与「53」相关的搜索结果

X AI ALGORITHM UPDATE (BIG ONE) 🚨 X updated their open source algorithm yesterday and the biggest number in it is gone: copy link went from 20 to 0 points. Small accounts should focus on: posts people like, reply to and stay on (so stop counting on link copies) tl;dr: - on Nov 13 X's open source code set the score for copying a post's link to 0 - copy link: 20 → 0 - it was the top score in the whole system, 4x a reply - the code also names a "copy link bait" spam check - likes (0.708), replies (5) and DM shares (5) didn't move full details: - The number that's gone Since I started reading X's open source code in August, one number sat at the top: 20, for someone tapping share and copying your post's link. Nothing else came close. As of the Nov 13 release, it's 0. X still guesses who'll copy your link. It just multiplies that guess by 0 now. X didn't explain it. It's just what the code says. (I check the open source algo daily with Claude and share updates with you) - Cross it off your list My own checklist called copy link the biggest number. Last week's post said it too. It was true then. It isn't now. If you saved that list, cross that line out. - The "copy link bait" check X's code now mentions a spam check called "copy link bait". In the code it adds a spam label to the post, and that label already keeps a post out of strangers' feeds. It only shows up in a test, so I can't see if it's running or how strict it is. My read: X saw people baiting link copies, so it turned the score off and built something to catch the bait. That's a read, the code doesn't say why. - Why that matters if you're small If your plan was posts people copy the link to, that plan now earns 0 in X's ranking. A copied link can still bring people in from outside X. It just doesn't push your post up anymore. What still pays: likes at 0.708 (the highest ever), people staying on your post, replies at 5 and back and forth with mutuals at 20. - Also new: photo and video tags If a post has a spam label, people you tag in its photo or video who don't follow you won't get notified. Same idea as last week's rule for replies. - What didn't change Every other score. Your new posts still get their extra push in the first 2 hours and first 200 views, and early likes still pick which one gets it. Here's a recap of what you should be doing: - aim for likes, replies and time spent, the copy link score is gone - a DM share still earns 5, same as a reply or a quote - likes sit at 0.708, never higher - time on your post keeps counting at its best rate yet - 10+ seconds after someone taps in adds 0.385 - write your replies yourself, under big accounts most of all - give people a reason to hang around your profile - in videos the opening seconds carry it, an open alone scores 0 - posts read to the end help X find you strangers - smaller accounts (below 50K) get a shot at a spot near 16 for a fresh original - early likes decide which new post gets that spot - post when your followers are awake, the push lasts 2 hours and 200 views - mutuals going back and forth earn 20, so follow back the regulars - only your originals ever get shown to strangers - like 1 and like 32 each unlock another way to reach strangers - one strong post per feed, your second only counts 62% - clips longer than 10 seconds for the video lists - a post likely to win you a follow gets +4 - give your pinned post a look, it can affect the whole account What you should NOT be doing: - counting on copy link shares, they score 0 now - baiting link copies, the code names a spam check for exactly that - a spam label also stops your photo tags reaching non-followers - AI-written replies under big accounts, "llm slop" is a flag X uses - copy-paste replies, labeled ones skip non-followers' notifications - chasing taps, 0.274 and dropping - drifting off your topic, each probable "not interested" takes 53.07 away - videos people open and leave, the open itself earns 0 - posting at 3am, it wastes the 2 hour push - expecting replies and reposts to reach strangers - an insult label, it hides that post from non-followers - earning a misinfo or low quality label, which adds a warning and locks strangers out of liking or sharing - 3 adult photos or videos among your latest 5 posts, that puts a label on you - forgetting videos get rechecked at 64 and 512 likes - one account label and strangers stop seeing you - pinning a link to a site X rates badly, that can mean a label for a week - posting your own old words again risks the copypasta flag - a low quality link plus tagged strangers reads as spam - bait for engagement, big or small it gets a label - several posts back to back, they split the same feed - hashtag piles, they do nothing - bookmarks for reach, they score 0 - hoping a 3 day old post still lands in For You, it stops at 2 days

