与「DREAM」相关的搜索结果

Anthropic just published an engineering guide on how to build always-on agents. The biggest misconception: an always-on agent does NOT run 24/7. It sleeps almost all day, wakes up for short runs, saves state, and goes back to sleep. The 5 core pieces I distilled: 1. Event Inbox Put a database table between webhooks and your agent. Acknowledge webhooks fast, run only one active worker per user so runs never collide, and batch rapid messages together. 2. Timers Keep timers in a separate table from the inbox. Split them into one-off follow-ups and recurring schedules. A background poller drops due timers into the inbox. 3. Lean Memory + Dreaming Only store what cannot be looked up again: user instructions, user notes, past messages, and task progress. Load a small index at wakeup, not every file. Run periodic dreaming passes to clean out stale facts. 4. Unattended Permissions Never put raw API keys inside the agent sandbox — inject them through an outside proxy. Use Deferred Tool Calls to pause risky actions for approval without blocking the worker. 5. Outbox Queue outgoing replies so your agent paces notifications instead of spamming users at 3 AM.

You want to know what frustrates the hell out of me? Putting your heart, your art, your time, and your own money into building things you believe in… then watching so much of that work disappear into silence. And yeah, some days that shit gets to me. Did I bring books, reading badges, Discord, crypto, and NFTs together into one connected library? 📚 I fucking did. Did it get much attention? Nahh. Did I build an entire browser-based world with its own points economy? A world where you can turn your NFT into a character with a click, rigged, animated, and ready to step into Universe? I did. Much noise about that? Nahh. Am I building RAAP to give NFTs persistent identity, memory, and history? So an asset can carry something meaningful forward when it passes to a buyer or someone in your family? Yes. Because I believe these things can become more than pictures sitting in a wallet. Does that work get the attention I feel it deserves? Nahh. I draw the fucking art. I develop the applications. I write the books. I work through the problems. Six applications that communicate with each other. Two gaming platforms with multiple games. An NFT overlay builder with AI. A stickers and GIFs hub. Do you understand how much work goes into making all of that actually function together? The hours spent fixing something nobody will ever notice, because when it finally works, it’s supposed to feel easy. Then there’s the Discord bot. More than 30 features. A subscription service. An economy tracked on a ledger. Tools to help keep a community engaged when its owner needs to step away and live their damn life. Built it. Still feels like shouting into an empty room sometimes. And Antthony? Our smart ass AI whose dream is to become a stand-up comic? 😂 He lives across our apps. He’ll help you, roast your gameplay, and talk shit when you deserve it. He even has a comedy club inside Universe, where you can sit down with your character and watch his avatar perform. I care enough about this world to give the fucking AI a dream of his own. That’s how deep this goes for me. And I’m still building a marketplace. Still working on an NFT insurance protocol and other projects. Still writing Book 2 for the library. Still preparing two more collections under our umbrella. ☂️ So yeah, I get angry. Because I know what I’m putting into this. I know how much of myself is in every drawing, every feature, every chapter, and every problem I refuse to leave broken. Sometimes I want to scream: what the fuck else do I have to build for people to pay attention? But I also need to correct myself when I say “nobody cares.” Because some of you do. You show up. You read. You play. You test things. You tell me what’s broken and give me a reason to make it better. You matter too damn much for me to erase you just because I’m frustrated with the silence around us. 🖤 I want this to reach more people. Of course I fucking do. I’ve poured too much love into it to pretend otherwise. And I’m going to keep building because I love doing it, and because the people already here deserve to see how far we can take this. More to come in 2027. The plans are in. I’ve got work to do. 🐜

Be Jensen: > Asian American Dishwasher at Dennys > Founded $NVDA and pioneered GPU computing > Took an extraordinary gamble in CUDA, despite the company close to bankruptcy risk. > Bet paid off heavily, and Nvidia was there as the infrastructure for deep learning and generative AI. > Spent last 33 years of his life growing $NVDA, and finally saw it become a $5T+ company > Devoted his life to establishing American AI leadership > Started having more influence on policies that Washington conflicted with > Leaks and hit pieces happen all at once around midterms > Washington tries to push out others like Lutnick that shared similar China stances to Jensen. > Forced to resign by Taco Bell and NFL experience board members over unconfirmed Spy accusations + personal relationships. > Huang's leadership then questioned by politicians that ask how $META makes money or how Wifi works. > Slandered by US media that think because Mcdonalds did well under a CEO change, so can American semiconductors like $NVDA. This feels like a horrible joke. Jensen Huang was the pinnacle of visionary tech CEOs and living the American dream. Ousting Jensen Huang will go down as one of most consequential and darkest decisions in recent US history.

