与「Animates」相关的搜索结果

We're starting to leave the territory where you'd test an LLM by e.g. "create an svg of pelican on a bicycle". As one idea to generalize it, I was interested what Opus 5 would do if I gave it the first paragraph of the Lord of the Rings, a 1M token budget (~$10) and asked for three js render of it. Opus went off for ~2 hours and wrote 5500 lines of code that (procedurally) rendered the story. It's kind of janky but fun. But it's a bit mindboggling that the LLM has to place and orchestrate various polygon assets in (x,y,z) coordinates and write code that animates it all, and that it even does anything at all. I also like this kind of examples because no one in their right mind would ever spend the time to write something this custom but LLMs have all the stamina and patience in the world, so it's an example where we go from "no one would ever do this" to "sure, why not, it's ~free". There might be a lot more. But I'm excited about creating hyper custom worlds that you can imagine dropping players into, e.g. here to participate in the LoTR story as a spectator NPC, or one of the characters, or etc. Something like an ephemeral GTA of X on demand. Last thought is that the domain of worlds/games exposes a weakness in LLMs: they can't easily audit their work because they aren't able to efficiently and natively perceive videos or play games within them. Here, Opus 5 had to very slowly and painstakingly take screenshots at different points, and it messed up a few times and created a bunch of jank. An example of raw capability (multimodal, gameplay) that I think is still quite lacking.

I built a Claude skill that makes motion-style animation. > Paste a reference image > It generates frames with Nano Banana 2 > and animates the video with Seedance 2.0 Everything runs in Claude through the Arcads MCP Comment "Motion", and I'll send you the skill

Hah judging by mentions overnight people seem to find the ghost analogy provocative. I swear I don't wake up just trying to come with new memes but to elaborate briefly why I thought it was a fun comparison: 1) It captures the idea that LLMs are purely digital artifacts that don't interact with the physical world (unlike animals, which are very embodied). 2) Ghosts are a kind of "echo" of the living, in this case a statistical distillation of humanity. 3) There is an air of mystery over both ghosts and LLMs, as in we don't fully understand what they are or how they work. 4) The process of training LLMs is a bit like summoning a ghost, i.e. a kind of elaborate computational ritual on a summoning platform of an exotic megastructure (GPU cluster). I've heard earlier references of LLM training as that of "summoning a demon" and it never sounded right because it implies and presupposes evil. Ghosts are a lot more neural entity just like LLMs, and may or may not be evil. For example, one of my favorite cartoons when I was a child was Casper the Friendly Ghost, clearly a friendly and wholesome entity. Same in Harry Potter, e.g. Nearly Headless Nick and such. 5) It is a nod to an earlier reference "ghost in the machine", in the context of Decartes' mind-body dualism, and of course later derived references, "Ghost in the shell" etc. As in the mind (ghost) that animates a body (machine). Probably a few other things in the embedding space. Among the ways the analogy isn't great is that while ghosts may or may not be evil, they are almost always spooky, which feels too unfair. But anyway, I like that while no analogy is perfect, they let you pull in structure laterally from one domain to another as as a way of generating entropy and reaching unique thoughts.

地元のアニメイト佐世保店様(@animatesasebo)も取り扱ってくださっております。 学生の時から本当にお世話になっております😢 ありがとうございます😭✨ ※写真撮影は許可をいただいております…！

You can now build custom themes for Claude Code on desktop with mods! Change the colors, add an animated background, and make it your own. Just tell Claude how you want it to look, or get started quickly with the theme-examples plugin. We'd love to see what you make!

