与「ANA」相关的搜索结果

This Mole CLI release is almost all reliability work, on purpose. Refusals now explain themselves and print the fix. Dry run is fully dry. Stricter cleanup boundaries, hard deadlines on slow scans, Parallels VMs in disk analysis. Safer everywhere.

Un multimillonario subió al escenario, agarró un marcador y en 42 minutos explicó cómo funciona realmente la economía. Gratis. Sin vender cursos. Sin promocionar fondos. Dibujó tres fuerzas en una pizarra blanca: crecimiento de la productividad, el ciclo de deuda a corto plazo y el ciclo de deuda a largo plazo. Con esas tres líneas explicó casi todos los crashes, recuperaciones y decisiones de tasas desde 1929. Las escuelas de negocios cobran 200.000 dólares por enseñar frameworks que él resolvió en los primeros 15 minutos. Algunos de esos modelos todavía se consideran “propiedad” en grandes bancos y él los regaló en YouTube. Lo más interesante: en 2018 ya estaba dibujando lo que después pasó en 2020. Tasas en cero. Bancos centrales sin herramientas. Impresora de dinero a toda máquina. Lo escribió en la pizarra como si estuviera leyendo el periódico del futuro. Hay gestores de carteras de primer nivel que hacen que sus analistas junior vean esta charla antes de tocar un terminal. No el material del CFA. No la formación interna. Esta. Millones de personas la han visto. Casi nadie puede nombrar las tres fuerzas que dibuja en los primeros diez minutos. Y sigue estando gratiss. Te recomiendo ver y guardarlo. ES UNA JOYA.

🚨 BREAKING: Apple filed for a PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION against OpenAI AND asked a federal judge to put them under forensic supervision "Apple respectfully moves the Court for a preliminary injunction to stop THE THEFT OF ITS TRADE SECRETS" Apple filed NINE sworn declarations, a 28-page memorandum and a concurrent motion for expedited discovery What Apple now says, under oath: Chang Liu: 8 years at Apple, now OpenAI "Member of Technical Staff" exploited an authentication bug to steal Apple trade secrets "on AT LEAST FIVE SEPARATE OCCASIONS" from February to April 2026, WHILE working for OpenAI Liu downloaded "THOUSANDS OF PAGES of Apple's most sensitive trade secrets" The stolen files, NAMED: >DisplayNotes.key — "several hundred pages" on Apple's custom display power development program >Architecture analyses. Fabrication decisions. Testing results >Engineering data for an UNANNOUNCED Apple product: 'touch, display, and power systems" >Final.key + V2.key — compilations of two undisclosed Apple R&D projects >and those are "only four of the dozens of proprietary documents Mr. Liu stole" Liu fed OpenAI "a steady stream of Apple proprietary information that he actively concealed" Liu also "coached Yu-Ting "Alyssa" Peng, then still INSIDE Apple, how to access and copy files from Apple workstations "to avoid trouble with the security team" and directed her to communicate with him on the encrypted LINE app "to avoid detection" Tang Yew Tan: 24-year Apple VP, now OpenAI's Chief Hardware Officer, "used an Apple internal project codename for an unannounced product to elicit still more trade secrets from job candidates." Tan's own messages, quoted in the motion: >"Just like last time, bring some parts you worked on" >"mlb, battery, shields type of stuff is interesting" OpenAI recruiter, quoted: "No, you won't sign anything at the exit interview. If they do ask you to sign anything, let me know asap." APPLE TOLD FEDERAL JUDGE: >"OpenAI knows its misappropriation is wrong and has tried to conceal it." >"This is not a case of 'mere hiring'... it is a case of repeated instances of deliberate theft." Apple says OpenAI went after its SUPPLIERS: >OpenAI "directed a trusted Apple partner [name redacted] to perform [Apple's proprietary metal finishing] process for them, knowing it was proprietary to Apple... because they were involved in this partnership while at Apple." Apple put its own Surface Finishing Manager, Jackie Hughes, under oath to prove it. Apple named ELEVEN MORE former Apple employees at OpenAI — beyond Liu, Tan, and Peng — Fourteen people total. Apple also filed a concurrent motion for EXPEDITED DISCOVERY demanding depositions: - Liu. Tan. Peng. - A fourth unnamed OpenAI employee - Plus OpenAI itself, under oath, through Rule 30(b)(6) Apple has asked a federal judge to put OpenAI under forensic supervision RIGHT NOW: >Forensic inspection of ALL OpenAI devices >ALL cloud storage, Slack, email >Including anything that "previously contained" Apple data — deleted included Demanding the "first available hearing date," citing "imminent threat" to its trade secrets. APPLE: > "The harm is happening now — every day that passes without an injunction allows OpenAI to embed their knowledge of Apple's stolen information into its hardware development efforts." Hearing: October 1, 2026. Judge Edward J. Davila. ITS HAPPENING