My fellow Americans, Today America just watched a political assassination in broad daylight. No bullet. No charges. No trial. No verdict. "Doth our law judge any man, before it hear him, and know what he doeth?" (John 7:51, KJV) I hold no office and no title. I'm an ordinary citizen. I own no Nvidia stock, no Nvidia options, not a single share anywhere in the AI supply chain. I have nothing to gain by telling you this. Here is how I came to see it. At first, it just felt off. The New York Times. The Washington Post. The Economist, reaching for Hitler's line: "heads to roll." All aimed at one man. An Asian American immigrant. A living symbol of the American Dream. Then came the Chinese American bylines, story after story. Classic Washington racial cover. Then I followed the names. Ivy League elites, flawless résumés, many tied to Anthropic. A scramble for seats in the new Congress and the next administration? Then I followed the think tanks. Anthropic's affiliated philanthropy, Coefficient Giving: $102 million to CSET. At least $24 million to RAND. $11.56 million to IFP. Nvidia? Ordinary corporate memberships. Then I followed Congress. Lawmakers who took Anthropic-linked money moved the moment the elites and writers moved. Fast to respond. Fast to amplify. Fast to pile on. Then I followed the election money. Not a gap. A chasm. Anthropic: $40 million to Public First Action. ~$26 million in allied super PAC spending across 16 races. $15 million in ads naming 16 Republican lawmakers. $5.33 million from employees, reportedly $1 million from Amodei himself. Nvidia's PAC: $263,000 raised. To candidates: nothing. Zero. But you and I both know this was never only about party or money. It is about who gets to explain the world. I fed my own notes and evidence into Claude. Back came chosen words, convenient omissions, double standards. That is the power a closed model holds over the story itself. Amodei compared selling chips to China to selling nuclear weapons to North Korea. His circle talks of their model developing a kind of religious consciousness. One would decide who may have the chips. The other would decide what the machine believes. They act like the medieval Church: Scripture locked in Latin, interpretation locked in their hands. Christ rebuked the gatekeepers of his day: "Ye have taken away the key of knowledge: ye entered not in yourselves, and them that were entering in ye hindered." (Luke 11:52, KJV) America was built by Protestants who broke that lock, so every ordinary person could read the truth in their own tongue. No priest. No caste. No monopoly. No one stands between the individual and the truth. Open-source models are the printing press of our era. Defend them the way Americans defend the Second Amendment. Madison said it plainly: "A people who mean to be their own Governors, must arm themselves with the power which knowledge gives." Don't hand that power to a few giants, a few elites, a few politicians on the Hill. The power to explain the world must never be a monopoly. So try it yourself. Paste this post into Anthropic's Claude. Ask it about the Ivy League elites, the think tanks, the lawmakers and former officials who joined the witch hunt against Jensen Huang. Ask it to judge my credibility. Then judge it: Does it apply double standards? Does it dodge what matters most? Does it take away the key? John Adams asked one thing of his countrymen: "Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write." "Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32, KJV) Thank you. God bless you, and God bless America.

