与「neon」相关的搜索结果

This looks like a $20K Porsche commercial. Workflow: 1. Upload the storyboard to Seedance 2.0 2. Paste the prompt below 3. Generate the video Full prompt 👇 Reference image is locked. Keep the exact yellow Maisto Porsche 911 GT2 RS proportions, body kit, headlights, rear wing, wheels, paint color and all design details consistent throughout the entire sequence. Ultra photorealistic miniature die-cast car with realistic materials and reflections. Premium automotive commercial, Hollywood cinematography, HDR, volumetric lighting, ray tracing, motion blur, speed ramp, hyperlapse, macro cinematography, seamless match cuts, whip pans, crash zooms, orbit camera, FPV chase camera, drone shots, extremely dynamic editing, 8K. 00:00-00:01 — The yellow Maisto Porsche 911 GT2 RS suddenly falls vertically from the sky into the center of a modern city street. Low-angle camera looking upward. Speed ramp during the fall. The car lands perfectly on all four wheels. Massive impact. Asphalt explodes and cracks outward. Dust, debris and small stones fly everywhere. Camera shakes violently. 00:01-00:02 — Extreme close-up. Engine instantly comes alive. Exhaust explodes with flames. Dashboard lights illuminate. Tachometer needle violently jumps to redline. Ultra macro mechanical details. Fast crash zooms between ignition button, tachometer, exhaust flames and engine vibration. 00:02-00:03 — Camera rapidly pulls backward while orbiting the car 180°. Tires begin spinning. Smoke fills the street. Sparks under tires. Suspension compresses. Engine revs aggressively. 00:03-00:04 — Instant launch. Full acceleration. FPV camera flies inches above the asphalt directly in front of the car. Heavy motion blur. Speed ramp transition. 00:04-00:05 — Ultra low side tracking shot. Wheels spinning at extreme speed. Brake discs glowing. Sparks from asphalt. Macro suspension movement. 00:05-00:06 — Front bumper close-up. Camera only centimeters above the road. Air rushes around splitter. Strong motion blur. Dynamic reflections. 00:06-00:07 — Drone chase. High-speed highway. Camera dives from above directly behind the vehicle. Hyperlapse feeling. 00:07-00:08 — Desert transition through seamless speed ramp. High-speed drift across sand dunes. Massive dust tornado behind the car. Camera circles 360° while drifting. 00:08-00:09 — Ultra macro wheel shot. Sand exploding from rotating tires. Flying rocks. Suspension travel. Slow-motion micro moment followed by instant acceleration. 00:09-00:10 — Snow transition through motion blur. High-speed mountain road. Snow explodes from tires. Controlled drift through icy corner. FPV chase. 00:10-00:11 — Front three-quarter tracking shot. Camera rotates around the moving car while maintaining identical speed. Snow particles hitting the lens. Dramatic lighting. 00:11-00:12 — Tunnel sequence. Speed ramp. Rapid whip pans between headlights, rear wing, spinning wheels, exhaust flames and side mirrors. Neon reflections. 00:12-00:13 — Extreme macro montage. Carbon fiber texture. Headlight LEDs. Porsche badge. Rear diffuser. Exhaust flames. Brake calipers. Rotating wheel center lock. Every shot lasts only a fraction of a second with seamless match cuts. 00:13-00:14 — Mountain highway at sunset. Drone flies underneath the car during a jump, then instantly moves above it. Cinematic FPV dive. Massive sense of speed. 00:14-00:15 — Final hero shot. Camera pulls far away while orbiting 360°. The yellow Maisto Porsche 911 GT2 RS accelerates toward the horizon at maximum speed. Long cinematic road, glowing sunset, heat haze, dramatic reflections, realistic tire smoke, premium automotive commercial ending, fade to black. Seedance 2.0 - #Seedance2#

$0.50 model just beat the most expensive AI on the market same prompt, one shot each: "build a $10k-looking landing page. single html file, dark theme, neon green accents, animated hero, pricing cards" claude fable 5 - anthropic's flagship, $10/$50 per M tokens: → 600 lines → clean page: hero, features, pricing, footer → solid. minimal. safe kimi k3 on openrouter - this request cost me $0.50: → 1200 lines → live animated chart with a ticking price feed → bento grid, testimonials, FAQ accordion → monthly/yearly pricing toggle, mobile menu, animated counters one of these looks like a template. the other looks like a funded startup full run in the video - kimi first, then fable. judge it yourself the frontier premium is real. but for one-shot frontend it just stopped making sense like + bookmark, prompt in the first comment

This indie dev is making a cozy cyberpunk life sim where neon dreams become your reality. In Nivalis Nights you start with a humble noodle stand and grow it into top restaurants and nightclubs, make friends and enemies, buy and decorate apartments, go fishing by boat, and maybe even find love in a city that stretches from the ocean to the clouds.

