Honestly this decade from 2020-2030 might be the most goated in human history.
- Scaling massive reusable rockets for orbital compute with $RKLB to $SPCX.
- on the cusp of ASI and recursive learning with Anthropic and OpenAI
- Backflipping Boston Dynamics and Unitree humanoids to replace the human workforce
- Star Wars laser beams from $EOS.ASX to AI DC lasers like $LITE.
- Waymo and $TSLA self driving cars everywhere in urban cities
- and we get industry Quantum commercialization end of decade
This is kinda crazy to be an investor in this timeframe. Feels like every movie from the Star Wars Death Star to Skynet is coming to life.
What’s next?
显示更多
Nah, gonna fill out the job application for $WEN and set up camp behind the dumpsters.
Even $MU and $SNDK ridiculous performance today couldn't save my port.
Cheering on Japan though, hoping Sweden gets mogged with a 2-0 to represent the 20% drop.
显示更多
Very interesting statement today: $MU CEO predicts a multi-decade memory demand cycle driven by humanoid robots.
"Humanoid robots, he says, will require roughly ten times more memory than today’s Level 2+ autonomous vehicles."
"And that demand wave is set to begin before the decade is out."
Something as well as was "Over time, we expect the value of on-device AI combined with pent-up unit replacement demand to drive memory demand growth"
Which is also another trend (Apple Intelligence is currently dog, but I'm sure we'll see innovations with localized/edge AI).
Feels like all the industry leaders from $TSM Chairman, $TSLA Elon Musk, to $MU CEO see humanoids as the next major trend so physical AI is probably next.
I wonder if the world is going to have enough memory. Or if we'll see enough breakthroughs to shrink memory usage.
显示更多
Always amazing looking at $MU earnings:
Revenue: $41.46B vs. $35.8B est.
EPS: $25.11 vs. $20.78 est.
Forecasts:
Revenue: $49B to $51B, vs $43.24B est
EPS: $30.00 to $32.00, vs. $25.31.
“Micron said on Wednesday that it has signed 16 long-term agreements”
"When completed, we expect approximately half or more of our company revenue to be under these"
Looks like memory demand has become structural…
But great earnings to show up the AI trade is continuing to ramp up.
显示更多
Wow, 3 limit ups in a row with WUS TW. Pretty sad I didn't take larger positions.
WUS TW is 1 my 2 NAV arbitrage + independent growth trades.
If you want context: WUS TW is a ~$1.12B PCB player with AI DC growth.
Their stake in WUS Kunshan is $4.79B (11.4% of 42.04 billion)
So basically they're a $1.1B PCB player growing independently, sitting on ~$4.79B worth of another company that looks to IPOed on Hong Kong markets soon.
And a successful activist investor in Palliser (with Ajinomoto and Toto), is pressuring them to trim some holdings along with a few others.
Seems like a pretty insane disconnect, and I think there's a lot of potential here.
显示更多
I agree with Palliser Capital here.
As a shareholder, it’s just so stupid how WUS (2316 TW) MC can be ~$1B MC.
While they own a 11.26% stake of WUS Kunshan, a $39.3B (¥282B CNY) company…
Which is worth $4.42B pre-tax. Just sell 1/4th or something?
And you get an extra ~$1.1B for PCB growth at the inflection point with AI demand.
Which is more than your current MC pre-tax, purely in cash.
And there’s still $3.3B in assets + markets might revalue your company because of willingness to trim locked up assets.
Nobody is asking you to trim everything, but the NAV disconnect is insanity.
WUS TW management should really reconsider.
显示更多
Jeez, Japanese markets seem happy.
Everything from Furukawa, Towa, Harmonic Drive, Ibiden, are up today.
Probably after winning the World Cup game 4-0?
Imo harmonic drive (6324) one of the better humanoid exposure names at $4B valuation listed in GS research report.
Personally I picked some up for exposure.
Chinese competitors might be used for mass production.
But personal preference in investing in Western supply chains + build them up.
显示更多
I’m just posting this since people seem really curious about X’s revenue sharing program.
Genuinely didn’t expect to get seen 100M+ times every 2 weeks!
Would keep doing the same thing tho, even if it were free and I just had a few friends from $RDDT to share ideas with.
