注册并分享邀请链接,可获得视频播放与邀请奖励。

与「BITGET」相关的搜索结果

BITGET 贴吧
一个关键词就是一个贴吧,路径全站唯一。
创建贴吧
用户
未找到
包含 BITGET 的内容
微策略上周没有进行 BTC 购买 (其实现在市场更怕他们买 BTC,因为大家更关注他们的付息能力。买会消耗用于付息的美元储备,而没钱的微策略那就只剩卖币一条路)。 BitMine 则是继续购买了 2.7 万枚 ETH ($4463 万),虽然不多,但好歹还有在买。 ◎比特币财库公司 @Strategy (MSTR) 现在总共持有 847,363 枚 BTC ($508.42 亿),成本均价 $75,651,浮亏 $132.62亿 (-20.7%)。 ◎以太坊财库公司 @BitMNR (BMNR) 上周以约 $1,648 的价格购买了 27,084 枚 ETH ($4463 万)。 他们现在总共持有 5,700,040 枚 ETH ($89.78亿),成本均价 $3,399,浮亏 $103.97 亿 (-53.6%)。 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- #Bitget# 来了就是VIP!Crypto、美股、CFD,全球先机一站布局
显示更多
现在用稳定币玩现货美股的话,Crypto 交易所里基本上是这两种形式:一种是直连真实美股,一种是股票代币。 有些交易所是支持其中一种,有些则两种都支持。不少朋友对这两种形式的具体区别是有些懵圈的,不知道哪种方式会更适合自己。 下面我就以两种方案都支持的 Bitget 进行优劣势对比,大家看完应该就知道自己该用哪一种了。 首先,这两种方式都能对应到真实股票。直连真实美股就是跟大家以前通过富途等券商平台交易是一样的,像在富途等平台买的股票也可以直接转仓到 Bitget 的。而股票代币则是把真实股票进行 RWA 代币化后在链上流通。 两者之间就有点像是 USD 跟 USDT 的区别,都能对应到美元,但实现路径有些不同。 底层逻辑不同,所以两者之间在很多细节上是有区别的: ◎股票代币因为是托管映射,所以不会有 CRS 这个风险。但 Bitget 的券商是注册在南非,属于大陆 CRS 同步区,是有 CRS 同步风险的。 ◎股票代币可以 7*24 不间断交易,但直连美股就只能做到交易日 24 小时交易,不开盘的日子 (周末、节假日) 就不能交易。 ◎持股权益也有点区别,直连美股拥有完整的股票权益,像分红权跟投票权。股票代币因为是存托映射的,分红权有,但投票权就没办法享有到了。 当然,这两者都能够用稳定币 (USDT/USDC) 进行交易,以及大陆身份可以开户交易。 所以: 如果你是在传统券商那有股票要转仓👉直连美股; 你不想被 CRS 同步:👉股票代币; 你想 7*24 都可以买卖:👉股票代币; 你想要投票权:👉直连美股。
显示更多
Bitget美股直连交易,当然要支持股票转仓了! 那么如何把股票转仓到Bitget呢? 简单5步就搞定 👇 #买美股首选Bitget#
这一周是够疲劳的,三件大事都是在本周出现的,首先是美国和伊朗的地缘冲突,虽然一直处于非常难受的状态,但走到现在不论和平协议的内容是否有偏向于某一方,但起码能看到在正常进展,最重要的是霍尔木兹海峡已经恢复部分通行,虽然还远没有回到战前状态。但确实是一项不错的进展。 起码 WTI 的价格已经回到了 70 美元左右,距离战前的 65 美元只有 5 美元的差距,这就意味着只要 WTI 不在继续上涨,那么美国因为油价上涨带动的通胀上行问题就能解决,这也是本周第二件大事情,核心 PCE 的内容,还好核心通胀上升在市场的预期之内,而且停火将会降低美联储加息的概率。 第三件事情就是美光的财报了,财报的表现非常的好,但财报后整体 AI 和科技股都出现了一定的降低,正好我也在研究这个情况,就准备专门写了一篇推文,明天上午应该就能发出来了,目前美股的科技股确实出现了大量的资金流动。 回到 Bitcoin 来看,一直在说 bitcoin:native 在 60,000 美元的购买力还是不错的,事实证明确实还算可以,数次击穿了 60,000 美元以后,现在还能在这个附近震荡,虽然 ETF 代表了大量的传统投资者在恐慌离场,但仍然有原生的投资者在买入 Bitcoin 的现货。 下周要好好看看 Bitcoin 的数据了,最近一周基本都在做 $MSTR 以及旗下优先股的科普了,MSTR 和 Bitcoin 真的是相爱相杀。但如果 MSTR 走的战略储备这条路都没有走成,可能就不会再有 Bitcoin 战略储备了。 #Bitget# 来了就是VIP!Crypto、美股、CFD,全球先机一站布局
显示更多
0
31
46
3
转发到社区
一次无心的点击,就可能让你掉入授权钓鱼陷阱! 🎣 欢天喜地领空投,却给了恶意合约授权,账户被洗劫一空。 Bitget 2026反欺诈月,帮你揭秘授权钓鱼骗局,守护数字资产。🛡️ 答题赢奖励🧧 1️⃣关注@Bitget_zh 2️⃣ 完成安全 Quiz: 3️⃣ 转推并在评论区晒出完成 Quiz 的截图 随机抽5人平分50USDT!
显示更多
0
46
45
42
转发到社区
灰度 (@Grayscale) 的 HYPE 现货 ETF $HYPG 在 5 小时前把 177 万枚 $HYPE ($1.14 亿) 存进了质押。 地址: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- #Bitget# 来了就是VIP!Crypto、美股、CFD,全球先机一站布局
显示更多
CZ said Binance offers "the best liquidity in the world" for consumer protection. He's right. But let's talk about WHERE that liquidity comes from. It comes from retail getting rekt on Binance Launchpad. Since 2019, Binance has launched 60+ projects. The narrative is always the same: Binance vets the project, lists it at launch, and retail piles in. Binance becomes the gatekeeper of "credibility." But here's the part CZ doesn't mention. The Lazio Fan Token (LAZIO) launched October 2021 at $1.00 on Binance Launchpad. Private investors got in at $0.10. Binance announced it. Retail FOMO'd. Price hit $26.75 in 48 hours. Retail thought they were early to something Binance blessed. Fast forward to today. LAZIO trades at $0.65. That's a 97.5% loss from the peak. Retail never stood a chance. Alpine F1 Team (ALPINE)? Same blueprint. Launched Feb 2022 at $1.00. ATH $11.29. Current price: $0.42. Down 96%. The token was delisted from Bitget in Feb 2026 due to zero trading volume just dead weight. But here's where it gets darker. Binance Launchpad isn't a bug. It's the business model. 1) Binance identifies a hype narrative (sports fan tokens, move-to-earn, etc) 2) Binance vets the project (gives it institutional credibility) 3) Private/VC investors get massive allocations at $0.001-$0.10 4) Launchpad subscription creates artificial scarcity ("hard cap" per user) 5) Retail buys at $1.00 thinking Binance wouldn't list garbage 6) Token pumps 10-100x in first week (retail euphoria) 7) Vesting schedule unlocks over 12 months (insiders exit) 8) Token declines 90-99% over next 24 months (retail holds bags) 9) Binance collected trading fees on every step of the decline The liquidity CZ brags about? It's built on retail extraction. Let's look at the pattern across Launchpad: - STEPN (GMT): Launched at $0.01, peaked at $4.11 (411x), now bleeding lower - Open Campus (EDU): 33x peak, now declining - Space ID (ID): 41x peak, now sliding - Hooked Protocol (HOOK): 41x peak, lost 90%+ since ATH - Arkham (ARKM): Only 16x at peak in 2023 (falling returns as the grift gets known) Notice the trend? Earlier projects had bigger peaks (because retail still believed). Recent ones are smaller. Why? Because the market is learning that Binance Launchpad = slow-motion rug pull. But retail is trapped. Binance has 100M+ users. Binance has regulatory licenses. Binance is THE credibility anchor. When Binance lists something, retail thinks "this must be vetted, this must be safe." It's not. It's the opposite. The vetting isn't for retail protection. It's for Binance's protection. Binance ensures the project won't implode in week 1 (that would hurt Binance's brand). But they don't care if it implodes in month 12. The damage is already extracted. Here's what "consumer protection" actually means in the Binance universe: - Deep liquidity pools (so Binance profits from every trade) - IEO credibility (so retail trusts the listing) - Vesting schedules published (so insiders can front-run the dumps) - No accountability for post-launch performance (so Binance faces zero liability) Retail thinks liquidity = safety. It's the opposite. High liquidity on a scarcity pump = maximum extraction efficiency. Compare Binance Launchpad to actual consumer protection: - SEC-regulated IPOs: Lock-up periods for insiders