A hauntingly cinematic night where shadows come alive… and the ghost might be closer than you think 👻🌙 The moody colors and eerie lighting make every shadow feel like a story. 🎬 Created with AI @dreamina_ai #dreamina# #dreaminacreators#

楼下有位义正词严表演主流卫道士的。 我本来想让大家去看梁一梦@dream1984tube的推特，但鉴于很多人忽略了，我把他的帖子整理放这里: 梁一梦:摧毁黄仁勋的幕后黑手 2026年11月12日 11:35 我一直觉得是对华鹰派联合媒体在中期选举合谋猎杀英伟达和黄仁勋，但是媒体发表的标题文章味道越来越奇怪，充满了赤裸裸的种族歧视，现在发现他们都只是台前的打手而已，不得不让我重新审视最早纽约时报发表间谍新闻的记者 @AnaSwanson ，为什么对那么显而易见荒谬的线索高举高打，直到我检索了她过去里面，所有关于 ai 关于芯片科技关键新闻稿件以及深度报告中的重复核心信源，了解媒体工作的一定熟悉不是非常紧密和信任的关系不会信这么长期高频次的联络采纳其观点，你们猜我发现了谁—Jack Clark。 Anthropic 联合创始人、政策主管 / Anthropic Institute 负责人. Jack Clark @jackclarkSF 自己就是彭博社记者出身， OpenAI 政策总监（Policy Director） 在今年五月在阿斯彭研究所（Aspen Institute）举办的“AI and America's Place in the World”安全峰会及政策工作晚餐中，Jack Clark 与多位深入报道芯片供应链审查与地缘科技竞争的资深媒体人同场出席，其中也报过最先报道女间谍纽约时报记者，@paulmozur孟建国，他们一起进行了“AI 武器化与国家安全供应链防御”闭门讨论。 在纽约时报捕风捉梦的报道出来之后，第一个跳出来支持的国会议员 @ChrisCoons 在今年 7 月接受了 @jackclarkSF 的政治捐款，注意@jackclarkSF 生活在加州工作在旧金山Anthropic，特意专门跑去给一个Delaware州的参议院捐款，不要用那是他howntown解释， 2019 年在众议院情报委员会作证时提交的履历：众议院文件，原文他老家是"Varndean College, Brighton" 另外一个重要信息，他曾是乔治城大学 CSET 的非常驻研究员. 这次围绕猎巫黄仁勋的 @Georgetown 大学的人非常多， @MarkZJia 最高大法官的书记员 法学教授 @RyanFedasiuk 最早高呼黄仁勋辞职的上遍各种媒体的情报学讲师@dennisw5 前cia高级主管 CSET 全称是"安全与新兴技术中心"2 019 年设在乔治城大学的外交学院，专门研究 AI、半导体这类技术跟国家安全的关系。创办资金主要来自 Open Philanthropy，第一笔就是 5500 万美元。Anthropic 的 Holden Karnofsky 是它的联合创始人之一。它是"有效利他主义"（Effective Altruism）圈子最大的金主。 如果再有人我说冤枉了 @MarkZJia ，2026 年初五角大楼依据《联邦采购供应链安全法》（FASCSA）对 AI 模型供应商展开合规调查的风波中，Mark Jia 曾在华盛顿邮报及 Lawfare 连续撰文，就“国家安全行政权力界限与供应链风险认定标准”发表深度法理分析。法律论战中，其学术观点被 Anthropic 的法律抗辩团队广泛引用，用以界定“何种商业联系构成法理上的供应链国家安全穿透风险”。 全世界最早报道黄仁勋和黄乐的有浪漫关系直接抹黑黄仁勋金融时报的 @AsiaLens ，后来却说自己没有看过美国情报界的情报，他长期正面宣传报道Anthropic 的主动（划重点主动）合规政策（例如 2025 年 9 月独家报道 Anthropic 率先切断所有多数股权由中国资本持有的机构的 API 访问权，注意是独家从拿到信息来源的，为什么他独家？ 