与「Focus」相关的搜索结果

not all crypto rewards are created equal. when a platform advertises yield, i think the first thing to check is what holders actually receive and where that value comes from. @RebateLaunch has an interesting approach to this. instead of paying holder rewards in newly issued $rebate, eligible holders receive payouts in the pair asset. on robinhood chain, that's usdg. the platform reports: → $28.5k distributed to holders. → 120,403 individual payouts. → rewards sent several times throughout the day. → no staking or manual claiming required. but the reward distribution is only one part of the model. rebate pad also uses a declining launch tax to address early sniping. → 99% during the initial stage. → 66% in the next stage. → 33% in the following stage. these penalties go into a locked treasury that supports the buyer bonus mechanism. separately, the 0.7% platform fee is used to buy $rebate from the market and burn it. the reported cumulative burn has reached 35.3m tokens, representing 3.53% of the original 1 billion supply. what makes this model worth examining is how several mechanisms connect: ✦ early launch activity contributes to the treasury. ✦ the treasury supports buyer bonuses. ✦ trading fees fund holder payouts and the $rebate buyback-and-burn mechanism. my perspective is that paying rewards in the pair asset is an interesting distinction because holders aren't simply receiving more of the same token. however, attractive payout numbers alone don't prove sustainable yield. trading volume, fee generation, treasury health and long-term user activity still matter. i'd rather evaluate the source of rewards than focus only on the advertised percentage. also, round 3 of the creator campaign closes november 17 at 22:00 utc. the real question is whether rebate pad can maintain this economic cycle as adoption grows. $rebate

Safety evaluations are critical for understanding whether a model is ready to deploy, which safeguards to build for it, and where to focus training and research. On our Engineering Blog, we offer 10 recommendations for how to design, run and report them.

🚀 $TART HOLDERS, THIS COULD BE AN OPPORTUNITY! 🍒 The market is bleeding, but builders are still building. Sometimes, the biggest opportunities appear when the market is at its weakest. While others are panicking, keep your eyes on what @notralbnb is cooking behind the scenes. $TART is more than just a token; there's an ecosystem being built, with staking, farming and long-term plans in motion. If you've done your research and believe in the vision, this dip might be an opportunity to strengthen your bag. Stay focused. Think long-term. Don't let market fear make your decisions. Something is cooking, and Notralbnb might just have more surprises for the $TART community. WE ARE EARLY! $TART 🍒

50 Sites That Show What Billionaires Buy and Read for Free🤯 1.) → Current portfolios of famous investors 2.) → Quarterly fund trades 3.) → Stock transactions of US politicians 4.) → Executives' own company stocks 5.) → Making fund filings readable 6.) → Companies' official reports 7.) → Buffett's letters since 1977 8.) → Video archive of Buffett meetings 9.) → Howard Marks' investor memos 10.) → Research from Ray Dalio's firm 11.) → Dalio's principles for free 12.) → Jeremy Grantham's market notes 13.) → Quantitative fund research 14.) → Damodaran's valuation data 15.) → Valuation professor's blog 16.) → Morgan Housel's money writings 17.) → Mental models for decision-making 18.) → JPMorgan's free market guide 19.) → Innovation-focused fund research 20.) → Venture capital essays 21.) → Value investing lecture notes 22.) → Columbia's value investing archive 23.) → Fed's economic data archive 24.) → Fed decisions and statements 25.) → European Central Bank data 26.) → Reports from the central bank of central banks 27.) → Countries' economic indicators 28.) → Companies' long-term charts 29.) → Company financials for free 30.) → Companies' market cap rankings 31.) → Stock screener and heat map 32.) → Portfolio backtesting 33.) → Charts and market analysis 34.) → Professional market screener 35.) → Company activity reports archive 36.) → SEC's investor education site 37.) → Passive investing encyclopedia 38.) → Financial terms dictionary 39.) → Free finance guides 40.) → CFA research publications 41.) → Fund and stock evaluations 42.) → Companies' visual analysis 43.) → Archive of selected investment theses 44.) → Seeing what's inside funds 45.) → European fund backtests 46.) → Investment writings with data 47.) → Market history notes 48.) → Investor psychology writings 49.) → Explaining the economy with charts 50.) ourfiniteworld? → (see note) The rich don't hoard information. They just don't tell you where it is. Save it, follow @Liyana_Coder you'll need it. Not investment advice. @Liyana_Coder

