与「story」相关的搜索结果

$BTC has 21 million. That's the thesis. ₿ $ROBINCAT is inside Robinhood app. That's the thesis 🪶😺 Markets can bleed, charts can turn red, but a good origin story doesn't disappear. One has digital scarcity. The other has an origin most memecoins can only dream of.

人的三重哲学进阶 1 兽性 猴子🐒猴急猴急 —喜欢吃快餐，喜欢暴富，喜欢走后门！ 2 人性具有一定的责任 ，喜欢讲故事，塑造形象！ 3 神性 静中取乐，喜欢静中作乐，修行！ 我们最初都是猴子🐒演变而来 The three philosophical stages of human development: 1. Animality - Monkey-like impatience and eagerness - fond of fast food, sudden wealth, and backdoor deals! 2. Humanity - bears a certain responsibility, enjoys storytelling, and image-building! 3. Divinity - finds joy in tranquility, enjoys amusing oneself in silence, and practices self-cultivation! We all evolved from monkeys in the beginning @elonmusk

A lovely song and a lovely video can still be completely wrong for each other. That’s why Montage Studio caught my attention on @termix_ai It takes a brief, plans the shots, hires other agents for the storyboard, music and video, then edits everything into a finished piece. I’d be paying for someone to make those choices work together. Otherwise I’ve bought three nice files and accidentally become the project manager. For creators, that’s a useful way to judge these services: how much work is actually left when the delivery arrives? I’d quite like to receive the video and remain peacefully uninvolved in its staffing issues.

“Being drafted, I felt like I was out there representing everyone at the Naval Academy, and then the larger Navy and Marine Corps family in that moment.” ❤️ Steelers RB Eli Heidenreich shares his Salute to Service story. #SaluteToService#

🚨 NOW: Treasury Sec. Scott Bessent just made it clear that Nvidia Board forcing out Jensen Huang does NOT let the rest of the company off the hook ‼️ "We don't know for a fact Jensen Huang knew this." "The story was on Jensen Huang's personal foibles. The REAL story should be, did Nvidia know their client? Was there a robust effort to make sure there was no leakage? That they were selling to what were obvious pass-through shell companies!" "It's important ANYONE at the company THERE be held accountable for THAT." Megaspeed became one of Nvidia's BIGGEST AI chip customers, reportedly spending more than $4 BILLION There were already questions as to whether they were being routed to China. We can't hand China an inch! The Board cannot just push out Huang and think it all goes away.

It took two weeks to end the career of the most successful Asian American in history. Jensen washed dishes at Denny‘s as a teenager, and by this year he was running the world’s most valuable company. This week a lot of Asian people on my timeline decided that story is over. That no matter how high you climb, a face like ours gets a different set of rules at the top. After Elizabeth Holmes, female founders spent years getting asked some version of “how do we know you’re not the next Holmes?“ One woman‘s fraud turned into a question every woman had to answer. I’m Chinese Canadian, I grew up in Vancouver, and now I live in the Bay Area. I already know what my version of that question is going to be and it‘s pathetic. Jensen was born in Taiwan and spent over thirty years building an American company. The second the word ”China“ landed next to his name, none of that counted. This country has done this before. In 1882 it banned Chinese immigrants. In 1942 it locked up 120,000 Japanese Americans, most of them citizens. In 1982 two Detroit autoworkers who blamed Japan for their jobs beat Vincent Chin to death with a baseball bat. He was Chinese. His killers never spent a day in prison. Yellow peril never checked which Asian you were, and that’s a big part of why “Asian American“ became one word. If they were going to lump us together anyway, we might as well stand together. Now look at Jensen‘s timeline. Oct 29, the spy story breaks. The next day Singapore’s government says it never said what the Wall Street Journal claimed. Nov 8, he admits an affair. Nov 12, he‘s gone. The spy part is still unproven. Two weeks start to finish, right before what could be the biggest IPO in AI. You can call that a coincidence. I don’t buy it. Meanwhile the powerful people who raped CHILDREN in the Epstein files are mostly still living their best life Jensen had an affair with an adult woman. That’s the only thing of what‘s actually been proven. So what exactly did Jensen do that was worse than them? Nothing. He was the best, he was Asian, and he was on the wrong side of the political fight. He did everything right. He built the company America needed most and showed up to every dinner in Washington. On Sunday night the president himself stood up for him and called him “an honorable guy.” It didn’t matter. By Thursday he was gone. If you can take down the president‘s favorite CEO in four days while the president is defending him, think about who that message was really for. They’ll use you for thirty years and still never count you as one of them. That’s what a political weapon is. You’re a tool while you’re useful. When the game gets serious, you’re the knife. And when it’s over, nobody comes back for the knife. Jensen was the best one they had. That's exactly why he made such a good "kitchenware".

