与「Whenever」相关的搜索结果

My cousin used to unplug my game console whenever he got mad at losing. Every. Single. Time. One day I warned him that if he unplugged it again I was going to hide his bike. He laughed and unplugged it while maintaining eye contact like a supervillain. So I dragged his bike into the neighbor’s garage and went about my day. Three hours later this man was outside sweating, accusing everyone in the family of theft, preparing a full detective investigation. Finally my grandma asked me if I knew where the bike was. I said “Yeah.”....

Event Rush lets you trade tokenized event outcomes. Trade outcomes like tokens, and close your position whenever you want. Start now on Binance Wallet 👉

Restore Britain is under brutal assault by the establishment. Listen to me when I say this - they want us gone. Everything will be thrown at us - false allegations, dishonest polling, media hysteria, vile personal attacks. They’ve already tried to put me in prison. It will all keep coming and coming. It is going to get a lot worse, the more support we gain. The establishment is getting very nasty with us. Good. It shows we are making progress. Ask yourself why? Why do they want to destroy us? Why do they react with such fury whenever ordinary British people begin organising outside their control? Because Restore Britain is not going to merely reform the establishment - we are going to destroy it. The system will be dismantled, the state will be torn apart and rebuilt as one that serves the people it always should have done - the British people. The permanent Westminster machine that has grown rich and comfortable while Britain became poorer, weaker, more divided and less safe is biting back. Is that any surprise? All-powerful bureaucrats who have lived the most comfortable life for decades in shadowy Westminster corridors will have it all taken from them. Many will even go to prison. That’s what will happen if Restore Britain takes power. They do not want that. They will do everything to stop that from happening. We are already seeing it. Reform, the Tories, Labour. With them, it all continues - their club is safe. Different slogans. Same people. Same outcome. Same decline. Is it any wonder they hate Restore Britain so much? The establishment understands it can accept a turquoise blue. Control it, use it. They know they can’t with Restore Britain, and that is why they want us removed. Because we are not here to ‘reform’. It is too late for that. The country is too far gone. The old political consensus is dead. The system has failed too many people, in too many places, for too long. We are here to restore Britain itself its borders, its safety, its confidence, its freedoms, its competence, its sense of who we are. And no amount of smears or intimidation will stop us doing that. Makerfield will show Britain the way. If you want change. And I mean real change, radical change, unprecedented change. Join us. Join the party. Join Restore Britain. Get your country back.

The most important thing you can do is understand that hiring is a high risk gamble that needs to be approached deliberately. A lot of time, effort, and resources go into hiring and developing new employees before it’s clear whether or not they are good fits. Months or even years and countless dollars can be wasted in training and retraining. (For example, every person you hire requires you to hire others to support them. I call this the "1.6 effect.") Some of those costs are intangible, including loss of morale and a gradual diminishment of standards as people who aren’t excellent in their roles bump into each other; other costs from bad outcomes can be measured all too easily in dollars and cents. So whenever you think you are ready to make someone an offer, think one last time about the important things that might go wrong and what else you can do to better assess those risks and raise your probability of being right. #principleoftheday#