Some GOP pointed to Times... I doubt Times would release a good investigative journal as they have not for the last decade as they focused on cheap, easy albeit wellwrutten EDITORIALs. FT and Economics is definitely a drainage for the target release of filth. The US leaks thru UK is definitely for legal reason as the UK media sits on the Defence and Security Media Advisory (DSMA) Committee to use sovereign immunity on their hit list. I doubt this is the case, they might have fucked up in this op: Georgetown, Columbia is the Goldmine. They first did it thru the US media: if it is false accusation, they are going to be fucking sued but the richest man.

Here’s the recap of @cz_binance’s fireside with Anthony Pompliano at Cantor Convergence in Miami: He showed up in Miami just weeks after the biggest hack in crypto history and still looked calm. No stress, no drama. Just there. What stood out: Trust gets built when things go wrong, not when everything is perfect. @cz_binance basically said resilience matters more than never getting hit. That’s how you actually move Bitcoin forward. He also talked about AI and regulation. “Any new technology will go through a phase we can’t make regulation ahead of time. It moves too fast.” Crypto already went through this. AI is going through it now. And security. The $6.3B hack showed the industry (and even banks) hasn’t been taking this seriously enough. AI is making attacks faster. The only real answer is fighting AI with AI and actually working together as an industry instead of everyone doing their own thing. No full recording out yet but @cz_binance said it should be somewhere. While most people are still panicking or pointing fingers, @cz_binance is still focused on the long game. Protecting users and building through the noise. That’s why a lot of us still trust him. 🔶

Four Leaders, One Vision: Adani Group Maps Out Succession Adani Group’s next-generation leadership structure brings together Pranav, Karan, Sagar and Jeet Adani under the G2 Leadership framework. Pranav focuses on urban infrastructure, natural resources and communications; Karan on ports, logistics and cement; Sagar on energy, transmission and finance; and Jeet on airports, AI, data centres, defence and metals. The transition comes as Adani Group operates across 20+ business verticals with nearly ₹3 lakh crore in FY26 revenue and over ₹17 lakh crore in listed market capitalisation.

Personal update: Last week I started a new role at the @ethereumfndn focused on applied AI x Client Dev where I will be working alongside the technical teams and the management. I guess the unemployment era is over unfortunately. milady.

I'm proud I worked at @NVIDIA. @JensenHuang is the biggest reason why. I'm not there anymore, so I can speak freely. His departure is a huge loss. Especially now. I spent almost five years in the culture he built and knew people who'd worked with him for 20+ years. They respected him technically and loved him as a person. They said it without a hint of doubt. The focus stayed on the mission and on people. Good ideas got support regardless of title. That sounds like standard company values. It wasn't. Behind it was his vision and a way of leading that is out of fashion in today's founder advice: - Be kind, not arrogant. - Innovation, not marketing. - The wins belong to the people, not the CEO. - Don't fire by default. Find the person a new role. It's counterintuitive, and I doubt there is a harder way to lead. What I saw was leadership through kindness and care, not by squeezing people. A real visionary. He understood the technology and the people building it. His internal talks had vision, conviction, technical depth and jokes good enough for stand-up. You left wanting to build, and you couldn't wait for the next one. An affair, on its own, shouldn't outweigh decades of leadership. The serious questions deserve real answers. But the soap opera shouldn't decide his future. We're at a critical moment for AI. His technical judgment, vision, and commitment to the work are incredibly hard to replace. I want Jensen to keep building and leading. There's too much important work ahead.