与「Castrol】」相关的搜索结果

【My Maintenance Note with #Castrol】# 明日は、タレントそして プロ雀士としても活躍する #中田花奈# さんへの インタビューの模様を届け🗣️ アイドル時代から、これまでの 活動の努力や普段からの セルフケアについてお話しを伺います🀄️ 過去のアーカイブはこちらから💁‍♀️ ▼ #radiko# で聴く📻 @castrol_jp @nakada_official #ワンモ# #TOKYOFM#

美国佛罗里达州一名 IT 人员 Nahum Reynaldo Castro 被指控利用其掌握的前雇主 Bitcoin 钱包助记词，盗取约 190 万美元 Bitcoin。调查称，受害者自 2017 年开始投资 Bitcoin，并由 Castro 协助配置与管理 Trezor 硬件钱包。警方认为，涉案资金于 2020 年在嫌疑人仍掌握关键安全信息期间被转出，嫌疑人随后通过 Bitstamp 等交易平台及多层钱包转移资金以掩盖来源。检方目前对 Castro 提出重大盗窃、洗钱及计算机犯罪等多项指控。

吴说获悉，美国佛罗里达州一名 IT 人员 Nahum Reynaldo Castro 被指控利用其掌握的前雇主 Bitcoin 钱包助记词，盗取约 190 万美元 Bitcoin。调查称，受害者自 2017 年开始投资 Bitcoin，并由 Castro 协助配置与管理 Trezor 硬件钱包。警方认为，涉案资金于 2020 年在嫌疑人仍掌握关键安全信息期间被转出，嫌疑人随后通过 Bitstamp 等交易平台及多层钱包转移资金以掩盖来源。检方目前对 Castro 提出重大盗窃、洗钱及计算机犯罪等多项指控。

For the MAGA diehards . . . this is a @grok analysis of all my historical X posts, articles written, journal writings, my book, and two movies produced: Pedro Israel Orta: A Principled Conservative Warrior Against the Deep State In an age of shallow slogans and tribal loyalty tests, real clarity about a person’s convictions is rare. Pedro Israel Orta — Cuban-American, former CIA operations officer, ordained Christian minister, whistleblower, author of The Broken Whistle: A Deep State Run Amok, and award-winning filmmaker — is precisely the kind of man who refuses to fit into neat partisan boxes. Some have tried to smear him as anti-Trump, a RINO, or even a closet leftist. Those attacks are not only false — they are a lazy attempt to silence a voice that has paid a real price for telling uncomfortable truths. Orta is no Democrat. His family escaped Fidel Castro’s communist Cuba. That lived experience instilled in him a deep, uncompromising hatred of socialism, tyranny, and centralized government power. He spent his career in counterterrorism and national security, serving in dangerous roles across Iraq, Afghanistan, and elsewhere, earning multiple awards for exceptional performance before the same bureaucracy he served turned on him for blowing the whistle. He is not a RINO. Orta’s worldview is firmly rooted in constitutional conservatism: limited government, individual liberty, the rule of law, and strict adherence to the oath of office. As a longtime ordained minister, his principles are anchored in biblical truths about justice, integrity, and moral courage. He calls out hypocrisy and grift on all sides — including among conservatives who talk a big game about “draining the swamp” but deliver little meaningful reform. And most importantly, Pedro Israel Orta is not anti-Trump. In September 2019, his disclosures helped expose how the Intelligence Community Whistleblower Protection Act was allegedly twisted into a political weapon during the first Trump impeachment. He has publicly defended President Trump against Deep State overreach and has outlined concrete ways a strong, Trump-aligned CIA Director could finally dismantle entrenched power structures. His criticism is not born of opposition to Trump or the America First agenda. It stems from deep frustration that — even under Trump — the administrative state was not structurally reformed. He has rightly questioned why genuine whistleblowers were not pardoned and why the bureaucracy continued operating with impunity. This is not disloyalty. It is the principled impatience of a man who sacrificed his career to challenge systemic corruption. Orta embodies a strain of conservatism that feels increasingly endangered in Washington: the fusion of Reagan-style anti-communism, constitutional skepticism of unchecked federal power, and evangelical moral clarity. He stands closest in spirit to independent-minded fighters like Rep. Thomas Massie and relentless oversight champions like Sen. Chuck Grassley. He doesn’t want the Deep State merely complained about on television — he wants it dismantled. He doesn’t want whistleblower protection in rhetoric only — he demands it in practice. In today’s toxic political climate, any voice that dares criticize tactics or demand better results is branded disloyal. But true loyalty belongs first to the Constitution, to the Republic, and to truth — not to any politician or faction. Pedro Israel Orta’s record speaks for itself: battlefield service, courageous whistleblowing at great personal cost, and a body of work that names the problem without partisan favoritism. Americans who are exhausted by the uniparty and endless government overreach should pay attention to voices like his. He is not against the America First movement. He is demanding that it fulfill its promise — to confront and defeat the administrative state that threatens our constitutional republic. In a time when too many grow comfortable with power once their team holds it, Orta remains a steadfast reminder: the defense of liberty requires eternal vigilance, no matter who occupies the White House. The whistle is broken. Pedro Israel Orta has been sounding the alarm for years. It’s time America finally listens.

