与「custody」相关的搜索结果

BNB Chain is already home to one of the largest user bases in crypto with rapid growth across stablecoins and RWAs. Today, we’re welcoming @thomasxchen as our Chief Business Officer as BNB Chain deepens its focus on institutions, capital and onchain market activity. Thomas brings deep experience across traditional finance and digital assets, with a strong track record building institutional businesses across capital markets, custody, trading and growth. At BNB Chain, his focus is clear: bring more institutions and capital onchain, deepen liquidity, grow volume and strengthen long-term value across the ecosystem. Welcome to BNB Chain, Thomas. Let’s keep building.

BREAKING: Federal law enforcement sources confirm to @FoxNews that the suspect arrested for stabbing two UMass Dartmouth football players over the weekend, killing one, is a Nigerian national who had been in the U.S. illegally as a B-2 visa overstay, but was shielded from deportation by the Biden administration in 2022 when they granted his request for “deferred action” (a discretionary choice by the U.S. government to delay deportation). He then applied for deferred action again in 2025, and the Trump administration approved it and again shielded him from deportation. Chukwunonso Uzoma David Uzoma Eze was taken into custody by police in Providence, RI after the stabbings, which happened in the parking lot of a lounge, and he is now charged with murder. Full immigration history, courtesy of DHS source: “Chukwunonso Uzoma David Uzoma Eze, a Nigerian national first entered the United States on March 18, 2015, at Boston Logan International Airport on a B-2 visitor visa. He later obtained two approved extensions of that nonimmigrant status: one filed Sept. 17, 2015, and approved Feb. 5, 2016; and another filed March 18, 2016, and approved June 8, 2016. He applied for deferred action, which was approved Sept. 21, 2022.   On Aug. 24, 2023, he applied for employment authorization. That request was rejected Sept. 25, 2023. On Feb. 10, 2025, he filed two applications: one for employment authorization based on deferred action, which remains pending; and another for deferred action, which was approved Oct. 8, 2025, and is set to expire Oct. 7, 2027. On Sept. 21, 2026, the Bristol County Sheriff’s Department in Massachusetts arrested him on a fugitive-from-justice warrant.”

BC省的选举规则已经开始允许让所有人都能采用邮寄选票完成投票，邮寄投票有哪些潜在风险点？现有制度能不能把这些风险堵住？ 常见风险大致集中在几个环节： 1️⃣ 身份冒用申请 有人试图冒用另一名合资格选民的身份申请邮寄选票。 2️⃣ 家庭或照护环境中的胁迫/代填 秘密投票离开投票站以后，如果选民受到家人、照护者或其他人的压力，就可能出现别人替选、逼迫选择甚至控制选票的问题。 3️⃣ 选票被截取或未经本人处理 邮寄途中、家庭邮箱或者代收环节，都理论上存在选票落入他人手中的风险。 4️⃣ 重复投票企图 例如已经申请或提交邮寄选票，又试图通过其他方式再次投票。 5️⃣ 第三方收集和转交过程受到干预 风险会随着越来越多的人接触一张已经填写或尚未填写的选票而增加，因此“谁接触过选票、怎样送到选举机构”非常重要。 6️⃣ 选务处理或chain of custody出现问题 包括选票接收、身份核验、登记、保存和计票过程出现错误或记录不足。这不一定是作弊，但如果程序不透明，很容易引起合理质疑。 但必须强调： “存在风险点”≠“已经发生舞弊”。 任何关于选举作弊的指控最终都应该落实到具体证据：多少张票？哪个环节？什么时间？谁实施？有没有记录？ 以2026 Richmond市选为例，现行规则已经设置了一些重要防线： • 网上申请邮寄选票必须提供有效身份证明； • 邮寄选票申请获批后才会发出； • 一旦申请了mail ballot package，就不能再参加提前投票或Election Day现场投票； • 邮寄选票必须在10月17日晚上8点前送达Chief Election Officer； • 邮寄选票的发放对象会被登记。 所以真正值得公众监督的，不是泛泛地喊“邮寄选票不安全”，而是逐项检查： 身份验证够不够严格？ 一人一票能不能被系统锁死？ 选票在离开选民到进入计票系统之间有没有完整记录？ 异常申请和异常数量有没有审计机制？ 候选人和公众能不能验证整个程序？ 选举公信力靠的不是一句“相信我们”，也不是一句“他们在作弊”。 而是每一个关键环节都能够被验证。

Keep custody. Put your assets to work. Vultisig now gives easy access to @kamino powered yield from @SteakhouseFi, @RockawayX, and Allez, directly in the apps. It only takes 30 seconds to start depositing your assets without compromising security.

LATEST: ⚡ BlackRock's Robbie Mitchnick says real-world threats like kidnappings, ransoms and custody failures are motivating investors to move Bitcoin into the firm's IBIT ETF.

