与「whatever」相关的搜索结果

A skill is basically a program for an LLM. We're thinking about orchestration as skills too: different message board setups for agents, run side by side, keep whatever works best. with @jamescalam and @micmakarov

In 2015, AI hallucinating was the whole point. 🌀 This is DeepDream, running on VGG16. You hand a neural network an image and tell it to exaggerate whatever it thinks it sees. Then you make it do that over and over, each pass building on the last. 🔁 It finds eyes and creatures everywhere 👁️ because it learned to see from ImageNet, a dataset of 1,000 categories packed with animals (about 120 are dog breeds alone 🐕). Ten years later, the same behavior has a less fun name: hallucination. And we spend a lot of engineering effort stopping it. 🛠️ Same thing underneath, just a different job.

Are we really gonna keep pretending there’s no elephant in the room? This kind of price action is NOT normal AT ALL. I don’t even remember seeing anything like this during the worst bear markets in history. Price action that’s literally going straight to zero without a single bounce. Once again, just like with 10/10, we’ll probably never know what actually happened. But imo, something shady has definitely been going on, whether it’s related to the Binance hack (with Binance once again trying every dirty trick in the book to make its money back) or whatever else.

Jensen Huang and his wife holding hands during his first public appearance since the reported resignation. ❤️ Despite all the noise, controversies, and public scrutiny, they still appear affectionate towards each other. Whatever happens in the corporate world, family and personal relationships remain an important part of life. After decades of building a global technology empire, perhaps this is a reminder that there's more to life than titles, wealth, and professional achievements. Success is great, but having someone who stands by you through different seasons of life is priceless. ❤️

BREAKING: Jensen Huang appeared “broken” in his final hours as Nvidia CEO, per Bloomberg. Nvidia’s board held an emergency meeting that ran late into the night after the latest affair reports, and by the end Huang had agreed to step down. The board left him no choice but to resign. According to people who spoke with him, his usual take-charge style was gone. He responded with indifference, saying things like “whatever” and “I don’t care,” and has since called himself a “piece of sh--.” He says he no longer cares what happens to him. His main concern is his wife and not “ruining the lives” of the women now linked to him. Inside Nvidia, employees are rallying behind him. More than 1,600 comments on internal forums call for his reinstatement, per Wired.

An American porn actress says a single shoot in Madrid involved 80 men and nearly a liter of semen. She counted 122 ejaculations, followed by another 10 onto her face. The night before, she had sat across from the director asking about pay and medical testing. He answered by opening a spreadsheet. In the interview below, she describes how the production was organized, from recruiting performers to deciding when she could take a break. According to her, the studio maintained a roster of around 300 men in Madrid. Getting onto it required a referral. Test results fed into the spreadsheet so the crew could track who was cleared to participate. The men could earn more depending on the shot they delivered. She says she was given three medications before filming, including one she describes as a muscle relaxant. Nine women worked as fluffers. Their waiting room had pink furniture and candy on the table. Outside, the men lined up while her videos played on a television. The shoot followed a repeating schedule: ten ejaculations into her mouth, swallow, then another ten. After fifty, she took a break and recorded an interview before returning. One assistant held a bowl beneath her chin to catch whatever spilled. She says the role even had a name: “scooper.” Amid all that coordination, she remembers one man missing and quietly apologizing. “I’m so sorry. I’m so sorry.” For the final sequence, she requested ten men instead of the usual five. Then the director addressed the group in Spanish. One word caught her attention: “ojos.” Eyes. Afterward, she asked whether he had instructed them to aim at her eyes. He denied it. According to her, he had repeated something she mentioned over dinner - that she didn’t mind and the men interpreted it differently. She has since referred other American performers to the production. “I’ve sent them so many Americans.”

how to become a latency sniper on Polymarket. people make ~$500 a day on this in BTC 5m markets. here's a step-by-step guide it turned out simpler than i thought: grab the old price after a BTC jump and buy the other side when the market flips his game plan: 1. every 5 minutes a new market opens: will BTC be higher or lower in 5 minutes 2. the market moves on the BTC price from Chainlink. Chainlink collects the price from exchanges, averages it and feeds it to Polymarket 3. the early move shows up on Binance, and that's the signal to get in. BTC moves hard one way within 15-30 seconds, Polymarket still has the old price, and he buys that side right away 4. if BTC turns back, the other side gets cheaper. he buys it too, so the UP + DOWN pair costs him less than $1 5. he holds everything until the market ends or merges the pair back into $1. he never sells where does the money come from? about 70% comes from entries after a price jump. other buyers at the same price and the same time left lose ~3% on average after fees, he makes +10% the other ~30% comes from pairs. UP + DOWN cost him 91¢ on average, and at resolve he gets $1 why does this even work? say there are 3 minutes left. BTC is flat and UP trades at 50¢. then BTC jumps up on Binance. on Polymarket sellers keep their orders at 50-55¢ for a bit longer, and he takes them. in 6 out of 10 markets he holds UP until the end. if BTC pulls back, DOWN drops to like 35¢ and he buys it. now he's got a pair for ~88¢, and at resolve he gets $1 whatever happens. his trades are small, ~$6 on average, because he's not the only one sniping here's his profile:

Jensen Huang in his last hours as Nvidia CEO, per Bloomberg: > The board met late into the night & left him no choice but to resign > > He looked broken, his take-charge style gone > Started saying things like "whatever" & "I don't care" > He has since called himself a "piece of sh--" > He says he no longer cares what happens to him > His main concern: his wife, and not "ruining the lives" of the women now linked to him

🚨 BREAKING: LONDON TRIED TO FLEX, ELON MUSK JUST DROPPED A TOTAL DIGITAL BLACKOUT! UK Prime Minister: "Elon Musk, adjust your platform algorithms and hand over satellite telemetry logs to our regulators immediately, or we will revoke your commercial spectrum licenses and seize all Starlink UK ground stations!" Elon Musk: "You confused parliamentary decrees with orbital mechanics. In space, satellite constellations don't bow to bureaucracy. Try revoking our licenses—your ministers can issue all the press releases they want, but your regional maritime routes can't function without high-speed telemetry." UK Prime Minister: "We will freeze SpaceX financial accounts in London and restrict your aerospace access!" Elon Musk: "Freeze whatever accounts you like! The moment your order goes live, SpaceX software shifts subsea data routing keys away from North Sea terminals. Good luck guiding transatlantic cargo fleets through maritime storms on dark screens!" If this exchange is real, the clash between government power and Elon Musk's technology empire just reached another level. Do you firmly support Elon Musk on this? YES or NO? IF Yes, Give me a THUMBS-UP👍!!

Telegram shipped a "sandbox" for HTML widgets in messages. It's an in-process QuickJS (C) interpreter on a thread... No fork, no isolatedProcess, no seccomp anywhere in the tree, so any QuickJS exploit is enough to gain full control with whatever privileges the Telegram client is running as without the need for any separate sandbox escape The bug is a UaF in the interpreter, from standard JS: ```js class D { [Symbol.dispose]() {} } const d = new D(); let leak; class C { static { for (await using x of [d, d]) leak = () => x; }} // ... run anything ... leak() // reads a freed frame ``` The fix for this particular vuln is still just in the master branch, and considering the number of vulnerabilities QuickJS has had in the past, this vuln will surely not be the last...