER ROOT_CAUSE_FINAL_AUTHORITY STRATEGY_SEMANTICS_GATEKEEPER 三个模型的典型思维模式 Grok 发现机制 → 推演可能副作用 → 生成多种优化 → 倾向建议修改 优点：覆盖广、思路多。 风险：过度设计、假设升级过快。 Kimi 追踪代码和字段 → 找实现不一致 → 找局部缺陷 → 尝试从缺陷推导策略改进 优点：代码问题定位强。 风险：局部正确不等于系统结论正确。 Fable5 理解代码 → 读取运行数据 → 找实际 binding constraint → 区分主因和次因 → 按实盘收益排序 优点：最接近生产运营思维。 风险：仍会在个别指标含义和金额口径上过度断言。

Today, I want to share something that happened to me on Kraken. I’m completely new to crypto, and this was my first time using Kraken. All I wanted to do was convert USDC into USD. Unfortunately, because USDT and USD differ by only one letter, I accidentally selected USDT instead of USD. I didn’t realize my mistake until the transaction had already been completed. In less than a minute, a single misclick resulted in a loss of approximately 810 USDT—more than $800. To be honest, I was shocked and devastated. Like many newcomers, I assumed that all major stablecoins were worth roughly the same, so converting between them would involve little or almost no loss. I never imagined that such a simple mistake could instantly cost me more than 1% of my funds. I immediately contacted Kraken Support, hoping they would understand that this was an honest human error and review my case, or at least consider making a one-time exception. What disappointed me even more was that almost every response came from AI. I was never able to speak with a real support agent. The only explanation I received was that the transaction had already been executed, the conversion details had been displayed before confirmation, and therefore nothing could be reversed or refunded. I understand that Kraken may not have violated its own rules, and I acknowledge that the final amount I would receive was displayed before I confirmed the transaction. But I believe that “the information was displayed” does not necessarily mean “a new user truly understands what it means.” As a beginner, I saw what I believed was a normal stablecoin conversion. I had no idea that the number shown on the confirmation screen meant I was about to lose more than $800. If a platform expects users to recognize an $800+ pricing difference on their own, instead of proactively warning them that the conversion is unusually unfavorable, I don’t believe that’s a user-friendly experience—especially for beginners. I believe that a platform responsible for customers’ assets should do more than simply display numbers. It should also be designed to help users avoid obvious mistakes that can lead to significant financial losses. Crypto is already complicated enough. The risks users take should come from the market—not from a product design that makes such costly mistakes so easy to make. This experience has left me deeply disappointed and has almost completely destroyed my trust in Kraken. I’m not trying to deny Kraken’s rules, and I’m not asking for special treatment. I’m simply asking @kraken and @krakensupport to review my case, seriously consider improving the user experience, provide real human support when genuine mistakes happen, and consider a one-time resolution for customers who make an honest human error. If this could happen to me, it could happen to any newcomer entering the world of crypto. I hope my experience helps others avoid making the same mistake. Please double-check every click. @krakenfx @krakenpro @krakensupport

A recent YC startup spent 250k on a domain. I was slightly shocked. But when I asked how much they raised after YC, the answer was 6.5m. So 1/26 of their round. This is the time we live in; one shocking number counterbalances the other.

Opus 5 is alien technology. Im in SHOCK. 🤯 I had it loop for 12 hours building a halo 1 clone. Today my chat and I were loading into games of TDM 5v5 on my server. Match making, leaderboards, even in game text chat worked flawlessy. Things are about to get insane.

