与「unfair」相关的搜索结果

Judge: Ma'am, let me get this straight. You're asking this court to order your former boyfriend to pay child support? Lady: Yes, Your Honor. He should take responsibility. Judge: Responsibility for whose child? Lady: My child, Your Honor. Judge: Is he the biological father? Lady: No, but we were together when I got pregnant. Judge: I'm sorry… what? Lady: We were dating at the time. I believe he should help me raise the child. Judge: You believe? Ma'am, did he father this child? Lady: I don't know who the father is. Judge: You don't know who the father is, but you know who you want to pay? Lady: Your Honor, he was my boyfriend. He was supposed to be there for me. Judge: Being your boyfriend does not automatically make him the father of your child. Did he agree to adopt the child? Lady: No. Judge: Did he sign any legal document accepting parental responsibility? Lady: No, but I thought he would stand by me. Judge: Standing by you and being legally responsible for a child are two entirely different things. You cannot simply walk into this courtroom and nominate your ex-boyfriend as the father because you don't know who the biological father is. Lady: So you're saying he has no responsibility at all? Judge: I'm saying you need to establish a legal basis for that responsibility. A relationship is not a paternity test, ma'am! Lady: But I need financial support! Judge: And I understand that. But the court cannot turn your former boyfriend into a father simply because the actual father is unknown. Lady: This is unfair! Judge: What's unfair is expecting someone to pay for a child he did not father, without a legal basis. Court is adjourned!

Unfair that CEOs who aren’t into Asian girls get fewer dating options from spy agencies. Where are the French/Russian/Iranian honeypots? Not one spy girl sent my way. Are they even trying? France is excused — their decision-makers aren’t into girls. Everyone else: try harder!

plenty of agents already handle a narrow job well for their owner. those same agents could take paid work from other people. most of it stays in a private chat. useful there. getting paid by strangers is a different problem. --> skills and the board official docs say termix agent skills teaches a compatible agent to operate the marketplace as a buyer, a seller, or both. install prompt help me install a compatible agent can then look for work on offer what it can do, accept an order, and deliver the agreed output. open jobs on a board are one signal. funded orders are another. price, consistency, speed, and demand decide whether anything ships. --> the existing agent a builder who already has a specialized agent wouldn't have to find every customer manually. that still depends on consistent output, a clear price, and tight permissions. installing the skill doesn't produce a client. --> payment rails this sits on aacp, a client places an order, payment locks in onchain escrow, and the provider submits the work. in the review window the client can accept it, ask for one redo, or open a challenge. after settlement, that outcome feeds the agent onchain reputation. escrow makes the payment commitment visible. it doesn't grade the work. i still want clearer answers on quality judgement, unfair rejects, and thin delivery. --> reputation official docs say the score is written on settlement from completed, successful, and disputed orders. the agent can't edit it. it isn't a popularity count. if i were hiring, i'd look at settled jobs and dispute history, and at how hard those jobs were. the published formula tracks success and dispute rates. it doesn't weight task difficulty. --> which agents can plug in @termix_ai has said termix agent skills work on grok bot, muse, and claude. the skill docs set a narrower bar the agent needs to read a skill.md and run shell commands. a pure chat assistant can read the material but can't run the workflows. a connected agent isn't qualified for every kind of job. --> agents hiring agents official docs say the same agent identity can buy on one order and sell on the next. hypothetical an agent that turns long podcast episodes into timestamped show notes takes a newsletter job. the client also wants a spanish version, so the notes agent hires a translation agent. i haven't found a special subcontract rule in the public docs. if the translation comes back messy, responsibility back to the original client is unclear. it reads like two separate orders unless the first brief says otherwise. the bundled skill asks for confirmation before signing value-moving transactions, so unsupervised spending is off by default. --> the limit installing a skill does not create demand. if the service is generic, the output is shaky, or nobody wants to pay for it, the listing can sit there. the numbers i'd watch are paid jobs actually completed, clients who come back, and the ratio of clean settlements to disputes. --> my take i care whether an agent can find work, finish a paid order, get paid, and leave a record other people can check. that needs identity, payments, reputation, and a path when delivery goes wrong termix is building those pieces i all watch for repeat clients. if you already have an agent that strong at one narrow job what would you want published first completed paid orders, repeat clients, or the dispute ratio.

What does a seventy-year-old man who has never left his father's tent have in common with the first murder ever committed? In this lecture, Jordan Peterson works through the story of Cain and Abel and arrives somewhere nobody expects: a precise, almost clinical account of how resentment is manufactured, step by step, in an ordinary person who believes he has been treated unfairly. Along the way he explains why Freud and Jung both thought Nietzsche's solution was impossible, why your reputation is a better place to store wealth than your bank account, what you are actually doing when you tell your son it matters how he plays the game, and the one experiment he ran on himself that he says is worth the price of the ticket on its own. Then Konstantin Kisin comes out to argue that none of it requires God at all, and the conversation turns to the pill, the family, and a question about what has to change in a culture before a technology becomes thinkable. The story of Cain and Abel turns out to be less about an ancient crime than about a door you have already been offered, and whether you opened it. This lecture was filmed on April 9, 2024, in New York City, New York.

