与「Whatever」相关的搜索结果

Jensen Huang and his wife holding hands during his first public appearance since the reported resignation. ❤️ Despite all the noise, controversies, and public scrutiny, they still appear affectionate towards each other. Whatever happens in the corporate world, family and personal relationships remain an important part of life. After decades of building a global technology empire, perhaps this is a reminder that there's more to life than titles, wealth, and professional achievements. Success is great, but having someone who stands by you through different seasons of life is priceless. ❤️

BREAKING: Jensen Huang appeared “broken” in his final hours as Nvidia CEO, per Bloomberg. Nvidia’s board held an emergency meeting that ran late into the night after the latest affair reports, and by the end Huang had agreed to step down. The board left him no choice but to resign. According to people who spoke with him, his usual take-charge style was gone. He responded with indifference, saying things like “whatever” and “I don’t care,” and has since called himself a “piece of sh--.” He says he no longer cares what happens to him. His main concern is his wife and not “ruining the lives” of the women now linked to him. Inside Nvidia, employees are rallying behind him. More than 1,600 comments on internal forums call for his reinstatement, per Wired.

An American porn actress says a single shoot in Madrid involved 80 men and nearly a liter of semen. She counted 122 ejaculations, followed by another 10 onto her face. The night before, she had sat across from the director asking about pay and medical testing. He answered by opening a spreadsheet. In the interview below, she describes how the production was organized, from recruiting performers to deciding when she could take a break. According to her, the studio maintained a roster of around 300 men in Madrid. Getting onto it required a referral. Test results fed into the spreadsheet so the crew could track who was cleared to participate. The men could earn more depending on the shot they delivered. She says she was given three medications before filming, including one she describes as a muscle relaxant. Nine women worked as fluffers. Their waiting room had pink furniture and candy on the table. Outside, the men lined up while her videos played on a television. The shoot followed a repeating schedule: ten ejaculations into her mouth, swallow, then another ten. After fifty, she took a break and recorded an interview before returning. One assistant held a bowl beneath her chin to catch whatever spilled. She says the role even had a name: “scooper.” Amid all that coordination, she remembers one man missing and quietly apologizing. “I’m so sorry. I’m so sorry.” For the final sequence, she requested ten men instead of the usual five. Then the director addressed the group in Spanish. One word caught her attention: “ojos.” Eyes. Afterward, she asked whether he had instructed them to aim at her eyes. He denied it. According to her, he had repeated something she mentioned over dinner - that she didn’t mind and the men interpreted it differently. She has since referred other American performers to the production. “I’ve sent them so many Americans.”

how to become a latency sniper on Polymarket. people make ~$500 a day on this in BTC 5m markets. here's a step-by-step guide it turned out simpler than i thought: grab the old price after a BTC jump and buy the other side when the market flips his game plan: 1. every 5 minutes a new market opens: will BTC be higher or lower in 5 minutes 2. the market moves on the BTC price from Chainlink. Chainlink collects the price from exchanges, averages it and feeds it to Polymarket 3. the early move shows up on Binance, and that's the signal to get in. BTC moves hard one way within 15-30 seconds, Polymarket still has the old price, and he buys that side right away 4. if BTC turns back, the other side gets cheaper. he buys it too, so the UP + DOWN pair costs him less than $1 5. he holds everything until the market ends or merges the pair back into $1. he never sells where does the money come from? about 70% comes from entries after a price jump. other buyers at the same price and the same time left lose ~3% on average after fees, he makes +10% the other ~30% comes from pairs. UP + DOWN cost him 91¢ on average, and at resolve he gets $1 why does this even work? say there are 3 minutes left. BTC is flat and UP trades at 50¢. then BTC jumps up on Binance. on Polymarket sellers keep their orders at 50-55¢ for a bit longer, and he takes them. in 6 out of 10 markets he holds UP until the end. if BTC pulls back, DOWN drops to like 35¢ and he buys it. now he's got a pair for ~88¢, and at resolve he gets $1 whatever happens. his trades are small, ~$6 on average, because he's not the only one sniping here's his profile:

Jensen Huang in his last hours as Nvidia CEO, per Bloomberg: > The board met late into the night & left him no choice but to resign > > He looked broken, his take-charge style gone > Started saying things like "whatever" & "I don't care" > He has since called himself a "piece of sh--" > He says he no longer cares what happens to him > His main concern: his wife, and not "ruining the lives" of the women now linked to him

🚨 BREAKING: LONDON TRIED TO FLEX, ELON MUSK JUST DROPPED A TOTAL DIGITAL BLACKOUT! UK Prime Minister: "Elon Musk, adjust your platform algorithms and hand over satellite telemetry logs to our regulators immediately, or we will revoke your commercial spectrum licenses and seize all Starlink UK ground stations!" Elon Musk: "You confused parliamentary decrees with orbital mechanics. In space, satellite constellations don't bow to bureaucracy. Try revoking our licenses—your ministers can issue all the press releases they want, but your regional maritime routes can't function without high-speed telemetry." UK Prime Minister: "We will freeze SpaceX financial accounts in London and restrict your aerospace access!" Elon Musk: "Freeze whatever accounts you like! The moment your order goes live, SpaceX software shifts subsea data routing keys away from North Sea terminals. Good luck guiding transatlantic cargo fleets through maritime storms on dark screens!" If this exchange is real, the clash between government power and Elon Musk's technology empire just reached another level. Do you firmly support Elon Musk on this? YES or NO? IF Yes, Give me a THUMBS-UP👍!!