"Disparate Impact," the legal doctrine that stipulates outcomes between blacks and whites must be the same, was codified into law by the 1991 Civil Rights Act. That doctrine has destroyed the schools and the colleges and the police. It very nearly destroyed financial system when mortgages were awarded on the basis of racial quotas. And, as of this writing, it remains the operating doctrine of every major public American institution. It has not been repealed. It has been mildly rolled back in some domains — the Supreme Court ruling in SFFA, the state DEI rollbacks in Texas and Florida, the Trump administration’s executive orders — but it has not been uprooted. The people who believe in "equity" still staff HR departments, admissions offices, the civil-rights divisions of the federal agencies and the editorial boards of what used to be the newspapers of record. They will not go quietly. They cannot. Their entire professional identity is built on a doctrine that, if honestly examined, would be repudiated as nothing more than racial Marxism. So they will fight — inside the universities, inside the corporations, inside the courts, inside the federal bureaucracy, inside the cities they still run — for every inch of the ground the doctrine has captured. And the fight they will put up is one of the things that makes the coming Fourth Turning particularly dangerous. A Fourth Turning in which the political class is honest about what it has done — as FDR was honest about abandoning the gold standard, as Hamilton was honest about paying the state debts — can be resolved relatively quickly. A Fourth Turning in which the political class refuses to admit what caused the crisis and continues to fight for it is what leads to violence. Like during the Civil War of 1861-1865. And, sadly, I believe it will, once again, lead us into the equivalent of a race-based, low-level civil war. Why? Because there is no reform that fixes this. There is no tax increase that reverses disparate-impact jurisprudence. There is no interest-rate cut that restores public safety to Baltimore. There is no stimulus that teaches an Oregon high-school graduate to read. There is no political candidate who can, within the current legal and regulatory framework, restore the premise that individuals are to be judged as individuals and that the standards by which a society measures achievement are not themselves to be abandoned whenever they produce a disparity. The false doctrine, that individuals are not equal under the law because some people are functionally different than others, is embedded in statute. It is embedded in case law. It is embedded in the professional identity of three generations of administrators. It will not be uprooted by ordinary political means. It will be uprooted, if it is uprooted at all, by the same process that has uprooted every other entrenched false political doctrine in American history — by a Fourth Turning severe enough to make the doctrine’s defenders surrender ground they would never have surrendered in ordinary politics. And thus, you must be ready for what will come next. You cannot, by yourself, fix American public schools. But you can choose your children’s schools. You can homeschool them. You can place them in classical academies or Catholic schools or the small number of charter schools that have kept the older standards. You cannot, by yourself, fix the violence and mayhem in our cities. But you can own productive land. You can own real assets, directly, that will survive what's coming. You cannot, by yourself, fix the police. But you can choose where you live, you can choose whom you associate with, and you can prepare your family to defend itself and to help defend your neighbors. And you cannot, by yourself, fix the disparate-impact doctrine. But you can see it for what it is. You can teach your children to see it. You can refuse to participate in its rituals. You can decline to sign its loyalty oaths. You can, and this is perhaps the most important thing, tell the truth about it in public, in your own voice. How? By using the words it refuses to accept. “Marxism” is one of those words. “Per capita” is another – some groups are prone to violence, prone to ignorance, prone to abandoning their families. Pointing this out isn’t “racist.” It is identifying serious social problems that must be addressed and that cannot fixed by waving the magic wand of "disparate impact" or by an HR rule. "Responsibility” is a third. The entire racist agenda today is based on the idea that people can’t be responsible for their own lives because of racial oppression that ended more than three generations ago. The antidote to these lies is speaking the truth. Use these words. Do not flinch when the doctrine’s defenders accuse you of racism or bigotry. They are not interested in your character. They are interested in your silence. The doctrine has only ever had one real enemy, and it is not a political party or a candidate or a court. Its enemy is the plain speech of a free people. When free people describe what the doctrine has done — when they name it, in the ordinary language of their communities — the doctrine loses its power. Because its power was never in its arguments. Its power was in its capacity to intimidate people out of naming it. So, name it. That is the first political act of a Fourth Turning. Everything else that the country needs to do to get through the next decade — the monetary reset, the fiscal consolidation, the restoration of discipline in the schools, the re-policing of the cities, the rebuilding of standards across the institutions — depends on millions of ordinary Americans recovering the courage to call the thing by its true name. The true name is Marxism. The American form of it is disparate impact. Its consequence, measurable in the statistics of forty years, is the ruin of American institutions. The doctrine can be defeated. It has been defeated once before — in the Soviet Union, which built a more ambitious form of it at greater cost and collapsed under the weight of the contradictions it could not resolve. Ours is smaller and more refined and better camouflaged, but it is the same doctrine, and in the end it will collapse because of the same contradictions. The only question — the only question that matters, now — is whether we can name the doctrine and defeat it at the ballot box and in the courts and in the schools, or whether we will have to suffer a violent collapse of society. However it resolves, you must survive. The rest of this book is dedicated to helping you and your family survive whatever comes next.

Whenever I investigate a bug, I let codex recreate the exact state in an emphemeral crabbox, verify the bug, fix it, verify the fix. No messy state because local system might be polluted, and no slowdown because I run 10 sessions in parallel.