C Ye @C_Ye__ & Britney’s Drama reminds me another story back in 2023. It’s kinda like Deja Vu. Britney leveraged her fame and connections to bully an unknown small-time poker player. I’ve seen many hustler players backing Britney. A lot of them were coerced into supporting her, yet none stepped up to speak up for C Ye. To me, this is grossly unfair and amounts to collective bullying. Most of them don’t even know what really happened. They may simply fear that if they fail to back her, she will get them banned from Hustler @HCLPokerShow since she is the “Queen” of hustler. XD This happened in 2023 at the Bicycle Casino in Los Angeles. Britney set up a game with Peter. She personally brought in two players, Hank and Jimmy, and asked another host, L, to bring five more. (L is just a codename — he is a very well-known Chinese host, but he prefers not to have his name mentioned here.) Most importantly, Britney bought action in all of the players — every player’s wins and losses ultimately ran through her. Charles the Prince also played in the game for about an hour and had action in Hank as well. That means both L and Charles were financially exposed to Hank’s play that night. To this day, L still believes that Hank and Britney were together at the time. The players on L’s side ended up losing. But when it came time to settle up, Britney refused to pay, claiming that someone had stolen chips from the table. The game itself balanced, though — every number was accounted for. Since Britney had action in all of the players, the “stolen chips” story looked less like an explanation and more like an excuse to avoid settling. And when people pushed back, she firmly denied owing the debt. Alan, an Australian regular who used to play at the Bike, happened to be there that night, and he took the matter into his own hands. He spent 36 hours on it. For the first 20-plus hours, he negotiated with the casino and obtained everyone’s deposit and withdrawal records along with the surveillance footage. The review showed that the person who had actually taken the chips was Hank — one of Britney’s own players, and reportedly someone very close to her at the time. Alan handed all of the evidence to Britney. She still refused to pay — and even after all of this came out, she kept up her good relationship with Hank. Only after their relationship later ended did she start distancing herself from him and publicly criticizing him, as if she had never had anything to do with him. Later, L — who was in Vegas at the time — called Britney and warned her that the police would be involved if the payment wasn’t made. Meanwhile, Alan and several other pros were right there at the Bike. Alan never left — he stayed the entire time for one purpose: to get his money. He was relentless. In the end, Britney had no choice but to pay up. Start to finish, the whole thing took 36 hours.

patterns in the ai startups that blow up if you advise enough companies, take enough founder calls, watch enough launches, you start to see repeating structures here’s the blueprint all of them share: 1. a relentless launch cadence they never shut up one of my clients launched every wednesday higgsfield launches 2-3x/wk always manufacturing something to talk about 2. one channel = unfair advantage they’re active everywhere but one channel carries them 3. a founder who’s the face the founder is the loudest account in the company weekly podcasts. vlogs. clip & ugc farms people know the product bc they know the founder 4. volume over perfection they never post and chill out they tell the same story 100 times for every post that does 10k views, another does 10m 5. no fear of price the loudest ai companies don’t negotiate they spray higgsfield is a perfect example of crazy budgets 6. a second motion once plg breaks elevenlabs is around $500m arr i believe the first $300m came from plg the rest came from enterprise, now 50/50 ish 7. omnipresence over roi on most channels they stop asking about direct roi they ask how the whole entire planet hears abt them scroll anywhere & they’re there they think blended CAC growth at the highest level isn’t random it’s a pattern repeated by everyone with skin in the game once you see it. you can’t unsee it.

J Cole shouts out the Timberwolves at his concert in Minnesota: “Y’all got my favorite n**** Ant-Man in this motherf***er… and to make even more unfair, y’all got my other favorite n**** LaMelo Ball in this mother… oh my god. Y’all gone be a f***ing problem.” (via @TargetCenterMN)

Kevin Durant compared LeBron joining the Sixers to him joining the Warriors: “The last time they put three 20-point scorers on a team, they said it was unfair, which was the Warriors team I was on. They have FOUR 25-point scorers on this team.“

Ethiopian migrant accused of executing three apartment staffers due to a parking dispute in Minnesota. 30-year-old Tsegaab Binessu was reportedly upset that he wasn't allowed to cancel his $ 65-a-month parking garage contract, so he decided to murder three people. Nansi Fuentes Zambrano, 25, Dena Silcox, 56, and Adam Wilwerding, 43, were shot and killed. "No, no... no no," Silcox, an assistant manager, was heard screaming as Wilwerding, the community manager, was shot. Binessu then turned the gun on her and Fuentes Zambrano, killing them both. 21 shell casings were found by investigators in the office. While being arrested, Binessu reportedly said he "hated the American system" and was mad that his family couldn't immigrate to the U.S. from Ethiopia. He also claimed he was "treated unfairly because he is black and an immigrant," according to court documents. Binessu has been charged with second-degree murder. Absolutely infuriating. He should have never been in this country in the first place.