注册并分享邀请链接,可获得视频播放与邀请奖励。

与「CivilRights」相关的搜索结果

CivilRights 贴吧
一个关键词就是一个贴吧,路径全站唯一。
创建贴吧
用户
未找到
包含 CivilRights 的内容
We @CivilRights are sending trained legal professionals to monitor the upcoming election. Monitors observe & document on election day, taking action later if needed. Election monitoring has been a routine practice at @theJusticeDept for decades. This will be the largest monitoring effort in history!
显示更多
0
491
8.6K
2.6K
转发到社区
Across the country, our government has identified hundreds of thousands of ineligible voters—so far. With at least hundreds of non-citizens voting there, New Jersey is no exception! The @CivilRights Division @TheJusticeDept is investigating.
显示更多
0
465
9.2K
2.9K
转发到社区
TODAY is a NEW DAY for #ParentalRights#! @CivilRights will restore parental authority—no secret transitions, no hiding info from parents, no surveys without consent. We WILL investigate, litigate & defund as necessary. Parents, your voice is back NOW! @TheJusticeDept
显示更多
0
356
7.5K
2.1K
转发到社区
Balance and credibility are the trademarks of Judge Larson's 18 years of service as a trial judge. That track record earned him endorsements from law enforcement groups across Washington, including the Washington Council of Police and Sheriffs, police guilds, and county sheriffs throughout the state. But the proof that his balance is real comes from the other side of the aisle: civil rights attorney Sheley Secrest, president of the NAACP for Alaska, Oregon, and Washington. Hear why she's endorsing Dave Larson in her own words in our latest commercial that we're proudly broadcasting.
显示更多
Every person living in a western nation needs to listen to every word of this Katherine Berbalsingh went to the University of Oxford and is Headmaster at Michaela Community School in London, UK She PERFECTLY explains the mass indoctrination into the narrative of oppressor and oppressed, and of hating White People I will write only some of this out because it’s very important, however you should listen to it so you can hear the passion: “The culture shift comes from what children learn at school and online. Ask any young person what history they learned at school, and they’ll tell you, Hitler. Ask them what else? Slavery. Ask them what else? American civil rights. In fact, what little they know of history will be all about Black and brown people fighting for equality against the white man, women fighting men for the vote, gay and trans people fighting for various rights. Our young people have been taught that history is simply one long story about various groups struggling under the oppressive dead white man. — History is taught through an oppressor lens. The triangular slave trade, white men held the power. What about Britain ending the slave trade? More than a quick mention, if at all? Mm, no. What of the Arab slave trade that lasted 3 times as long as the triangular slave trade? Mm, no. Okay, so GCSE history in Britain is often taught as migration through time, so the idea that Britain has always been a land of immigrants is embedded in our children’s heads. Most schools would prefer to concentrate learning about the tiny number of Black people who existed in Tudor England over a thorough analysis of England’s break from Rome. — Not to mention weeks on King Mansa Musa of Mali because he was a Black Muslim. His bearing on British institutions, laws, and faith is nonexistent. And the fact that he is said to have been the richest man in history, thanks in part to his massive slave-owning society, is a detail somehow that teachers rarely ever teach. But it isn’t just our schools. It’s our general culture too. Take your kids to a museum or an art gallery in any Western country, and you’ll find the same narrative. As an example, when learning about aviation in London’s Science Museum and the extraordinary feat that is man making massive machines move in the sky, a write-up on the wall explains that women and Black people were historically barred from aviation schools and the military. Similarly, James Watt, the man who invented the steam engine and is considered the founder of the Industrial Revolution, has a write-up on the wall explaining that his early career involved slave trafficking, with a bonus analysis of the whole of Britain’s complicity in the slave trade. They flatten the entire human story and all of its complexities into the narrative of oppressor and oppressed, leaving young people unable to see the world in any other terms.” We have to end the mass indoctrination
显示更多
0
243
11.3K
4.3K
转发到社区
More than 40 years ago, I arrived in Chicago in search of an idea. I was a young man looking for purpose, who believed deeply in America, was inspired by the Civil Rights Movement, and wanted to be a part of something larger. The America I believed in was one where everyone has opportunity, everyone is seen, everyone belongs—because that was an America that had a place for me, too.
显示更多
0
3.3K
68.7K
9.4K
转发到社区
Why should a young lawyer work in civil rights? @HarmeetKDhillon explains
0
1
65
19
转发到社区
.@AAGDhillon on reforming DOJ’s Civil Rights Division: “I don’t need to be liked. I just need to get the job done. They had unhappy hours, mass departures, and crying sessions… They meet regularly. They place media hits on us. They monitor every filing.”
