与「seed」相关的搜索结果

笑死，一个朋友嫌 Seedance 做视频太贵。🤣 转头花了十几万，组装了一台 RTX 5090 机器，专门在本地跑 MiniMax H3 视频工作流。 今天跟我聊天，我给他看了下 Veo + Fable 5.2 做出来的 AI 视频。 他看完沉默了半天： “怎么感觉比我本地跑的效果还好……” 本来想省点 AI 视频生成费，结果直接把未来几年的会员费一次性交了。🤡

BLACK FRIDAY MEGA DEAL 🖤 Get up to 6 months of Topview Ultra free. Buy 2 years, get 6 months free: 30 months for $1,200 Buy 1 year, get 2 months free: 14 months for $600 That's Seedance 2.5 at 720p for under $0.10/sec on the 2-year deal. Limited time only. #TopviewAI# #BlackFriday# #AIVideo#

阿里巴巴，字节，腾讯急了！都急了！ 张一鸣，Seedance 2.5视频生成很强，Seed模型却做成一坨💩 被Dario嘲笑和梁文峰内涵: 视频生成是弯路，代码模型能力上来后，视频顺手就拿捏了 (底子太弱) 🤣 马化腾，招了一堆人做Workbuddy做不明白，只能抄，简单任务跑3个小时，复杂任务做不过来。 内部讲话要裁员，砍掉一半陆军，让去支援海军的Ai😭 马云，阿里巴巴的Qwen 4 好尴尬，双十一配合李佳琦带货，但是却踩在Claude Fable 5.2发行。 鹈鹕骑车🚲测试崩成💩，全网群嘲🤣 现在国内最有希望的就只有DeepSeek和Kimi了！ 核心还是开源！开源！开源！

字节 Seed 核心负责人周畅离职后，整个视频生成业务被曝更多由 97 年少女曾妍承接。 她于 2021 年校招加入字节跳动，成为字节内部晋升最快员工之一，本科西交，硕士蒙特利尔，著名 Seedance 2.0 核心负责人。 无背景，级别 4-2，对标阿里 P11。

I am actually disgusted by the timing of this drop. And this will get a bit more technical. Let’s do a real technical teardown of this "1,385-sigma Blackwell weight fingerprint" report that OpenAI and Anthropic are breathlessly promoting today, because banking on nobody reading past the headline is how DC narratives get manufactured. ​First, look at the actual CUDA maths: when PyTorch initialises model weights (torch.nn.init) with a fixed PRNG seed, curand/Philox parallelises random number generation across the GPU’s Streaming Multiprocessors (SMs). Because Hopper has 132 SMs and Blackwell has 148 or 152 SMs, the exact same seed lays out initial weights in a different spatial pattern depending on the GPU’s SM count. In huge MoE models, certain low-gradient null-spaces or unrouted slices preserve faint directional traces of those step-0 weights even after training. ​So yes, brute-forcing the seed and SM grid can show that a model’s step_0 weight initialisation script ran on a 148/152-SM Blackwell GPU. Now read what the summary explicitly admits in the fine print: 1. Initialisation is not full training: The report literally states that these signatures show how the weights were created, and "support (but do not prove) the inference that Blackwell also participated in model training". Initialising a model checkpoint takes seconds on a single rented dev node before loading the safetensors onto a standard Hopper cluster. The "2,000 to 3,000 Blackwell GPUs" and "$500 million" cluster numbers do not come from the weight fingerprint and Depue admits in his own thread that he simply "estimated" cluster sizes from release schedules and model details. ​2. Zero geolocation and zero proof of smuggling: The final sentence of the executive summary explicitly admits that the findings "do not establish the physical location of the chips, how they were acquired, or whether export control regulations were violated". Depue himself rented a cloud GB200 instance just to run his verification test. Commercial labs that are not on the Entity List renting bare-metal Blackwell nodes in offshore clouds (Singapore, Japan, or the Middle East) is completely legal under BIS rules and leaves the exact same SM fingerprint. Now ask yourself why a former OpenAI researcher dropped this on November 12, the exact day Jensen Huang was pushed out, with OpenAI and Anthropic immediately stepping in to "independently verify" it. US closed-source labs are watching their paid API moats get eaten alive by free Chinese open-weights models. Conflating a step-0 PRNG initialisation seed with a "$500M smuggled Blackwell cluster" hands DC hawks the exact pretext OpenAI and Anthropic want to regulate global cloud compute and kneecap open-source AI.

I have a major result to share. I’ve found conclusive forensic evidence that the top 4 Chinese AI labs—DeepSeek, Moonshot, MiniMax and Ant Group—have built their newest models on NVIDIA’s most advanced Blackwell chips, which are barred from export to China. This sounds insane, but I discovered that almost every AI model carries a hidden signature of the GPU that trained it. When a model is first set up, the starting values of its weights are laid out in a pattern that depends on the exact GPU. Each combination of GPU and seed number produces a unique pattern—a sort of fingerprint of the hardware used to create the model. Traces of that pattern survive training into the published model. Again, this evidence isn’t based on any insider information or leaking. It’s based on a forensic analysis of the model weights released by the companies themselves. I searched more than six trillion combinations of chip layout and seed number and matched them to open-weights models. In doing so, I found conclusive evidence that six Chinese AI models—including DeepSeek-V4-Pro, Kimi K3, and MiniMax-M3—were initialized on NVIDIA Blackwell systems. Four of the models match Grace Blackwell, the GB200 and GB300 parts in NVIDIA’s flagship liquid-cooled rack-scale systems. I then verified these results on real hardware. Running unmodified PyTorch with the seeds I’d recovered, a Blackwell B300 reproduced DeepSeek-V4-Flash’s untouched starting weights bit for bit, and a rented GB200 reproduced Kimi K3’s to a correlation of 0.999995. A Hopper H100 reproduced none of DeepSeek-V4-Flash’s, and changing the seed by one broke the match. (DeepSeek’s seed is 953049583 by the way.) The method also was verified to match 24 known open-weights models to the hardware that developers said they used. It is exceedingly unlikely that these results are a coincidence. Across six trillion combinations, the best accidental match should reach only about 8 sigma (i.e., eight standard deviations above what random chance would produce). The real matches range from 49 to 1,385 sigma, and even the weakest single test hits 20. These were data-center-scale training runs. With some analysis of release schedules and model details, I estimate that the largest, Kimi K3 and DeepSeek-V4-Pro, used 2,000 to 3,000 Blackwell GPUs each. Clusters of this size cost on the order of $150 to $200 million each to buy, and across these labs alone would add up to more than half a billion dollars of export-controlled GPUs, not counting experimental compute or otherwise. It’s quite likely that we see multi-billion dollar expenditure on export-controlled GPUs. I am highly confident in this result, and it has been independently verified by senior researchers at OpenAI and Anthropic. You can read the full report at There is much more I’ve identified about these models through other forms of checkpoint forensics like this, and will have more to share soon.

6 ans d’invest partis en fumé ?? Je viens de me faire siphonner tous mes wallet pour une raison qui m’est inconnue ? @TrustWallet ?? Explain ??? Mon IOS est à jour, ma seed sur papier ?? Que faire de plus ? Une solution ? @TagadoBTC @Crypto__Goku any idea ?? 1 de mes wallet