与「DEMO」相关的搜索结果

这是我最近看到最漂亮最惊艳的项目 之前我就非常喜欢 linear 的互动效果，但是用几个 agent 实现都不那么完美。 现在有了这个库，里面有33 个线稿插画的 figure， 按主题排列，每个 figure 都是纯 SVG 绘制，鼠标靠近时会有响应非常丝滑的交互，可以调节 intensity 控制反应强度。 光靠描述感觉不到，去这个网站的 demo 里面感受一下，这是我最近最喜欢的一系列的效果了。

DeepSeek把自家产品也完全开源了 DeepSeek开源了自家官网用到的几乎全部API，包括搜索、读取文件、读取链接、语音识别、生成语音等，同时开源了使用这些API搭建的网页Demo。 任何人现在都能使用这些API搭建一个Agent产品了，而且API价格实惠，童叟无欺。 Github： API文档：

Thinking about joining BNB Bangkok, but trying to figure out where you fit? Whether you have an idea, a live product or just want to attend Demo Night, here’s what you need to know before Nov 25 - 27 🧵 👇

Dario looks just like Cesare Borgia. He has been fabricating stories from the very beginning, trying to frighten society, manipulate public opinion, and force the U.S. government to regulate AI. His political allies will then help Anthropic use regulation as a knife to kill open-source models, so they can achieve an oligopoly. To that end, he is even willing to team up with Altman—first eliminate everyone else. The biggest threat to Dario is Jensen Huang, who supports open-source models, and Nvidia is also about to release its own open-source model. The second threat is China’s open-source models. This is why Dario uses the scare tactic that “AI will destroy humanity.” He even wants to turn AI into a religion. All religions originate from fear—they need an apocalypse to terrify the believers. Because the Republicans are vigorously developing AI, the Democrats have turned around and started demanding limits and regulation on AI, using it as a political weapon to attack Trump and the Republican Party. This is the American political-business game. Have you learned it? ---

Dario looks just like Cardinal Richelieu. He has been fabricating stories from the very beginning, trying to frighten society, manipulate public opinion, and force the U.S. government to regulate AI. His political allies will then help Anthropic use regulation as a knife to kill open-source models, so they can achieve an oligopoly. To that end, he is even willing to team up with Altman—first eliminate everyone else. The biggest threat to Dario is Jensen Huang, who supports open-source models, and Nvidia is also about to release its own open-source model. The second threat is China’s open-source models. This is why Dario uses the scare tactic that “AI will destroy humanity.” He even wants to turn AI into a religion. All religions originate from fear—they need an apocalypse to terrify the believers. Because the Republicans are vigorously developing AI, the Democrats have turned around and started demanding limits and regulation on AI, using it as a political weapon to attack Trump and the Republican Party. This is the American political-business game. Have you learned it? ---

First @tedlieu. Now @RepGraceMeng. Both Taiwanese American Democrats. The racial cover isn't even subtle. Rep. Grace Meng calls the @nvidia chip sales a "five alarm fire" and demands full transparency. Fine. Let's start with her. Let voters see how the Washington machine really works. The checks: Three @AnthropicAI employees gave her $17,000 this cycle. The PAC of Americans for Responsible Innovation (@americans4ri) added $2,000. The same donors: Those same three Anthropic employees also funded ARI's PAC—$85,000 in total. One gave Meng $3,000, then nearly $1M to Public First, an AI super PAC network. The same operative: ARI and Public First share a founder: former Democratic congressman Brad Carson (@bradrcarson). Anthropic gave Public First Action $20M, and Dario Amodei (@DarioAmodei) added $1M of his own. The same agenda: Two days after the midterms, ARI led 52 groups urging Democrats to hand out committee chairs based on AI safety positions. The seat and power: With Democrats taking the House, ARI is pushing hard for Grace Meng to chair the Commerce, Justice, Science (CJS) Appropriations subcommittee— the panel that funds the Department of Commerce (@CommerceGov). Commerce runs AI chip export controls and @NIST's AI safety work: Anthropic's top two priorities in Washington. Now she's going after NVIDIA—Anthropic's fiercest rival on export controls—and Commerce, the very agency she'll fund. Same donors. Same operative. Same agenda. Same subcommittee. No law needs to be broken. Interests find power. Power finds interests. That's the five-alarm fire. The real one. Congresswoman, you asked for full transparency. Here it is.