Grok Build is becoming a complete environment for building, deploying and managing real-world applications Its plugin marketplace brings the entire development stack into one connected workflow: • Vercel for deployment • Sentry for monitoring • Chrome DevTools for debugging • Cloudflare for infrastructure • Supabase, MongoDB and Neon for databases • Firecrawl for web data • Figma for design • Railway for hosting • Stripe for payments You are not just asking Grok to write code You can build, test, debug, connect infrastructure, deploy and manage production without constantly switching between tools Grok Build combines a frontier model, a powerful agentic harness and all the tools needed to go from an idea to a shipped product

kimi k3 vs gpt 5.6 sol vs fable 5 vs grok 4.5 @Kimi_Moonshot just dropped kimi k3 – a 2.8t param native multimodal model, the first open 3t-class release. key facts: • 1m token context. stable latentmoe activating 16 of 896 experts, built on kimi delta attention (kda) and attention residuals • quantization-aware training from the sft stage onward – mxfp4 weights, mxfp8 activations. moonshot claims ~2.5x scaling efficiency over k2 • max thinking effort by default. low- and high-effort modes are "coming in updates" – there is no way to turn the thinking down today, and you feel it in every run • pricing: $0.30/mtok cache-hit input, $3.00/mtok cache-miss, $15.00/mtok output. claims >90% cache hit rate on coding workloads • benchmarks: swe marathon 42.0 (1st – fable 5: 35.0, sol: 39.0, opus 4.8: 40.0), terminal bench 2.1 88.3, browsecomp 91.2 (1st), program bench 77.8 (1st), gpqa-diamond 93.5. loses frontierswe 81.2 vs fable's 86.6, and deepswe 67.5 vs sol's 73.0 our test – 3 prompts, single-file html, @threejs, fully procedural, no assets: 1. photorealistic european roulette wheel – 37 pockets in the real sequence, mahogany clearcoat bowl, chrome turret, diamond deflectors, flick-to-spin, ball that spirals inward and settles on a mathematically real number 2. las vegas slot machine – 3 reels behind transmissive glass, drag the chrome lever to play, mechanical odometer counters modelled in 3d, coin physics on win 3. full pinball table – 6.5° tilted playfield, flipper impulse physics, spline ramps, drop targets, 6 bumpers, mechanical score reels in the backbox we ran the test on @aimlapi platform results: - cost #1# grok 4.5 – $0.30 #2# kimi k3 – $0.71 #3# gpt 5.6 sol – $2.05 #4# fable 5 – $7.69 - tokens #1# grok 4.5 – 34,241 #2# gpt 5.6 sol – 51,748 #3# fable 5 – 144,126 #4# kimi k3 – 157,999 - lines of code #1# gpt 5.6 sol – 3,054 #2# grok 4.5 – 3,047 #3# kimi k3 – 2,255 #4# fable 5 – 1,950 - generation time #1# grok 4.5 – 5.1 min #2# gpt 5.6 sol – 22.0 min #3# fable 5 – 31.5 min #4# kimi k3 – 75.6 min observations: • kimi k3 is cheap and it is slow. 75.6 minutes across three prompts against grok's 5.1. it is 2.4x grok's price and 15x grok's wall clock. the roulette took 15 min, the slot 18, the pinball 42 • it failed 2 of 3. only the roulette works. the slot machine has reel cutouts on both faces of the cabinet and the symbols face backwards – you can only read your spin by walking around to the rear of the machine. the pinball table stands vertically on its edge with the legs floating detached beside it. • 81% of kimi's output tokens are reasoning, not code. grok: 22%. you are not paying for a bigger answer, you are paying for a longer argument with itself • price per 100 shipped lines – grok $0.010, kimi $0.031, sol $0.067, fable $0.394. a 39x spread for the same three files kimi k3's code quality: upsides: • the roulette is genuinely good – procedural wood grain with real specular breakup, correct european sequence (0-32-15-19-4...), chrome turret, diamond deflectors, clean console • the pinball artwork is the best in the test – a synthwave "nova strike / deep space" field with six individually coloured neon bumper rings, a retro sun on a grid horizon, a nova burst, and a scoring legend printed on the apron. no other model printed the rules on the machine. it is a beautiful texture on a broken object • physics reasoning is real – it derived a 480hz substep for the collider, worked out ball settle conditions and termination guarantees, and checked every ramp exit vector by hand before writing any of it • it is the only model that saw the importmap trap coming. sol shipped a blank white page twice because three.js addons import the bare specifier 'three' and die without an import map downsides: • it dodged that trap on the slot by loading three.js r128 through classic script tags – a 2021 build with no working transmission. its slot glass rendered fully opaque and buried all three reels behind a white pane. the code asks for transmission: 0.93, ior: 1.5 – correct, and silently ignored by a renderer that predates the feature • after 42 minutes and 212k characters of reasoning, the pinball cabinet is not assembled. the table stands vertically on its edge like a wardrobe – the prompt asked for 6.5° from horizontal, it delivered 90°. the legs float detached in the void beside it. head-on it photographs beautifully; orbit ten degrees and it is a painted slab with four chrome rods hovering nearby • the playfield z-fights with the glass – hard black banding across the whole field as soon as you pull the camera back a note on the pinball, in fairness to kimi: nobody passed it. every model shipped broken ball physics and controls you cannot trust. it is the hardest prompt we have run and the whole field failed it, each in its own way kimi k3 reasons better than anything else here and it shows exactly where reasoning pays – physics constants, sequences, edge cases, traps the others walked into follow @thehypedotnews for 24/7 ai news, analysis and breakdowns

