与「court」相关的搜索结果

Hello guys, tonight I watched a 50 minute podcast with Albert Castellana from GenLayer on The Future of Crypto Compliance, and one minute in it is still stuck in my head. Code is free now, execution is becoming free, so what still has value? According to Albert, it’s judgment. AI already decides what we see on Twitter, whether we get hired, whether we get a loan or insurance, and right now we’re just trusting a few big AI labs with that power Main points: - His previous project lost access to around $150M after keys were lost, and the courts turned out to be too slow and expensive - GenLayer is building a small digital court onchain for decisions that aren’t just yes or no - Five random validators, each with its own AI model, vote on the outcome - Disagree? Appeal, and the validator set doubles each time, up to 1,500 - The first decision takes minutes and costs around 50 cents - It doesn’t replace real courts, it handles small disputes nobody would take to court anyway

Elon Musk offered $97.4 billion to buy OpenAI, and Sam Altman answered in under 60 minutes. “no thank you but we will buy twitter for $9.74 billion if you want.” Same digits, 1/10th the price the insult was in the math. Rewind to 2015, when Musk co-founded OpenAI as a nonprofit, put in $44 million and sent late-night emails about saving humanity. Then he walked. OpenAI took $13 billion from Microsoft, shipped ChatGPT and grew into a $135 billion company without him. Altman wrote him a private email: “I don’t think OpenAI would have happened without you and it really fing hurts when you publicly attack us.” Musk reply came in public instead “Scam Altman,” “Greg Stockman,” and then a lawsuit. In court, OpenAI lawyer handed him a 2018 email from his own inbox, spelling out the plan to raise $10 billion years before he claims he learned of it. Musk, under oath: “I did not read the fine print.” The lawyer: “It’s a 4-page document.” The jury ruled against him unanimously. So count what’s left on the table: a $44 million donation, a $97.4 billion bid dead in an hour, and a $135 billion company run by the man he once mentored. He co-founded the future, then sued it and it won.

Judge: Ma’am, you need to leave this courtroom and return properly dressed. Woman: Properly dressed for what exactly? Walking up to a podium for two minutes? Judge: Properly dressed to appear before a court of law. This is not a gym, and it is not your living room. Woman: I’m here to handle my case, Your Honor, not walk a runway. I didn’t think yoga clothes were going to become the issue. Judge: The issue is respect. Respect for this court, for these proceedings, and for the people in this room. Woman: I do respect the court. I just don’t respect pretending workout clothes are somehow offensive. Judge: I’m not going to stand here and argue with you about basic courtroom decorum. Woman: I’m not arguing either, sir, but this is ridiculous. I’m fully covered, I’m on time, and I’m here for my hearing. Judge: And yet instead of listening, you’re challenging the court at every turn. Woman: Because nobody told me there was some invisible fashion rule attached to showing up. Judge: Common sense is not an invisible rule, ma’am. Woman: So now this is about common sense? Judge: One more word and I will hold you in contempt. Woman: … Judge: That’s what I thought. You may step out, change into something appropriate, and come back when you’re prepared to conduct yourself properly. Woman: So I’m being sent home over clothes? Judge: No, ma’am. You’re being sent out over your attitude and your clothes. Woman: …Understood. Judge: Good. Bailiff, escort her out. We’ll recall the case when she’s ready to respect the courtroom.

Judge: Ma'am, let me get this straight. You're asking this court to order your former boyfriend to pay child support? Lady: Yes, Your Honor. He should take responsibility. Judge: Responsibility for whose child? Lady: My child, Your Honor. Judge: Is he the biological father? Lady: No, but we were together when I got pregnant. Judge: I'm sorry… what? Lady: We were dating at the time. I believe he should help me raise the child. Judge: You believe? Ma'am, did he father this child? Lady: I don't know who the father is. Judge: You don't know who the father is, but you know who you want to pay? Lady: Your Honor, he was my boyfriend. He was supposed to be there for me. Judge: Being your boyfriend does not automatically make him the father of your child. Did he agree to adopt the child? Lady: No. Judge: Did he sign any legal document accepting parental responsibility? Lady: No, but I thought he would stand by me. Judge: Standing by you and being legally responsible for a child are two entirely different things. You cannot simply walk into this courtroom and nominate your ex-boyfriend as the father because you don't know who the biological father is. Lady: So you're saying he has no responsibility at all? Judge: I'm saying you need to establish a legal basis for that responsibility. A relationship is not a paternity test, ma'am! Lady: But I need financial support! Judge: And I understand that. But the court cannot turn your former boyfriend into a father simply because the actual father is unknown. Lady: This is unfair! Judge: What's unfair is expecting someone to pay for a child he did not father, without a legal basis. Court is adjourned!

🚨 NEW: Man jailed for five years for penetrative sexual offences against a child in Merseyside. • Mohammed Ajmal, 26, of Sefton Park in Liverpool, has been sentenced to five years in prison after being found guilty of sexual offences against a 14-year-old girl. • The offences took place in Birkenhead and Widnes three years ago when Ajmal was 22. He contacted the victim on Snapchat, arranged to collect her from Wirral, and drove her to a flat in Widnes where a sexual assault occurred. • A further assault took place in Birkenhead later the same evening. • Following a three-day trial at Liverpool Crown Court, he was convicted of two counts of sexual activity with a girl aged 13 to 15 and one count of engaging in penetrative sexual activity with a girl aged 13 to 15. • He was also placed on the Sex Offenders Register indefinitely and given a Sexual Harm Prevention Order lasting 10 years after his release.

"I got kinda emotional walking in here... When I came here as a freshman, I just wanted to get on the court in an Iowa State uniform... let alone play in an NBA game here." Tyrese Haliburton on returning tonight to play at his alma mater, Iowa State 👏 (via: Pacers/YT)

A 67-year-old woman was arrested in Vernon, Indiana, after allegedly doing doughnuts in her car on a courthouse lawn while under the influence, according to local news reports.

Started with a video in his room... now the whole team is lifting him on the court 🥹 The @utahjazz brought out their hype man Hudson to return the love! 🎶 (📹: utahjazz/IG, madi.butcher/IG)