注册并分享邀请链接,可获得视频播放与邀请奖励。

与「April9」相关的搜索结果

April9 贴吧
一个关键词就是一个贴吧,路径全站唯一。
创建贴吧
用户
未找到
包含 April9 的内容
📢 BrownDust2 × Shinovi Master Senran Kagura NEW LINK Collaboration Rerun Update Countdown! D-Day The shinobi have officially joined the battle! To thank all of our players who’ve been waiting for the collaboration rerun update, we’ve prepared special events. Join in now! [Collaboration Rerun Update Countdown Login Event] 📅 Event Period - April 9, 12:00 AM (UTC) – April 12, 02:59 PM (UTC) 🎁 Rewards - 🎫2 Draw Tickets [Collaboration Rerun Countdown Mission Event] 📅 Event Period - From the time of posting on April 9 to April 12, 02:59 PM (UTC) 📝 How to Participate ① Follow the official BrownDust2 X (Twitter) account ② Like, comment on, or repost (RP) the countdown post (Complete at least one action to participate!) 🎁 Mission & Reward - When the total number of Likes + Comments + Reposts (RP) reaches 10,000, 🎫 2 Draw Tickets will be distributed 🎉 Results Announcement - April 13 (Mon) #BrownDust2# #BD2# #ShinobiMaster# #SenranKagura# #Collaboration# #Update# #April9#
显示更多
0
13
868
105
转发到社区
ROUND ROCK MAN walks up behind a 62-year-old stranger sitting near a park bench on a Monday morning, wraps an arm around him, and stabs him repeatedly in the neck. Andrew James Wimsatt tried to fight back, but surveillance video shows he couldn't. A passerby found his body near the Chandler Creek Trail. 26-year-old Benedict Ogbodiegwu Jr. was arrested before at least three times. His record: 2017: charged with theft, a state jail felony. Dismissed. Jan 2026: arrested for theft. Court ordered a competency evaluation, then committed him for restoration in February. The competency hearing set for May 29 was canceled. The theft charge was dismissed April 7. May 2026: arrested again, this time for giving police false identification. Dismissed. Three cases, three dismissals. Now first-degree murder.
显示更多
0
942
8.1K
3K
转发到社区
everyone calling Reddit dead because ChatGPT stopped citing it is wrong Promptwatch said Reddit's share of ChatGPT citations went from 3.83% to 0.52% when in April it was the most cited domain in ChatGPT the panic is fair if you built your AI visibility plan on Reddit, you'd be worried about it going to waste but almost nobody opened the other dataset Ahrefs looked at 145M US Google results when the "discussions and forums" block shows up, Reddit is still in it about 84% of the time Reddit lost one channel (maybe, it's not definite yet), but it's still showing up in the other one your buyer uses before they've decided anything and nobody has a comparable baseline for the ChatGPT number either: - Promptwatch had Reddit at 3.83% of citations before the drop - Ahrefs, same platform, around the same time, had it at 16.7% - Semrush once put it near 60% yet everyone quoted an 86% collapse off a number the industry measures four different ways and nobody outside OpenAI can actually explain either one. we all rebuilt our strategy around a number one tracker caught Reddit is miserable to market on it takes months of being useful before anyone lets you mention what you built so continue doing that
显示更多
0
37
56
4
转发到社区
Half of RWA Perp Volume Runs Through Binance Binance cleared $1.59T, or 50.4% of all RWA perp volume. Hyperliquid’s HIP-3 builder framework ranked second at $542.8B, followed by OKX at $345.1B. The other 16 venues split just over one-fifth of the market. The shift toward CEXs has also accelerated over time. DEXs handled 51% of volume in the first week measured, but just 12.8% in the last. That shift spread beyond the new equity trade. Index perps were 96% to 98% DEX-cleared through April, but finished the period with 85% of volume on CEXs. CEXs first captured most of the new equity flow, then gained share in products that had originally been dominated by decentralized venues. Full venue breakdown ⬇️
显示更多
0
25
50
5
转发到社区
2/ Decentralized venues cleared 51% of volume in the first week measured and 12.8% in the last, and index products, a 96% to 98% DEX-native business through April, ended the window 85% CEX-cleared.