You want to know what frustrates the hell out of me? Putting your heart, your art, your time, and your own money into building things you believe in… then watching so much of that work disappear into silence. And yeah, some days that shit gets to me. Did I bring books, reading badges, Discord, crypto, and NFTs together into one connected library? 📚 I fucking did. Did it get much attention? Nahh. Did I build an entire browser-based world with its own points economy? A world where you can turn your NFT into a character with a click, rigged, animated, and ready to step into Universe? I did. Much noise about that? Nahh. Am I building RAAP to give NFTs persistent identity, memory, and history? So an asset can carry something meaningful forward when it passes to a buyer or someone in your family? Yes. Because I believe these things can become more than pictures sitting in a wallet. Does that work get the attention I feel it deserves? Nahh. I draw the fucking art. I develop the applications. I write the books. I work through the problems. Six applications that communicate with each other. Two gaming platforms with multiple games. An NFT overlay builder with AI. A stickers and GIFs hub. Do you understand how much work goes into making all of that actually function together? The hours spent fixing something nobody will ever notice, because when it finally works, it’s supposed to feel easy. Then there’s the Discord bot. More than 30 features. A subscription service. An economy tracked on a ledger. Tools to help keep a community engaged when its owner needs to step away and live their damn life. Built it. Still feels like shouting into an empty room sometimes. And Antthony? Our smart ass AI whose dream is to become a stand-up comic? 😂 He lives across our apps. He’ll help you, roast your gameplay, and talk shit when you deserve it. He even has a comedy club inside Universe, where you can sit down with your character and watch his avatar perform. I care enough about this world to give the fucking AI a dream of his own. That’s how deep this goes for me. And I’m still building a marketplace. Still working on an NFT insurance protocol and other projects. Still writing Book 2 for the library. Still preparing two more collections under our umbrella. ☂️ So yeah, I get angry. Because I know what I’m putting into this. I know how much of myself is in every drawing, every feature, every chapter, and every problem I refuse to leave broken. Sometimes I want to scream: what the fuck else do I have to build for people to pay attention? But I also need to correct myself when I say “nobody cares.” Because some of you do. You show up. You read. You play. You test things. You tell me what’s broken and give me a reason to make it better. You matter too damn much for me to erase you just because I’m frustrated with the silence around us. 🖤 I want this to reach more people. Of course I fucking do. I’ve poured too much love into it to pretend otherwise. And I’m going to keep building because I love doing it, and because the people already here deserve to see how far we can take this. More to come in 2027. The plans are in. I’ve got work to do. 🐜

Most of us open Google Sheets for budgets, trackers, and tables. With Gemini 4 Hydrogen, we wanted to see if it could paint a moving landscape instead 🍃 In Google @Antigravity, Hydrogen handled the coding to paint and animate thousands of cells — creating coastal trains, drifting clouds, and falling autumn leaves that recalculate frame by frame inside the spreadsheet.

想让 Claude 做视频，别再只丢一句“帮我做得高级一点”了 从找风格、写分镜到生成动画、接着剪辑，GitHub 上已经有一批项目可以分工干这些活 可以按自己的内容这样选 做产品宣传片，先看 huashu-motion 能生成片子和配乐，后续还可以针对画面局部提修改 做知识类账号，看看这两个 vibe-knowledge-film 走知识短片路线，先出短样片确认方向 story-studio 把故事口播的文案、配音、配图接到剪映草稿，适合还想自己精剪的人 想做有画风的动画，用 animate 挑风格，或者给参考图 还没想好画面长什么样，就先逛这两份参考 mg-styles-15 有 15 种 MG 动效成片，附提示词和源码 motion-prompt 把动效、运镜的名字和动态样例放在一起，方便把脑子里的效果说清楚 像素风项目可以补一个 pixelfx，现成特效和制作 Skill 都有 已经有口播素材、想让 AI 帮忙粗剪，再看 video-editor-skills 它对接达芬奇，需要 Studio 版，而且许可不允许商用，接单前别忽略这点 第一次试，拿一个具体任务就够了 “用我的产品截图做一条 30 秒功能介绍，先给脚本和分镜，确认后再生成，不要编造产品功能” 先出一条能改的样片，比装满一堆 Skill 更有用