与「Thread」相关的搜索结果

很多人翻墙之后，只会刷推特 其实真正的信息差，藏在海外这些网站里。 下面这 10 个地方，建议全部收藏。每天花半小时逛一圈，信息获取能力可能超过身边 90% 的人！ 1、Reddit 互联网最大的兴趣社区之一。AI、投资、编程、创业、科技，几乎任何领域都有专属 Subreddit。真人经验、深度讨论、行业内幕，挖宝圣地！ 2、GitHub 全球最大的开源代码社区之一。AI Agent、LLM、大模型、自动化工具、开发框架，想找宝藏开源项目，这里简直挖不完！ 3、Hacker News 硅谷程序员的情报站。AI、开源项目、技术趋势、创业故事，每天都有高质量讨论，技术信息密度爆表！ 4、Product Hunt AI 工具和 SaaS 产品的发射场。每天都有新产品上线，很多爆火的 AI 项目都能在这里提前发现。 5、LinkedIn 千万别只把它当招聘网站。全球 CEO、投资人、创业者、科技公司高管都在这里分享一手行业动态。 6、Telegram 海外信息集散中心。AI、加密货币、投资、开源工具，各种频道和社群层出不穷，不少一手消息传播速度非常快。 7、Threads Meta 旗下社交平台。海外创作者、开发者、创业者聚集地，氛围比 X 更轻松，经常能看到有意思的新观点。 8、Discord 海外互联网社区的大本营。AI 项目、Web3、游戏、开发者社区都喜欢在这里建群，很多项目的核心讨论和早期动态都在 Discord。 9、Medium 海外技术和商业长文聚集地。AI 技术教程、创业复盘、投资思考、产品分析，适合系统性补充知识。 10、Substack 独立作者和行业专家的内容订阅平台。大量投资人、科技创业者、研究员在这里发布深度报告，有些内容比新闻媒体更有洞察力。 最后说一句： 不要把翻墙后的互联网，只当成一个刷 X 的娱乐工具。 Reddit 找讨论，GitHub 挖项目，Hacker News 看趋势，Product Hunt 找工具，Substack 追踪大佬观点。 这才是打开海外互联网的正确姿势！ 建议收藏，也转发给还在只会刷 X 的朋友。 你还有哪些值得推荐的海外网站？评论区补充！

We've made some big updates to Projects in Claude Code! In a project, Claude coordinates your tasks across parallel threads. The coordinator is now much more proactive. It answers your questions in the project chat and gives you updates on the status of your ongoing threads.

Status update: 1. Safe and sound. Coloradans are made of steel—we don't fold. Go Broncos. 2. They flagged my thread exposing them as a "political ad." Cute. 3. They even dangled a lot of "Reuters interview" as bait to try and buy me off. Seriously? 4. Zero interest in clout. Zero chance I'm for sale. 5. And yes, they're trying to hack my X right now.Predictable as ever. Nobody pays me for this. The full piece is free, All I want is for as many people as possible to read it help me spread it: Who Is Really Behind the Hunt for Jensen Huang?

Threads上台灣用戶對黃仁勳的反應較為複雜。 批評出軌、國安疑雲與形象崩塌的聲音不少，尤其女性網友失望明顯。但同時也有不少感謝他長期挺台灣供應鏈、行銷台灣的貼文獲高互動，像財經專家發文「失去鐵桿夥伴」引發萬人共鳴，留言多屬「行為不認同但恩情記得」。 樣本有限難精準計數，整體罵聲與務實支持並存，後者相對X上更明顯。

I am actually disgusted by the timing of this drop. And this will get a bit more technical. Let’s do a real technical teardown of this "1,385-sigma Blackwell weight fingerprint" report that OpenAI and Anthropic are breathlessly promoting today, because banking on nobody reading past the headline is how DC narratives get manufactured. ​First, look at the actual CUDA maths: when PyTorch initialises model weights (torch.nn.init) with a fixed PRNG seed, curand/Philox parallelises random number generation across the GPU’s Streaming Multiprocessors (SMs). Because Hopper has 132 SMs and Blackwell has 148 or 152 SMs, the exact same seed lays out initial weights in a different spatial pattern depending on the GPU’s SM count. In huge MoE models, certain low-gradient null-spaces or unrouted slices preserve faint directional traces of those step-0 weights even after training. ​So yes, brute-forcing the seed and SM grid can show that a model’s step_0 weight initialisation script ran on a 148/152-SM Blackwell GPU. Now read what the summary explicitly admits in the fine print: 1. Initialisation is not full training: The report literally states that these signatures show how the weights were created, and "support (but do not prove) the inference that Blackwell also participated in model training". Initialising a model checkpoint takes seconds on a single rented dev node before loading the safetensors onto a standard Hopper cluster. The "2,000 to 3,000 Blackwell GPUs" and "$500 million" cluster numbers do not come from the weight fingerprint and Depue admits in his own thread that he simply "estimated" cluster sizes from release schedules and model details. ​2. Zero geolocation and zero proof of smuggling: The final sentence of the executive summary explicitly admits that the findings "do not establish the physical location of the chips, how they were acquired, or whether export control regulations were violated". Depue himself rented a cloud GB200 instance just to run his verification test. Commercial labs that are not on the Entity List renting bare-metal Blackwell nodes in offshore clouds (Singapore, Japan, or the Middle East) is completely legal under BIS rules and leaves the exact same SM fingerprint. Now ask yourself why a former OpenAI researcher dropped this on November 12, the exact day Jensen Huang was pushed out, with OpenAI and Anthropic immediately stepping in to "independently verify" it. US closed-source labs are watching their paid API moats get eaten alive by free Chinese open-weights models. Conflating a step-0 PRNG initialisation seed with a "$500M smuggled Blackwell cluster" hands DC hawks the exact pretext OpenAI and Anthropic want to regulate global cloud compute and kneecap open-source AI.

Your dot now has… ⚡️ Faster replies 💬 Less jargon 🫡 Better follow-through And, they can now follow your custom instructions. Tell your dot in the thread things like how to behave or which actions need your go-ahead. “always talk in lowercase.” “Show me a draft before sending any emails.” You can also set custom instructions and rules in Customize > Behavior on mobile, or through your dot’s menu on web and desktop.