看着好像没那么简单。 Grok BOT接上 “PUMP FUN” 官方仓库，一晚上都在自动交易。本金121美元，早上8点的时候变成2794美元。 Fable 5.2挨个分析币，下单操作交给Grok来做。 我之前还以为，想要做到这种效果，得有开发团队还要有人熬夜盯着才行： → 连上一次 ，自己设好花钱上限，机器人没办法把钱提走 → Fable 5.2在投钱之前，给每个新币跑Pulse、回测还有打分 → Grok的Curve代理专门交易还在债券曲线上的币 → 等币转到PumpSwap之后，Swap和AMM接着跟进交易 → Shield盯着进场，避免被别人抢跑 → 下单之前先查滑点，核对报价和手续费 Fable挑机会，Grok负责下单。8个代理一起跑，每分钟9036次操作，就一台手机搞定。 一共139笔单子。86笔是还在曲线的时候做的，53笔是币毕业之后做的。胜率79%，每一笔都设好了止盈止损。 赚最多的是$Hope，赚了638.70美元。亏最多的是$Peanut，亏掉182.96美元。 一开始放进去121美元，最后拿到2794美元。一晚上直接翻了23.1倍。 把截图存好吧，以后再回头看会很有意思。

not all crypto rewards are created equal. when a platform advertises yield, i think the first thing to check is what holders actually receive and where that value comes from. @RebateLaunch has an interesting approach to this. instead of paying holder rewards in newly issued $rebate, eligible holders receive payouts in the pair asset. on robinhood chain, that's usdg. the platform reports: → $28.5k distributed to holders. → 120,403 individual payouts. → rewards sent several times throughout the day. → no staking or manual claiming required. but the reward distribution is only one part of the model. rebate pad also uses a declining launch tax to address early sniping. → 99% during the initial stage. → 66% in the next stage. → 33% in the following stage. these penalties go into a locked treasury that supports the buyer bonus mechanism. separately, the 0.7% platform fee is used to buy $rebate from the market and burn it. the reported cumulative burn has reached 35.3m tokens, representing 3.53% of the original 1 billion supply. what makes this model worth examining is how several mechanisms connect: ✦ early launch activity contributes to the treasury. ✦ the treasury supports buyer bonuses. ✦ trading fees fund holder payouts and the $rebate buyback-and-burn mechanism. my perspective is that paying rewards in the pair asset is an interesting distinction because holders aren't simply receiving more of the same token. however, attractive payout numbers alone don't prove sustainable yield. trading volume, fee generation, treasury health and long-term user activity still matter. i'd rather evaluate the source of rewards than focus only on the advertised percentage. also, round 3 of the creator campaign closes november 17 at 22:00 utc. the real question is whether rebate pad can maintain this economic cycle as adoption grows. $rebate

Leopold Aschenbrenner’s complete Q2 performance before his newest trades release Monday Top tier: • SanDisk $SNDK: -62% • Micron $MU: -34% Second tier: • Bloom Energy $BE: -38% • Taiwan Semiconductor $TSM: -18% • Nebius $NBIS: -59% Third tier: • CoreWeave $CRWV: -49% • Core Scientific $CORZ: -45% • STMicroelectronics $STM: -39% • Applied Digital $APLD: -49% • Riot Platforms $RIOT: -37% • SharonAI $SHAZ: -74% • IREN $IREN: -61% Smaller positions: • T1 Energy $TE: -82% • WhiteFiber $WYFI: -76% • Babcock & Wilcox $BW: -69% • Keel Infrastructure $KEEL: -69% • Bitdeer $BTDR: -66% • HIVE Digital $HIVE: -58% • CleanSpark $CLSK: -56% • Cerebras $CBRS: -53% • Vishay $VSH: -52% • ProPetro $PUMP: -49% • Solaris Energy $SEI: -23% Options: • Bloom Energy $BE [Calls]: $44,100,000 • Taiwan Semiconductor $TSM [Calls]: $23,900,000 • Infosys $INFY [Puts]: $5,200,000 Summary: Every common stock position is red. His entire portfolio is down 46.8% from Q2 release to present day. His newest trades release Monday, November 16th, showing what he owned on September 30th, after he sold most of this to Citadel in late July

