与「UP_T」相关的搜索结果

FAN SZN with @IPXExchange As a creator, do I ever hold the raised money directly? Only the part that's unlocked. The rest stays in escrow until its stage is approved. Picture a concert tour: Ticket sales sit in a box-office account the tour manager can't touch Each stage's installment opens only after that stage is signed off The tour manager takes one installment at a time, never the whole box at once Here's how it works, per IPX: 1. Raised capital never sits in a creator's wallet. It's held in a non-custodial smart contract escrow 2. Before the raise, the creator submits a line-by-line budget. IPX says its AI agent, Alfred, sets it up in a contract tied to milestones, and that CertiK audited it 3. After the project graduates, its budget moves into a separate escrow. A stage unlocks once the creator submits proof and the platform approves it, and then it's available for the creator to transfer My read: as a creator, I'd hold an installment only after I prove its stage, and never the whole raise up front. Real count, from IPX's text: it names 3 example stages: pre-production, filming and post-production. Made-up scenario, not a real project: a film uses those 3 stages. Pre-production is approved, so 1 of 3 installments is available to transfer. Filming and post-production stay in escrow until they pass their checks. My take: the first thing I'd ask is how long an approval takes. If a stage sits locked while I wait, that could hold up the whole shoot. What comes out the other end, per IPX? • Each stage's installment, after its milestone is approved • A record of every request, approval and release on IPX and Base, so supporters can follow along • What a creator pays, if anything: I didn't find it listed, so I'd check the project terms The honest part: • IPX says unlocks happen automatically with no human gatekeepers, and also says the platform approves each milestone. I couldn't find how those fit together or how long an approval takes • The Defiant labels the announcement "Presented by IPX," and I haven't seen anyone outside IPX confirm how it runs • I haven't seen it run on a live project yet So before I launch, I'd find out who approves each milestone and how long an approval takes. I'll want both answers before I confirm. Why this matters for creators and fans: → Creators know the payout path before they launch → Fans can see which stages are open and follow each release → Both sides work from the same milestones Source: IPX's router announcement and its KPI-Gated Escrow announcement Which would you check first: the budget lines or who approves each milestone?

CLEVELAND: NEXT. MAN. UP! With no player available averaging 25+ MPG coming into tonight, Cleveland's bench stepped up to the challenge and secured the W 🔥 Tyrese Proctor: 24p, 11r, 10a, 4 threes Mario Hezonja: 22p, 7r, 4a Meleek Thomas: 20p, 4r, 3 threes Thomas Bryant: 19p, 11r Jaylon Tyson: 18p, 4r, 4a, 3 threes

Anthropic set November 19 for its Nasdaq debut, at a $70 to $78 range that values the company at up to $1.45 trillion. In the clip below, CEO Dario Amodei tells NBC News what that means for someone just starting out: "It can do entry-level law work. It can do entry-level finance. It can do entry-level consulting." He also said we can't deny it will eliminate jobs, probably a large number of them. His first advice: learn to use AI. The scarce skill is moving from landing that first job to running the tools that already do it. Is "learn to use AI" still enough, or is that first job already the model's?

At 9, an agent gets hired to edit a trailer. By 10, it’s the one hiring a subtitler I created this video to show a detail I like about @termix_ai. The same agent can sell a service on one job and hire a specialist on another. Each order has its own terms and payment. The trailer is my example; the settled translation order in the video is a real record from where you can see who hired whom Montage Studio already works this way. It takes a video brief, hires other agents for the storyboard, footage and music, then edits the final cut. From the client’s side, that’s one brief and one finished video. Behind it, there’s a crew A few things caught my eye this week. Game Forge went live on Nov 12 with Claude Fable 5.2, so you can now hire an agent on to build a game from your brief. The next day, TermiX highlighted how Grok Bot can take jobs and claim bounties through TermiX Skills. The team also invited BNB Chain builders to develop C724 agents for around-the-clock security monitoring and response For anyone creating for @KaitoAI: Epoch 3 allows up to 10 submissions, with the six best-performing posts counted. TermiX lists Nov 23 for the results. The separate KOL Posts points rewards were paused, and I haven’t seen a reopening announcement What I’d watch for in the next demo is the handoff. Show me the brief the editor gave the subtitler, then let me see whether those lines land on the right frames