A good research agent should't just answer a question. It should know which tool to call next. At every research workflow is carefully designed as a sequence of actions: 1. Clarify needs 2. Plan the study 3. Search personas 4. Scan social media 5. Build new AI Personas 6. Interview or run group discussions 7. Generate the research report and reusable panel Each step uses different tools to move the research forward. And the report is not the end. The Personas involved become a reusable AI Panel — a consumer asset you can return to whenever you have a new question. Validate an idea. Design a product concept. Analyze competitors. Build a go-to-market plan. One research workflow can become a reusable system for understanding the people you're building for. 👉 Start your AI research from here:

基于 Three.js 构建的交互式 3D 人体解剖探索器，可立体查看人体结构，适合医学学习与可视化演示。 解剖教材里器官是平面图加文字标注，空间位置和结构关系看不出来。Anatomy Atelier 把 9 个器官做成可旋转的 3D 模型，热点标注、对比查看都在模型上直接点。

Yes, the rumors are true: The more powerful Notebook experience is now 100% rolled out to ALL Pro users. You might be asking... How exactly do I use it? Here are a few queries to try (ofc dependent on your sources). Hot Tip: bookmark this post! Free users too 😉 For Learning: "Create 5 quizzes of ascending difficulty focusing on a different topic from my sources" "Turn my raw lecture notes into a formatted PDF study guide complete with a 5-question practice quiz." "Add all of the URLs from this class syllabus as sources" For Business: "Calculate revenue growth across each product line and plot the trends" "Read our marketing brief, search the web for competitors, and recommend how we should tune our messaging" For Personal: "I uploaded a bunch of receipts from our kitchen renovation, make a spreadsheet to track all the work and costs" "Help me analyze this property purchase. Look up recent market performance in the neighborhood, predict trends, and make a spreadsheet to model all the data you find"