Some members of my community have reached out regarding a few concerns, and I want to make sure I properly address them before we fully move on from this topic: Look, I’m flattered that Hemomal tweeted that she considers me a close friend, and I’m grateful for her trust, but the first time we spoke was on April 7th, so this narrative that the video was made as a "favor" to anyone is simply false. The truth is, Sykkuno’s serial cheating & manipulation was only the tip of the iceberg, and I was hoping the video would encourage the many others who have stayed quiet for *years* to finally find the courage to talk about their experiences. Unfortunately, with the current state of affairs, that doesn’t seem like it will happen anymore, even if they were to somehow fit the image of a "perfect victim". I don’t blame them whatsoever. Instead, I can only wish them the best, and I hope that his ex who was cheated on for over 5 years can find the peace that she deserves. As for me, I’ll continue making videos that millions of people enjoy, and when prompted, I’ll still strive to do the right thing even if it’s not trendy, because that’s just how I was raised, and it’s simply who I am. That will never change, no matter how many vultures try to desperately farm my name. Thank you for being the best community I could ever ask for, and I’ll see you in the next video whenever that is! -Mujin

I typically ignore all these false claims attacks. But... You can apologize now. I am officially divorced. I won't post any legal docs online, as I respect privacy of my ex-wife, and I appreciate the time we spent together. I am happy to bet $1 billion USD (or any number you choose) that: I am officially divorced (way before today). If you agree to take the bet, we can get lawyers to validate my divorce agreement, which should be dead simple. This bet offer is valid permanently, whenever you feel ready. But if you don't take it within 24hrs, it clearly shows who has been mis-representing to the public. Moving on to better things to do.

It’s important not to let our biases stand in the way of our objectivity. To get good results, we need to be analytical rather than emotional. Whenever I observe something in nature that I (or mankind) think is wrong, I assume that I’m wrong and try to figure out why what nature is doing makes sense. That has taught me a lot. It has changed my thinking about 1) what’s good and what’s bad, 2) what my purpose in life is, and 3) what I should do when faced with my most important choices. To help explain why, I will give you a simple example. When I went to Africa a number of years ago, I saw a pack of hyenas take down a young wildebeest. My reaction was visceral. I felt empathy for the wildebeest and thought that what I had witnessed was horrible. But was that because it was horrible or was it because I am biased to believe it’s horrible when it is actually wonderful? That got me thinking. Would the world be a better or worse place if what I’d seen hadn’t occurred? That perspective drove me to consider the secondand third-order consequences so that I could see that the world would be worse. I now realize that nature optimizes for the whole, not for the individual, but most people judge good and bad based only on how it affects them. What I had seen was the process of nature at work, which is much more effective at furthering the improvement of the whole than any process man has ever invented. Most people call something bad if it is bad for them or bad for those they empathize with, ignoring the greater good. This tendency extends to groups: One religion will consider its beliefs good and another religion’s beliefs bad to such an extent that their members might kill each other in the mutual conviction that each is doing what’s right. Typically, people’s conflicting beliefs or conflicting interests make them unable to see things through another’s eyes. That’s not good and it doesn’t make sense. While I could understand people liking something that helps them and disliking things that hurt them, it doesn’t make sense to call something good or bad in an absolute sense based only on how it affects individuals. To do so would presume that what the individual wants is more important than the good of the whole. To me, nature seems to define good as what’s good for the whole and optimizes for it, which is preferable. #principleoftheday#

Whenever there is a dispute, both parties are required to have equal levels of integrity, to be open-minded and assertive, and to be equally considerate. The judges must hold the parties to the same standards and provide feedback consistent with these standards. I have often seen cases in which the feedback wasn't appropriately balanced for various reasons (to hold the stronger performer to a higher standard, to spread the blame). This is a mistake. The person in the wrong needs to receive the strongest message. Not operating this way could lead them to believe that the problem wasn't caused by them, or was caused by both parties equally. Of course, the message should be conveyed calmly and clearly rather than emotionally to maximize its effectiveness. #principleoftheday#