are EQUAL to retail - Traditional venture: Downside protection, governance rights, legal recourse - Binance Launchpad: Insiders get $0.10 pricing, retail gets $1.00, both tokens identical = wealth transfer complete The 60+ projects Binance has launched since 2019 represent billions in retail wealth extraction. LAZIO alone = $26.75 ATH on a $1.00 launch = $26.75B market cap at peak. The fact it's now $0.65 doesn't erase the fact that retail lost 97% while Binance kept the trading fees. CZ's statement about "the best liquidity in the world" is technically true. But it's like bragging about having the best highway system while running tolls that siphon wealth from drivers. The liquidity exists to serve extraction, not protection. The real consumer protection would be: - Identical vesting schedules for all token holders (no insiders first) - Binding lock-up periods (prove you believe in your own project) - Performance clawback clauses (if the token dumps 90%, insiders pay retail back) - Regulatory disclosure (project financials, insider allocations, exit plans) Binance offers none of this. Because that would kill the model. The model is: - Build hype through Binance credibility - Capture retail FOMO - Execute insider exit - Repeat Liquidity is the tool. Extraction is the goal. So when CZ says Binance offers "the best consumer protection," what he means is: Binance offers the most efficient wealth extraction vehicle the crypto world has ever seen. And the liquidity is so good, retail can watch their investment die in real-time on every refresh. That's not protection. That's the grift, just wrapped in institutional packaging. The Lazio Token didn't fail because it was a bad project. It failed because the Binance Launchpad model requires failure. Insiders need to exit. Retail needs to hold bags. Binance needs trading volume on the decline. The ecosystem needs constant new projects to pump and dump because the old ones are dead. It's a machine. And it's working exactly as designed. Binance isn't protecting users from bad liquidity. Binance is using liquidity to protect itself from accountability.
显示更多
0
6
49
12
转发到社区
2022年我还在读书 那时候满脑子都是怎么发sci怎么搞科研 也很迷茫自己的未来,不想过一眼望到头的生活 2026我在crypto行业 不知不觉过上了以前渴望的生活方式 不用上班,到处飞,想去哪去哪 时间自由,精神自由,财富还未自由 但我没有班味!现在在和bitget一起庆祝世界杯~ 跟全球的web3er一起熬夜看球盯盘! 巴适!穿着bitget的球衣给大家舞一个! @brightness96 @Crypto777888 @xTrdvbJL0F31161 @Bitget_zh @Bitgetyaya #Bitget看球狂欢季#
显示更多
0
17
25
0
转发到社区
神奇的数据,昨天这条推文有 276 人投票 币安 33.6% 拿了第一 剩下三家交易所的比例,非常平均 Gate、Bitget、Backpack 都是 22% 龙一有了,剩下的龙二位置看看哪家所能坐稳。
显示更多
0
24
25
0
转发到社区
一个持有 ETH 已长达八年时间的巨鲸,过去 1 小时里在链上卖出 17,598 枚 ETH 换成 2724.5 万 USDS,出售价格 $1,548。 他在 8 年前 (2018 年 2 月) 收到 37,602 枚 ETH ($3116 万),当时 ETH 价格 $829。 8 年后的今天,他卖出了约一半的 ETH,获利 $1265 万。 地址: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- #Bitget# 来了就是VIP!Crypto、美股、CFD,全球先机一站布局
显示更多
0
39
28
0
转发到社区