显示更多
In terms of personal notes:
1. Priortech owns 21% of $CAMT, ~1.35x their MC, seems more like holding co.
2. Bit Digital people kept shouting, but NAV discount is not clean $WYFI, lot of dilution + not AI parent.
3. Wistron (3231) is the best one I've seen since $SIVE + Ayar + Wiwynn are one of my favorite trio.
~$16.2B MC, Q1 revenue up a ridiculous amount with 144% Y/Y growth.
Owns 35.46% of Wiwynn, which is ~0.66x of MC. I'd expect Wiwynn to keep on growing.
4. Sin-American Silicon 5483 does own 46.64% of GlobalWafers (6488).
MC is $3.5B, stake value is ~$7.9B, but not exactly growing too fast independently, though it's heavily trading heavily discount to NAV.
5. Iljin Holdings owns 42.99% of Iljin Electric, it's ~$0.22B MC vs. ~$1.13B NAV holding. This was transformer/cable DC related.
But again idk if I trust korean stocks for NAV unlock, probably better for activist investors.
6. Simmtech Holdings was ~$0.17B MC vs. ~$1.0B of parent, which also looks ridiculous.
So 6x+ NAV. PCB substrate related name. Also another prob don't trust korean governance type name.
I think both $ACMR and WUS have H-Share subsidiary listing soon, and those were the biggest NAV discounts with independent growth.
Then you have a highly successful activist going after WUS so I'd expect some middle ground there.
So maybe I'll put more concentration into those on top of what I already own Monday, we'll see. And Wistron was growing very fast independently.
I'm still doing research, normally this goes in shower thoughts since I haven't formally made a conclusion, but thought others might be interested.
显示更多
I think something to highlight also is not all my ideas are green, especially on short term timeframes!
My core three themes are Neoclouds (Energy), Memory, and Photonics.
And I'm glad I chose the literal top performers for each segment from $NBIS to $EWY leaps to $SIVE.
However, I still have pretty large losses following the false analyst report on CPO delays that $NVDA refuted:
That nuked 3 of my TW CPO longs from Foci, Msscorp, Xintec and others. (which are heavily red). Shunsin / Win Semi are holding up much better though.
Some of the other ones in Japan that I've mentioned like Towa, Harmonic Drive, NCI, etc. are performing much better following short-term volatility.
As for Korea yes I have PTSD for from Auros and now Foosung that are both both red (I didn't own 093370 though, just got PTSD watching price action).
Idk if I'll touch Korea again, just way too volatile. But I still think those will end up green eventually following Sk hynix/samsung qualifications + HVM, and the future japanese supply chain shutdown.
I also did change some of my previous long ideas like $XLU following the Iran War nuking all chances of rate cuts from 3-4 down to 0, and that didn't play out too well. Three software names I mentioned previously like $TTD, $META ended up red. $SNAP, I also changed my thesis after noticing the endless SBC accounting methods. $RDDT idea was finally in the green from $130 -> $170 after a long time.
But I think the vast majority of my ideas like $MRVL, $NBIS, $ARM, $INTC, $MU, $LITE, SK Hynix, Samsung, for larger cap.
Down to $AXTI, $LITE, $AAOI, $RPI, $IQE, and others for smaller cap positions directionally play out pretty well.
With random stuff like $SIMO, $HPS.A, $TSEM, $AEHR, $LPK, $SOI, $ALRIB, and so on all ended up turning out aight too.
The blended average is kinda overwhelmingly green since majority of my long ideas are triple digit YTD.
But I've definitely missed a few.
Also entry point is really important too... I mentioned $AAOI at $30 or $AXTI at ~$13, but not everyone has the same entry point. So if someone bought AOI at $220 and it dropped to $160, I'd feel bad.
But regardless, I'd prefer to judge how ideas play out on medium term timeframes over a few months rather than a few weeks.
显示更多
Bernstein is basically the institutional version of Jim Cramer:
Tells retail Kioxia looks like it’s going to crash, gives a -50% PT.
Bunch of retail sells.
Stock proceeds to skyrocket right after, with another +12% today.
显示更多
Bernstein is legit the dumbest analyst firm I’ve seen calling for a 50% crash in Kioxia.
They gave $INTC a $36 PT back in Jan and now it’s $118.
Good lesson to ignore institutional reports that get published for retail consumption.
They’re not here to help retail investors.
显示更多
非常感谢中文社区对我最看好股票的投资思路进行的深度剖析!
