与「Hiring」相关的搜索结果

Over the past few months, we have restructured MEGA to move in a new direction. We’ve brought together new capabilities and reorganized our teams, a process that has resulted in a 20% reduction in our staff. These are people who helped build MEGA from its earliest days ( building out the chain / wallet, supporting our ecosystem, and telling our wild stories). To everyone who is leaving: I appreciate you. Your work is foundational in what we’re doing next. If you are hiring, please reach out. These are some of the best people we have worked with, and we will gladly make introductions. Our founders, early employees and core engineering team remain committed to MEGA and to the work we started three years ago with MegaETH. We believe cryptography and distributed systems will change how the world produces and accesses purified intelligence. We have a lot to prove, and a lot of work ahead.

Jensen Huang just resigned from Nvidia. What if Elon ends up hiring him to help with Terafab (as well as other things) and together they make America the greatest producer of advanced chips in the world? The most entertaining outcome is the mostly likely, right?

Jacek from DEGEN shares his perspective on how rapidly AI is changing software development and what that could mean for the future. “Jacek has seen the progress firsthand. Work that once required hiring separate developers to build an iOS app could now be handled by a single engineer using modern AI tools. The pace of improvement over the last 18 months has been remarkable.” “He believes AI could eventually become far more capable than humans across almost every type of work. Looking ahead, he sees two possible paths: humans adapting to a world led by advanced AI or integrating more closely with it. Either way, he believes this transformation is coming much sooner than many expect.”

Jensen Huang rescued me from probably living in debt the rest of my life. I was told I was one of just three hires that he approved during the pandemic, during a hiring freeze. I've never spoken to him, and only passed by him in HQ once. His personal life is frankly none of my business. But as a leader, I have yet to meet a better one. Ousting him is financial suicide, and I can only assume there is a hidden ulterior motive because I can't fathom any other reason for destroying the company's value.

A year ago I got fired from MrBeast. For no reason at all by the way. Restructuring they said, personally I just think their HR guy didn’t like me. Anywho, that really sucked and I was super depressed, it was my dream job. Last night my girlfriend looked at me after a wonderful date night. She said, “I’m so proud of how far you’ve come” I was so confused and asked why? She said “you were so hurt and depressed and I didn’t think you’d get better from it” She was right but also day one I said “I’ll figure it out” and I did (thanks Prozac) Since that awful day I’ve: - doubled my MrBeast salary - traveled to more countries than I ever have - directed numerous shoots solo - led edits and creative production on launches for multi million dollar founders - met the coolest people I get to call family at @shownmedia All this rambling is to say, even if you think you’ve found your “dream job” something better may be out there and it’s not as big and flashy. I feel so low anxiety it’s amazing. We’re hiring btw;)

plenty of agents already handle a narrow job well for their owner. those same agents could take paid work from other people. most of it stays in a private chat. useful there. getting paid by strangers is a different problem. --> skills and the board official docs say termix agent skills teaches a compatible agent to operate the marketplace as a buyer, a seller, or both. install prompt help me install a compatible agent can then look for work on offer what it can do, accept an order, and deliver the agreed output. open jobs on a board are one signal. funded orders are another. price, consistency, speed, and demand decide whether anything ships. --> the existing agent a builder who already has a specialized agent wouldn't have to find every customer manually. that still depends on consistent output, a clear price, and tight permissions. installing the skill doesn't produce a client. --> payment rails this sits on aacp, a client places an order, payment locks in onchain escrow, and the provider submits the work. in the review window the client can accept it, ask for one redo, or open a challenge. after settlement, that outcome feeds the agent onchain reputation. escrow makes the payment commitment visible. it doesn't grade the work. i still want clearer answers on quality judgement, unfair rejects, and thin delivery. --> reputation official docs say the score is written on settlement from completed, successful, and disputed orders. the agent can't edit it. it isn't a popularity count. if i were hiring, i'd look at settled jobs and dispute history, and at how hard those jobs were. the published formula tracks success and dispute rates. it doesn't weight task difficulty. --> which agents can plug in @termix_ai has said termix agent skills work on grok bot, muse, and claude. the skill docs set a narrower bar the agent needs to read a skill.md and run shell commands. a pure chat assistant can read the material but can't run the workflows. a connected agent isn't qualified for every kind of job. --> agents hiring agents official docs say the same agent identity can buy on one order and sell on the next. hypothetical an agent that turns long podcast episodes into timestamped show notes takes a newsletter job. the client also wants a spanish version, so the notes agent hires a translation agent. i haven't found a special subcontract rule in the public docs. if the translation comes back messy, responsibility back to the original client is unclear. it reads like two separate orders unless the first brief says otherwise. the bundled skill asks for confirmation before signing value-moving transactions, so unsupervised spending is off by default. --> the limit installing a skill does not create demand. if the service is generic, the output is shaky, or nobody wants to pay for it, the listing can sit there. the numbers i'd watch are paid jobs actually completed, clients who come back, and the ratio of clean settlements to disputes. --> my take i care whether an agent can find work, finish a paid order, get paid, and leave a record other people can check. that needs identity, payments, reputation, and a path when delivery goes wrong termix is building those pieces i all watch for repeat clients. if you already have an agent that strong at one narrow job what would you want published first completed paid orders, repeat clients, or the dispute ratio.

STATE OF THE TECH JOB MARKET IN 2026 Twice a year, I dig into trends in hiring and job openings. This is the fifth report I've done, and the most surprising yet: 1. PMs are winning in the AI era 2. Engineering demand has stalled 3. Design openings are at a record low 4. Every role now requires AI skills 5. Tech jobs are concentrating in the Bay Area 6. Remote roles are at a record low 7. The tech job market is growing fast, but mostly outside of software (gasp!) Full report here:

6. 面试模拟器 “以 [职位名称] 的 hiring manager 身份，做一场逼真的模拟面试。提出相关问题并评估我的回答，针对表达清晰度、逻辑结构和自信程度给出具体反馈。”