AI模型评分都是被专项攻坚创造出来的，于是我对比了Fable5，Grok4.5， Kimi K3针对同一个交易系统审计结果进行了对比。 先说结论： Fable5：最适合作为系统级主审核模型 Kimi：最适合作为代码缺陷与一致性专项审核模型 Grok：最适合作为代码梳理和方案发散模型，不适合单独决定策略修改 最佳组合：Fable5全面审核+Grok 4.5代码梳理+K3代码审核 具体细节： 1. Fable5：系统级判断能力最强 Fable5 最大的优势不是代码读得比另外两个模型更多，而是它能把： 代码规则； sizing snapshot； intent ledger； 实际 block 统计； 当前资产 headroom； SELL/REDEEM 回流路径； 放进同一个因果框架。 它使用了几个非常关键的实盘指标： ADD 近 7 天约占新增资金 43%； 84% 资金已经部署； ETH、SOL、XRP headroom 为 0； 近 40 个周期中主要阻塞是：blocked_capital_efficiency=47 blocked_asset_cap=28 deployment cap=0 runway=0 这让它能够区分： “某个机制理论上可能限制资金” 和 “当前实盘真正正在限制资金的机制”。 最终它得出： ADD 对资金流向重要，但当前周转主因在回收端、资产 cap 和效率过滤，不在 ADD 准入本身。 这是三个模型中最接近生产系统审核要求的判断。 弱点 Fable5 仍有一些过度推断： 把 ADD 描述为让资金“锁得更久”，实际上 ADD 的剩余 TTE 通常比 ENTRY 短； 把超 cap 资产总持仓约 $382 说成可以“直接解锁 $382”，没有区分总持仓、超额部分和可成交部分； 把模型中的 redeem_lag_days=2 一度当作实际回款延迟； “$5 仓位几乎不受每美元每日利润门约束”的推理不正确，因为该指标已经按资金归一化； 2-lot 最低 ENTRY 建议可能系统性损失覆盖率。 因此，Fable5 的系统方向判断最好，但具体数字和金融指标仍需二次校验。 最适合的角色 PRIMARY_SYSTEM_REVIEWER LIVE_OPERATIONAL_DIAGNOSIS CHANGE_PRIORITY_DECISION CROSS_MODULE_ROOT_CAUSE_ANALYSIS 2. Kimi：代码缺陷侦测能力最强 Kimi 对代码结构的还原比较准确： 固定 ADD 次数和 interval 已退役； ADD 采用 target-gap 模型； ENTRY 60%，ADD 补到 100%； allocator 是最终数量权威； style 仅作诊断； 现金、集中度、shock、深度共同限制订单。 更重要的是，Kimi 找出了其他两个模型没有明确指出的具体问题： shared_deployable_pool() 读取 account_snap["capital"]["deployable_cash"] 但该字段可能没有实际写入 → 回退到 free_cash → 策略层与 allocator 层资金口径可能不一致 它还发现了： 合同写 debounce 60 秒，代码/配置为 30 秒； 注释周期 16 分钟，实际 loop 600 秒。 这些是典型的静态审核、字段追踪和合同一致性检查优势。 弱点 Kimi 在资本效率和交易语义上的推理弱于它的代码检查能力。 典型错误是： ADD 价格更高，所以边际 edge/day 必然更差。 这忽略了剩余持有时间也缩短。更高 ask 并不必然意味着更低 edge/day。 它还认为： 60/40 会让剩余资金长期闲置； 提高 entry share 会改善周转； CONFIRMATION_NO 应收紧； 增加单市场软 cap 会改善组合周转。 这些结论缺少真实候选竞争、实际 block attribution 和反事实分配数据支持。 最适合的角色 STATIC_CODE_AUDITOR SCHEMA_AND_FIELD_FLOW_CHECKER CONTRACT_IMPLEMENTATION_DIFF LOCALIZED_BUG_DISCOVERY Kimi 很适合回答： “代码是否存在字段没有写入、默认值回退、文档与实现不一致、某个 gate 实际是否生效？” 但不适合单独回答： “应该如何改变交易策略和资本分配？” 3. Grok：代码梳理最完整，但最容易过度设计 Grok 对整个 ADD 路径的整理最详尽： 各层准入条件； risk latch； REDUCE reentry cooldown； 价格带； fingerprint； emergency cap； market target； ENTRY/ADD gap； allocator 的现金、集中度、shock 和深度约束； ADD 与 ENTRY 的评分和 continuity； SELL/REDEEM 对现金回收的影响。 它对当前代码执行模型的概括非常清楚： 能不能加由 headroom 决定；加多少由 target gap 离散为 lot；ADD style 只是解释标签。 因此，在“快速理解一个陌生复杂系统”方面，Grok 表现很好。 弱点 Grok 最大的问题是： 从“发现一个可能的机制副作用”快速跳到“建议修改策略”。 它提出了大量未经实盘证明的改动： TIME_TOPUP 冷却； ADD 1.5 倍 edge/day 门槛； ask≥0.97 限制为 1 lot； 降低 peak target； 提高 entry share； 单次仅补部分 gap； 弱化 continuity； 降低 TTE confirmation 权重。 这些建议表面上都很合理，但存在三个问题： 没有先证明这些机制实际造成了损失； 没有量化被 ADD 挤出的 ENTRY 是否更优； 可能重新引入此前已经修复的低 ADD recall 和 leader fidelity 偏差。 Grok很擅长生成完整优化空间，但容易把： POSSIBLE SIDE EFFECT 升级成： CONFIRMED ROOT CAUSE 再进一步升级成： SHOULD CHANGE PRODUCTION LOGIC 这是生产交易系统审核中最危险的倾向。 最适合的角色 SYSTEM_MAPPING CODE_AND_CONFIG_EXPLANATION HYPOTHESIS_GENERATION DESIGN_OPTION_ENUMERATION 不适合作为唯一的： PRODUCTION_CHANGE_APPROVER ROOT_CAUSE_FINAL_AUTHORITY STRATEGY_SEMANTICS_GATEKEEPER 三个模型的典型思维模式 Grok 发现机制 → 推演可能副作用 → 生成多种优化 → 倾向建议修改 优点：覆盖广、思路多。 风险：过度设计、假设升级过快。 Kimi 追踪代码和字段 → 找实现不一致 → 找局部缺陷 → 尝试从缺陷推导策略改进 优点：代码问题定位强。 风险：局部正确不等于系统结论正确。 Fable5 理解代码 → 读取运行数据 → 找实际 binding constraint → 区分主因和次因 → 按实盘收益排序 优点：最接近生产运营思维。 风险：仍会在个别指标含义和金额口径上过度断言。

Big news: Qwen3.8-Max by @Alibaba_Qwen just landed at #4# on the Frontend Code Arena leaderboard with a score of 1,668! With 1,668 points, Qwen3.8-Max is trailing only Claude Opus 5 (Max) with 1,705 pts and Kimi K3 (Max) with 1,676 pts, on par with Claude Opus 5 (High) with 1669 pts. It also ranks high across all domains: #2# in Consumer Product #3# in Brand & Marketing, Reference-based design, Gaming, and Content Creation Tools #4# in Data & Analytics #5# Simulations Dig into the thread for more details and to see how it also performs on real-world tasks in the Text Arena. Congrats to @Alibaba_Qwen on this huge release!

Grok can now analyze any video. From identifying AI-generated content to explaining what's happening frame by frame, Grok's video understanding is taking another big step forward.