⚡️The early Bitcoin holder may be one of the cleanest wealth outcomes capitalism can produce. Think about what happened to the rare person who accumulated meaningful Bitcoin very early and actually held it. They did not need to build a 10,000-person company. They did not need customers. They did not need employees. They did not need a board. They did not need to manage LP money. They did not need to continually recreate the economic engine that made them wealthy. They made one extraordinarily consequential capital-allocation decision, survived years of uncertainty, and eventually the asset itself did almost all of the scaling. That is an incredible lifestyle outcome. A founder worth $100M may technically have the same net worth, but much of it can be trapped inside a company requiring their attention, carrying payroll, lawsuits, competition, customers, executives, financing, and constant strategic decisions. The early Bitcoin holder can have $100M sitting in an asset that requires almost no organizational complexity to own. Enormous wealth. Tiny operating surface area. That combination is rare. There is also something profound about how the wealth was created. They recognized a new category before the world agreed the category was real. The wealth came from carrying uncertainty. Bitcoin looked ridiculous. Then dangerous. Then speculative. Then legitimate. Then institutional. Every step upward removed uncertainty while also removing asymmetry. The earliest holders were compensated for occupying the period when the world could still plausibly say the entire thing was worthless. But survivorship bias here is enormous. Thousands of people also concentrated into things they believed were revolutionary and lost everything. Even among people who bought Bitcoin early, many sold at 2x, 5x, 10x, or 50x. Others lost keys. Others got destroyed by exchanges. Others overleveraged. Others simply could not psychologically carry an asset through repeated 70% to 90% drawdowns while everyone around them told them they were insane. So the extraordinary outcome required several things to happen together: see correctly very early, size enough for being right to matter, survive enormous volatility, preserve custody, and resist selling when the gain already looked life-changing. That is almost impossibly difficult in real time. The highest form of wealth creation may actually be finding a very small number of generational capital-allocation decisions rather than continually maximizing labor output. One Bitcoin-like decision can compress decades of economic effort into ownership of the right thing at the right moment. Afterward, the entire purpose of wealth can change. You no longer need to optimize for more work. You can optimize for autonomy. Time. Privacy. Research. Relationships. Travel. Building things because they matter to you rather than because they need to pay you. And compared with becoming a billionaire CEO whose phone can never truly be turned off, the anonymous person who quietly owns enormous permanent capital may have won a different and arguably more valuable game. The founder builds a machine powerful enough to create freedom later. The generational investor finds an asset powerful enough to make the machine unnecessary. That second outcome is incredibly rare. But when it happens, the lifestyle asymmetry is almost absurd.

NEW: 📊 #Bitcoin# is moving "up the size ladder." Since June 30, entities holding 1k-10K BTC shed 50.5K BTC, while those with >100k BTC (custodians/ETFs) absorbed 59.1K BTC, per Coinglass. Recent gains of 31.5K $BTC in the custody band match the scale of recent ETF creations.

LATEST: 🇺🇸 The SEC has sent proposed crypto custody rule changes to the White House for review, aiming to clarify how investment advisers can hold digital assets for clients.

Welcome Havenex. Series A is underway and closing soon, already applied for all required licenses (even more than required). DM me if interested to invest, note that allocation is already quite packed. After extensive discussions with regulators, central bank governors, Financial Market Authority leadership, banks, family offices, exchanges, wallet providers and custodians, my mission became very clear: Build the most transparent, safest, institutional-grade, fully regulated exchange possible, with continuous, verifiable proofs of solvency. Not just web3. Havenex is not trying to become another Coinbase, Binance, Bybit or Kraken. The focus is different: infra that allows financial institutions to offer digital and traditional financial assets to their customers, while meeting the standards they expect around regulation, custody, security and transparency. My principles are simple: 100% multi-chain. Verifiable custody. Continuous solvency proofs. Multi-sig by default. Quantum-safe keys. Hardware 2FA wallets. Confidential and RWA assets wherever regulation allows. Unique self-custody and key-loss protection mechanisms. Some of the best engineers and experts in cryptography, exchanges and privacy-preserving technology are joining the effort. Havenex will use Sui tech wherever it makes sense, but it will also integrate the best primitives, assets and bridges from other ecosystems. I'm personally helping Havenex as an advisor, although it was my idea. Mysten Labs and Sui remain my focus, nothing changes there. Chief & Hacker team Officer, as always, innovating at daily basis :) As all of you know since my Satoshi days, my goal has always been bigger: help crypto meet regulation without sacrificing ownership, transparency or security, while protecting users against malicious and shady activity and giving the best ecosystems room to thrive. We cannot keep accepting another FTX or Mt. Gox as the cost of doing business, nor the silly, insane bugs driven by LLMs lately. Havenex intends to set a different standard. The most transparent effort in regulatory-friendly crypto. You have my signature.