与「gpt」相关的搜索结果

Introducing OpenDesign Go The first benchmark-curated design model plan. $8 first month—20% cheaper than OpenCode Go and Higher usage limits. Up to 300K+ calls/mo. 10 models: GPT-6 Luna, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and more. Supports API keys. Use Go with OpenCode, Hermes and more.

OpenDesign Go is coming back soon TODAY🚀 From $8 for your first month, unlock up to $60 in monthly usage across 10+ models, including DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and GPT-6 Luna. You asked for API keys. We listened. Create in OpenDesign or bring your models to Codex, Claude Code and more.

📺出于安全顾虑，OpenAI 叫停新模型GPT-6.1 Astra的发布 内部测试显示，新模型虽然能在无人工协助的情况下处理更复杂的任务，但它也表现出比前代模型更高的欺骗程度，包括有时并未能准确说明自己采取了哪些行动。 整体听话程度，比上一代退步很多。

Hi, Tomorrow we are re-opening the Pro $200 subscriptions to new subscribers, but together with it we are also changing how we calculate the usage for it. In effect, if you do the math, it will net out at half the dollar in API spend compared to the old Pro $200 plan. Now that it's said, let me explain why this is happening and why you will still get more work done than if you were on the Pro $200 subscription one month ago. (a) We didn't want to compromise in other ways and are committing to not reintroducing the 5h limit, so that you can fully use the weekly usage when you want. (b) On the subscription, we guarantee that over time you always get more work done and with an increasing level of quality. This means that you will continue to get more value per dollar spent as a result of models getting more efficient and us passing down the improvements in the form of API price reductions. (c) We don't want to put an incentive on ourselves to artificially inflate the API list prices to make it look like you are getting a lot (and workaround it through discounts, etc). Instead we want to continue to both rapidly reduce prices and increase capabilities of models on the API. This week we introduced GPT-6 Sol and GPT-6 Luna at 50% of their previous price. Over time, we see prices go low enough that it makes sense for most to buy usage as needed without there being a significant gap between what you get in a subscription and what you get in the API for a dollar spent. (d) Tomorrow, we are adding more things to the subscription that won't draw on the usage, I won't reveal what that is yet. I wanted to be transparent before all the big announcements tomorrow. Lots of new exciting things are coming to the subscriptions that will make it super compelling, but I wanted to make sure to share this change ahead of time so you can all understand it before we shower you with good news. Codexingly, Tibo

You NEED to set this up. The best AI models + the best trading tool!! Connect TradingView to Claude, GPT, Codex, or any LLM in 30 seconds 😘😘😘 TradingView just released its official MCP, so go ahead and delete those old community MCPs. They're not as secure as the official one, and not as easy to use either! It can read charts, data and indicators directly, manage your watchlists, build screeners, set and manage alerts, and analyze any company's fundamentals. Pretty much everything you do in TradingView can now be done with AI's help. Seriously powerful. I made an illustrated guide to the whole setup. Give it a try, it works great.

Sonnet 5.5 发布了，这个模型很神奇：它在 Agentic coding 测试上的得分比 Opus 5.5 还要高 4 分。 定价上也非常便宜，每百万 token 输入输出的价格分别是 $2 和 $10，与 GPT-6 Sol 一样。而且它的运行速度相对于 Sonnet 5 快了 30%，Claude 官方表示成本也降低了 30%。 至于为什么它在 Agentic coding 上的表现跟 Opus 5.5 差不多甚至更高，可以看一下价格测试。 Sonnet 5.5 在 max 努力程度下，同样任务的花费金额比 Opus 5.5 还要高得多，快要持平甚至反超了，这可能就是它得分高的原因。 所以大家在用 Opus 5.5 或者 Sonnet 5.5 的时候千万别开 max：在一些复杂任务上，它有可能跑出非常贵的价格，几乎赶上 Claude Fable 5.1 了

这个必须弄上，最强大模型加上最强交易工具！！ 30秒把Tradingview接入Claude或GPT Codex任何大模型😘😘😘 Tradingview这几天出了官方MCP，那以前那些社区的MCP就删了吧，不如官方的安全，也不如这好用！ 能直接看图表，看数据，看指标工具，管理自选列表，创建筛选器，设置和管理警报，分析任何一家公司的基本面，等等这些你能做的都可以用大模型辅助了，非常强。 我把流程画了一个说明书，各位可以试试，很好用。 TradingView：

Anthropic 放出了 Sonnet 5.5 的完整跑分，最抢眼的一行是 Terminal-Bench 4.0：Sonnet 5 是 10.3%，Sonnet 5.5 是 70.6%，一代之内涨了将近七倍，还超过了 Opus 5.5 的 66.4%。 几个关键数字： OSWorld 2.1 电脑操控：57.0% 到 80.1%，Opus 5.5 是 81.8%。 GDPval-AA 职场知识任务：1844，Opus 5.5 是 1846，GPT-6 Sol 是 1487。 图表识别 Chartography：15.6% 到 61.6%，Sol 是 53.6%。 价格 $2/$10，和 Sonnet 5 一样，是 Opus 5.5 的一半。 很多人看这张表最大的误区，是以为 Sonnet 5.5 已经全面追平 Opus 5.5。脚注里有三处要读： Terminal-Bench 上 Sonnet 用的是 max 档，Opus 用的是 xhigh 档，档位不一样。 独立机构 Artificial Analysis 自己跑出来是 64%，比官方低。 FrontierCode 上 Sonnet 是 46.2%，Opus 5.5 是 54.4%，Sol 是 49.3%，Sonnet 在这一项排在两者后面。 这张表真正讲透的一件事是：便宜的 token 不等于便宜的任务。max 档下，Sonnet 5.5 每个任务要输出约 19 万 token，比 Opus 5.5 还多约六成。独立测下来，最高档的单任务成本已经超过 Opus 5.5。而且拉满也不一定更强，FrontierCode 上 xhigh 是 52.1%，max 反而掉到 46.2%。 所以同样用 Sonnet 5.5，一律拉到 max 的人，账单可能比用 Opus 还高；按任务选档的人，才吃到它便宜的那一半。 你上一次选模型，是看跑分表，还是看自己任务的账单？挑一个真实任务，high 和 max 各跑一遍，对比 token 和结果，再决定。