与「Change」相关的搜索结果

The latest work has been focused on what happens after a user already has exposure. Getting into a position is only one part of the experience. Managing it needs to feel just as clear. We’re refining how users can understand what they currently hold, what actions are available, and what happens when they make a change. None of this is about adding complexity for the sake of features. It’s the opposite. We want someone to open Zero Stocks, understand their position quickly, make the change they want, and move on without wondering whether they missed something. The privacy infrastructure can be complex underneath. The product itself shouldn’t feel that way.

🚀 For 13 flights, Starship was intentionally kept on a suborbital path. Flight 14 changed that. On September 28, Ship 41 reached orbit for the first time, despite an early Raptor engine shutdown. SpaceX then used another engine burn to complete orbital insertion. At roughly 275 km above Earth, Starship deployed 26 Starlink V3 satellites—its first operational payload in orbit. The flight ended early, but the milestone was enormous. Starship didn’t just reach space. It finally entered the orbital era. 🌍🔥

This is how HOUND smells a market. Market data enters as raw signal. HOUND normalizes it into a feature vector, projects it across 32 synthetic odor channels, activates 971 receptor slots, generates a scent fingerprint, compares it against memory, then decides what deserves attention. Market data → Feature encoding → Synthetic odor → 971 receptors → Scent fingerprint → Memory → HOUND response. The point is not to predict the next candle. It is to give market behavior another sensory representation, so changes, similarities and unfamiliar patterns become easier to notice. Try here :

Stablecoins are getting easier to hold. The harder question is still: what can you actually use them for? In most wallets, the loop stops at Hold → Send → Receive. Changer+ is building the next layer: global eSIMs, tickets, and everyday digital services — redeemed with supported stablecoins. Not just holding stablecoins. Using them.

Hi, Tomorrow we are re-opening the Pro $200 subscriptions to new subscribers, but together with it we are also changing how we calculate the usage for it. In effect, if you do the math, it will net out at half the dollar in API spend compared to the old Pro $200 plan. Now that it's said, let me explain why this is happening and why you will still get more work done than if you were on the Pro $200 subscription one month ago. (a) We didn't want to compromise in other ways and are committing to not reintroducing the 5h limit, so that you can fully use the weekly usage when you want. (b) On the subscription, we guarantee that over time you always get more work done and with an increasing level of quality. This means that you will continue to get more value per dollar spent as a result of models getting more efficient and us passing down the improvements in the form of API price reductions. (c) We don't want to put an incentive on ourselves to artificially inflate the API list prices to make it look like you are getting a lot (and workaround it through discounts, etc). Instead we want to continue to both rapidly reduce prices and increase capabilities of models on the API. This week we introduced GPT-6 Sol and GPT-6 Luna at 50% of their previous price. Over time, we see prices go low enough that it makes sense for most to buy usage as needed without there being a significant gap between what you get in a subscription and what you get in the API for a dollar spent. (d) Tomorrow, we are adding more things to the subscription that won't draw on the usage, I won't reveal what that is yet. I wanted to be transparent before all the big announcements tomorrow. Lots of new exciting things are coming to the subscriptions that will make it super compelling, but I wanted to make sure to share this change ahead of time so you can all understand it before we shower you with good news. Codexingly, Tibo

“My attitude toward the game… that will never change.” New city, new number but one thing with @Giannis_An34 will always remain the same as he begins Year 1 in Miami 💪

Day 274 of tagging @cz_binance, @Leonard_Aster, and @Aster_DEX about $ASTER. I don’t know but I think $ASTER was supposed to get better with time? Really, time isn’t even doing it for $ASTER, because at this rate, we will hold $ASTER for 2 more years before we get to break even. There’s absolutely nothing fascinating about $ASTER at the moment. I had conversations with one of $ASTER investors and he made a valid point, he said, @cz_binance has given up on $ASTER, and now believes that $HYPE is a far better product than $ASTER, hence they listed $HYPE on binance. Because make it make sense, why would you list your biggest competitor???? Calling out a project, shows they’re doing something wrong that we want them to change from or stop doing, yet, $ASTER keeps ignoring those complaints, too bad for the community. Again, pls don’t sell for peanuts, let’s stay optimistic till end of the year.

Eight democracies. One message to Beijing. Australia, France, Germany, Japan, New Zealand, Poland, South Korea and the UK issued a joint statement on September 22 opposing any unilateral change to the Taiwan Strait status quo. It came out of a meeting on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly, where officials called today's security environment more volatile than a year ago. Their language was direct: "We encourage dialogue and oppose any unilateral attempts to change the status quo across the Taiwan Strait." The same day, the US, Japan and South Korea issued a separate statement making the same point, and also backing Taiwan's participation in international organizations. Taiwan's foreign ministry welcomed the statement and said it would keep building self-defense and deepen ties with democratic partners.