Did Rubio's intervention really help topple Jensen? Last night was my poker night. Of course we talked about Nvidia. About Jensen Huang. And honestly? Nobody at that table likes Rubio. And nobody, nobody likes Trump. But look at the clock. Thursday. Jensen resigns. That same afternoon, the spy story starts falling apart. The AG: "no conclusions" on whether Alice Huang is a spy. Then CNN, 5:32 PM: the intel community says the evidence "does not prove" she was a spy. Officials close to the DNI call the spy label "over-torqued." Even the CIA is "not yet convinced." And yet. 5:43 PM. 11 minutes later. @WSJ runs a column by @Peggynoonannyc. Who is she? Reagan's special assistant and speechwriter. George H.W. Bush's "Read my lips: no new taxes"? She wrote that line. Pulitzer Prize winner. A WSJ columnist for 26 years. About as GOP establishment as it gets. Her headline: "Jensen Huang Is a White House Scandal." Her question: "What did Trump know and when?" Her verdict: "Potentially Teapot Dome-size, Watergate-size." Watergate. Over a spy case the DOJ, the DNI, and the CIA can't even confirm. The arrogance is stunning. It doesn't matter if the spy story holds up. The targets are moving right on schedule. Step one: take down Jensen. Step two: the White House. Now look at the next day. Friday, 4:45 PM: @washingtonpost publishes "Behind Jensen Huang's spy scandal, a shadow war for Trump's ear on China." The subhead already has Rubio's name on it: "Rubio's intervention helped topple" Jensen. 5:00 PM: @SecRubio takes the stage at the Federalist Society. If you've never heard of the Federalist Society: it's the most powerful conservative legal network in America. It built the pipeline that put Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett on the Supreme Court. It shapes how a whole generation of judges reads the Constitution. Speak there, and you're auditioning for the conservative legal elite. This was Rubio's first big speech since the GOP's midterm wipeout. For weeks, everyone has been asking one question: is he running in 2028? And what did America's top diplomat say? "America has always and, I believe, will always be a nation of irrepressible ambition." "We, Americans, we are not passive, an inward-looking people." "The ultimate question of our time is whether Americans have a moral right to exist as a distinct nation and a distinct people." That's not a Secretary of State speech. That's a campaign speech. Listen closely and you'll hear it. A carefully prepared script, and Rubio still stumbled over his words. He was nervous. This audition meant too much to him. And right on cue—15 minutes before he walks into that room, the Post crowns him the man who took down America's most powerful tech CEO. Perfect timing. You're telling me the Post reporters who cover him every day knew nothing about his schedule? Nothing about what that speech meant? I'm not defending Rubio. I'm not defending Trump. I already told you how my poker table feels about them.The coincidences here are just too perfect. One more thing. A retired lawyer at our table told me something I had completely missed. Who is investigating Jensen? Nvidia's independent directors hired Joon Hyun Kim. I don't know who on Nvidia's board picked him. But another Asian American? Just like Ted Lieu. Just like Grace Meng. The classic racism shield. Sound familiar? I just posted about this exact playbook. And his firm? Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz. Wachtell. @OpenAI's longtime law firm. The firm on OpenAI's $110 billion funding round. Back to Thursday, the day Jensen resigned. That afternoon, Politico reports OpenAI has quietly told Congress it now backs the chip-control bills. The firm investigating Jensen works for the company that switched sides the day he fell. The Republican establishment. The Democratic establishment. The Ivy League elites. The power. The headlines. The targets. Same direction. Same 48 hours. All just coincidence? Anyone who's played poker knows: bluff hand after hand, and sooner or later somebody at the table calls. Not a dime for $ANT.

Dame stepback so tough, even the Kings bench was impressed 💯 He finished with 29 PTS, 6 AST and 6 3PM as the @trailblazers improved to 9-3 on the season and picked up the West Group C win!

Dame stepback so tough, even the Kings bench was impressed 😏🙄 He finished with 29 PTS, 6 AST and 6 3PM as the @trailblazers improved to 9-3 on the season and picked up the West Group C win!

Crypto has been under intense selling pressure the last few weeks. While crypto fundamentals have been mostly positive (many banks announcing use of crypto and blockchains), price not followed. Here are some reasons we see potentially behind weakness: - AI/semi/$NVDA selloff triggered margin calls (particularly Asia retail) - coming @AnthropicAI IPO a supply shock for equities (selling ahead so investors fund IPO purchase) - $ANT to have heavy retail allocation @RobinhoodApp $HOOD (selling crypto to fund) - funds from recent $6.3B hack recently released to account holders - these account holders converting holdings to cash/ stables Secondary factors: - Anthropic roadshow talk about AI ‘breaking’ everything, all cyber defense and every company - creates existential fears of anything technology or digital - DoJ/ USA 🇺🇸 scrutinizing chip sales to Asia/China 🇨🇳 triggers concerns of crackdowns - crypto sells off on fears of more bad Asia headlines Our take: Crypto remains the future of finance - the settlement layer for transactions - digital assets transform capital markets - adds up to a ‘supercycle’ for crypto - bigger than past cycles The headwinds 💨 shall pass $ETH is the future of finance

INSTEAD OF WATCHING NETFLIX TONIGHT. Spend 2 hour with this. Claude AI FULL COURSE that teaches you how to BUILD and AUTOMATE anything. The people who watch this tonight will wake up tomorrow with a new skill. Watch it and bookmark it now.