显示更多
0
24
685
120
转发到社区
One of the big reasons for the current lack of patriotism and pride in our nation’s history is that about 40 years ago our most prominent storytellers in Hollywood just basically stopped telling stories about American history altogether, unless it has something to do with WW2, civil rights, or slavery. I mean they just released a movie about the meteorologist who did the weather report for D-Day. They’ll give WW2 weathermen their own movies before they tell a story from any other era of American history. The Right has attempted to counteract this a little bit, but “conservative” attempts at American history films and TV shows are invariably hokey and kid friendly, the kind of thing you can watch with your grandmother and your 5 year old, and you’ll all be equally informed and bored by the experience. We need R-rated adult-oriented American history stories. Daniel Boone should have his own series. It would be gritty and violent and not for children, but it would also be phenomenally entertaining and put an American legend back on the cultural map, so to speak. The fact that Daniel Boone hasn’t been depicted on screen at all since like the 60s is a travesty. Throw a dart at that guy’s Wikipedia page and you’ll land on something that could be its own feature length trilogy. That’s just one example. How is there not a great R-rated movie or series about Antietam? Or Kit Carson? Or the Panama Canal? How does Theodore Roosevelt not have like 10 movies about different periods of his life? You could go much farther back to pre-American history. A movie about Cortes’s conquest of Tenochtitlan would be tremendous and horrifying and fascinating, and it would introduce into the public consciousness one of the world’s most incredible stories that most Americans know next to nothing about. And on and on. The possibilities are literally endless. All of these movies, if they’re executed to even a B+ level, could make hundreds of millions of dollars and transform the culture in a way that a million podcast monologues never could. If the Right actually wants to reclaim the culture, this is the place to start.
显示更多
0
1.5K
17.5K
1.9K
转发到社区
TO @mtgreenee IN DEFENSE OF BOOMERS!! Back in our day, colleges had a few loud radical leftists. Now they’re everywhere, loud, and angry and they still blame Boomers for the mess. They are taught to hate themselves and their country. They believe men can become women (and vice versa) by declaration. They’re obsessed with race in the most counterproductive way possible treating every outcome as proof of systemic oppression while ignoring individual behavior, culture, and the massive progress that actually happened. And instead of blaming the people and ideologies that pushed this worldview into every institution, they point at Boomers. That’s not analysis. That’s brainwashing dressed up as enlightenment. The “long march through the institutions” was real. A minority of 1960s radicals didn’t just protest they stayed in academia, became professors, and eventually controlled hiring. Faculty political ratios went from noticeable left tilt in the ’60s–’90s to extreme monocultures today: often 10:1, 15:1, or worse liberal-to-conservative in humanities and social sciences. Far-left faculty have grown dramatically while conservatives became rare. The result? Generations raised on critical theory, grievance studies, and the idea that Western civilization (especially America) is defined by oppression rather than its achievements. Boomers didn’t invent this. A subset of us lived through the early stages and many of us rejected it. The average Boomer worked, raised families, paid taxes, and expanded opportunity. We, lived through and supported the real civil rights era color-blind equality under law, not racial score-settling. Built the post-war economy, suburbs, infrastructure, and technological foundations (internet precursors, computing, medical advances) that younger people now take for granted. Navigated the Cold War and helped bring down Soviet communism. Created the wealth and stability that made today’s safety nets and opportunities possible. The current version of “social justice” biological denial on sex, racial essentialism, national self-loathing, and “punch a Boomer” energy is a later-stage product of captured institutions, not something Boomers as a generation imposed. Most Boomers still believe in observable reality: there are two sexes, judging people by skin color is wrong either way, and America, for all its flaws, has been a net force for human flourishing. Blaming “Boomers” is the laziest possible scapegoat. It lets the actual drivers (ideological capture of education, media, HR departments, and tech platforms) off the hook. It ignores that many Boomers are as disgusted by this stuff as anyone. And it’s historically illiterate every generation has produced radicals and conformists. Judging 76 million people by the worst campus activists is the same tribal stupidity they claim to oppose. I could write a whole book on how a handful of bad ideas metastasized into cultural dominance while the people who benefited most from Boomer-era progress turned around and spat on the generation that built the platform they’re standing on. The angry ones aren’t the victims of Boomers. They’re the product of an education system that replaced critical thinking with approved narratives. Stop blaming your grandparents. Start questioning what you were taught. ...and don't even get me started with government corruption and the cancer of MARXISM!
显示更多