Telegram shipped a "sandbox" for HTML widgets in messages. It's an in-process QuickJS (C) interpreter on a thread... No fork, no isolatedProcess, no seccomp anywhere in the tree, so any QuickJS exploit is enough to gain full control with whatever privileges the Telegram client is running as without the need for any separate sandbox escape The bug is a UaF in the interpreter, from standard JS: ```js class D { [Symbol.dispose]() {} } const d = new D(); let leak; class C { static { for (await using x of [d, d]) leak = () => x; }} // ... run anything ... leak() // reads a freed frame ``` The fix for this particular vuln is still just in the master branch, and considering the number of vulnerabilities QuickJS has had in the past, this vuln will surely not be the last...

The Moral Collapse of the Chinese Crypto Community To Elon Musk 2022–2023 marked the golden age of Chinese-language Twitter. Back then, there was no creator revenue you offered purely based on traffic. Two main groups of creators came here to share insights: Influencers who migrated over with their followers after their Weibo accounts were banned. Content creators who were already living overseas. These people came with genuine intent to share, and they often uncovered valuable market alpha. Whether it was Bay Area Spaces, inscription research bloggers, or spot and secondary market analysts. Back then, everyone believed the next bull run would be bright. People expected their altcoin spot holdings would deliver at least 5–10x returns. After all, A16Z poured capital into projects left and right, and every so often, stories popped up of Gen Z traders hitting A8 and retiring financially free. Then the tide turned. High-cap tokens pumped immediately upon launch. Instead of bringing fresh liquidity into the market, the ETF event drained what little liquidity remained, driven largely by Trump-related narratives. The crash on October 11 was almost inevitable. Long before that, many had already lost everything on altcoins. That black-swan event merely liquidated whatever leveraged contract positions were left. Starting around 2024–2025, after X rolled out creator ad revenue, a flood of traffic chasers emerged, catering to lowbrow audiences. These people do not trade crypto, nor do they care about any market narratives. They crossed over to this platform just to scrape together that tiny creator payout, as they have little footing in real life. Consequently, we saw the worst tropes from mainland domestic social media spill over: gender polarization, disinformation, and bootlicking culture. While you tweaked the algorithm to curb plagiarism, the platform still fails to incentivize high-quality content. Plenty of boundaryless content farms still rack up views, and accounts that harass others relentlessly often evade effective reporting penalties. Meanwhile, posts from creators I used to follow have vanished from my timeline. I kindly request that you strictly investigate accounts that distribute other users’ private information without consent.

The Moral Collapse of the Chinese Crypto Community To Elon Musk @elonmusk 2022–2023 marked the golden age of Chinese-language Twitter. Back then, there was no creator revenue you offered purely based on traffic. Two main groups of creators came here to share insights: Influencers who migrated over with their followers after their Weibo accounts were banned. Content creators who were already living overseas. These people came with genuine intent to share, and they often uncovered valuable market alpha. Whether it was Bay Area Spaces, inscription research bloggers, or spot and secondary market analysts. Back then, everyone believed the next bull run would be bright. People expected their altcoin spot holdings would deliver at least 5–10x returns. After all, A16Z poured capital into projects left and right, and every so often, stories popped up of Gen Z traders hitting A8 and retiring financially free. Then the tide turned. High-cap tokens pumped immediately upon launch. Instead of bringing fresh liquidity into the market, the ETF event drained what little liquidity remained, driven largely by Trump-related narratives. The crash on October 11 was almost inevitable. Long before that, many had already lost everything on altcoins. That black-swan event merely liquidated whatever leveraged contract positions were left. Starting around 2024–2025, after X rolled out creator ad revenue, a flood of traffic chasers emerged, catering to lowbrow audiences. These people do not trade crypto, nor do they care about any market narratives. They crossed over to this platform just to scrape together that tiny creator payout, as they have little footing in real life. Consequently, we saw the worst tropes from mainland domestic social media spill over: gender polarization, disinformation, and bootlicking culture. While you tweaked the algorithm to curb plagiarism, the platform still fails to incentivize high-quality content. Plenty of boundaryless content farms still rack up views, and accounts that harass others relentlessly often evade effective reporting penalties. Meanwhile, posts from creators I used to follow have vanished from my timeline. I kindly request that you strictly investigate accounts that distribute other users’ private information without consent.

🇺🇸 WTF is this thing flying near a U.S. military base in Alaska? A woman in Anchorage was taking pictures of a rainbow when she spotted something bizarre in the sky. It looked like a giant jellyfish, with dark tentacle-like parts dangling underneath. The thing hovered for about 3 minutes before suddenly disappearing. Even stranger, it was spotted in the direction of a U.S. military base that houses F-22 fighter jets. She and her husband went looking for a kite or anything that could explain it, but found nothing. Whatever that thing was, it sure didn't look like anything we've built on this planet. Source: Daily Mail / Writer: Daniyal