注册并分享邀请链接,可获得视频播放与邀请奖励。

与「CRAZY」相关的搜索结果

CRAZY 贴吧
一个关键词就是一个贴吧,路径全站唯一。
创建贴吧
用户
未找到
包含 CRAZY 的内容
Hot take… isn’t it kinda crazy that nobody is really using AI Agents? I don’t mean software engineers or AI early adopters. I mean “college friends talking about it in group chat,” the feeling you got when everyone started using Instagram or TikTok. These frontier AI models are *insane* (as are the harnesses & tool calls & the like). And every large tech co has an AI agents platform, not to mention all the YC startups doing vertical agents. Yet all of your friends and family outside of tech — who spend all day staring at their iPhones and get paid to work in browser tabs — don’t really care or find themselves using any AI agents yet. Yes ChatGPT, Claude, etc. are extremely popular… but if you look at the engagement data the vast majority of people are still using these aI chat tools like a glorified Google + Grammarly. That’s why the AGI labs are all pushing desktop apps for Codex, Cowork, etc. so hard to non-technical ppl. And yes exceptions for lawyers and customer service but even those have some asterisks and exceptions to rule. Look I’m not saying the ChatGPT moment for AI Agents is not coming… it most definitely is! Remember we pivoted from Arc to Dia precisely because we believe computing is going to be radically reimagined around these AI primitives. No doubt. But that’s my point: it’s just so surprising it hasn’t happened yet because all of the tech you’d need is there. Again if you stop for a second and think about it… for all the press and money and hype and models and crazy ARR numbers… this “AI Agent” moment does not *feel* like the other breakthrough tech moments we’ve lived through (e.g. think the shift to Stories via Snapchat & Instagram, or shift to on-demand via Uber/Airbnb/Doordash). Which is a long way of saying: if you can figure out the answer to “why” most people don’t care about AI agents yet (and have no enduring interest in using them) — especially since the models and harnesses are here and ready — the answer to that question will allow you to capture a lot of marketshare and make a lot of money in 2027. Theoretically, the tech is ready for AI Agents to totally transform how we work and live our lives… but alas the general public dgaf… that’s the generational puzzle to solve for the next 12 months for anyone not working on the models themselves.
显示更多
0
794
3.4K
196
转发到社区
Dang it’s crazy that all of this literally did happen
0
87
2.3K
125
转发到社区
Count the paint touches... this Knicks ball movement from last season's NBA Finals is still crazy to watch 🤯 What do you expect from the defending champs in 2026-27?
jesus turns water into wine and everybody go crazy. i turn grass into milk and nobody bats an eye
0
376
30.2K
4.5K
转发到社区
jean grey in a spider-man movie before black cat is crazy
top 10 liquidity providers on FWA are printing like crazy 1st place is earning: → 1.53 ETH per hour → 22k $FWA per hour at current prices, that’s $3,400 every hour or $81k per day
显示更多
0
10
93
5
转发到社区
Fake uppercut to hook that's crazy
0
691
162.3K
5.4K
转发到社区
Wow, the situation in Spain looks crazy!
0
19.3K
403.3K
47.9K
转发到社区
DeepMind's Andrew Trask on why the scaling laws are pushing AI from one big model toward a protocol: "The zoomed-out picture is that in the end, AI is gonna be a protocol instead of a program. We're seeing that evolution start to really gather steam as the scaling laws constrain how much data, compute, and talent one company can bring together." "When you combine models from multiple different providers, you're implicitly combining the data, compute, and talent that they trained on. So you can get better, faster models for a lower price, which is pretty crazy when you think about it." "If you want the absolute most accurate model, ensembling the top models is always going to win, you'll get higher scores than any single model. And if you want the best accuracy relative to any unit of price, ensembling some open and closed models is likely gonna own that Pareto frontier quietly for a while." "It won't be until there's a leaderboard that widely recognizes ensembles as comparable to individual models that we start to really see it. Then in 12 to 18 months, that saturates a bunch of benchmarks across the space, and the harnesses pick it up, routing you to the best combinations of models on the fly. That's when the market really starts to change in terms of how people buy intelligence." @iamtrask @openminedorg
显示更多
Payton Pritchard has always had crazy handles 🤯 (via @celtics)
0
10
21
2
转发到社区