Videos like this get millions of views — and I’m giving you the exact prompt for free. Seedance 2.0 Prompt: 【Style】Epic Zodiac Clash, Live-Action VFX, Infernal Force vs Sacred Judgment, Gritty Battle-Worn Visual Quality, High-Speed Photography, Realistic Physical Destruction, Premium Fantasy Blockbuster. 【Duration】15 seconds 【Scene】A colossal ruined tribunal arena split between two powers. On the left, a scorched battlefield corridor of shattered iron, burning horned gates, cracked red stone, drifting embers, and impact craters. On the right, a sacred marble court with fractured pillars, floating scale fragments, luminous white floor sigils, suspended dust, and pale divine light. In the center, a broken judgment platform where red infernal force and silver-white sacred law collide. 【Characters (Humanized Description)】 Aries Champion: A brutal crimson warlord in black-red armor with broken horn motifs, broad shoulders, and a violent forward-driving presence. His armor glows through cracked magma-red seams, and he fights with a heavy Ram Breaker, a short brutal horned battering weapon of black metal, molten red fractures, and crushing close-range force. Libra Champion: A calm sacred judge-warrior in silver-white ceremonial armor with symmetrical scale motifs, flowing pale fabric elements, and a cold expression of absolute control. Faint golden-white law sigils orbit around his body. He fights with a Balance Blade, a long elegant double-edged sword of white metal and luminous gold lines, perfectly symmetrical, precise, and severe. [00:00-00:05] Shot 1: Zodiac Awakening and Hero Introduction. Wide-angle / cinematic reveal shots. 【Aries Side】The camera opens on the Aries Champion standing inside a corridor of burning horned gates. He crushes a tiny glowing zodiac orb in his hand, the Aries symbol burning inside it. A violent red shock runs through his arm and instantly forges the Ram Breaker. Behind him, shattered iron gates slam open one after another, embers blasting through the air, and the cracked red stone floor fractures outward under raw impact pressure. 【Libra Side】The camera cuts to the Libra Champion standing in the sacred court. He crushes a tiny glowing zodiac orb in his hand, the Libra symbol shining inside. Rings of pale golden law-light unfold around his arm and instantly forge the Balance Blade. Behind him, the tribunal floor ignites with giant symmetrical scale sigils, and broken marble fragments slowly rise and hold in perfect balance in the air. [00:05-00:10] Shot 2: Fast Zodiac Close-Range Combat. Rapid action cuts, tight readable impacts. 【Action Design】Aries attacks first with brutal head-on force, driving forward with crushing short-range swings of the Ram Breaker. Libra remains composed, redirecting the attacks with precise sword angles, sliding parries, and severe counter-cuts. They exchange two to three clean close-range clashes. Aries uses explosive body-weight blows; Libra answers with balanced exactness and punishing timing. 【Physical Feedback】Each collision between Ram Breaker and Balance Blade creates violent impact feedback: sparks, red shock fractures in the floor, silver-white law flashes, shattered marble dust, and short pressure bursts ripping through the arena. Aries cracks stone with every hit; Libra’s counters slice through debris and freeze the momentum of the fight with impossible precision. [00:10-00:15] Shot 3: Ultimate Release and Final Winner Reveal. Extreme long shot / catastrophic judgment collision. 【Aries Ultimate】The Aries Champion slams the Ram Breaker into the ground and opens a corridor of colossal burning horn gates behind him. Through them surges a gigantic Infernal Ram Force, a compressed battering mass of horned red-black energy, fire, shattered iron, and unstoppable forward pressure, charging in a straight line to obliterate everything ahead. 【Libra Ultimate】The Libra Champion raises the Balance Blade and summons a massive Celestial Judgment Scale above the battlefield, a giant radiant structure of white-gold law, floating in the sky like a divine execution device. Two enormous luminous balance arms extend outward, and a colossal vertical judgment blade of pure law-light forms at the center. 【Clash】The Infernal Ram Force charges directly into the tribunal center, but the Celestial Judgment Scale activates first. Time seems to lock for one split second. The scale tilts, then snaps into perfect equilibrium, pinning the red force in place. The central judgment blade descends with overwhelming precision and splits through the Infernal Ram Force and the Aries Champion’s entire attack line. The battlefield erupts in a massive cross-shaped burst of red embers, white-gold law light, shattered iron, and broken stone. 【Ending】Libra wins. As the destruction clears, the horn-gate corridor has completely collapsed into burning debris. The Aries Champion is defeated and erased beneath the judgment impact. The Libra Champion remains standing alone at the center of the tribunal platform, sword lowered, surrounded by floating fragments of balanced marble and fading golden scale-light. The final frame holds on Libra as the victorious sign of absolute judgment. 【Audio】No dialogue. Quiet epic background music with a slow cinematic rise, restrained sacred choir texture, low percussion, and a victorious divine finish. Sound design emphasizes iron gate impacts, battering force, blade collisions, sacred law resonances, marble shattering, pressure bursts, and the final overwhelming judgment strike. #Seedance2# #AiVideo#