总的来说,像 $AAOI 和 $SIVE 这样的激光公司是我个人的最爱,因为它们在拓展营收方面有着极大的想象空间。它们可以不仅仅局限于销售激光器,还能制造完整的光模块 以及各种光引擎或 ELS (外部光源) 组件。
又或者像 $COHR 那样,甚至可以向上游延伸进军衬底制造领域,从而实现垂直整合,并不断提升自身的毛利率和总潜在市场规模 TAM
这其中很大一部分的关键在于要率先精准踩中投资主线,毕竟去年很多人甚至都不觉得“光子学(photonics)”能成为一个真正的热门概念。
而且我认为最会让大多数人感到惊讶的是,我们目前仍处于极其早期的阶段。绝大多数的营收放量(爬坡)要到明年,也就是 2027 年的上半年乃至下半年才会真正开始!
不过,能看到中文社区大家持续不断的支持,真的让我感觉非常棒。我会尽我所能,不辜负大家给我起的 “白毛股神” 这个称号。
显示更多
I agree with Palliser Capital here.
As a shareholder, it’s just so stupid how WUS (2316 TW) MC can be ~$1B MC.
While they own a 11.26% stake of WUS Kunshan, a $39.3B (¥282B CNY) company…
Which is worth $4.42B pre-tax. Just sell 1/4th or something?
And you get an extra ~$1.1B for PCB growth at the inflection point with AI demand.
Which is more than your current MC pre-tax, purely in cash.
And there’s still $3.3B in assets + markets might revalue your company because of willingness to trim locked up assets.
Nobody is asking you to trim everything, but the NAV disconnect is insanity.
WUS TW management should really reconsider.
显示更多
Bernstein is legit the dumbest analyst firm I’ve seen calling for a 50% crash in Kioxia.
They gave $INTC a $36 PT back in Jan and now it’s $118.
Good lesson to ignore institutional reports that get published for retail consumption.
They’re not here to help retail investors.
显示更多
Just some random thoughts, I do think AI is the most disruptive technology in human history.
To the level of agricultural or industrial revolution.
Since Anthropic, OpenAi, XAI, and others are racing to build superintelligence.
The amount of economic impact can't be measured if AI helps find cures for cancer or accelerates discovery for Quantum Computing.
Or if AI end up displacing the workforce, which increases profitability for companies.
The US Gov has every incentive to keep the buildout going too, as the implications from Warfare, Cybersecurity, is also immeasurable if China takes the lead.
So there's likely to be incentives and subsidies to win, even if there's not enough profit derived LLM training/inference.
As for sustainability, when you look upstream, $GOOGL is able to fund it majorly with their own cashflow, same with $AMZN, $MSFT.
More lukewarm on $META. Very iffy about $ORCL.
But I do see some bubbles forming around debt interest like $CRWV.
Maybe circular valuations that's happening with OpenAI backlog agreements or $NVDA / $AMD agreements with Neoclouds to buy their GPUs.
But as seen with $MSFT and having OpenAI be a major part of the backlog, it did correct off the information, so "bubbles" like that do pop despite the overall markets increasing.
Definitely don't see a bubble in upstream semiconductors from $LITE to Sk Hynix though since the amount of profit they get from the buildout would likely be insane to make up for capex decreasing.
OpenAI was actually my biggest fear from contagion, eg. $CRWV, $CBRS and others, but they just raised a lot.
So think it will be fine for another 1 1/2 years of capex, especially if they IPO this year.
I also don't think we'll get massive Fed tightening despite "predictions" since this will trigger a contagion since many of these players rely heavily on debt.
And although the Fed is independent, don't think Trump would have supported someone who is against his administration goals.
As for semiconductor valuations going up every day like $AMD or $MU, there's probably going to be some corrections here and there. Everything going up together is kinda unhealthy.
Can't time the capex peak but just from $AVGO and other projections, it just keeps accelerating exponentially into 2028.
Especially as everyone is starting to sign multi year agreements as well.
OpenAI contagion / hyperscaler capex decreasing / fed tightening was what I'm looking out for, and no blaring signs of any of those yet.
So I think the music will keep playing for this year at the bare minimum.
显示更多
New reports that $AMD is scrambling for CW laser supply.
And is negotiating large-scale purchase orders for CW Lasers to ensure its production capacity is not constrained by $NVDA (Trendforce)
Obvious CW laser beneficiaries:
- $SIVE (AMD went to GFS for CPO, Sivers reference laser level)
- $AAOI (Rosenblatt analyst checks)
Lumentum/Coherent are kinda booked out way into 2028 as well.