同一个 prompt，让三家一把手搓一个 canvas 保龄球物理小游戏 🎳 Fable 5 ⚔️ Grok 4.5 ⚔️ Codex (gpt-5.6-sol) 硬性检查全过，成本差 8 倍。UX 你自己看 👇 固定题面「NEON BOWL」——800×480 canvas、10 瓶三角摆位、圆形物理、自动演示、禁用任何 CDN。 Hard checks（canvas + RAF + 控件 + no-CDN + JS 语法）： → Fable 5：100% ✅ → Grok 4.5：100% ✅ → Codex：100% ✅ 成本 / 延迟： → Grok 4.5：$0.040 · 39.9s 💸⚡最便宜也最快 → Fable 5：$0.324 · 61.5s → Codex：CLI agent，无可比单价 #AI# #LLM# #CanvasArena#

Built from scratch by Grok 4.5 + Grok Build in UE5.8: a cyberpunk L-corner street with neon facades, rain, signs, and crowds walking through the scene. End-to-end, the run took 10.75M tokens, 36.5 minutes, and only ~$12.4 at API pricing. What impressed me most is not just the final render, but the process: the coding agent built it in many small steps, saved 30+ map checkpoints, verified the scene, and iteratively fixed issues autonomously. Congrats to the @SpaceXAI team for building such an impressive coding model and harness. This feels like a real step toward agentic 3D world creation. @elonmusk @milichab @skcd42 @yunta_tsai #UnrealEngine#

This chart is misleading! But it's misleading in a cool way. ChatGPT has seen its market share shrink from total market domination to 46.4% by May 2026. But it hasn't lost. This is a 46.4% share of 2.38 billion AI users worldwide, which equates to 1.1 billion users for ChatGPT. Now compare that to December 2022, when it was just a month old. It has a 98.8% market share, but just 57.7 million users. That's a 41x increase between now and then. This is what makes the story so interesting. It helped grow that market and let other competitors grow alongside them too. And in truth, there's plenty of space to expand still. So that's why this story is interesting. That's the danger of using percentages and it also shows you the limitations of pie charts. A bar chart with absolute user numbers would show that ChatGPT still dominates this market. What do you think? Music: Drive by Neon One, Epidemic Sounds

在 Fable 5 的帮助下，把我一部分服务从 AWS 撤走了，每月省了 500美元。 EC2 迁移到了 Fly/Render。 RDS 迁移到了 Neon/Supabase。 Redis 迁移到 psql。 ES 和 TSDB 还没确定选哪个。 它还用 aws cli 帮我发现了上百刀不再使用但一直扣费的资源。