显示更多
my beige flag is i love those sim slop games. i've been playing one regularly since april and i love it 🥲
everyone's got that one rule they swear by. "just stay above the 200 day moving average and you dodge every crash, easy money, sleep like a baby." never seen anyone actually back it with numbers though, so i had horizon run it instead of trusting vibes. dead simple rule on QQQ going back to 2018. long when price closes above the 200 day sma, flat the second it closes below, back in when it reclaims. no extra filters, no discretion, just the line doing the talking. 9 trades total in over 8 years. thats the whole strategy. 7 winners, 2 losers, 77.78% win rate, +268% total return, ~17% CAGR, profit factor of 7.05. horizon scored it 64/100, "viable." ngl thats a solid card for something this basic. heres the part that never makes it into the "just follow the trend" tweets though. even with all that green, the equity curve was sitting underwater from its last high 78.77% of the time. one single trade in april 2022 ate a straight -21% before the rule even caught the whipsaw. it's not a smooth line up and to the right, its long stretches of nothing followed by a handful of trades doing all the work. the rule isnt fake. it's just way less comfortable to actually hold than it sounds when someone posts it as a golden rule with no context. built and backtested the whole thing on horizon in plain english, no spreadsheet, no coding it myself. you can go try it yourself and test your own strategy
显示更多
LATEST: ⚡ Kalshi has sold $1.12B in equity to 71 investors under a $1.5B offering since April, with about $380M still available, per an SEC filing.
0
26
50
6
转发到社区
Four protocols I track describe themselves as buying back their own token, and the four promises have almost nothing in common. The word does a lot of hiding. A buyback can mean tokens are permanently destroyed, or that they are sitting in a vault someone still holds the keys to, or that a team has decided for now to spend some revenue this way and could decide otherwise next quarter. Those are different claims on future supply, and only one of them is irreversible. hyperliquid:native is the strict version. Protocol fees buy HYPE on the open market and the tokens go to an address with no private key, which makes the destruction provable rather than promised. Validators formalized the mechanism rather than leaving it as a team policy. That is about as binding as this gets. The catch is the buyback is denominated in dollars, so a rising price retires fewer tokens for the same spend. Tokens repurchased fell roughly 61% year over year while the dollars spent fell under 20%. The support mechanically weakens exactly when the price is working, and there is a separate overhang underneath it, with a large tranche of team tokens vested but unclaimed. ethereum:0x1f9840a85d5af5bf1d1762f925bdaddc4201f984 is the conditional version, and it is the newest. Governance had to vote the fee switch on, which it did in late July, and the mechanism itself is code rather than discretion. But the burn rate is a function of trading volume, and a meaningful share of that volume currently runs on a chain where gas is being subsidized. Day one spike burned 106,000 tokens. The 30-day mark lands Saturday, and the number that matters is the lowest sustained rate over the window rather than the average, because the average is still carrying the launch. solana:pumpCmXqMfrsAkQ5r49WcJnRayYRqmXz6ae8H7H9Dfn is the discretionary version. The share of revenue directed to buybacks was cut from most of it to half of it in April. The revenue is real and recovering, but the allocation is a dial the team controls, and it has already been turned once. A policy that has been changed is a policy that can be changed. Same dollar-denominated arithmetic applies here too. $LINK is the one most people misread. Chainlink converts revenue into LINK on the open market, including revenue from enterprise contracts that settle in dollars, which almost nobody else does. Then it puts the tokens in a timelocked reserve. A reserve is not a burn. The tokens still exist, and the contract permits them to move eventually. Scale is the bigger challenge as roughly $60 million a year of conversion against a market capitalization near $7 billion absorbs about 1% of supply, while team-managed unlocks have added multiples of that. Emissions are outrunning absorption by something close to ten to one. The business is winning its market. The token is losing the arithmetic. The ranking that matters is not which protocol buys back the most. It is which promise survives someone changing their mind. Provably unspendable beats code-executed beats team policy beats a vault with keys. The market frequently prices all four the same way. Observations, not advice.
显示更多
NBA Defense Week brings us back to April, thanks to Dylan Cardwell! He came up CLUTCH in the final seconds for Sacramento's W... and Russ' reaction from the sidelines said it all 😤
显示更多