注册并分享邀请链接,可获得视频播放与邀请奖励。

与「GE」相关的搜索结果

GE 贴吧
一个关键词就是一个贴吧,路径全站唯一。
创建贴吧
用户
未找到
包含 GE 的内容
🫪重度使用了Gemini 4 Carbon一周,Gemni高管才告诉我最屌的用法! Orchestrator 就是用最强的Carbon写规划指挥,然后用最性价比的模型Hydrogen做执行。 真的巨省额度,并且执行出来的效果基本与Carbon无异,重点是便宜,而且快啊!用过GPT的人都哭了,和GPT比起来,Hydrogen真的快得起飞!
显示更多
The winter approaches ❄️ Can’t wait for our snow queen to arrive 😭 ❄️ Set B this month ❄️ #genshin# #genshinimpact# #genshincosplay# #genshinimpactcosplay# #anastasya#
显示更多
A trading platform becomes truly valuable when users can make better decisions without becoming dependent on it. That's an idea I've been considering while following @Hypesium. In Web3, platforms often compete by offering more features, faster execution, and access to additional markets. Those improvements can make trading more convenient. But there's another question I think deserves attention. Does a trading tool make its users more capable, or simply more dependent on its interface? Imagine someone who has spent months trading through a single application. They understand where to click, how to place orders, and how to navigate its features. But if that application suddenly becomes unavailable, can they still evaluate opportunities and manage their positions independently? If the answer is no, convenience may have created an unexpected weakness. Hypesium offers a Telegram-based trading workflow focused on the Elysium ecosystem, connecting activity across multiple launchpads. I see this as an interesting example of how specialized infrastructure can simplify market participation. However, I believe the strongest trading products should preserve user independence. Traders should understand the assets they hold, the networks they use, and the risks associated with their transactions. They should also know how to verify important information outside any single interface. This isn't an argument against trading bots. It's an argument for using them as tools rather than treating them as substitutes for knowledge. For me, @Hypesium is worth examining through this perspective because accessibility and independence should develop together. A convenient trading experience can save time. But genuine confidence comes from understanding the process well enough to operate without that convenience when necessary. The best infrastructure shouldn't make users feel trapped inside one workflow. It should make them more capable wherever they choose to participate. Would you trust a trading platform more if it helped you become less dependent on it?
显示更多
0
20
26
20
转发到社区
卧槽,用 Gemini 的兄弟赶紧停手! 刚看到个惨案,有人把订阅额度偷偷接给第三方代理(比如 OpenClaw),结果直接被谷歌无预警封号了,报错 403 违规。 人家条款写得清清楚楚,禁止这种第三方客户端白嫖。 听句劝,老老实实用官方的 Antigravity 或者 Gemini CLI,别为了省事把号折腾没了
显示更多
we have all seen the comparison going around token prices in 2021 vs today. i wanted to do one for @BNBCHAIN on what it was in 2021 and what it has become. during all these years, fundamentals didn't just hold, they kept getting stronger. “build and build” (and still, the price followed with a first 4 digit all time high last year). plus with the new L1 in the works the future is already being prepared. extremely bullish on what's coming for this ecosystem.
显示更多
A trading tool that only feels useful during market hype might not be as valuable as people think. That's a question I've been considering while following @Hypesium. Most trading platforms attract attention during moments of extreme activity. New tokens launch. Trading volume increases. Opportunities appear everywhere, and users rush to execute transactions before prices move. During those periods, speed and accessibility become obvious advantages. But what happens when the excitement disappears? Imagine a week with fewer launches, lower liquidity, and limited trading opportunities. Suddenly, the value of a trading tool becomes harder to measure through transaction volume alone. Hypesium provides a Telegram-based trading workflow focused on the Elysium ecosystem, connecting activity across multiple launchpads. I think its long-term relevance should be evaluated through a broader question. Can trading infrastructure remain useful when users aren't actively chasing opportunities? For me, the answer depends on whether the workflow encourages sustainable participation rather than constant activity. A quieter market gives traders time to study previous launches, examine liquidity patterns, compare market behavior, and refine their strategies. Those activities might not generate immediate trading volume, but they can contribute to better decisions later. This is where I see an important distinction between a tool designed around excitement and one designed around lasting utility. The first benefits when everyone wants to trade. The second should still have a meaningful role when traders decide to wait. Of course, maintaining that relevance is a challenge for any execution-focused product. But I believe @Hypesium represents an interesting case for thinking about how ecosystem trading infrastructure can evolve beyond periods of speculation. Because real product adoption isn't just about attracting users during the busiest days. It's about giving them reasons to return when the market becomes quiet. Would you judge a trading platform by its activity during hype cycles or its usefulness between them?
显示更多
0
27
26
21
转发到社区
Most agent demos look good right up until the agent gets something wrong So this @reppo update actually makes sense to me Their new Eval Engine checks what an agent is about to say or do before it moves. Bad answer, try again. Trade doesn’t look right, pause it for review Nothing super flashy here. But if agents are going to touch real money, I’d rather see more of this than another speed demo Beta is already live. Public release on Nov 21
显示更多
0
23
36
2
转发到社区
A cut everyone has seen before. Grab the last frame, use it as the start frame of the next generation. Unless you nail it, the seam shows. This video is two 10s clips. Watch the cut at the 10s mark. The color shifts, and the sushi belt suddenly runs the other way. Fix in the reply ↓
显示更多
in this big 2026, you can’t afford to fade Bagel 🥯 @bagel_win is making prediction markets more accessible by creating a dedicated mobile app that allows users to explore markets and make predictions anytime, anywhere. available in 150+ countries and regions, bagel connects users to polymarket’s existing markets and liquidity through a convenient mobile experience. here are some advantages of using bagel: 1. mobile convenience 📱: explore markets and make predictions directly from your phone. 2. polymarket integration: access a wide range of existing prediction markets across different topics. 3. established liquidity: trade through polymarket’s existing liquidity rather than a separate trading ecosystem. 4. personalized discovery: discover interesting markets through the for you feed. 5. live market updates: follow market developments as events unfold. 6. copy trading: follow other predictors and copy their trades. 7. social features: connect with other users, track their activity and exchange market ideas. - download bagel now: - register with my code: stunner - you will get 10% off fees. happy predicting. bagel combines @Polymarket’s market access with mobile convenience and social trading features. whether you’re a beginner or an experienced predictor, there’s plenty to explore.
显示更多
币安神算子活动在11月16日早8结束了 这次第4周因为 @cz_binance 清理了一大批工作室账号,所以整体分数下降了不少 可惜了,就算不押注geng ,也能稳进赛季前1000,跟周榜…..也是个大毛 但反押注上BLG都双双进前100了,错失2个 $PREDICT 大毛 再对应上OKX的积分😭😭😭😭 早知道不睡觉,看直播算了
显示更多