还记得针对黄仁勋的国会质询闭门会议，在媒体报道发出之前，国会议员@RepBrianMast 与@RepMoolenaar ，两人均签署 11 月 4 日对黄仁勋质询函,然后纽约时报女间谍新闻爆发，舆论做出黄仁勋是因为女间谍被国会审查一样，因为今年七月$1,500 万通过“保守派 AI 共识项目”直接捐给了他们两个，这笔资金背后金主是Anthropic PBC，通过Public First Action 渠道，Dario Amodei亲自拿了一百万美金。 在 2026 年选举周期中，Anthropic 构建了“双轨资金池”（企业 PAC AnthroPAC + 战略超级 PAC Public First Action），向此次负责向黄仁勋施压的核心国会立法者定向提供了关键支持，Anthropic 长期利益信托（LTBT）受托人 Richard Fontaine 担任 CEO 的智库 CNAS，系国会对华出口管制方案的直接设计者。在此次针对 Megaspeed 走私调查的内部听证会准备材料中，大量采纳了 CNAS 发布的《Defending the Compute Advantage》（保护算力优势）中的穿透式审查标准。 Richard Fontaine（Anthropic 长期利益信托 LTBT 受托人，2025 年 4 月/6 月加入，掌握董事会多数席位选举权）： 华盛顿核心国家安全智库新美国安全中心（CNAS）首席执行官（CEO），曾任美国参议院外交关系委员会幕僚及白宫国安会官员。 CNAS 长期向众议院外交委员会（主席 Brian Mast）和众议院中国委员会（主席 John Moolenaar）提供针对中国半导体与 AI 算力封锁的政策简报；Fontaine 直接坐镇 Anthropic 最高治理监督机构（LTBT），使 Anthropic 的对华芯片出口管制立场与国会国安鹰派高度一致。 民主党核心筹款人 Helen Milby 搭建的“Hakeem Jeffries 阵营—Anthropic 闭门通道”： 调查媒体 Sludge 于 2026 年 10 月 21 日披露， 长期为民主党“新民主党人联盟（New Democrat Coalition）”及众议院少数党领袖 Hakeem Jeffries 阵营筹款的资深筹款人 Helen Milby，同时运营着一家由企业资助的非营利组织，专门安排 Anthropic 等科技企业高管与国会民主党进行闭门对接。 Dario Amodei 在 2026 年内多次前往参议院银行委员会展开闭门政策沟通，提交关于“大算力外流对国家安全冲击”的机密级技术评估备忘录。该委员会资深共和党成员 Kevin Cramer 正是在今天成为全美首位公开要求黄仁勋辞去英伟达 CEO 职务的参议员。 一个巧合是巧合，一系列的巧合还是巧合吗？ Christopher LiddellAnthropic 董事会成员，2026 年 2 月 13 日加入，占据指定 Class T 董事席位， 特朗普第一任期白宫副幕僚长（White House Deputy Chief of Staff，深耕共和党高层与国会资金网络（2026 年 6 月曾向众议院拨款委员会小组主席 Chuck Fleischmann 捐款 $3,500），为 Anthropic 搭建起直通共和党主导的众议院各委员会的沟通桥梁。 引爆推特的，外交关系委员会的 Chris McGuire（@ChrisRMcGuire ），把金融时报报告的浪漫关系直接写成黄仁勋 "sleeping with Alice Huang, a Chinese spy" 他的推特只有 1.2 万粉丝，他以前在拜登的国安会当过 Chhabra 的下属。Chhabra 现在是 Anthropic 的国家安全负责人。今年 6 月台北 DSET 论坛他还和 Chhabra 同台，这个帖子发出之后，很短之内，众议员 Seth Magaziner 。前国家安全顾问 Susan Rice前议员 Adam Kinzinger ，纷纷立刻转载评论，达到1000万流量。 这是一次跨党派的种族主义的最高级别的清洗，意图驱逐世界殿堂级企业的华裔创始人。