Anthropic 这次真上演了一场自家模型打自家模型的戏码。🤣 Arena 最新榜单显示，Claude Fable 5.2（Max）直接登顶 Agent Arena，在与 Opus 5.5（Max）共同参与的 10 个类别中，9 项领先，剩下 1 项统计上打平！ 🤯 最离谱的是视觉设计，差距直接拉开： 🎨 视觉设计：45.34% vs 23.29% 📄 文档处理：31.51% vs 17.88% 💻 编程：31.45% vs 22.24% 🧠 知识工作：25.67% vs 13.24% 综合净改善得分：30.48% vs 19.51%。 好家伙，Opus 5.5 还在顶级模型里争王座，结果自家 Fable 5.2 先跑上来抢了第一。🤡 最扎心的是，Fable 不只是会做漂亮 Demo，连代码、文档和知识工作都开始全面领先。 不过这是 Agent Arena 的净改善指标，不等于任务绝对成功率。 以前选 Claude 是纠结用不用 Opus，现在是 Anthropic 自己让用户纠结：到底谁才是真旗舰？ 🤣

GCSA Insight: Critical Security Vulnerability Discovered in a Leading Robotics Manufacturer’s Product, with System-Level Privilege Compromise Verified on Physical Hardware As artificial intelligence and embodied AI technologies continue to advance, robots are evolving from conventional automated machines into intelligent systems capable of perception, decision-making, and autonomous operation. At the same time, cybersecurity risks are extending beyond software and data into the physical world. The security of robotic systems is no longer solely a matter of protecting data and devices; it can also directly affect operational safety, physical environments, and user safety. Recently, the security research team of the Global Cybersecurity Alliance (GCSA) discovered and verified a critical security vulnerability in a product developed by a leading robotics manufacturer. Through in-depth analysis and multiple rounds of testing on physical hardware, the team successfully breached the device’s system security boundaries and obtained the highest level of operating system privileges in a real-world device environment, demonstrating the vulnerability’s actual impact under specific testing conditions. This research encompassed the entire process, from identifying the security flaw and assessing its risks to validating its impact on physical hardware. The findings also highlight significant challenges facing the underlying security mechanisms of embodied AI systems. The research findings and supporting evidence have been formally submitted to the manufacturer. On November 13, 2026, the manufacturer responded by email, preliminarily confirming the existence of the vulnerability and stating that it had initiated internal remediation efforts and an assessment of the scope of affected products. It is important to emphasize that confirmation of a vulnerability does not mean the associated security risks have been eliminated. GCSA will continue to monitor the manufacturer’s assessment of the affected scope, remediation plans, and subsequent security validation, and will update its research findings as new information becomes available. For intelligent systems capable of physical interaction and movement, timely, effective, and verifiable security remediation is particularly important. In accordance with responsible vulnerability disclosure principles, GCSA is currently withholding sensitive information, including the manufacturer’s identity, specific product details, the vulnerability’s underlying mechanisms, and exploitation methods. GCSA is currently seeking guidance from relevant authorities and regulatory bodies regarding the associated security risks. Taking into account the manufacturer’s remediation progress and a comprehensive assessment of potential security implications, GCSA will carefully determine the appropriate arrangements for further disclosure. Subject to appropriate conditions and upon obtaining the consent of the relevant authorities and regulatory bodies, GCSA will publicly release a detailed security insight report, providing the industry with ongoing updates on the research findings and associated risk assessments. The findings of this research are based on specific testing environments and the evidence obtained to date. They do not imply that other product models or similar robotic systems are affected by the same security issue. This security research and validation on physical hardware represent one of GCSA’s initiatives in the field of embodied AI security. GCSA will continue to advance security research, coordinated vulnerability disclosure, and industry collaboration to promote stronger security response mechanisms across the artificial intelligence sector, enhance product security, and strengthen industry trust. 🔗 Read the full report: · Stay Connected with GCSA Follow GCSA's official social media channels for the latest news, product launches, research developments, and ecosystem updates. GCSA Official Telegram Channel: GCSA Official WeChat Account: #GCSAInsight# #GCSACybersecurity# #GCSASecVibe#

Wintermute CEO Evgeny Gaevoy really told Bloomberg these auctions are "more transparent and democratic" than Wall Street colocation Bro, of course you love the system when your wallet (0xecb63caa47c7c4e77f60f1ce858cf28dc2b82b00) has extracted $227M in lifetime profit on Hyperliquid and printed +$18.8M in the last 30 days alone Spending $10M a year to lock down 76% of the top slots and get a 60ms head start isn't competing fairly, it is literally paying pennies on the dollar for a legal money printer while smaller MMs get slaughtered Look at their actual positions right now: they are sitting on $93M+ in equity, $18.9M staked just to keep their direct node peering, and shorting the entire market including a massive $7.5M $HYPE short while gutting altcoin liquidity across the exact ecosystem they pretend to support