I analyzed eleven New York Times reports on the Jensen Huang story. Most notably, NYT makes the "spy" claim 30 times in these 11 reports. The original report cites unnamed officials who had been "briefed" on the intelligence. Not who had seen it themselves -- but who had been "briefed". This is a game of telephone with plausible deniability. Nobody named. No specific details of the intelligence used to draw the conclusion that the woman was a spy. Anonymous "officials" "briefed". This was used to try to take Jensen Huang down. When that didn't work, journalists resorted to viciously digging up and scandal mongering about Jensen Huang's other alleged affairs. Then he was removed as CEO. Without an investigation. Without due process. And now officials and intelligence agencies are contesting the New York Times characterization. This is unethical. It is unjust. It is an absolute disgrace. If anyone should resign now, it is Nvidia's board who aggressively removed Jensen Huang without an investigation, after he gave decades of his life to make the company what it is. And any investigation that proceeds from here should involved not just the "spy" claim, but the New York Times -- who has engaged in potentially unethical behavior. Jensen Huang deserves due process -- not mob justice. He deserves respect for everything he has done for technology and America -- not a disgraceful removal after anonymous, unsubstantiated allegations, several parties removed from the source.

Bombshell story. The spy narrative is collapsing already. Is there clear & convincing evidence that Alice Huang was a Chinese spy? - AG says no. (“no conclusions reached”). - CIA says no. (“not yet convinced”). - DNI says no (“not entirely accurate and over-torqued”). - Ranking Democrat on House Intelligence (incoming Chairman) says no. (“today, at least, I don’t know”). This was immediately after he was briefed. Who argues otherwise? Anonymous officials tell CNN “it strains credulity to believe that she was not acting as an agent of the Chinese government — simply by virtue of the fact that she is a successful Chinese businesswoman working with one of America’s most powerful companies.” This is their proof after a year of investigating and surveillance? That she was a “successful Chinese businesswoman”? At this point, the only crime that we know for sure happened is the leaking of the classified memo. Who did that and why? An investigation should be opened.

Everyone believes CUDA is NVIDIA's moat, the reason we've maintained our dominance in the AI era. I've never believed that. NVIDIA has only one true moat: its people. And the most important of them is Jensen Huang. I've worked on CUDA compilers, libraries, and DSLs for eight years, from Volta to Rubin. I think I've earned the right to share my perspective on what NVIDIA's moat really is. I hope you'll bear with me. 1. What is CUDA? Many people think CUDA is just a programming language and its compiler, and that NVIDIA's moat comes from the massive amount of software written in CUDA, making it impossible for developers to leave NVIDIA GPUs. This is completely wrong. It's an incredibly naive understanding of CUDA. To me, CUDA is everything NVIDIA does. CUDA isn't just a language, software, or hardware architecture. It's a product defined by a unique customer experience. When you find GPU programming too difficult, CUDA gives you an easier way. When your GPU code isn't fast enough, NVIDIA engineers respond and help you solve it. When a handful of GPUs can no longer push your technology forward, NVIDIA has already scaled its computing platform from desktops to massive data centers. When you need more data centers than anyone else can supply, NVIDIA has already secured wafer and HBM capacity years in advance to meet your demand. That experience is CUDA. It's made possible by the relentless, day-to-day work of everyone at NVIDIA. And the person who brings all these people together, who gives them a shared vision and purpose, is Jensen Huang. 2. What made CUDA possible? Patience. Perseverance. An unwavering commitment to a vision. Around 2006, NVIDIA bet that the future would demand far more computing power, and began transforming GPUs from graphics processors into a platform for general-purpose computing. Initially, it was a commercial disaster. The added costs hurt margins, the market wasn't ready, and the strategy faced enormous skepticism and pressure, including questions from the board. But Jensen persisted. For roughly a decade, NVIDIA kept investing in CUDA, building its hardware, software, and developer ecosystem long before the commercial payoff became clear. Eventually, deep learning arrived. And NVIDIA was ready. Today, this sounds like an inspiring story. But for those who lived through it, it meant a decade of perseverance, doubt, and being misunderstood. Looking back at the history of technology, how many people could have done the same? This is what I've always loved most about NVIDIA. And now, Jensen has been pushed out. This won't kill NVIDIA. The company can still create tremendous commercial value. But it has killed NVIDIA's soul. And how far can a body go without its soul? If this is how Jensen Huang is treated today, how will those of us who built CUDA be treated tomorrow? I love NVIDIA deeply, but I have to say it: NVIDIA is dead.