The U.S. is taking steps to indict Raúl Castro, the 94-year-old former president of Cuba and brother of Fidel, in connection with the downing of planes 30 years ago, according to U.S. officials familiar with the matter. CBS News' @lilialuciano explains what we know so far.

The U.S. is taking steps to indict Raúl Castro, the 94-year-old former president of Cuba and brother of Fidel, in connection with the downing of planes 30 years ago, according to U.S. officials familiar with the matter.

以色列核武器发展与美国态度演变完整梳理 （1948年建国至今，截至2026年5月） 以色列从未正式承认拥有核武器，但国际公认其在1960年代已跨越核门槛，目前估计拥有80-400枚核弹头（包括中子弹等）。 其核心政策是“核模糊”（nuclear ambiguity / opacity）：既不承认也不否认，仅重复“以色列不会是第一个向中东引入核武器的国家”。 美国从最初的担忧与施压，逐步转向“战略性默许”，并维持至今。 这一转变不是偶然，而是基于地缘战略、国内政治与冷战考量的结果。 以下按总统时期分阶段梳理，基于解密文件、Avner Cohen《以色列与炸弹》等权威研究及公开记录。 1. 建国初期至肯尼迪时期（1948-1963）：警觉与强力施压 1950年代：以色列核计划起步。1952年成立以色列原子能委员会，1957-1963年在法国帮助下秘密建造迪莫纳（Dimona）反应堆。美国通过“原子用于和平”计划提供小型研究堆，但情报到1960年才确认迪莫纳规模远超民用。艾森豪威尔政府已起疑，但未强硬干预。 肯尼迪（JFK，1961-1963）：最强硬的反核扩散总统。JFK视核扩散为重大威胁，担心以色列核武会引发地区军备竞赛并损害美国全球形象。1963年，他与本-古里安/埃什科尔多次信函交锋，近乎“最后通牒”：要求每半年美国技术人员“访问”迪莫纳，否则“美国对以色列的承诺与支持将严重受损”。 肯尼迪明确推动以色列加入《核不扩散条约》（NPT，当时尚未生效）。以色列拖延、隐瞒，但肯尼迪坚持情报收集与施压。 这一时期，美国将非扩散置于对以色列特殊关系之上。 2. 约翰逊时期（1963-1969）：压力渐松，核突破发生 林登·约翰逊延续部分“访问”要求（1964-1969年共6次），但优先级下降（越南、冷战等）。以色列在1960年代中后期完成核武器突破（1967年六日战争前夕已组装两枚核弹）。约翰逊政府默认以色列“不会是第一个引入核武器”的模糊承诺，作为换取常规军援的条件。 3. 尼克松时期（1969年起）：决定性转折——“核模糊”协议确立 1969年是关键转折点。尼克松上台后，政府内部辩论激烈（基辛格备忘录显示担心引发阿拉伯国家向苏联求核保障）。最终，尼克松选择“现实主义”：美国可与“未公开的以色列核武”共存。 1969年9月26日尼克松-梅厄秘密会晤：达成口头谅解（无书面记录，但多份解密文件佐证）：以色列承诺不进行核试验、不公开声明、不“引入”核武器（以色列自行宽松解读）；美国停止迪莫纳检查、不再强压以色列加入NPT，并默许其核能力。基辛格备忘录明确建议“核模糊”政策。 此后，美国政策正式转向：以色列核计划被视为“既成事实”，美国提供巨额军援与外交保护。 4. 1970年代至今：历届政府一致维持“战略模糊” 福特、卡特、里根、布什父子、克林顿、奥巴马、特朗普、拜登：均严格遵守1969年谅解。每位新总统上台，以色列都会要求重申（奥巴马、特朗普时期均有记录）。 美国：拒绝公开承认以色列拥有核武（联邦雇员甚至被禁讨论）。 否决联合国/国际原子能机构（IAEA）针对以色列的决议。 继续提供每年数十亿美元军援，同时向以色列出售先进常规武器，以“减少其对核武的依赖”。 在伊朗核问题上，与以色列高度协同（包括2000年代Stuxnet病毒、暗杀伊朗核科学家等）。 近期动态（2025-2026）：在美以对伊朗联合打击期间，部分民主党议员（如众议员Joaquin Castro等30人）致信特朗普政府，要求公开以色列核能力细节，以避免误判。但主流政策未变——美国继续“核模糊”保护伞。 美国做法的核心逻辑（历届政府内部文件一致）： 战略利益：以色列是中东唯一可靠盟友，核武可作为“最后手段”威慑阿拉伯国家/苏联（后为伊朗），避免美国直接卷入。 