与「THE_WINNING」相关的搜索结果

Kiki Iriafen showed out in the @WashMystics win on the road 🤩 With this win, Iriafen marked her 11th double-double of the szn and 27th of her career! She helped lead the Mystics back into the winning column with this stat line: 23 PTS | 12 REB | 4 AST #WNBASeason30#

Did you know Ben & Jerry’s reportedly sold soups, crêpes, and even pottery when they first opened their shop? Ice cream was only one part of the business 🤯 Like many early-stage founders, they had not perfectly defined the winning offer before launching. They entered the market, watched what customers responded to, and gradually learned where the strongest demand was. According to ice cream eventually became the shop’s main attraction. The other products faded as customers kept returning for what they valued most 👏 Many new founders delay launching because they think the business needs to be fully figured out first. The perfect offer. The perfect positioning. The exact thing they want to become known for. But a business plan can only take you so far. Real market clarity comes from watching what customers repeatedly buy, ask for, return to, and recommend. 💡 Pay attention to patterns such as: → Which offer creates the strongest response? → What do customers keep coming back for? → What do they mention when recommending you? → Where are they willing to spend more time or money? Then use those signals to sharpen your offer, positioning, and business model. You do not need to predict the final version of your business before you begin. Get into the market, observe closely, and let customer behaviour help reveal what the business should become known for. As always, keep going and growing. 👉 Follow @bMightie for more founder intelligence for solo founders and bootstrapped businesses on the journey from day zero to takeoff. #foundingstory# #founderlife# #startupshowup# #startupstory# #newbusiness#

The wait is over. Start auto-clipping your best moments in Grand Theft Auto V, Red Dead Redemption 2, and Rocket League with Razer Cortex Game Clips: Whether you're pulling off impossible escapes, surviving a tense gunfight, or landing the winning goal, Razer Cortex Game Clips automatically captures your gameplay so you can stay focused on the action.

One thing I find striking in the discourse between AI 2040 and its detractors is that the two seem to be locked in to totally incompatible worldviews of how fast and how much of a big deal AI progress is: * In AI 2040, every scenario sees superintelligence of some kind emerging by 2040, unless a herculean effort is made to completely stop it * Detractors say things like "AI 2040 is naive about human coordination ability and a threat to freedom", but don't seem to see any naivety in assuming that the ASI transition will just go well by default, don't seem to see ASI itself as a massive power concentrator risk, and don't seem to feel fear of humanity's "hard power" dropping to zero if ASIs can do literally every task better than we can. This stance makes total sense in a "AI is normal technology" world, zero sense in a world where superintelligence is possible by 2030 and almost guaranteed by 2040 I think my beliefs are: - If I was confident that (present-day-style) AI is normal technology, I would be in the detractor camp - If I was confident that superintelligence is coming in 2030 by default, I would be closer to the AI 2040 camp - it's naive, but every other option is naive squared? But my problem is that I feel great uncertainty and have no idea which of the two worlds (or some other third thing) we're living in? Hence why I continue to be open-minded about slowdowns/pauses, but also I feel very uncomfortable with the "open source bad, the good outcome is the one where our guys have controlling global dominance" push coming from some major AI companies and intellectuals - in a "normal" world that's the sort of thing that triggers every political alarm bell at the same time. A big reason why I have been advocating and trying my best to support the d/acc platform (rapid up-skilling in formal verification, cryptography, secure and open hardware, pandemic resistance and other defensive biotech, food and basic resource security, public epistemics, non-power-concentrating versions of physical security) is that these things are clearly worth doing in both worlds. The 2040 plan is already much more open source friendly (even mandating it! yay). It also includes "mutually assured compute destruction" ideas which (if they work) effectively give one of 2-5 actors the ability to trigger a global compute winter - as opposed to giving 1-5 actors the ability to selectively disenfranchise people they consider baddies while exempting themselves. This is also a big improvement. So I can see the earnest attempts to improve along the dimensions detractors criticize on ("does this concentrate power in big AI labs and superpower governments?"), and I appreciate this. I think many people don't appreciate enough the differences between different "kinds" of pause buttons, and how some concentrate power far more than others. Probably we can think harder and improve even more here. But on the "slowdown/pause or not" topic, there isn't a magic "escape the tradeoff" button. The Hansonian in me says: the winning deal is a deal which, from the perspective of both sides' present-day beliefs and knowledge, both sides would accept, though for different reasons. If the crux is AI progress speed, then identify a set of pre-agreed triggers for "okay, serious shit is happening" [super-pandemics? >25% unemployment? something involving slaughterbots?], and pre-agree that we become much more open-minded to the slowdown or pause thing if enough triggers come to pass within some timeframe. 2040 detractors (who clearly implicitly think that we'll see amazing speedup of progress from AI but think that what I call the "serious shit" category is overhyped) will accept expecting that the triggers don't come to pass, and AI worriers will accept expecting that they will. Pre-agreeing on the specific triggers means that once the triggers either hit or don't hit, there is stronger legitimacy around the idea that one side's worldview turned out more correct and we should be more inclined toward their program. If I were @elonmusk (or zuck, or...) I would re-tool twitter much more heavily into being a platform for helping to identify and make these kinds of grand win-win deals, so that we can bypass big-country governments and big-company CEOs and big nonprofit intellectuals and give more people a voice in the discussion. It's possibly one of the best things that social media _could_ do for humanity if it wanted to. But again, maybe this is also naive. Actually, probably it's naive. But currently, I see zero plans for how to deal with an ASI transition that are not naive. Perhaps humanity is stuck with a choice between naive and naive squared (or maybe even naive squared and naive cubed), so I feel inclined to cut some slack to people who are trying.