Lumentum is especially constrained for CW capacity already from existing EML contracts (so they probably are buying from Sumitomo/Furukawa and co).
Maybe Macom and Japanese giants still have spare capacity. (disclosure, own aaoi/sivers).
I predicted this last year and said hyperscalers should go more upstream to secure capacity... at laser levels, epiwafer levels, or even inp substrate levels.
To not get bottlenecked by Nvidia.
显示更多
Apparently, $SPCX is a $2.5T company now.
I did say Americans would buy anything futuristic without caring about valuations...
I guess everything in Murica go brrr.
If I had to stereotype my X experiences with markets:
China 🇨🇳: set on cloning me with AI, can only think of trades in short term timeframes from A-shares PTSD.
America 🇺🇸: bullish on anything futuristic like $SPCX, don’t care about valuations
Europe 🇪🇺: from $SIVE to $SOI, cares more about water usage than the AI buildout. Somehow can only look at past 12 months. (Belgium is cool so far), looking at you France + Sweden
Korea 🇰🇷: leveraged degens. I’ve never seen a market so volatile. Equivalent of 50x hyperliquid traders but with stock markets.
Japan 🇯🇵: somehow supportive of everything, haven’t seen any Japanese person aggressively bear post and short stocks before.
Not enough data on other places yet like Latin America, but will have some soon enough ig.
显示更多
Ur welcome with $IQE
-> $LITE is a known $GOOGL supplier.
-> $IQE is a known $LITE supplier.
-> $AXTI is a known $IQE supplier.
Google TPU + Hyperscaler ASIC BOM are extremely confidential.
But you can kinda guess from relationship mapping even though nobody will say $AXTI or $IQE supplies to X hyperscaler?
You'd be surprised how multi-hop relationships are missed.
显示更多
$NVDA and $GOOGL lead 800V DC ahead of schedule.
"Ahead of schedule", pulled up to Q3 2026 with small volume shipments starting .
- Delta Electronics (2308), $VRT
- Song Chuan Precision (7788)
- Schneider Electric, Eaton, Siemens.
All flagged as beneficiaries.
"Market sources indicate that Nvidia’s Vera Rubin platform and Google’s next-generation AI data centers will be the first to adopt the technology"
Source: Commercial Times
The power semi trade should be happy to hear this.
显示更多
If I had to stereotype my X experiences with markets:
China 🇨🇳: set on cloning me with AI, can only think of trades in short term timeframes from A-shares PTSD.
America 🇺🇸: bullish on anything futuristic like $SPCX, don’t care about valuations
Europe 🇪🇺: from $SIVE to $SOI, cares more about water usage than the AI buildout. Somehow can only look at past 12 months. (Belgium is cool so far), looking at you France + Sweden
Korea 🇰🇷: leveraged degens. I’ve never seen a market so volatile. Equivalent of 50x hyperliquid traders but with stock markets.
Japan 🇯🇵: somehow supportive of everything, haven’t seen any Japanese person aggressively bear post and short stocks before.
Not enough data on other places yet like Latin America, but will have some soon enough ig.
显示更多
VPEC new price hikes on Epiwafers today.
Positive bottleneck read through on companies like $IQE and Landmark (3081) in terms of pricing power/demand for epiwafers.
This follows $MTSI investment into IQE to secure capacity, and shows how important some of these chokepoints are.
(disclosure: have positions in IQE)
显示更多
VPEC全新光電
產品價格調整通知書 (Price Adjustment Notification)
親愛的合作夥伴您好:
首先,衷心感謝貴司長年以來對 VPEC 的鼎力支持。作為您供應鏈中值得信賴的夥伴,我們始終致力於透過技術革新與製程優化,為您提供卓越的產品品質與服務價值。
然而,在過去的一年中,受全球原物料成本持續攀升、供應短缺及通膨壓力之影響,我們面臨了前所未有的挑戰。儘管我司已盡最大努力透過內部優化來吸收這些額外成本,但為因應不斷增加的營運壓力,並確保能持續穩定提供高品質產品與不間斷的售後服務,經內部審慎評估,我司決定對磊晶晶圓的產品價格進行適度調整。
本次磊晶晶圓價格調整的具體調幅將依品項規格有所差異,相關細節將由我司業務專員與您進一步聯繫。
显示更多