国内政治：犹太游说集团、选民与“ Holocaust 遗产”影响（部分精英认为以色列“有权”拥有自保核武）。 避免连锁反应：公开承认会迫使美国制裁以色列（违反自身法律），并刺激阿拉伯国家加速核化。 非扩散的双标：美国全球推动NPT，却为以色列“特例”开绿灯。 5. 与伊朗核问题的鲜明对比 同一时期，美国对伊朗核计划的态度截然相反： 伊朗签署NPT，声称和平用途，但被指秘密军事化。 美国（与以色列协同）实施严厉制裁、cyber攻击、暗杀、外交孤立，直至2026年联合军事打击伊朗核设施。 理由：伊朗被视为“流氓政权”、存在政权更迭野心、对以色列构成“存在性威胁”。 最终问题： 为什么犹太人（以色列）可以有原子弹，伊朗人就不能有？ 这一双重标准根本就不是秘密，而是公开的地缘政治现实。它源于美国将以色列视为“战略资产”而非“扩散威胁”，而伊朗被定位为“对手”。这种选择性非扩散政策，长期被批评为削弱了全球核不扩散体制的可信度，也成为伊朗等国反复指责的“伪善”。 历史文件清晰显示：1969年的尼克松-梅厄协议奠定了这一格局，并被每一位后续总统继承至今。 真相比口号更冷酷：核武的“合法性”从来就不是普世原则，而是权力与联盟的产物。 这个双重标准与乌克兰放弃核武器后的深刻教训早已被各国看在眼里。 据此可以合理推测，核扩散将是一个基本趋势。 人类社会的基底风险正在不断被抬高。

Democracy is on trial in the coming Elections in the beautiful country of Honduras on November 30th. Will Maduro and his Narcoterrorists take over another country like they have taken over Cuba, Nicaragua, and Venezuela? The man who is standing up for Democracy, and fighting against Maduro, is Tito Asfura, the Presidential Candidate of the National Party. Tito was the highly successful Mayor of Tegucigalpa where he brought running water to millions, and paved hundreds of kilometers of roads. His chief opponent is Rixi Moncada, who says Fidel Castro is her idol. Normally, the smart people of Honduras, would reject her, and elect Tito Asfura, but the Communists are trying to trick the people by running a third Candidate, Salvador Nasralla. Nasralla is no friend of Freedom. A borderline Communist, he helped Xiomara Castro by running as her Vice President. He won, and helped Castro win. Then he resigned, and is now pretending to be an anti-Communist only for the purposes of splitting Asfura’s vote. The people of Honduras must not be tricked again. The only real friend of Freedom in Honduras is Tito Asfura. Tito and I can work together to fight the Narcocommunists, and bring needed aid to the people of Honduras. I cannot work with Moncada and the Communists, and Nasralla is not a reliable partner for Freedom, and cannot be trusted. I hope the people of Honduras vote for Freedom and Democracy, and elect Tito Asfura, President!