与「Driver」相关的搜索结果

Elon Musk 最近和 SpaceX 团队坐下来，讲了一套非常疯狂的路线图： 如何把人类推进到 Kardashev Type 2 civilization 核心不是单纯去火星 而是把火箭、卫星、AI 数据中心、芯片制造、月球工业和深空能源串成一张网 他提到，人类现在使用的太阳能量，还不到太阳总输出的一万亿分之一 在 Kardashev scale 上，我们几乎还没有真正“注册” 所以 SpaceX 的目标，不只是发射更多火箭 而是大幅提高人类能调用的能源和算力规模 Starship 是这套系统的起点 Musk 的逻辑很简单： 汽车、飞机、船、自行车，大家都默认可以重复使用 但火箭过去一直是一次性消耗品 如果飞机每飞一次就要扔掉，几乎没人坐得起飞机 所以 fully reusable rocket 是关键 SpaceX 现在已经承担了地球轨道发射质量的 85–90% 但这还不是 Starship 真正开始后的状态 他们内部目标是： 从每年 2,500 吨入轨，提升到每年 100 万吨 大概 3 年内做到 然后是 AI 数据中心上天 按 Musk 的说法，SpaceX 目标是在明年年底前，把 1GW AI compute 放到轨道上 之后每年 10x： 2.5 年到 10GW 3.5 年到 100GW 最后到 terawatt 级别 AI satellite 的结构反而没那么复杂： solar panels radiator 一排 GPUs 最难的部分，Starlink 已经解决过了 现在只是把它做大 很多人以为 orbital compute 会有很高延迟 但他提到，从轨道到地面的 latency 大约是 3ms light 每毫秒大约走 300km 所以低轨算力并不一定离你很远 再往后，就是 terafab Musk 提到的规模是 100 million square feet 大约是 Tesla Gigafactory Texas 的 10 倍 因为如果未来要做到 terawatt 级 AI compute，现有全球芯片产业的产能级别可能不够 所以他们选择自己做 但要超过 terawatt，就要去月球 没有大气 地球六分之一重力。 可以用月球材料制造 solar panels 和 radiators 然后用 electromagnetic rail gun，也就是 mass driver，把 AI satellites 发射到 deep space 不需要火箭 这也是他路线图里的下一步 如果月球上已经有足够大规模的工业和发射能力，那普通人去月球也会变得更现实 Musk 原话是： “我认为每个人都应该至少去一次月球。” 整套方案听起来很科幻 但它的底层逻辑其实很一致： fully reusable rocket → 发射成本下降 → 大规模卫星网络 → 轨道 AI 数据中心 → 太空能源和通信 → terafab 制造能力 → 月球工业 → deep space infrastructure 很多人看 SpaceX，看到的是火箭公司 但 Musk 讲的更像是一套面向 Type 2 civilization 的基础设施系统 SpaceX 最终会被理解成一家航天公司，还是人类进入太空能源和太空算力时代的基础设施公司？

You may have heard our research on Tesla Robotaxis... @CathieDWood just rode one through Austin. No driver. No safety monitor. Ride along with Cathie as she shares her thoughts from the passenger seat, including a newly discovered line item for our model.

The Netherlands also has its Henry Nowak cases. In July 2020, 14-year-old Tamar from Marken was hit by a car on a dark dike road and left to die. Her body was later found in the berm. What happened next is deeply disturbing. The police initially told her mother that the driver was German. Days later the truth came out: it was four Iraqis in the car. The mother was told they withheld the real background because they didn’t want to create a "Wilders-effect" — they didn’t want to give Geert Wilders political ammunition. Even worse: evidence strongly suggests Tamar’s body was moved after the accident. The driver didn’t just flee, they dragged her off the road and left her there like an animal. The driver received only a €1,500 fine for looking at his phone while driving. He then disappeared completely. The fine was returned “undeliverable” and for years he was untraceable. Only after years of fighting by the family (including going to court to force prosecution), a breakthrough came in March 2026: the now 33-year old Jamal is finally being prosecuted for causing the fatal accident and leaving the scene. Just like Henry Nowak in Southampton — an innocent young person dies, authorities seem more focused on protecting a narrative and avoiding “political incorrectness” than on delivering swift justice. A 14-year-old girl dies on a Dutch dike. The system lies about the identity of the driver, gives him a slap on the wrist, loses him for years, and only after massive pressure does real prosecution begin. This is not just a traffic accident. This is a story about truth, accountability, and what happens when institutions put ideology before grieving families. Her name was Tamar. She was 14. She deserved better. ♡

California Is Blocking a Federal Audit of Its Voter Rolls California allows first-time voters to register using forms of ID that most Americans would find surprising, including: -Gym membership card -Employer ID card -Credit or debit card -Prescription drug label -Insurance card (California provides free health coverage to undocumented immigrants) Full list: This is permitted when a voter fails to provide a Social Security number or driver’s license at registration. Our office believes this policy deserves a closer look. We also have serious concerns about how California maintains its voter rolls. There are open questions about whether the state is promptly removing deceased voters, people who have moved, and individuals convicted of disqualifying felonies. On top of that, California allows third parties to collect and turn in ballots on voters’ behalf (a practice known as ballot harvesting) with few restrictions. This makes it difficult to track who actually received, completed, and submitted each ballot. For over a year, the Department of Justice has been trying to audit California’s voter rolls. Federal law gives the Attorney General the authority to review state voter files and confirm that only eligible U.S. citizens are voting in federal elections. @AAGDhillon sent California a letter explaining our legal authority. California refused to comply, claiming state privacy laws block the review, an argument that does not hold up because those laws don’t apply to the federal government in this context. We’ve sued California in federal court, and the case is before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. If California genuinely wants voters to trust its elections, it should open its records, not fight to keep them closed. What are they afraid of?