兄弟们，又一套顶级 AI 量化打法出来了。 有人拿 Claude Fable 5.1 搭了套 Quant Spline Balance，专门扫 Polymarket 上的加密涨跌盘。日均能稳稳吃 1667 美元左右。 实盘数字挺夸张的。跑了 201 天，总利润 335210。平均每笔大概 60 块。忙的时候每小时能自动成交 70 多笔。BTC、ETH、SOL 的短时涨跌全覆盖。 说白了，不是在赌方向。是靠两个 AI 一块干活，一个负责定价，一个负责对冲，吃的是市场自己搞出来的价差。 定价那边用的是 GAM 非线性模型。它实时抓 BTC 行情，把偏离度、波动率、还剩多少时间、订单流偏了没，这几样丢进公式，算出涨跌该是多少概率。 公式长这样： z = β₀ + s₁(d) + s₂(v) + s₃(τ) + s₄(OFI) 然后转成价格： p_Up = 1 / (1 + e^(−z)) F_Up = 1 × p_Up F_Down = 1 − F_Up 同一波 BTC 波动，时间剩得多少、波动大不大，模型给出的估值就不一样。只要它算出来的公允价比当前买价高，系统就自动进。 另一边是均值方差风控。专门管仓位，别让一边敞口太大。手里有多单的时候，它会盯着空单成本，算一个最合适的残差区间： R* = min(Rmax, max(0, [p_Up − (1 − c_Down)] / [γ × p_Up × (1 − p_Up)])) 一旦一边偏了，马上补反向单，把风险压下来。 核心就一句话。多单成本加空单成本要是低于 1 美元，中间就有差价可以吃。机器人就反复干这件事。 账号实盘： 几笔比较猛的。535 变 2860，净赚 2325。632 变 2896，净赚 2263。685 变 2601，净赚 1916。 简单说，GAM 负责算该值多少钱，均值方差负责别让仓位失控。

درایو C رو سپردم به DeepSeek گفتم اون وسط که داری اطلاعات خصوصی من رو می‌فرستی به سرورهای خودت توی پکن، یه حالی هم به درایو C من بده و با وسواس خیلی زیاد و بررسی و تایید گرفتن‌ها، 140 GB فضا برام خالی کرد روی PC.

华尔街日报把黄仁勋当面骂 Kress 的事登出来以后，欧易上抄底 NVDA 的人开始撤了，多空账户比一天从 10.7 掉到 3.7🥲 这条是北京上午 10 点出头出来的，NVDA 永续那会儿在 168，到中午滑到 164。 持仓一天少了 17%。 大家在怕什么？英伟达 8 月底的季报里，采购承诺、租约、投资、担保加起来 5300 亿美元出头，公司总资产才 3200 亿。 这里面担保有 1085 亿，其中 1050 亿担的是 OpenAI 一家。 哥大商学院一位教授跟 CNBC 说，英伟达得走到快倒闭，这些担保才会全出问题。 接下来几天盘面就等 11 月 18 号早上 6 点那场财报，Kress 第一次以 CEO 身份开电话会，这 5300 亿她怎么讲。

这位是 David Sinclair 教授。 他 53 岁了，但看起来像二十多岁。 他是哈佛大学遗传学教授，下面是他逆转衰老的几个方法： 1. 运动到喘不上气的程度。

那些因为婚外情、办公室恋情，最终丢掉高管职位的商业大佬： 1、英伟达CEO，黄仁勋：2026年，63岁 ——网传涉及婚外情，但目前没有可靠证据证明其因此离职。 ——芯片可以领先，桃色新闻也能上头条？ 2、惠普CEO，马克·赫德：2010年，53岁 ——因与女性承包商的私人关系及费用报销问题辞职。 ——年薪千万美元，最后栽在报销单上。……显示更多

上架不到 90 天、估算月收入已经过 1 万美元的 App,我们今天数了一下:536 个。三个月前它们还不存在,现在都在收钱。 我们找点子就盯着这批看: 1、打开 2、筛「上架 90 天内」加「月收入 1 万美元以上」 3、去掉游戏和大公司,剩下的挨个点开:卖什么、卖给谁、量从哪来 4、挑一个你能做的,换个国家或者换个人群再做一遍 库里一共 51 万个 App,每个都有估算月收入、月下载和各国榜单名次。每天更新,免费查。