Allisha Gray did it all in the dub for the @atlantadream 🤩 She reeled in an impressive 22 PTS, 3 REB, and 5 AST, allowing a losing streak to be snapped and getting the Dream back in the winning column! #WNBASeason30#

Boise State will forever immortalize #Saints# HC Kellen Moore with a permanent 11-foot bronze statue honoring the winningest starting quarterback in college football history (50-3). The statue will stand near the northeast entrance of Albertsons Stadium. (📷 @BroncoSportsFB)

Today, we're announcing a $60M Series B led by @BatteryVentures, bringing our total funding to $85M in just under a year. Also joining the round are founders and operators who’ve built generational companies of the last two decades – @tobi (CEO, Shopify), @arashf (Dropbox), @chughesjohnson (Stripe), and more. The round came together in 6 days. Here's why. Every major category in enterprise software is seeing multiple AI-native challengers. CRM, ERP, ITSM – all being rebuilt from scratch by a new generation of companies applying AI to solve persistent problems we couldn’t before. Employee Management (also known as HCM) is the exception. It’s the last frontier, and we believe the most important one. The operating layer to manage people, run payroll, benefits, compliance, and IT, for every company in the world, is still built on architecture that predates AI by decades. This fundraise is the story of how Warp is changing that. The average Warp customer is growing 5x faster than their peers, with 1/10th of the HR and admin overhead. We’re seeing a massive shift happening in how the best companies run their people operations. From the fastest-growing AI-startups to massive public companies, the winning teams are running lean: HR, finance, and ops generalists who automate as much as possible, and use their time instead for strategic work that AI can’t automate. Warp is the platform of choice for ambitious companies operating at this new pace. Legacy HCMs help humans track the work. Warp uses AI to proactively complete the work. Workday was built for the last era. We're building for the next one. And it’s working. We've – - Doubled ARR in Q1 - On track to $2B+ payroll volume this year - Signed enterprise customers with thousands of employees - Launched entire product lines back-to-back: Warp benefits brokerage and Warp Fabric (our AI-native IT automation suite built in-house). A few thank-yous: 1. Our customers, the fastest-growing companies in the world, who trust us with their most critical systems. We wouldn't be here without you. 2. Our team - 50+ people in NYC who've built this platform, taken on the hardest problems in business-critical software. We're just getting started. 3. Our investors doubling down in this round, and some of our earliest believers – @sound_ventures_ (@aplusk, @epsteineffie), @PeakXV, (@arnavsahu341), @harjtaggar at @ycombinator, @balajis, @kevinhartz, @kvogt, @amasad, @HOFCapital (@myfady), @colinevans (@OpenAI) We're here to arm ambitious American companies with Workday-grade power, but with the usability and delight of an Apple product. With this new funding, we plan to fund deeper AI agents, tax and compliance infrastructure, expand our product suite, and support even closely our fast-growing customers. Come join us.

The winning duo. Replicating their success from the Youth Olympic Winter Games #Lausanne2020#, Eileen Gu and Li Fanghui secured the top two spots once again at #MilanoCortina2026#. 🥇🥈 #Olympics# #WinterOlympics# #FreestyleSkiing# @FISfreestyle